Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 ILC Crab Cavity Collaboration Cockcroft Institute : –Graeme Burt (Lancaster University) –Richard Carter (Lancaster.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cockcroft Institute P. Goudket Cockcroft All Hands Meeting - March 2007 ILC Crab Cavity Collaboration Amplitude and Phase Control Development Cockcroft.
Advertisements

Cockcroft Institute LC-ABD plenary April 2007 ILC Crab Cavity Collaboration Cockcroft Institute : –Richard Carter (Lancaster University) –Amos Dexter (Lancaster.
Cockcroft Institute LC-ABD plenary April 2007 ILC Crab Cavity Collaboration Cockcroft Institute : –Richard Carter (Lancaster University) –Amos Dexter (Lancaster.
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Prospects of Compact Crab Cavities for LHC Peter McIntosh LHC-CC Workshop, CERN 21 st August 2008.
Initiating the Crab System R&D Graeme Burt Lancaster University Philippe Goudket Daresbury Laboratory.
Synchronization system for CLIC crab cavities Amos Dexter, Ben Woolley, Igor Syratchev. LCWS12, UTA October 2012.
Particle Accelerator Engineering, London, October 2014 Phase Synchronisation Systems Dr A.C. Dexter Overview Accelerator Synchronisation Examples Categories.
ILC RF phase stability requirements and how can we demonstrate them Sergei Nagaitsev Oct 24, 2007.
Laser to RF synchronisation A.Winter, Aachen University and DESY Miniworkshop on XFEL Short Bunch Measurement and Timing.
RF Stability Working Group Jorn Jacob (ESRF), John Byrd (LBNL) General Issues RF phase and amplitude noise –filtered by cavity and translate into timing.
RF Synchronisation Issues
Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.
Phase noise measurements in TRIUMF ISAC 2 cryomodule K. Fong, M. Laverty TRIUMF.
Direct Wakefield measurement of CLIC accelerating structure in FACET Hao Zha, Andrea Latina, Alexej Grudiev (CERN) 28-Jan
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
STRIPLINE KICKER STATUS. PRESENTATION OUTLINE 1.Design of a stripline kicker for beam injection in DAFNE storage rings. 2.HV tests and RF measurements.
A magnetron solution for SPL?
Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales (FONT) - Review of Feedback Prototype Tests at ATF(KEK) Glenn Christian John Adams Institute, Oxford for FONT collaboration.
BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
LLRF ILC GDE Meeting Feb.6,2007 Shin Michizono LLRF - Stability requirements and proposed llrf system - Typical rf perturbations - Achieved stability at.
D. Angal-KalininEUROTeV Annual Meeting, DESY WP2 : Beam Delivery System D. Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, STFC, Daresbury Laboratory 4 th EUROTeV Annual.
FAST KICKER STATUS Fabio Marcellini On behalf of LNF fast kickers study group* * D. Alesini, F. Marcellini P. Raimondi, S. Guiducci.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
IWLC10 CLIC Crab Cavities Amos Dexter (on behalf of the LC Crab System Collaborations) CERN 20 th October 2010.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
Cockcroft Institute August2008 ILC Crab Cavity LLRF Amos Dexter, Imran Tahir, Peter McIntosh, Graeme Burt, Philippe Goudket, Carl Beard, Phil Buckley,
LLRF for EUCARD Crab Cavities Graeme Burt (on behalf of Amos Dexter) Paris May 2011.
July 19-22, 2006, Vancouver KIRTI RANJAN1 ILC Curved Linac Simulation Kirti Ranjan, Francois Ostiguy, Nikolay Solyak Fermilab + Peter Tenenbaum (PT) SLAC.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
LCLS LLRF System October 10-13, 2005 LLRF05 B. Hong, R. Akre, A. Hill, D. Kotturi, H. Schwarz SLAC, Stanford, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA Work supported.
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
13 September 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ML (x.7) Goals and Scope of Work to end FY09 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab Peter Tenenbaum SLAC.
Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV 24 th January 2007 ILC Crab Cavity Collaboration FNAL Leo Bellantoni Mike Church Timergali Khabiboulline Brian Chase SLAC Kwok.
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
P I T Z Photo Injector Test Facility Zeuthen Design consideration of the RF deflector to optimize the photo injector at PITZ S.Korepanov.
DRAFT: What have been done and what to do in ILC-LET beam dynamics Beam dynamics/Simulations Group Beijing.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
Cockcroft Institute February 2008 Low Level RF for Crab Cavities (The ILC in particular) Amos Dexter, Imran Tahir, Peter McIntosh, Graeme Burt.
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Intra-Pulse Feedback at the NLC Interaction Point Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass 2001.
Direct Wakefield measurement of CLIC accelerating structure in FACET Hao Zha, Andrea Latina, Alexej Grudiev (CERN) 18/06/2015 High Gradient work shop 2015.
CarterFest 14 th July 2010 Stabilised Magnetrons Presentation to mark Professor Richard Carter’s contributions to Vacuum Electronics Delivered by Amos.
F Sergei Nagaitsev (FNAL) Webex meeting Oct ICD-2 chopper requirements and proposal #1.
HOMs in high-energy part of the Project-X linac. V. Yakovlev, N. Solyak, J.-F. Ostiguy Friday 26 June 2009.
Dither Luminosity feedback versus Fast IP feedback
Coupler RF kick simulations.
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
RF Synchronisation Issues
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Developments on Proposed
WP10.3 LHC Crab Cavities Overview EUCARD SRF Annual Review
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors
Damping Ring Kicker Tests at AØ
Intra-Pulse Beam-Beam Scans at the NLC IP
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) LLRF Preliminary Design Review LLRF Monitor and Control System September 26, 2005 Ron Akre.
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Injection design of CEPC
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
Time Domain Modelling for Crab Cavity LLRF Performance
Update on Crab Cavity Simulations for JLEIC
Presentation transcript:

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 ILC Crab Cavity Collaboration Cockcroft Institute : –Graeme Burt (Lancaster University) –Richard Carter (Lancaster University) –Amos Dexter (Lancaster University) –Philippe Goudket (ASTeC) –Roger Jones (Manchester University) –Alex Kalinin (ASTeC) –Lili Ma (ASTeC) –Peter McIntosh (ASTeC) –Imran Tahir (Lancaster University) FNAL –Leo Bellantoni –Mike Church –Tim Koeth –Timergali Khabiboulline –Nikolay Solyak SLAC –Chris Adolphson –Kwok Ko –Zenghai Li –Cho Ng

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Crab Cavity Function The crab cavity is a deflection cavity operated with a 90 o phase shift. A particle at the centre of the bunch gets no transverse momentum kick and hence no deflection at the IP. A particle at the front gets a transverse momentum that is equal and opposite to a particle at the back. The quadrupoles change the rate of rotation of the bunch.

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 RDR Crab Cavity Parameters Crossing angle 14 mrad Cavity frequency, GHz 3.9 GHz Kick required at 0.5 GeV CM 1.32 MV Anticipated operational gradient at 0.5 GeV CM 3.81 MV m -1 Max gradient achieved in 3 cell cavity MV m MV m -1 RMS relative phase stability for 2% rms Luminosity drop 0.1  RMS amplitude stability for 2% rms Luminosity drop 1.2% Potential X beam jitter at crab cavity,  m 500  m Potential Y beam jitter at crab cavity,  m 35  m For 500 GeV CM we might use 1 nine cell cavity or two 5 cell cavities

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Anticipated RF system ~ 14 m Cryostat Reference Phase Reference for crab cavities on other beam Minimum requirement for 14 mrad crossing is 1  9 cell or 2  5 - cell cavities per linac 2  9 – cells would provide full redundancy in case of failure Need space for cryostat, input/output couplers, tuning mechanisms… Phase Control RF Amplifier Feedback loop Phase Control RF Amplifier Feedback loop luminosity reference from IP BPM spent beam kick reference from spent beam IP

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 TM110 Dipole mode cavity View from top Beam Magnetic field in green Electric Field in red For a crab cavity the bunch centre is at the cell centre when E is maximum and B is zero

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Beamloading Longitudinal electric field on axis is zero for dipole mode Beamloading loading is zero for on axis bunches Bunches pass cavity centre when B transverse = 0 hence of axis E = maximum Crab cavities are loaded by off axis bunches Dipole deflection cavities are not loaded by off axis bunches Power requirement for 9 cells (500 GeV CoM) ~ a few kW

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Phase Control Model equivalent electrical circuit for excitation of a single cavity mode resulting differential equation conversion from circuit parameters to cavity parameters Microphonics cause  o to vary with time Beamloading causes V to jump when a bunch passes through The amplitude and phase of F depend on the controller, the amplifier, the coupler temperature we need a numerical solution

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Envelope Equations Require an accurate solution over the cavity fill time plus the bunch train time At the design gradient the required energy per cell is J If 250 Watt per cell is available the minimum fill time ~ 0.12 ms For best possible phase performance we would want to fill slowly and let settle Allowing 4 ms for filling and operation simulation needs 20 million RF cycles Hence solve envelope equations defined by This form assumes Q o >>Q e note that Q L = Q o + Q e

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Using amplifier to extract cavity energy For the crab cavity the bunches can supply or remove energy. Whilst in principle the amplifier can be used to reduce cavity energy after shifting its phase by 180 o this is undesirable when one is trying to control cavity phase. It is desirable to chose a low external Q so this never needs to happen. Bunch goes through cavity at time t =0

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Modelling of cavity amplitude (no microphonics) Initial cavity frequency = E+09 Hz Cavity Q factor = E+09 External Q factor = E+06 Cavity R over Q = E+01 Energy set point = E-02 J Amplitude set point = E+05 V Maximum Klystron Power = E+02 W Max amplitude set point = E+05 V Max beam offset = E+00 mm Max bunch phase err = E+00 deg Voltage jump at t=0 = E+02 V RF cycles between bunches = 1200 Delay for control system in cycles 3900 PI controller with 1 ms delay c pr = 2.5e-6  Q e c ir = 1.0e-10  Q e c pi = 2.5e-6  Q e c ii = 1.0e-10  Q e Random bunch to bunch offset of 1 mm and arrival phase of 1 degree

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Modelling of cavity phase (no microphonics) Random bunch to bunch offset of 1 mm and arrival phase of 1 degree Beam loading does not give an special problems in stabilizing the phase

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Modelling of cavity amplitude with microphonics Oscillatory bunch offset of 1 mm and random arrival phase of 1 degree Drive frequency in GHz = 3.9 GHz Centre cavity frequency in GHz = 3.9 GHz Cavity Q factor = 1.0E+09 External Q factor = 3.0E+06 Cavity R over Q (2xFNAL=53 per cell) = 53 ohms Energy point ILC crab~0.0284J per cell) = J Amplitude set point = V Maximum Amplifier Power per cell = 300 W Maximum voltage set point (no beam) = V Maximum beam offset = 1.0 mm Maximum bunch phase error = 1.0 deg Beam offset frequency = 2kHz Bunch charge (ILC=3.2e-9) = 3.2E-09 C RF cycles between bunches = 1200 Delay for control system in cycles = 3900 Bunch length = 1 ms Cavity frequency shift from microphonics = 600 Hz Cavity vibration frequency = 230 Hz Initial vibration phase (degrees) = 20 deg PI controller with 1 ms delay c pr = 2.5e-6  Q e c ir = 1.0e-10  Q e c pi = 2.5e-6  Q e c ii = 1.0e-10  Q e

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Modelling of cavity phase with microphonics Oscillatory bunch offset of 1 mm and random arrival phase of 1 degree

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Modelling of cavity drive power with microphonics A single klystron can’t easily do this but solid state amplifiers can. To work with a Klystron we must lower the external Q

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Modelling of cavity drive with microphonics follows microphonics follows beam offset

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Model refinement Still need to add detailed amplifier models A measurement model Alternative controllers

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Phase Control Development Vector modulation available to 4 GHz Digital phase detection currently under investigation will eventually be used alongside a mixer and digital IQ detection at an intermediate frequency as used on flash. Have improved precision of measurement since August by upgrading ADC and DAC from 12bit to fast 16bit. Programmed basic control software in DSP and have demonstrated phase locking of warm cavity to 0.02 degrees rms so far. Need to upgrade connectors, cabling and low noise amplifiers Vector Modulator I Q D/A DSP A/D 1.3 GHz Digital Phase Detector /3 Frequency Divider /3 Frequency Divider Oscilloscope 3.9 GHz Oscillator 10 MHz Reference Amp Spectrum Analyzer Cavity D/A

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Issues in developing 16 bit ADC and DAC boards The phase control work at Lancaster is focusing on the use of a digital phase detector with 16 bit ADC and DAC conversion. One of the remaining problems is getting the d.c. voltage output from the phase detector into the ADC without picking up noise. DESY abandoned this approach as they could not get the same performance as can be achieved by transferring phase information into the DSP on an intermediate carrier frequency from a double balanced mixer. The digital phase detector offers an absolute measurement without calibration and can be used alongside phase quadrature measurements at an intermediate frequency which are necessary to give amplitude.

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Development of 16 bit DAC & ADC ADC 16 bit gives resolution of 5.6 mdeg in 360 degrees latency = 130 ns sample rate = 100 Mbits/s rms noise ~ ± 2.4 bits so need to average 8 or more bits which takes ~ 100 ns Digital Phase Detector resolution ~ 5 mdeg DAC settling time ~ 10 ns Have potential to react to a phase error of 5 mdeg in 2-3  s. DSP Have yet to implement FPGAs hence slow read & write read time to DSP ~300 ns write time to DAC ~200 ns. still using in built functions to get Sine and Cosine for vector modulator hence processing is a little slow.

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Status of measurement precision Precision of the measurement is determined by looking at the jitter on the DAC input to the vector modulator when a controller in the DSP is used to phase lock a low Q cavity. We now controlling close to the noise level on the ADC ( 3 bits ) We still have ripple from a miss match on the ADC input which is d.c. coupled. Next we need to re-instate an independent measurement of jitter using a double balance mixer.

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Phase synchronisation If cavities are stabilized with respect to local references to ± 0.01 degrees we then seek synchronisation between local references to 0.06 degrees at 3.9 GHz = 43 fs Optical systems have been developed elsewhere that achieve this. Initial plans are to see what can be achieved with coax and s.o.a. RF components. simple synchronisation scheme

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Vertical Cryostat Phase Control Tests Local reference and controller Phase measurement Line to synchronise the local references must have its length continuously measured to with an accuracy of a few microns

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Horizontal FONT The alternative to absolute phase synchronisation is to using a horizontal FONT system. If one can accurately measure the x displacement of the spend beam (after the IP) as it passes the crab cavity on the ingoing beam one can determine the phase error between the crab cavities. The deflection can be cancelled either by changing the phase of one cavity or using a magnetic kicker Chris Adolphson (SLAC), Phil Burrows (Oxford)

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Work plan Status Goal 2 System design NoDueTaskStatus 2.1Apr 06Study of crab cavity deflection mode effects on beam dynamics Complete 2.2Jul 06Contribute to RDR Complete 2.3Jul 06Study of effect of HOMs on beam dynamics (kick only – not emittance growth). Complete 2.4Oct 06Development of RF system model (phase stability performance). Initial model available 2.5Feb 07Recommendation on development of a superconducting crab cavity. Initial recommendations made

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Work plan Status Goal 3 Cavity and RF Design and development NoDueTaskStatus 3.1May 06Electromagnetic design of a multi-cell dipole superconducting cavity including couplers and system for damping higher order modes (HOMs). Using CKM 3.9 GHz– coupler development is needed.. 3.2Aug 06Numerical multipacting study for a multi-cell dipole cavity. Need coupler designs to complete 3.3Nov 06Development of LOM damping of system and coupler design. Major collaboration task in progress – completion in Jan 07Manufacture and testing of normal conducting prototype cavity. Cavity manufactured and initial tests completed 3.5Nov 07Full design recommendations with respect to electromagnetic design, electronic design and thermal design. Awaits other results

Cockcroft Institute EuroTeV January 2007 Work plan Status Goal 4 Phase Stability Experiments NoDueTaskStatus 4.2Apr 06Phase control measurements/experiments on ERLP defined Complete 4.3Jul 06Phase control measurements/experiments on ERLP set up. Postponed to Jan 07Establish validity of phase control model.Requires completion of 3.3 or other experiment 4.7Jan 07Phase performance tests complete.Tests not reliant on ERLP are also being planned 4.8Nov 07Proposal for high power tests of crab cavity system. Dependent on future funding program 4.1Apr 06Measurements of Klystron performance available.Have some CPI data 4.4Jul 06Klystron performance simulation established.Complete 4.6Apr 07Evaluation/development of phase control system.On target 4.9Jan 08Final report on Klystron performance complete.