Teacher Evaluation System Administrator Training June 5 & 6, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Survey of Super LEAs Evaluation Systems Performance Evaluation Advisory Council July 16 th, 2010.
Advertisements

Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
Teacher Evaluation A Metric for Performance
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012.
Most current teacher evaluations provide little information that can be used to give teachers the training and tools they need to be effective; better.
Presented by Steve York and Linda Vrooman Peterson Office of Public Instruction Office of Public Instruction Denise Juneau, Superintendent.
Developing Principals One State’s Initiative Dr. Sharon Brittingham RTTT Project Director, Development Coaches Dr. Jacquelyn Wilson Director, Delaware.
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal Requirements SB 290 ESEA Waiver Oregon Framework.
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Implementation MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice August 2014.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
The Webster Groves School District’s Journey to a More Effective Evaluation Process September, 2014.
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
Educator Effectiveness in Colorado State Policy Framework & Approach October 2014.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Division of School Effectiveness Office of Instructional Practices and Evaluations.
New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING (FFT) SUMMER INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DR. MICHAEL BROOKS JUNE 18, 2012.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation Pilot (TPEP). Objectives & Agenda What we’re going to learn General Pilot Details …. Who, What, How, What Then Explore.
NEW TEACHER PRINCIPAL EVALUATION. RACE TO THE TOP AND ESSB 5895  The principles guiding the change  Quality teaching and leading is critically important.
Slide 1 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Educator Performance Assessments ESE Spring Convening May 27 and 28, 2015 Presented by: Jennifer Briggs.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
TEACHER EVALUATION SUPPORT ESU 10 DEC. 14 TH, 2011.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
XXXXX School District Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project: Instructional Framework Selection.
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
Texas Educator Evaluation & Support System Systems US Department of Education NCLB Waiver-Fall 2013 Condition of Waiver to develop new Texas evaluation.
Improving the Craft of Teaching: Training & Implementation of Idaho’s Teacher Evaluation Framework Nick Smith, Deputy Superintendent School Support Services.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Overview of Proposed Educator Evaluation Regulations August 1, 2012.
Teacher Evaluation Process Update March 13, 2015 SCASPA Roundtable.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
SCDE Expanded ADEPT Advisory Team Meeting April 23, 2015.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Professional Growth & Effectiveness System. DECISION REQUIRED BY MARCH 2013 Current Evaluation and PD Models The current evaluation plan was last revised.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
Nelson County December CDIP Update. Goal: Professional Growth and Effectiveness System: Increase the percentage of effective teacher from ____ in 2015.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Principal Evaluation Update
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Five Required Elements
Educator Effectiveness System Overview
State Board of Education Progress Update
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Evaluation System Administrator Training June 5 & 6, 2012

AGENDA DAY 1Technology Tool Development Best Practice & State Update Intro. To Tech Tool Setting Up Local District Tool (work time) DAY 2Sharing Of Local Tools OR Work Time Practice Using Tool With Teacher Videos

Nebraska Teacher Standards 40 Committee Members from State Educational Stakeholder Groups Used National Standards and The Framework for Teaching by Charlotte Danielson State Board of Education adopted the Teacher Performance Framework in Nov. Intended as best practice - not mandated PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK

Where Have We Been? After meeting last summer, Administrators indicated they….. Want an evaluation tool based on the Nebraska Teacher “Standards” Want a tool used to help teachers improve Would like it to be a mobile, electronic tool Want to work collaboratively

What Does The Tool Look Like? Mobile Device For Walk-Throughs Data Feeds Formal Evaluation Form Printable Reports/Evaluation Forms Levels of Access Determine Views

Associated Fees Required: Administrator Trainings FREE to all ESU 10 Schools (Pilot Year) Advisory Committee For Improvements to the System Beginning – $100 Annual Maintenance Fee, plus $10 per certified teacher – Non ESU 10 Schools $100 Annual Maintenance Fee, plus $20 per certified teacher

Key Elements Teacher Reflection Formal/Informal Feedback Goal setting Plan to address needs Measuring Teacher Growth Growth Model

Determination of Performance Levels UnsatisfactoryDevelopingAccomplishedInnovating Weak Deficient Not Meeting Standard Basic Beginning Meets Standard Applying Excelling Proficient Above Standard Advanced Distinguished Developing = “Non-Negotiable” Developing/Unsatisfactory Levels to Satisfy “Met” & “Not Met”

Rubric Development Based on the language of the Performance Framework Effective Practices & Indicators See Handout

Identify Evidence of Effective Practice “What does this look like in the classroom?” See Handout

Informing the Tech Tool

ESU 10 ODIE System The evaluation tool will be managed through our ODIE system which will enable schools to build the tool and set levels of access.

Using the DATA Collected What does the data tell us? How will we use the data? How can the data inform our Professional Development plan? School Improvement? How can the data help us help teachers?

ESU 10’s Role Facilitation of the creation of the tool Professional development in the use & understanding of the tool/process Management of the technology ESU wide reports for the purpose of identifying needs & designing aligned PD Assisting schools in prioritizing local PD needs

Statewide Leadership Committee Task from State Board of Education Develop teacher and principal evaluation models based on the Nebraska Teacher and Principal Performance Framework for voluntary use by local districts.

State Model Development Groups Design/Pilot District Committees- To design specific instruments, oversee training and implementation. Includes pilot districts selected ESU staff developers and tech coordinators. Begin meeting in Fall 2012 Rubric Committee- Drawn from Framework Drafting Committee; will draft summative rubrics for Framework, June ESU’s- Training and staff development and possible development of evaluation technology Vendors- Provide expertise and other products and services as process develops.

Best Practice There are common best practice elements for teacher evaluation regardless of the model Growth-oriented practices such as teacher: – Self-reflection – Goal setting – Professional growth plans

Possible Model Products: Toolkit Model Board policy/admin. Regulation Observation instruments & rubrics Summative evaluation documents/rubrics Guidelines for using student learning in evaluation Feedback surveys & related materials Training & implementation guides Professional development resources Technological resources

Initial Planning Timeline Phase I- Leadership-Steering Committee: Spring, Summer, Fall, 2012 Phase II- Design/Training Process: Phase III- Pilot School Implementation in Phase IV- Full Implementation (All Schools):

Time to Tour the System

Setting Up Your Local Tool

Next Steps Complete building your local tool Pilot the tool in Advisory committee to adopt improvements as the State recommendations come forth & participating schools identify need areas IF you decide to use this as a formal tool, you must first: Local Board approval of the new tool Submit to State for approval Teacher awareness training

Questions? Kelly Clapp Denise O’Brien Nate McClenahan