1M. Ellis - MICE Tracker PC - 19th October 2007 Station QA Analysis (G4MICE)  For details of software see my previous talk here: u

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Simulation Status/Plans Malcolm Ellis Sci Fi Tracker Meeting Imperial College, 10 th September 2004.
Advertisements

LHCb PatVeloTT Performance Adam Webber. Why Upgrade?  Currently we de-focus the beams o LHCb Luminosity ~ 2x10 32 cm -2 s -1 o ~ 1 interaction per bunch.
1 Tracker Resolution Malcolm Ellis MICE Analysis Forum Meeting 15 th September 2005.
First Results from Tracker 1  Cryostat Commissioning  AFE/VLSB Firmware and Readout  Cosmic Ray Setup  Tracker Readout  Software  Trigger Timing.
1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.
1 Status of Cosmic Analysis Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Wednesday 10 th March 2004.
Status of the MICE SciFi Simulation Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
1 PID, emittance and cooling measurement Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE Analysis phone conference.
1 VLPC system and Cosmic Ray test results M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting Oct, 3, 2007.
Julia Sedgbeer Mice Collaboration Meeting, June SciFi Tracker – SW Status & Plans General SW status Simulation & Reconstruction Performance Studies.
Sci Fi Simulation Status Malcolm Ellis MICE Meeting Osaka, 2 nd August 2004.
1 Online data quality and monitoring M. Ellis Daresbury DAQ Meeting 31 st August 2005.
QA for the Fibre Tracker 28 October 2004Brunel QA for fibre bundling Dr Paul Kyberd and Dr Peter Hobson School of Engineering & Design Brunel University,
1 Analysis code for KEK Test-Beam M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
Cosmic Ray Analysis 1M.Ellis - CM23 - Harbin - 15th January 2009  Not enough time to go into detail, so just a quick summary of the status since CM22:
GLAST LAT Project Software vrvs meeting X. Chen 1 GLAST LAT Project Software vrvs meeting X. Chen 1 Analyses of Muon Calibration Data Xin Chen.
1 Data Storage MICE DAQ Workshop 10 th February 2006 Malcolm Ellis & Paul Kyberd.
6 th April 2005 Malcolm Ellis, Imperial College London 1 Sci Fi Status & KEK Test.
1Malcolm Ellis - Tracker Meeting - 6th November 2006 Tracker Software  Offline u Modeling u GRID u Tests u Decoding u Kalman fit u Reconstruction & “data.
Final Tracker Connection Map Version 1 1 Connection Mapping for the Final Mice Trackers Geoff Barber November 2005 TM – 03 Jul 06 TM – 21 Jul 06.
Takashi Matsushita Imperial College T. Matsushita 1 Station5 in UK.
An offline look at TIF data David Stuart UC Santa Barbara May 2, 2007.
1 G4MICE TOF Reconstruction & KEK Test Beam Analysis Update Aron Fish Tracker Phone Conference May 25, 2006.
Tracker QA Test Station Status. 29/08/2015Imperial College 2 Updated QA Scan Definition Scan definition: 1 –One 300 mm scan  r to V (1) 25 –Two 75 mm.
Software Summary 1M.Ellis - CM23 - Harbin - 16th January 2009  Four very good presentations that produced a lot of useful discussion: u Online Reconstruction.
1M. Ellis - MICE Video Conference - 15th March 2007 Software Report  New G4MICE Users  TOF Simulation and Digitisation  SciFi Reconstruction  Tracker.
1 MICE Tracker Update M. Ellis UKNFIC Meeting 25 th August 2005.
Non-identified Two Particle Correlations from Run I Understanding drift chamber tracking – Tracker and candidatory – Two particle efficiencies/ghosts A.
1 SciFi Results and Comparison Malcolm Ellis, for the MICE Scintillating Fibre Group Abingdon, 31 st October 2003.
1 MICE Tracking Detectors Malcolm Ellis NFMCC Meeting 12 th March 2006.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
Tracker QA Paul Kyberd Quality Assurance A status report: A procedure for ensuring the quality of the finished tracker has been designed following our.
To view the completion status of the members of your station or district, start by logging into the HFD Staffing web site. Click on Reports.
Sci-Fi Tracker: Progress Report Malcolm Ellis, MICE Video Conference Wednesday 6 th October 2004.
Tracker Summary Alan Bross MICE CM October 10, 2007.
1M. Ellis - MICE VC - 1st November 2007 Cosmic Ray Test Preparations  The cosmic ray test was initially planned to be held in R12, but this proved to.
G. Barber Sci-Fi Tracker Progress Ral 28 Oct Progress On The Design Of The Full Tracker Contents:- Recap of New Station Layout Version 2.5 Version.
4 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning January 16 th & 17 th, CERN Muon Tracking (MUON_TRK, MCH, MTRK) Conclusion of the first ALICE COSMIC.
1M. Ellis - MICE Tracker Meeting - 12th February 2007 Readout Electronics & DAQ  Introduction  DAQ Spreadsheet u VLSB_DAQ Sheet u Initialisation u Bias.
2 Oct 2008PC We have only 1 hour today May need to be brief.
Status of cosmic-ray test of the SciFi prototype and SciFi software in G4MICE M. Yoshida (Osaka Univ.)
Online Reconstruction 1M.Ellis - CM th October 2008.
1M. Ellis - 17th May 2007 SciFi Decoding (Everything you never wanted to know but couldn’t avoid going over and over)  VLSB Data (unpacking to AFE, MCM,
1Malcolm Ellis - Tracker Meeting - 28th November 2006 Electronics - Station Acceptance  Hardware: u 1 MICE cryostat with 1 VLPC cassette. u VME crate,
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Linda R. Coney – 5 November 2009 Online Reconstruction Linda R. Coney 5 November 2009.
 In this packet we will look at:  The meaning of acceleration  How acceleration is related to velocity and time  2 distinct types acceleration  A.
G.Barber/Peter Cooke: Mechanical Design Update Imperial 22 July Mechanical Update for Tracker workshop Contents:- New Station Layout Light Guide.
Shiuan-Hal,Shiu To-do-list and schedule 1. Things need to do before beam comes 2 Generate new trigger matrix for test beam base on the final geometry.(1)
Final Tracker Connection Map Version 1 1 Connection Mapping for the Final Mice Trackers Geoff Barber November 2005 TM – 03 Jul 06 TM – 21 Jul 06.
G.Barber Mice Tracker Mechanical Progress Tracker Mechanical Progress Contents:- Station Space Frame Station Layout Light Guide Map Connectors Patch.
1 MICE Software Phone Conference Introduction 27 th July 2005 M. Ellis.
Analysis for QA (temporary) Hideyuki Sakamoto 1 st October 2007 MICE Tracker Phone Meeting.
ALICE Offline Week October 4 th 2006 Silvia Arcelli & Chiara Zampolli TOF Online Calibration - Strategy - TOF Detector Algorithm - TOF Preprocessor.
1 Light Yield results from the KEK tracker test using G4MICE M. Ellis Tracker Phone Meeting 25 th January 2006.
1 Tracker Software Status M. Ellis MICE Collaboration Meeting 27 th June 2005.
Overview of PHENIX Muon Tracker Data Analysis PHENIX Muon Tracker Muon Tracker Software Muon Tracker Database Muon Event Display Performance Muon Reconstruction.
16th May 2007 MICE tracker phone meeting 1 Setup test bench/ Installation DATE Hideyuki Sakamoto 16 th May 2007 MICE phone meeting.
Station Acceptance Test. 22/02/2007 M. Takahashi 2 Lab Layout at IC.
1M. Ellis - MICE Tracker PC - 1st October 2007 Station QA Analysis (G4MICE)  Looking at the same data as Hideyuki, but using G4MICE.  Have not yet had.
20 April 2007MICE Tracker Phone Meeting1 Analysis of cosmic/self-triggerd data of station 5 Hideyuki Sakamoto MICE Tracker Phone Meeting 20 th April 2007.
1M. Ellis - Tracker PC - 7th March 2007 VLPC Cassette Characterisation  Third application (as described in past tracker meeting and CM17) is now working.
Online – Data Storage and Processing
Requirements for the Software Group (and agreed actions)
Tracker Specific Software
Tracker Station QA Acceptance Test Rig Status
Tracker Software Status
Pixel Non-Uniformity Study
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
Presentation transcript:

1M. Ellis - MICE Tracker PC - 19th October 2007 Station QA Analysis (G4MICE)  For details of software see my previous talk here: u  Slower progress since the last meeting than I had wanted to make due to other commitments.  Have made a first pass on the Co57 data that James has taken.  As expected at the previous meeting, the Co57 data gives a peak that can be fitted (compared with the distribution from the Sr90 source).  Still in the process of finishing up the new set of histograms that use the source location to select the fibres to histogram (currently still using the fibre with the most entries, which was already shown to agree with the source position, but perhaps isn’t ideal for the final QA as it will not spot a dead channel).  Will try to finish this and the automatic fitting over the weekend...

2M. Ellis - MICE Tracker PC - 19th October 2007 Co57 Data RunTRIP Discrim. Setting DAQ Rate (Hz) Events in Plane V Events in Plane X Events in Plane W Useful Events s (highest) (mostly ped) / 0.08 / / 0.25 / / 0.27 / (lowest) / 0.56 / 0.63

3M. Ellis - MICE Tracker PC - 19th October 2007 Optimum setting  From those 4 runs, it would appear that with the Co57 data we favour the lowest threshold (i.e. the highest number in that specific register).  This results in a 10k trigger run for a position that gives a histogram with a few hundred entries (see following slides) in a time of about 5 minutes.  In practice, I think we need more statistics, however, so will likely want a longer run per position.  I would still like to understand what is going on with the gain/overflows (particularly in light of the results reported by Hideyuki a few days ago), but it seems to me that the best approach to take is the Co57 source (as we no longer try to reconstruct triplets) and runs of minutes per source position.  This would result in the ability to take points per day (assuming automated, unattended running 24 hours per day!)  Perhaps we could thus characterise a station in 2 days ( points in a strategic arrangement)?

4M. Ellis - MICE Tracker PC - 19th October 2007 Plane V (TRIP: 240)

5M. Ellis - MICE Tracker PC - 19th October 2007 Plane X (TRIP: 240)

6M. Ellis - MICE Tracker PC - 19th October 2007 Plane W (TRIP: 240)

7M. Ellis - MICE Tracker PC - 19th October 2007 Next Steps  IF we agree that the Co57 is the way to go, I would like those at IC to take a test run of Station 5 with the statistics that I suggested (i.e points, 50k triggers per point) over the weekend (is this possible now?).  In parallel I will complete the automation of the analysis application and then on Monday/Tuesday we can perform the analysis and revisit the results perhaps on a phone meeting on Tuesday afternoon?  Henry is working on the large disk storage at Brunel and the necessary infrastructure to allow James and Hideyuki to transfer the data to Brunel for analysis.  We also need to revisit the database and in particular what information needs to come out of the QA process and be saved in the database...

8M. Ellis - MICE Tracker PC - 19th October 2007 What should the scan pattern be?  We have a limited number of discrete positions if we ask for high statistics at each point.  We could scan along the length of fibre and so sum the statistics at each point along the fibre, however that then leaves very low statistics on the cross fibres (and presumably more dead time due to increased stage movement?).  Perhaps it makes sense to pick points which are uniformly distributed about the area of the active circle of the station?  Or do we scan down the length of each of the three centre fibres? (Thus developing fantastic precision on the three centre fibres and decent results over the limited area of those three lines but no information about the bulk of the area of the station)