Task7: NUSTAR2 - Design and Prototype Construction of a Radiation-Resistant Magnet C. Mühle GSI Task leader: G. Moritz /GSI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnetic Specifications and Tolerances Weiming Guo, NSLS-II Project In this presentation I briefly introduced the.
Advertisements

Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
1 M. Modena for the CLIC MDI magnet study Team (A. Aloev, P. Thonet, E. Solodko, A. Vorozhtsov) CLIC MDI Meeting,16 January 2015.
Powered Magnets, DB Formation and Decelerator Alexey Vorozhtsov (JINR) International Workshop on Linear Colliders October 2010.
Status of CEPC Detector magnet
Magnet designs for Super-FRS and CR
Task7: NUSTAR2 - Design and Prototype Construction of a Radiation-Resistant Magnet C. Mühle GSI Task leader: G. Moritz /GSI.
IHEP participation in SIS300 production UNILAC SIS 18 SIS 100/300 HESR Super FRS NESR CR RESR Institute for High Energy Physics Protvino, Russia FAIR meeting.
SIS 100 main magnets G. Moritz, GSI Darmstadt (for E. Fischer, MT-20 4V07)) Cryogenic Expert Meeting, GSI, September 19/
Thoughts about the MQXF development plan P. Fessia Thanks to discussions within the MDT section (P. Ferracin, J. C. Perez, E. Todesco, P. Ferracin), L.
LQ status and plans – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP Collaboration Meeting - LBNL, April , 2006 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC OUTLINE: Goals, Input and Output Sub-tasks.
Martin Winkler, DP NUSTAR DIRACsecondary Beams Design Project NUSTAR  Research Field and Production of Exotic Nuclei  The NUSTAR Facility and.
Permanent Magnet Quadrupoles for the CLIC Drive Beam Jim Clarke, Norbert Collomb, Neil Marks, James Richmond, and Ben Shepherd STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Martin Winkler, Task7: NUSTAR Task7: NUSTAR2 - Design and Prototype Construction of a Radiation-Resistant Magnet  The Pre-Separator of the Super-FRS.
Review of Quench Limits FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab 1 st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011.
General Considerations for the Upgrade of the LHC Insertion Magnets
Superconducting Quadrupoles inside the HERA Experiments M. Bieler, DESY, LHC LUMI 05 Workshop, Arcidosso, September The HERA Interaction Region.
FP6 Design study "DIRAC secondary beams" Project "NUSTAR":Experiments with stored radioactive beams Super-FRS high-power production target has to cover.
Beam line Experiment area SC magnet Pion production target
Magnet design issues & concepts for the new injector P.Fabbricatore INFN-Genova Magnet design issues & concepts for the new injector P.Fabbricatore INFN-Genova,
CLIC Workshop th -17 th October 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC 1 CLIC Main Linac Quadrupoles Preliminary design of a quadrupole for the stabilization.
LARP Collaboration Meeting, April 26-28, 2006Gian Luca Sabbi HQ Design Study (WBS ) LARP Collaboration Meeting April 26-28, 2006 N. Andreev, E.
1 V. Kashikhin for ILC ALCPG 2007, FNAL Meeting October 23, 2007 Ring to Main Linac Magnets.
Muon Cooling Channel Superconducting Magnet Systems Muon Collider Task Force Meeting on July 31, 2006 V.S. Kashikhin.
16 T Dipole Design Options: Input Parameters and Evaluation Criteria F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT-VC, Sept. 4th, 2015.
JRA on Development of High Temperature SC Link Motivation Work Packages Partners & resources Amalia Ballarino Esgard open meeting CERN,
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
SBS Magnet and Support Status Robin Wines June 2013.
Superconducting Technologies for the Next Generation of Accelerators CERN, Globe of Science and Innovation 4-5 December Superconducting Links for the Hi-Lumi.
Reducing the Iron in the Endcap Yoke of CLIC_SiD Benoit Curé, Konrad Elsener, Hubert Gerwig, CERN CERN, June 2014 Linear Collider Detector Magnet Meeting.
Long Quad (LQ) & High Gradient (HQ) Series Alexander Zlobin bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program DOE LARP review Fermilab, June.
Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.
O. Kester, NuSTAR annual meeting, 27/02/2013
First Q4 cold mass engineering follow up meeting 16/03/2016 Q4 Status update H. Felice, M. Segreti, D. Simon and JM. Rifflet.
Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole for Linear Accelerators Progress Report V. Kashikhin for the FNAL Superconducting Magnet Team (presented.
DOE Review, 6/2/2011Answers to Committee Questions – Magnet Systems Answers to committee questions - magnets.
Yingshun Zhu Design of Small Aperture Quadrupole Magnet for HEPS-TF
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Super-FRS multiplet field.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Super-FRS magnet configurations.
HTS and LTS Magnet Design and Prototyping for RAON
The Super-FRS Multiplet, Magnetic and Cryogenic requirements
Iranian Light Source Facility, IPM, P.O. Box , Tehran, Iran
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
Status of BDS (QD0 and SD0) and PCL magnet studies for CLiC
One plane dipole corrector for the CLIC MBQ TYPE 1
Yingshun Zhu Design progress of QD0 in CEPC Interaction Region
CBM magnet overview of the BINP work
High Gradient Magnet Design for SPring-8 Upgrade Plan
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
SLHC –PP WP6 LHC IR Upgrade - Phase I.
Warm magnets for LHeC / Test Facility arcs
6th BINP-FAIR-GSI Workshop,
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
(Procurement, testing of magnets)
EFREMOV INSTITUTE SAINT PETERSBURG RUSSIA
Arc magnet designs Attilio Milanese 13 Oct. 2016
Technical Feasibility of Anti-DID Coil
CHEN, Fusan KANG, Wen November 5, 2017
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
Pierre-Alexandre Thonet
Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Design The DESY Experience
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
Ramesh Gupta Brookhaven National Laboratory
HL LHC WP3 (magnets) TASK 2 ADVANCEMENT
Updated concept of the CBM dipole magnet
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
CEPC Collider Magnets CHEN, Fusan November 13, 2018.
CEPC Booster Ring Magnets
Review of Quench Limits
Presentation transcript:

Task7: NUSTAR2 - Design and Prototype Construction of a Radiation-Resistant Magnet C. Mühle GSI Task leader: G. Moritz /GSI

High-radiation area Design parameters and layout of the Super-FRS Magnets in the high radiation area QuantityField/gradient Length Usable apert. Gap height/Pole radius Dipole 1 11° T 2.39m 380x140mm 170mm Quadrupole 1 Ap.rad.10cm T/m 1m Ø90mm 100mm Quadrupole 2 Ap.rad.20cm T/m 1m 380x200mm 200mm Sextupole T/m 2 0.6m 380x200mm 200mm

Participating institutes in task7 (NUSTAR2) OrganisationSub-Task GSI Coordination, Radiation Impact, Magnetic Field Calculation, DesignDrawings, Prototyping Philipps Universität MarburgMaterial Research Technische Universität Dresden Cryogenics Fachhochschule MainzSurveying & Alignment Babcock Noell Nuclear (industry) Coil winding

Multi-annual implementation plan for NUSTAR2

Exploration of radiation load on magnets behind the high-power production target 3 different aspects of energy deposition Quench limit (2-3mJ/g): close to limit Material life time (see table): mineral insulation required Cooling requirements (expected FAIR cryogenic power: 20 kW): economic operation not possible Decision Normal conducting magnets with mineral insulated cable (MIC) Average energy deposition on on the coil surface: /M ≈ 1 mJ/g Equivalent to 14 MGy/a (4000h/a operation ) Heat load on the cryogenic system for a 5 ton quadrupole magnet: ≈ 2.3 kW Projectile: 1500 MeV/u 238 U /s σ x = 1.0 mm σ y = 2.0 mm σ p /p = 0.5% Energy deposition distribution (calculated with PHITS) Target: Carbon 4 g/cm 2 Material properties:

Mineral insulated cable (MIC) Potential suppliers Hitachi, Japan Kirscable, Russia Tyco Thermal Controls, Canada Copper conductor with and w/o cooling channel Rated up to 3000 A (engineering current density 3-6 A/mm 2 ) Expected cable costs ≈150€/m

Magnets with MIC New technology for GSI -> investigation of feasibility for all magnets potentially to be build with MIC 11° dipole (3 units) Quadrupole with 10cm aperture radius (2 units) Quadrupole with 20cm aperture radius (1 units) Sextupole (2 units) Conceptual designs for all magnets were prepared (additional collaboration work with P.Vobly (BINP) is appreciated) Direct cooling vs. indirect cooling was investigated Indirect cooling is favorable Cooling circuit and electrical circuit are separated -> no copper corrosion in the high radiation field Engineering current density is higher Conductor end plugs easier to be made Separation of water and current terminals to one end of the magnet, each Parameters of cooling circuit are independently from electrical circuit Use of one conductor cross section for all magnets probable

Example: Quadrupole with 10cm aperture radius Indirectly cooled Cable 14x14mm Copper cross section 9x9mm Current 1100A 170kW Directly cooled Cable 19.8x19.8mm Copper cross section 14.5x14.5mm Cooling channel 7.3x7.3mm Current 1900A 240kW Sizes are comparable!

Example: Dipole Indirectly cooled Laminated magnet Pole shims for improved field quality Bent magnet under investigation Half yoke weight: 43 tons Electrical terminals Cooling terminals

Example: Sextupole Indirectly cooled Laminated magnet

Surveying and alignment system for high-radiation areas  Remote-controlled camera vehicle in tunnel or on working platform  Eccentric photogrammetric targets on magnets  Sequential photogrammetric survey of inaccessible areas during shutdown  Bundle adjustment of photogrammetric network  Determination of correction values for magnet positions  Automatic, remote-controlled adjustment of machine geometry

Surveying and alignment system for high-radiation areas Work packages  Development of basic concept (photogrammetric solution)  Evaluation of camera specs; geometric camera tests  Design of algorithms for image analysis  Simulations of potential camera configurations  Camera tests at radioactive environments  Evaluation of constraints for accelerator design  Evaluation of criteria for automatic remote adjustment  Concept for integration in accelerator operation Most of the work packages ( ) are still in process since planning of accelerator design is not finished yet