Ad Hominem Abusive and Circumstantial Fallacies Week3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argument, Persuasion, Persuasive Techniques, and Rhetorical Fallacies
Advertisements

Text Table of Contents #5 and #8: Evaluating the Argument.
Understanding Logical Fallacies
{ The Ad Hominem By: Zechariah J Taylor.  - the most common of all mistakes in reasoning. The fallacy rests on a confusion between the qualities of the.
Logical Fallacies Persuasion Pitfalls. Logical Fallacies What is a logical fallacy? A mistake in reasoning that seriously affects the ability to argue.
By Ryan Davis and Nick Houska. Fallacies  Fallacies- are defects in an argument that cause an argument to be invalid, unsound or weak  Example: Hasty.
Part 3 – REFUTING OPPOSING ARGUMENTS.  Before you start writing an argumentative essay, I strongly suggest you to prepare an outline and first, write.
Fallacies Information taken from Purdue OWL, Nancy Wood’s Perspectives on Argument and Annette Rottenberg’s Elements of Argument.
LESSON 5: INFORMAL FALLACIES PT 1 Logic & Argument.
Flawed Arguments COMMON LOGICAL FALLACIES.  Flaws in an argument  Often subtle  Learning to recognize these will:  Strengthen your own arguments 
 In this task you will see 16 different arguments.  You have to identify which of the 8 common fallacies is being used by the argument.
Reading and Evaluating Arguments. Learning Objectives: To recognize the elements of an argument To recognize types of arguments To evaluate arguments.
Age of the Sage Advertising, Inc. “I cannot teach anybody anything; I can only make him think.” Socrates.
Logical Fallacies A Brief Review. Argumentum ad hominem This is the error of attacking the character or motives of a person who has stated an idea, rather.
ASK QUESTIONS!!! During the next 45 – 90 minutes, I will present the main points of each chapter. Presented in terms of questions you should be able to.
Reason: as a Way of Knowing Richard van de Lagemaat, Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma (Cambridge: CUP, 2005)
INFORMAL FALLACIES. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE Errors resulting from attempts to appeal to things that are not relevant, i.e., not really connected to or.
NEATLY write down the vocabulary word and the definition. There will be a quiz later, so THINK while you write. Include examples when you think they are.
Common Logical Fallacies #3: Misjudging or Misusing People Arguments.
Persuasive Text convincing a reader to do something, buy something, believe in something.
Critical Thinking: Science and Citizenship A.Selective Use of Evidence Even a false theory is likely to have some support Critically evaluate the evidence.
Ad Hominem Brandon Sneed and Tesia Bailey AP English III L. Hughes- 7 th Period.
LOGICAL FALLACIES Informal Reasoning.  A fallacy is a failure in reasoning that leads to an argument being invalid.  They are like cracks in the foundation.
Logic Fallacies Debate Class Production Spain Park High School
Informal Fallacies Sign In Quiz! Midterm Study Guide
ARGUMENTS. WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT? An argument consist of two or more premises and one conclusion. A premise is a statement that supports the conclusion.
Logical Fallacies.
Arguments & Propaganda. Arguments States a problem States a thesis/claim (an opinion on the problem) Considers the other side of the claim Uses logic,
Rhetori cal Strategi es A mistaken belief, especially one based on an unsound argument.
Persuasive  To convince someone to believe in something or do something.  Writers may use language that appeals to the reader’s senses.
By Nat Murphy.  Involves drawing conclusions about something based on a physical sign  Mystery Novels  Conclusions based on such reasoning are based.
Fallacies of Irrelevance
Logical Fallacies 10/24/07. What is a fallacy? Fal*la*cy | ˈ faləsē| noun ( pl. -cies)  a mistaken belief, esp. one based on unsound argument : the notion.
Look for these in the arguments of others and avoid them in your own arguments.
Fallacy An error of reasoning based on faulty use of evidence or incorrect interpretation of facts.
Analyzing an argument.  Expresses a position on an issue or problem and supports it with reasons and evidence  Example: “I think I should be allowed.
Errors in Reasoning. Fallacies A Fallacy is “any error in reasoning that makes an argument fail to establish its conclusion.” There are two kinds of fallacies.
 ad hominem  tu quoque  strawman  Define them.
Argumentum Ad Hominem Attacking the person’s character or personal traits rather than the argument at hand Rejecting a claim based on the person defending.
Critical Thinking Lecture 5b More Fallacies
Reasoning & Problem Solving Lecture 5b More Fallacies By David Kelsey.
Ad Hominem LUCAS ENGLAND & ZACH ZACCARI A.P. LANGUAGE ROSEMARIE GRICE 7 TH PERIOD.
LOGICAL FALLACIES. Learning Outcomes Identify and describe logical fallacies and other bad arguments Identify the different types of logical fallacies.
Lecture Notes © 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education© 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education 1 Critical Thinking Chapter 5 Logical Fallacies I Fallacies of Relevance.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Fallacies of Relevance Bianca helped with this one too….apparently pink is pretty.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Copy the following information on fallacies. Fallacies are: Flaws in an argument Often subtle.
Common Logical Fallacies FLAWED ARGUMENTS SUBTLE ERRORS IN JUDGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION.
Ad Hominem (Personal Attack) An attempt to discredit the argument by discrediting the character of the person advancing it.
A Journey into the Mind Logic and Debate Unit. Week 2: May 23 through May 26 The Fallacies SWBAT: Identify the common fallacies in logic in order to be.
Reading Persuasive Texts
College English Yichun Liu
Understanding Fallacy
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
Common Logical Fallacies
Propaganda and Logical Fallacies
Logical Fallacies Unit 2.
Introduction to Logic Lecture 5b More Fallacies
Common Logical Fallacies
Appeal to Force (Argumentum ad baculum)
Errors in Reasoning.
Torture’s Terrible Toll
Fallacies.
Fallacies in Argumentation
Common Logical Fallacies
Information, data, maps & photos explanation & analysis
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
Critical Thinking JEOPARDY!.
Presentation transcript:

Ad Hominem Abusive and Circumstantial Fallacies Week3

Ad Hominem Abusive Definition Attacking a person making an argument, rather than attacking the argument itself. When the attack on the person is irrelevant to the argument itself. Personal attacks Name calling Refutation of charater

Ad Hominem Abusive Example My opponent suggests that lowering taxes will be a good idea -- this is coming from a woman who eats a pint of Ben and Jerry’s each night! The fact that the woman loves her ice cream, has nothing to do with the lowering of taxes, and therefore, is irrelevant to the argument. Ad hominem attacks are usually made out of desperation when one cannot find a decent counter argument.

Ad Hominem Circumstantial Suggesting that the person who is making the argument is biased, or predisposed to take a particular stance, and therefore, the argument is necessarily invalid. Appeal to motive Conflict of interest Vested interest

Ad Hominem Circumstantial Example Salesman: This car gets better than average gas mileage and is one of the most reliable cars according to Consumer Reports. Will: I doubt it—you obviously just want to sell me that car. The fact that the salesmen has a vested interest and selling Will the car does not mean that he is lying. He may be, but this is not something you can conclude solely on his interests. It is reasonable to assume that salespeople sell the products and services they do because they believe in them.

Ad Hominem Circumstantial Exception As the bias or conflict of interest becomes more relevant to the argument, usually signified by a lack of other evidence, the argument is seen as less of a fallacy and more as a legitimate motive. When you know you have something to gain from a position you hold (assuming, of course, you are not guilty of this fallacy for holding the position), be upfront about it and bring it up before someone else does.

I will lower taxes and end the war in Vietnam Of course you say that, you just want to be elected president