The Big Picture Getting Started The Process Follow-Up – 5 Year Action Plan Program Review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SENATE ORIENTATION RYERSON ACT  Sets the objects of Ryerson University  Defines role of Board of Governors management.
Advertisements

1 Administrative Units - Compact Planning Details.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Library Evaluation Evaluation by the Valley Library (for new.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
Sara Kim, PhD, Director, Associate Professor Instructional Design and Technology Unit, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine Katherine Wigan, BS, MBA, Senior.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
The Program Review Process What is Instructional Program Review?
FOLLOW UP SITE VISIT Dr Robert Schofield Dr Arthur Brown Advisors to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
Monash University Library Quality Cycle EXCELLENCE AND DIVERSITY and LEADING THE WAY Monash University’s strategic framework and overall directions MONASH.
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
1 Overview of Issues and Activities of the Planning Committee of Council Presented to University Council October 19, 2006.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Program Framework Review November 2011 Pamela Miller, Ph.D. AVP for Learning.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Dr Saleh Mohamed Al Khusaiby Personal Reflection on the Interviews Dean, Oman Medical College Sohar Medical Campus Oman Accreditation Council meeting November.
Creating a Culture of Accountability and Assessment at an Urban Community College Diane B. Call, President Paul Marchese, VP Academic Affairs, Liza Larios,
1 Academic Departments - Compact Planning Details.
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
Curriculum Design & the Enhanced role of CELT in PARM Preparation and Panel Events Penny Sweasey Rachel Forsyth
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
THE QUALITY ASSURANCE AND ACCREDITATION Project Outcomes and Activities.
2013 Common Block Development Evaluation and Feedback February 26, 2014.
ACP Finance DC FB 4.Appointment of Taskforce Team Taskforce Team 5.Environment Scanning Plan (ESP) 8.Potential & feasible? 7.Confirm the ESP Result 10.Detailed.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Middle States Update Progress Report Improved Staff Development Guest Speakers Guest Speakers Superintendent's Conference Day with PGCD cooperation.
Academic Program Review Committee Report Faculty Senate meeting November 11, 2008.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Master Plan Process FY Proposed Draft. October - February Cluster Groups and Units Identify Initiatives These are general goals or outcomes that.
Periodic Review Report Committee Summary: Amended Monthly Progress Report December 22, 2003.
1 University Compacts Dorothy J. Minear, Ph.D. December 6, 2007.
Indiana University Kokomo Strategic Enrollment Management Consultation Final Report Bob Bontrager December 8, 2007.
Presentationto Deans and Heads Conference 17 th April 2009 NUI Galway.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
Annual Program Assessment With a Five- Year Peer Review John Henik Associate Vice President, Academic Affairs Dave Horsfield
Orientation to the Self-Assessment Process in Head Start.
CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
2017/18 SIP Request Process September 2016.
CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Office of Educational Effectiveness
New Program Proposal Workflow Chart
Center For Faculty Excellence: Leadership and Faculty Development
COD Institutional Effectiveness Process (IEP)
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
Realize. It starts with you.
FGCU GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
Strategic Enrolment Management Planning OVERVIEW
HARNESSING VOICES OF SUPPORT FOR PROGRAM REVIEW
Time Line for Program Reviews
Governance at the University of Regina Glenys Sylvestre
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
Extend an Existing Degree Program to a New Location
Human resource and Work flow of the Research Office, RUPP
New Certificate Program
Instructions: PLEASE DELETE BEFORE PRESENTATION
Periodic Review Departmental Review.
Terminate an Academic Unit
Reorganize (Merge, Split, Move) an Academic Program or Academic Unit
External Examiner Reports
New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program
Conducting Needs Assessments for UF/IFAS Extension
Establish a New Academic Unit
Suspend a Degree or Certificate Program
Rename an Academic Program (Degree or Certificate) or Academic Unit
Time Line for Program Reviews
Fort Valley State University
Cyclical Program Review
GC University Lahore Quality Enhancement Cell
Presentation transcript:

The Big Picture Getting Started The Process Follow-Up – 5 Year Action Plan Program Review

The Big Picture Program LevelInstitutional Level

The Big Picture Strategic Enrolment Management MappingProgram Reviews Requests for Capital Budgets Emphasis on Accountability/Maximizing Return on (Shrinking) Investment KPI and Retention Improvement Multi-Year Accountability Agreement Program Advisory Boards Other plans, policies, etc…

The Big Picture Formal Review – every 5 years 20 Program Reviews/Year 2006/07 – (still in process) 2007/08 – 6 confirmed, 14 TBD (Clusters?) Completed during the academic year Yearly Informal Review – each May/June

Program Review Team Associate Dean Coordinator Selected Faculty Program Advisory Committee Graduate(s) Student(s) Industry Representatives Getting Started Centre for Teaching & Learning Curriculum Design Specialist Director, Institutional Research Research Officer

The Process Program Review Instructions, Self Assessment Template Review documents and discuss Self Assessment process with Program Team Program Review Team: Associate Dean, Coordinator, selected faculty and Program Advisory Committee member(s), graduate(s) student(s), industry representatives Office of Institutional Research and Quality Complete Self Assessment Template Existing Data Q&A Check for completeness Prepare Final Draft Program Review Team Notice of Completion, Schedule transmittal Associate Dean, VP Academic Transmittal Meeting 5 Year Action Plan to BoG Program Development & Renewal Committee Development of 5 Year Action Plan Sub-Committee Recommendation BoG

Program Review provides a: Chance to review all available program data (KPI, FITS, Mapping, OCAS, registrar, HR, etc.) in a methodical way Examine program strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats Voice for faculty, the Program Advisory Board, industry, students, and grads Springboard for future program quality enhancements Follow-Up: 5 Year Action Plan 5 Year Action Plan: Builds on momentum Is a plan for the future Quantifies program objectives Outlines innovative program quality enhancement initiatives/strategies Details projected capital and budget needs Updates Board of Governors on program review outcomes