Peabody Coal Lower Basin Pipeline Engineering Appraisal Study Bureau of Reclamation September 18, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OR 42: County Line Curves Environmental Assessment Purpose and Need February 17, 2009.
Advertisements

Planning for fish bearing waters between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead.
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Community Water Supply Plan Update Public Meeting Monticello High School September 21, :00 pm.
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Billings, Montana October 18, 2007 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mid-West Electric Consumers Association September 16, 2014 Corps of Engineers US Army Missouri River Mainstem.
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Central Yavapai Highlands Water Resource Management Study [BOR Appraisal Study] Presented by: Ken Janecek January 28, 2009.
HATCH, NM, Background Information Village of Hatch Case Study.
Negotiating our Water Future in Colorado & the Colorado River Basin Colorado’s Water Plan & the Colorado Basin Plan February 2015 Update Presentation developed.
Colorado River Protection Activities on the Moab UMTRA Project Ken Pill, Hydrogeologist Technical Assistance Contractor CMU Upper Colorado River Basin.
Source: Bureau of Reclamation Diverse communities making beneficial use of all available water Agriculture Agriculture Municipal and Domestic Municipal.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® FOLSOM DAM MODIFICATIONS APPROACH CHANNEL EIS/EIR Major Robert Dion and Cameron Sessions Project Managers.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Metro Green Line Eastern Extension Summary of January 1993 Final Environmental Impact Report.
Progress Report – Design of Native Wetland Nursery Facility Design of Native Wetland Nursery Facility For Metro’s Native Plant Center Prepared by: Portland.
Drainage Channel Restoration Construction Project Wood Co. Engineer’s Office Great Lakes Protection Fund A.D. Ward, D. Mecklenburg, R. McCall, D.J. Mears.
Negotiating our Water Future in Colorado & the Colorado River Basin Colorado’s Water Plan & the Colorado Basin Plan February 2015 Update Presentation developed.
Public Location/Design Hearings November 17, 2010 Laughlin, Nevada November 18, 2010 Bullhead City, Arizona.
Longmeadow Parkway Fox River Bridge Corridor
WESTCAS - Shortage Impacts on AZ CAP General Manager David Modeer October 29, 2014.
‘The world’s greatest plumbing system’ An example of how a river is managed to use its water as a resource.
Impacts of Low-Flow Rates on Recreational Rafting Traffic on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park Catherine A. Roberts Joanna A. Bieri.
Bureau of Reclamation Overview Christopher Cutler Deputy Chief Boulder Canyon Operations Office.
Wareham Fire District Water Department Glen Charlie Road Water Storage Tank Special District Meeting June 23, 2009.
Emergency Action Plans Miriam Gradie Anderson Planning Specialist 608/ Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Environmental Assessment Public Information Meeting – September 2010 Realignment of a Portion of a Utah Lake Drainage Basin Water Delivery System (ULS)
Well Systems. Well System Capacity Well system capacity needs to be large enough to supply daily water need in 10 to 12 hours. Some designers assume 5.
In-Delta Storage Process OverviewProcess Overview Program BenefitsProgram Benefits Project CostsProject Costs IssuesIssues Proposed Work Plan for FY 2003Proposed.
USGS Water Resource Monitoring and Assessment Activities Salinity and other topics presented to the Garfield County Energy Advisory Board Dec. 1, 2005.
Electric Transmission Siting, Permitting and Land Acquisition Energy and the Economy Summit June 26, 2013.
Cost Allocation Studies for the MP Region Bureau of Reclamation April 29, 2008 Central Valley Project Cost Allocation Study Update Public Meeting #2: October.
State of Oregon New Hydroelectric Projects Mary Grainey October 2008 Oregon Water Resources Department.
Pipeline Route Selection. Safety Minute What is a Typical Pipeline Project? There is no typical pipeline project since each pipeline project takes on.
Feasibility of Aquifer Storage and Recovery in the Upper Colorado River Basin Presented by: Western Water & Land, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado.
Proposed Action Purpose and Need A proposal to authorize, recommend, or implement an action in response to the need identified in the Purpose and Need.
VILLAGE OF PATCH, NM, FEASIBILITY STUDY Village of Patch Case Study Seattle Environmen tal Planning Class June, 2009 US Army Corps of Engineers Albuquerque.
John Hoffmann Introduction to USGS Arizona Program and Hydrology USGSGeologyMappingBiologyWater Water-Science Centers.
LCWDBoardMtg_ pptx/1 LCWD Board Meeting January 14, Carneros Avenue, Napa Los Carneros Water District.
Yakima-Tieton Irrigation District Agency Kickoff Meeting Tieton Canal Replacement Project June 16, 2015.
PROJECT SCOPING FOR LOCAL AGENCY FEDERAL AID PROJECTS.
A Perspective on Today’s Colorado River Issues. Upper Colorado Region River Basins.
Purpose of the Scoping Meeting Provide information on the project Identify public issues to be analyzed in the EIS to assist with alternative development.
Exploring Hydropower Hoover Dam. About 30 miles southeast of Las Vegas, NV Black Canyon, Colorado River, 1922.
An Interregional Water Solution with Conjunctive Use of Groundwater Haskell L. Simon President, Coastal Plains Groundwater Conservation District Vice President,
Chapter 33 Dam Construction. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Give reasons why.
Waste Management Strategy Outline - Geography - Future Needs – 5 and 25-Year Time Frames - Capacity - Near-Term Needs - Long Term Needs.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority June 8, 2007 Presentation to the State Reclamation Board Proposed Feather River Setback Levee.
Otter Creek Watershed Meeting January 19, 2008 Mike Dreischmeier Agricultural Engineer Natural Resources Conservation Service.
September 25, Who is Brushy Creek Regional Utility Authority? Local government corporation formed by Cedar Park, Leander and Round Rock to access,
1 Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project Site LTS&M Planning LTS&M Conference Grand Junction, CO November 16, 2010 Donald Metzler U.S.
South Orange Coastal Ocean Desalination (SOCOD) Project Dana Point/Doheny Beach, California November 2010 Status.
Colorado River Update Terry Fulp Deputy Regional Director
Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation ACWA Regions 9 and 10 Carlsbad Water Summit U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation State.
Navajo Nation Basin Transfer Issues Stanley M
Reservoir Development Update Region K Meeting July 11, 2012 Karen Bondy, P.E. Manager of Resource Strategy 1.
Phil Gruenberg, Executive Officer California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin Proposed IID/SDCWA Transfer CRWQCB-R7 Staff Concerns.
Ruttinger & Sons Engineering Designed by: Taylor Kasperick Jacob Wilson Loren Ruttinger Presented by: Loren Ruttinger.
Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) Arvid Veidmark, III EVP, Senior Estimator Specialized Services Company
Alameda Creek Watershed San Francisco Public Utilities Commission October 27, 2009.
STORM WATER SOLUTIONS FOR EXISTING URBAN AREAS: IDENTIFYING SITES TO MAXIMIZE RESULTS Jared Bartley, Cuyahoga SWCD September 8, 2011.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Temecula Valley Recycled Water Pipeline Joe Mouawad Sr. Director of Engineering September 2, 2015.
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
NRCan Community Roundtable Presentation Meliadine Gold Project Rob Johnstone Deputy Director Sustainable Mining and Materials Policy Division Minerals,
Evaluating the long-term future of fine sediment in Lake Powell
Hoover Dam.
Taum Sauk Dam Failure Missouri, 2005
SEQRA as a Tool to Review Energy Projects
POWER FOR WATER: Meeting Infrastructure Needs
Stream Crossing Replacement Policy
Sacramento Environmental Commission January 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Peabody Coal Lower Basin Pipeline Engineering Appraisal Study Bureau of Reclamation September 18, 2002

Purpose and Scope To develop alternatives to divert 5,700 and 12,000 acre-feet of main stem Colorado River water from a point located downstream of Lee Ferry (0.0 mile), (including associated conveyance infrastructure necessary to deliver lower basin river water), to Kaibito, Arizona.

Objectives To identify “fatal flaws” as related to the study purpose. Develop conceptual alternatives

Assumptions Final report of findings to be reviewed and completed by September 20, Design for 5,700 and 12,000 acre-feet per year using a 1.2 peaking factor. Use existing available data. Study area limited to the corridor of land necessary for development of a diversion, storages, pipeline conveyance, right-of-way, and electrical infrastructure necessary to deliver water from the main stem Colorado River to the community of Kaibito, Arizona. Right-of-Way cost to be determined by Navajo Nation. (not included in project cost estimate)

Investigations and Data Conducted and over-flight of the project area. Utilized Reclamation’s project database and made contacts with industry experts. Accessed Grand Canyon Research and Monitoring Center database. Obtained copies of completed studies in the project area and incorporated by reference. All data utilized in the Report of Findings are suitable for conceptual Appraisal Level studies.

Alignment follows existing roadways

Alignment Profile 3,097’ to 5702’ elevation

Infiltration Gallery

8.0 Mile Jackass Canyon Diversion Site Infiltration gallery

Direction Jackass Canyon

Second Direction Echo Cliffs

Outlet of Direction Drill Hole at top of Echo Cliffs

Engineering Hydraulics The peaking factor is based on information received from the Settlement Negotiation Team. Assuming a 1.2 peaking factor, pumping occurs 20 out of 24 hours on the maximum day, the required design flow is cubic feet per second (ft 3 /s) and ft 3 /s, respectively.

PIPE TRENCHING COSTS Pipe Installation ItemUnit Cost ($/cubic yard) Excavation (Rock Trenching)20.00 Pipe Bedding (Select Material)15.00 Backfill 3.25

Environmental Impacts 28 species to be potentially considered in the scoping of potential fish and wildlife issues. Listed species are for Coconino County under the Federal Endangered Species Act. Consultation would also be required with the Navajo Nation to address project impacts to species on the Navajo Endangered Species List. Area through which the proposed pipeline may be constructed is rich in prehistoric and historic cultural resources going back perhaps as far as 10,000 years in age.

Project Cost Estimates Conceptual Appraisal Level 15% Unlisted Construction Costs 25% Contingency Alternative #1 (5,700 acre-feet p/yr) = $38 million Alternative #2 (12,000 acre-feet p/yr) = $58 million

Summary No identified “fatal flaws” at conceptual appraisal stage. Project alignment can change. Diversion point could possibly be moved upstream to alluvial basin in proximity to Lees Ferry crossing. Environmental Impacts to main stem Colorado River need more evaluation. Various degrees of uncertainty remain without additional data and analysis.