CEDAR RIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL JANUARY 15, 2015 acos2010.wikispaces.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transition to CCSS Math What it means and what are the expectations for learning? Middle School Parent Meeting March 26, 2014.
Advertisements

Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.
Technology Integration and the Common Core Linda Jones, Coordinator/Instructor, The Eighth Floor Technology and Learning Center.
1 Know where you students are
A Presentation of the New Hampshire State Task Force on Mathematics Instruction Report to the State Board of Education, March 2012 Patty Ewen (603)
Common Core State Standards—Mathematics Introduction/Overview 1 Cathy Carroll
Got Data? Using your ACT tools to improve performance on all levels, moving students to College and Career Readiness.
Building an Accurate SBPR RECORD KEEPING ASSESSMENT AND INSTRUCTION GRADE LEVEL STANDARDS SBPR 1.
Oregon Common Core State Standards Foundation of the Oregon Diploma.
College and Career Readiness Mathematics at Middle School Poway Unified School District 2014.
Math Learning Progression
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
Middle School Liaison Meeting
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Transitioning to the Common Core.
© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
Shifting to a Standards- Based Mindset Through Quality Assessments and Backwards Design LMS Department Everett High School October 10, 2014.
GED 2014 Changes, Challenges, and Choices October 14, 2014.
Getting the Most from your ACT Explore Reporting Package
Presented by: COMMON CORE Standards Plus ®. A nonprofit group of educators All Learning Plus instructional materials are developed by educators. Our mission.
Jackson County 6-12 Math CCRS Quarterly Meeting # 2 Unpacking the Learning Progressions August 10, minute Welcome participants to 2nd Quarterly.
Ensuring State Assessments Match the Rigor, Depth and Breadth of College- and Career- Ready Standards Student Achievement Partners Spring 2014.
Are We Ready to Implement the Common Core Standards in Mathematics ? Katy White based on a presentation by DR. WESLEY BIRD
Common Core State Standards Oregon Foundation of the Oregon Diploma.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Tran Keys, Ph.D. Research & Evaluation, Santa Ana USD
Jeanne Simpson AMSTI Math Specialist March 10, 2015
Understanding the Common Core State Standards March 2012 These slides were taken from: and I have deleted.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Mrs. Charlena Lynn Welteroth Language Arts 8 Mrs. Elizabeth Dietrich Algebra & Geometry PA Core Standards.
Overview Criteria Item Examples.  Create a sense of “measured urgency” ◦ Timeline is not immediate, but close ◦ Urgency in you and your teachers ◦ Difference.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS (CCSS) OVERVIEW The Shifts: What they are and why they are important.
Welcome to Curriculum Night I am so glad you are here. Feel free to ask questions. Remember our time is short. Welcome to Curriculum Night for Ms. Figurelli’s.
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
Acos2010.wikispaces.com. ACT Provides the Following:  a standards-based system of assessments to monitor progress toward college and career readiness.
Overview Dr Kwaku Adu-Gyamfi Stefanie Smith. 2  Work with your group  Who did you work with?  What did you learn about them?  Their knowledge of.
Family Presentation Hamilton Public Schools February 24,
Day 2 Summer 2011 Algebraic Reasoning Institute 1.
You Can’t Afford to be Late!
The Redesigned SAT January 20, About the Redesigned SAT.
April 14, Welcome  Internet Connect to CLIU CO; passkey: cliu1 Keystone Commons ○
ACTion for Mathematics-ASPIRE. Background The math assessment was developed to reflect students’ knowledge and skill accumulation over time; capturing.
Joint Council April 6,  Standards for Mathematical Practice  Standards for Mathematical Content  PA Standards & CCSSM.
Performance Task and the common core. Analysis sheet Phases of problem sheet Performance task sheet.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Common Core State Standards What you need to know Cambrian School District.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
N EW S TUDENT A SSESSMENT P ROGRAM Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
ACT Aspire ® Summative Data Interpretation Workshop for Administrators.
Mater Gardens Middle School MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT WHERE LEARNING HAS NO FINISH LINE ! 1.
Assessment in Common Core. Essential Questions How is CAASPP different than STAR? How is SBAC different than CST? What do students have to know and be.
1 Common Core Standards. Shifts for Students Demanded by the Core Shifts in ELA/Literacy Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction and informational.
Palmyra Area School District Summer Goals  Develop an understanding of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in the area of Math, including the.
Linking Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment in Mathematics March 10, 2016 CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
CCSS & Smarter Balanced Mathematics: Key Shifts to Claims tinyurl.com/UPK5math University of Portland Brian Graham Camas School District TOSA M.Ed.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
You Can’t Afford to be Late!
Boston Tutoring Services: The Redesigned SAT
Create a Strong Start ACT® Aspire ®.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Analyzing PARCC Results to Inform Instruction
Common Core Vs Kansas Standards
Presentation transcript:

CEDAR RIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL JANUARY 15, 2015 acos2010.wikispaces.com

ACT Provides the Following:  a standards-based system of assessments to monitor progress toward college and career readiness from grade 3 through early high school, connecting each grade level to the next  statewide assessment, data management and reporting functions for all students, districts, schools, aggregated and disaggregated groups of learners, and the individual learner  alignment with the ACT College Readiness BenchmarksACT College Readiness Benchmarks  student outcomes aligned to the Domain and Cluster reporting categories of the Common Core State Standards  capability for predicting outcomes on the ACT

Assessments  assessments in summative, interim and classroom formats  summative content areas of English, math, reading, science and writing  multiple question types including multiple choice, constructed response and technology-enhanced items  online delivery of assessments using state-of-the-art technology while also offering paper-and-pencil testing options  capability to create a personal needs profile for students on an individual education plan (IEP)

Interim Assessments

Classroom Assessments

Data Reporting  online reporting for professionals based on approval levels  capability for state downloads of data to secure district websites  capability for district downloads of data to secure district sites  capability for school downloads of data to secure school sites for parental review  capability of paper reporting for parental review

Sustainability  ongoing research, support, and validation of the system to reflect changes in college and career readiness standards  flexible professional development on the state, district or school levels

e/ Content Specifications – Technical Bulletin #1  “The ACT Aspire mathematics assessments emphasize quantitative reasoning frequently applied to real-world contexts rather than memorization of formulas or computational skills. “ (p. 26)  Some items give the formula(s) they need, but others do not.  “Students are allowed and expected to strategically use acceptable calculators on the ACT Aspire mathematics assessments for Grade 6 and above.” (p. 27)  Paper-and-pencil tests test do not have technology-enhanced items. Multiple choice items are used in their place. (p. 27)

Time – minutes Number and types of questions Selected response and technology enhanced items are worth 1 point each. Constructed response items are worth 4 points each. (TB #1, p. 27)

Reporting Categories All questions are either measuring  Grade Level Progress – mathematical topics new to the grade  Foundation – topics learned in previous grades Some questions are also categorized as  Modeling – questions that assess understanding of mathematical models and their creation, interpretation, evaluation, and improvement  Justification and Explanation – giving reasons for why things work as they do, where students create a mathematical argument to justify (constructed response)

How does ASPIRE match the CCSSM? “Through grade 7 the two are the same.” (page 5) Grades 8-12 based on ACT College and Career Ready Standards. “Across all parts of the test, students can apply Mathematical Practices to help them demonstrate their mathematical achievement.” (page 2)

Points by Content Category by Grade 6 th Grade7 th Grade8 th Grade Total46 53 Number & Operations in Base 10 Number & Operations – Fractions The Number System Operations & Algebraic Thinking Expressions & Equations Ratios & Proportional Relationships Functions3-5 Measurement Geometry Data Statistics & Probability Justification & Explanation16 20

Points by Content Category by Grade 6 th Grade7 th Grade8 th Grade Total46 53 Number & Operations in Base 10 Number & Operations – Fractions The Number System Operations & Algebraic Thinking Expressions & Equations Ratios & Proportional Relationships Functions3-5 Measurement Geometry Data Statistics & Probability Justification & Explanation16 20

Justification and Explanation Level 1 – students should have a fluent command of these skills Level 2 – most closely aligned with grade level focus Level 3 – more advanced As students progress from grade to grade, expectations increase according to which JE skill belongs to which level. Some level 3 JE skills will become level 2, and some level 2 will become level 1. A full-credit response shows evidence of the required level of JE skills needed to solve the problem and applies these skills to complete the task. Evaluated by trained scorers.

Score Scale

Depth of Knowledge “…assessing new topics for the grade and whether students continue to strengthen their mathematical core. Within this structure of content comes a level of rigor represented in part by a distribution of depth of knowledge (DOK) through Webb’s level 3. The Foundation component includes only DOK level 2 and level 3 because the component is about assessing how well students have continued to strengthen their mathematical core. Across all parts of the test, students can apply Mathematical Practices to help them demonstrate their mathematical achievement.”

Webb’s Depth of Knowledge 1.Recall and Reproduction 2.Skills and Concepts 3.Strategic Thinking / Reasoning 4.Extended Thinking

Percentage of Points by DOK 6 th Grade7 th Grade8 th Grade DOK 17 – 15 % 8 – 15 % DOK 233 – 41 % 30 – 38 % DOK 348 – 57 % 51 – 58 % Foundation questions are DOK 2 and 3.

Practice Test UN: math PW: actaspire

5.NBT.B MP3 N(13-15) 6-8 FoundationJE Level 3DOK Level 3

8.F.A MP -- F(20-23) 8 Grade Level Progress JE Level --DOK Level 2

6.G.A MP3 G(20- 23) 6 Grade Level Progress JE Level 3DOK Level Foundation JE Level 3 DOK Level 3

Multiple levels  Multiple problems with common information  Questions are independent of each other. It is not necessary to get one correct in order to correctly answer the others.  Students must extract only the information needed for a particular question.

7.EE.B MP4 A(24-27) 7 Grade Level Progress JE Level -- DOK Level 3 8 Foundation JE Level -- DOK Level 2

6.SP.B MP-- S(16-19) 6 Grade Level Progress JE Level -- DOK Level Foundation JE Level -- DOK Level 2

More Practice Items    

Contact Information Becky Cornelius Jeanne Simpson acos2010.wikispaces.com