Özkan ŞAHİN & Tadeusz KOWALSKI Uludağ University, Physics Department, Bursa – TURKEY Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Richard Young Optronic Laboratories Kathleen Muray INPHORA
Advertisements

General Characteristics of Gas Detectors
Tutorial 2 GEM2507 Physical Question from Everyday Life
Analysis of the Visible Absorption Spectrum of I 2 in Inert Solvents Using a Physical Model Joel Tellinghuisen Department of Chemistry Vanderbilt University.
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Program Degrad.1.0 Auger cascade model for electron thermalisation in gas mixtures produced by photons or particles in electric and magnetic fields S.F.Biagi.
I.Dalton’s Law A.The total pressure of a mixture of gases equals the sum of the pressures each gas would exert independently 1.P total = P 1 + P 2 + …
Review of Chemical Thermodynamics Combustion MECH 6191 Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Concordia University Lecture #1 Textbook: Introduction.
Maxwell-Boltzmann; Temperature and Catalysts
5.7/5.1 Kinetic Molecular Theory of Gases
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) The Visible Spectra.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
1 Gas processes in OTP straw  Questions: HV limit SQS mode Gas gain ??? Location- O:\Data\Osotr1\Presentation3.ppt and O:\Data\Osotr1\chargestudy.ps V.
CSC Simulated Charge Tim Cox, Jay Hauser, Greg Rakness, Rick Wilkinson CSC Charge Simulation1.
H Yepes, C Bigongiari, J Zuñiga, JdD Zornoza IFIC (CSIC - Universidad de Valencia) NEWS ON ABSORPTION LENGTH MEASUREMENT WITH THE OB SYSTEM ANTARES COLLABORATION.
Proportional Counters
Department of Information Engineering256 Semiconductor Conduction is possible only if the electrons are free to move –But electrons are bound to their.
Almost all detection of visible light is by the “photoelectric effect” (broadly defined.) There is always a threshold photon energy for detection, even.
Richard Young Richard Young Optronic Laboratories Kathleen Muray Kathleen Muray INPHORA Carolyn Jones Carolyn Jones CJ Enterprises.
Lecture 19 © slg CHM 151 PERIODIC TRENDS: atomic size, ionization energy electronegativity ionic size Overview TOPICS:
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
28 February, 2003 STAR Collaboration meeting Status of the dE/dx calibration Yuri Fisyak.
The Classification of Stellar Spectra
Resonance Crossing Experiment in PoP FFAG (preliminary report) M. Aiba (Tokyo Univ.) for KEK FFAG Group FFAG W.S. KEK.
TRIGGERING EXCIMER LASERS BY PHOTOIONIZATION FROM A CORONA DISCHARGE* Zhongmin Xiong and Mark J. Kushner University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI USA.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. This work is protected by United States copyright laws and is provided solely for.
Özkan ŞAHİN Uludağ University Physics Department Bursa -TURKEY Bursa gas detector laboratory, status.
What is an error? An error is a mistake of some kind... …causing an error in your results… …so the result is not accurate.
1 Ankit D. Mohapatra, Dr. Marcus Hohlmann Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013.
Systematic studies on the rate capability of MWPC operated in Xe/CO 2 D. Gonzalez-Diaz for the CBM-TRD group March, 2008.
Özkan ŞAHİN & Tadeusz KOWALSKI Uludağ University, Physics Department, Bursa – TURKEY Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of.
1 TRD-prototype test at KEK-FTBL 11/29/07~12/6 Univ. of Tsukuba Hiroki Yokoyama The TRD prototype is borrowed from GSI group (thanks Anton).
Ionization Detectors Basic operation
2nd RD51 Collaboration Meeting, Paris, October PENNING TRANSFERS Ozkan SAHIN Uludag University Physics Department Bursa -Turkey 2nd RD51 Collaboration.
Experimental and Numerical studies on Bulk Micromegas SINP group in RD51 Applied Nuclear Physics Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics Kolkata, West.
Muon Drift Tube Gases Chris Clark Advisors: Rachel Avramidou, Rob Veenhof.
Energy Scan of Hadron (  0 ) Suppression and Flow in Au+Au Collisions at PHENIX Norbert Novitzky for PHENIX collaboration University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
6 Kinetics Year 11 DP Chemistry.
Resolution and radiative corrections A first order estimate for pbar p  e + e - T. H. IPN Orsay 05/10/2011 GDR PH-QCD meeting on « The nucleon structure.
High rate studies of TRD at GSI (update) D. Gonzalez-Diaz, GSI
Özkan ŞAHİN & Tadeusz KOWALSKI Uludağ University, Physics Department, Bursa – TURKEY Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of.
--Experimental determinations of radial distribution functions --Potential of Mean Force 1.
Özkan ŞAHİN & Tadeusz KOWALSKI Uludağ University, Physics Department, Bursa – TURKEY Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of.
MPGD (RD-51) Workshop Nikhef, Amsterdam, April Penning Effect on Gas Amplification Factor Ozkan SAHIN Uludag University Physics Department.
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
Measurement of Azimuthal Anisotropy for High p T Charged Hadrons at RHIC-PHENIX The azimuthal anisotropy of particle production in non-central collisions.
When components of a reaction are mixed, they will proceed, rapidly or slowly (depending on kinetics) to the equilibrium position. Equilibrium position:
Costas Foudas, Imperial College, Jet Production at High Transverse Energies at HERA Underline: Costas Foudas Imperial College
Özkan ŞAHİN Uludağ University Physics Department Bursa – TURKEY Survey of transfer rates using Zaragoza (Xe – TMA) and Krakow (Ar – CO 2 ) measurements.
Penning transfers: survey of available data, life-time of excited states, pressure dependence Ozkan SAHIN Uludag University Physics Department Bursa -TURKEY.
Particle identification by energy loss measurement in the NA61 (SHINE) experiment Magdalena Posiadala University of Warsaw.
Possible Improvement of MUID Performance Itaru Nakagawa, Seyoung Han (RIKEN, Ewha/RIKEN)
R&D Collaboration, CERN – September 10, Micromegas Performance and Ageing studies David Attié MPGD. Towards an R&D Collaboration,
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Erice, 7th July th International School for Cosmic Rays Astrophysics Motivation Energy Reconstruction Air Fluorescence.
1 Proton Structure Functions and HERA QCD Fit HERA+Experiments F 2 Charged Current+xF 3 HERA QCD Fit for the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Andrew Mehta (Liverpool.
SIMULATION STUDIES ON THE EFFECT OF SF 6 IN THE RPC GAS MIXTURE Mohammed Salim, Aligarh Muslim University, INDIA Presented by Satyanarayana Bheesette,
Read Summary Notes, page 69, “Emission Spectra.” 30/09/2016 Background to Spectra. Continuous spectra In a continuous spectrum all frequencies of radiation.
Secondary avalanches in gas mixtures
Improvements to magboltz and degrad data bases
and the NEXT collaboration
Electron Observations from ATIC and HESS
Field quality to achieve the required lifetime goals (single beam)
Analysis Update: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
Factors Limiting the Linearity of Response of Tissue Equivalent Proportional Counters Used in Micro- and Nano – Dosimetry T.Z. Kowalski i AGH, University.
ADC: Improving fitting
CHEM 3310 Chemical Kinetics Collision Theory & Transition State Theory.
Hot Cold Molecules: Collisions at Astrophysical Temperatures
HL CHEM 6: Kinetics BY HEIMAN KWOK 12N03S
Presentation transcript:

Özkan ŞAHİN & Tadeusz KOWALSKI Uludağ University, Physics Department, Bursa – TURKEY Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, Krakow – POLAND Transfer rate updates (Ne – CO 2 )

Ne – CO 2 measurements and calculations 2/14 13th RD51 Collaboration Meeting 5– 7 February 2014, CERN  High precision gain measurements in Krakow (Tadeusz KOWALSKI)  Single wire proportional counter: r c = 1.25 cm, r a = 24  m or r a = 50  m  Wide gain regime: ionisation to higher than10 5 ; less than 5% error on gas gain,  Pressure range: 0.4 – 1.8 atm; in addition 0.25 atm for a few mixtures. 3 months ago 1) 2% CO 2 2) 5.1% CO 2 3)7.3% CO 2 4)10.1% CO 2 5)15% CO 2 6) 20.2% CO 2 Now 1) 1% CO 2 2) 3.6% CO 2 3)30.1% CO 2 4)50% CO 2 5)74.1% CO 2 6) Pure CO 2  Ne* + CO 2  Ne + CO e -  All of the excited Ne atoms can ionise CO 2 Admixture concentrationPenning correction Photon feedback !!! No gain scaling needed in the fits !!!

Gain measurements and fits (r a = 50  m) 3/14 13th RD51 Collaboration Meeting 5– 7 February 2014, CERN  Better agreement with experimental data after the gain of 10,  departs before gain of 10 decrease at high pressures.  Energy transfers have more impact on gain (Penning effect) with increasing pressure and CO 2 concentration,  Shorter collision time with excited Ne atoms !  The strongest over-exponential increases.

4/14 13th RD51 Collaboration Meeting 5– 7 February 2014, CERN Gain measurements and fits (r a = 50  m)  Almost perfect fits even at very low gains,  Additional data at 0.25 atm for 10.1% CO 2 mixture,  Visible decrease on photon feedback at high pressures.

5/14 13th RD51 Collaboration Meeting 5– 7 February 2014, CERN Gain measurements and fits (r a = 50  m)  Lesser impact of the transfers on gas gain at high CO 2 concentrations,  20.2% CO 2 : no visible over – exponential increases higher than 0.4 atm but still feedback parameters are needed to get better agreement  30.1% CO 2 mixture: no fit of the latest gain data at 1.2 atm and 1.8 atm,  Given photon feedback is valid if we still working in proportional region,  Proportionality of the gain curves destroys (breakdown points?).

6/14 13th RD51 Collaboration Meeting 5– 7 February 2014, CERN Gain measurements and fits (r a = 50  m)  the biggest admixture concentration in which Penning effect on gain is clearly seen,  Still we have feedback but the uncertainty is large (see later),  the fits with feedback parameter at 0.4 and 0.8 atm are not shown on the plot.  0.04 transfer rates at 0.8 atm;  0.4, 1.2 and 1.8 atm data are fitted without Townsend adjustment  1.8 atm: agreement at very beginning and high gains

7/14 13th RD51 Collaboration Meeting 5– 7 February 2014, CERN Gain measurements and fits (r a = 24  m)

8/14 13th RD51 Collaboration Meeting 5– 7 February 2014, CERN  1.8 atm: departure from the proportionality for the last data point,  seen the same for at 1.2 atm for the counter with r a = 50  m and also for 30.1 admixture concentration at 1.2 and 1.8 atm.  Penning adjustment needed only for the highest pressure but seems improbable to have 0.7 transfer rate ???  last 2 gain points at 0.8 atm: calcuted gains are bigger than the measured ones,  Space charge ??!!!?? Gain measurements and fits (r a = 24  m)

Penning transfer rates 9/14 13th RD51 Collaboration Meeting 5– 7 February 2014, CERN  The biggest transfer rate for 2% CO 2 (both at 0.4 atm and 0.8 atm),  Systematic decrease of the rates with increasing admixture fraction,  Larger energy transfer at 0.8 atm than 0.4 atm,  0.8 atm in 50% CO 2 : upper rate corresponds to the fit without Penning transfer.

Penning transfer rates 10/14 13th RD51 Collaboration Meeting 5– 7 February 2014, CERN  The biggest transfer rate shifts to 10% CO 2 (both at 1.2 atm and 1.8 atm),  Systematic decrease of the rates loses and the rates become flat with increasing pressure till 30% CO 2 admixture fraction,  1.8 atm: two different data for 50% CO2 mixture indicates the same rates.

Feedback parameters 11/14 13th RD51 Collaboration Meeting 5– 7 February 2014, CERN  Photon feedback parameters decrease with increasing pressure and admixture fraction till 20.2% CO 2 (related with the mean free path of the photons),  Increase of the feedback with pressure for 20.2% and 50% CO 2 mixtures could be a sign that the model we use is not sufficient in breakdown region ?!?

Gain measurements and fits for Pure CO 2 12/14 13th RD51 Collaboration Meeting 5– 7 February 2014, CERN  Perfectly fine overlaps with all experimental gain curves,  the first time that we ever have such a successful agreement for pure gases without using any scaling or correction factor:  confirmation of the high precision measurements (thanks to Tadeusz),  correctness of the cross sections used in Magboltz (thanks to Steve),  our calculation method is sufficient enough to reproduce the measured gain curves.

13/14 13th RD51 Collaboration Meeting 5– 7 February 2014, CERN Summary  Until 50 % CO2 admixture concentration transfer rates change in a narrow range (0.46 – 0.58) in Ne – CO2 mixtures,  the range in Ar – CO 2 was much bigger (0.15 – 0.56),  Larger than 50% CO 2 admixture fraction kills the energy transfers,  Understanding of the drops on the transfer rate at high CO 2 fractions,  Increase of the photon feedback parameters with pressure in 20% and 50% CO 2 (breakdown regime),  Space charge effect is visible in 74% CO 2 and pure CO 2,  Calculations with pure CO 2 measurements are not only useful for Ne – CO 2 but also very important for Ar – CO 2 mixtures.

14/14 13th RD51 Collaboration Meeting 5– 7 February 2014, CERN Thanks and ???