How Regional is Regional Environmental Governance? Comparing Regional Environmental Governance in East Asia and Europe EE-REG Kyoto 24-25th January 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Territorial cohesion: what scales for policy intervention? Bruxelles Jean Peyrony DG REGIO, Unit C2 (Urban development, territorial cohesion)
Advertisements

The territorial implications of demographic change in the North Sea Region – scope for a transnational planning approach? Stefanie Dühr, Radboud University.
Project Eco-pedological Map for the Alpine Region SUMMARY 1. The Alpine Convention context 2. Ecopedological map project proposal 3. Preliminary APAT approach.
Transboundary Environmental Conservation and Livelihood Creation in the proposed BALKANS PEACE PARK: Albania, Kosovo & Montenegro Presentation: Brandeis.
STATE OF TRANSPORT CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION ACTIONS IN EEA COUNTRIES, RECENT EXPERIENCES Natalia Sobrino (TRANSyT- UPM) ETC/CCA Task Adaptation.
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café 8 September 2010 in Bruxelles Call for Proposals on Targeted Analyses.
Workshop 3 – Territorial integration in cross-border and transnational functional regions ITAN – Black Sea case study, first results Pierre BECKOUCHE ESPON.
Political Geography Study of human political organization of the Earth at various levels – Studied at three scales Supranational scale – Ex. United Nations.
„South East Europe Programme” as a financing opportunity for projects in the Danube region and complementarity to other instruments COMPLEMENTARITY OF.
INTERNATIONAL LAW AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 1 Environmental Law.
UNEP.Net Country Portals ELECTRONIC ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FOR DECISION MAKERS AND PUBLIC IN THE CIS Workshop B: Construction.
Introduction The GEOSPECS project: Background, objectives and setup.
The Geography of European Integration The Emergence of the Region.
Networking with Southeast Europe SEE-ERA.NET Pilot Joint Call for Research Proposals Southeast European Era-Net.
European Macro-Regions Andrea Gramillano t33 ESPON Seminar “Territories Acting for Economic Growth: Using territorial evidence to meet challenges towards.
The role, specific situation and potentials of urban areas as nodes in a polycentric development ESPON Project Lead partner Nordregio Third interim.
Policy coordination process in AttractSEE project and Spatial Plan of Republic of Serbia Jelena Miljković, Siniša Trkulja Republic Agency for Spatial Planning,
Mirna Bojić Ministry of Environmental and Nature Protection, Croatia Budapest, November 2012.
EE-REG Kyoto 2013 Framing the Carpathians for Regional Environmental Cooperation Simon Gaberell University of Geneva Department of Geography and Environment.
Tisa Catchment Area Development TICAD KEY ROLE OF SPATIAL PLANNING IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESSES - REGIONAL SPATIAL PLAN OF AP OF VOJVODINA - Msc Arch.
EU Territorial Agenda and aspects related to the Baltic Area Content: Chapter I: Tomorrow´s Territorial Challenges to be tackled today.
EU Strategy for Danube A new challenge in the context of the territorial cohesion in the South East European Space Bucharest, 20 January, 2010 Dr. Mary-Jeanne.
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
DATOURWAY Transnational Strategy for the Territorial Development of the Danube Area with special regard to Tourism WP3 - ANALYSIS Kick off meeting Braila.
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
Vienna International Centre, 8 September 2010 Adaptation to the Impacts of Climate Change for Reducing Security Risks in SEE Pier Carlo Sandei UNEP Vienna.
Disaster Preparedness and Prevention Initiative for South Eastern Europe DPPI SEE Seminar on Strengthening Cooperation with Candidate Countries and Western.
EU Legislation in the field of environment – key developments in 2007 and rd ECENA Plenary Meeting 18 September 2008.
Streamlining Climate Change Adaptation into RBM: European Perspective Birgit Vogel (MRC) Raimund Mair (ICPDR) 6 th Sharing & Learning Seminar Asia Pacific.
The Carpathian CHM: a regional contribution to the European Biodiversity CHM Part 1 Carpathian Protected Areas Clearing House Mechanism (CPA-CHM) A Web-Portal.
EUROPEAN STUCTURAL FUNDS Esben Poulsen, European Commission Head of the INTERREG Unit Directorate General for Regional Policy INTERREG IIIB Partner Search.
WHEN AND HOW TO GO TRANSBOUNDARY EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES FOR TRANSBOUNDARY NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Harry van der Linde Senior Program Officer Biodiversity.
Update of the Territorial State and Perspectives of the EU and review of the Territorial Agenda Action 4.3. and 5.3. Dr. Péter Szaló Prague, 18 May 2009.
Indicators on Territorial Cohesion – The ESPON INTERCO project 1 Open Days | European Week of Regions and Cities Regional and Local Economies in a Changing.
Jernej Stritih. Climate is a Global Common!? –Opneghagen 2009 climate is a geostrategic subject –Balancing reduction commitments, adaptation and mutual.
1 Short overview of the legal and institutional framework of protected sites, existing ecological networks Short overview of the legal and institutional.
Extreme events, regulatory style and regional environmental governance Rolf Lidskog, professor of sociology Centre for Urban and Regional Studies Örebro.
Bucharest, 20 January Position of the Slovak Republic The EU Danube Strategy A new instrument of Cohesion Policy after 2014 Implementation of projects:
1 Joint Research Centre (JRC) Annual Meeting of the EGTC Platform The EGTC-ready to use - Beyond cohesion policy Ulla Engelmann Interinstitutional and.
1 La dimension territoriale Ronald Hall Commission européenne Directeur relations internationales Politique régionale November 2009.
Salzbourg, 13th March 2005 Joaquín Farinós Dasí University of Valencia ESPON GOVERNANCE OF TERRITORIAL AND URBAN POLICIES FROM EU TO LOCAL LEVEL.
MOUNTAINS OF THE WORLD Yuri Badenkov. MOUNTAINS OF THE WORLD Biggest terrestrial ecosystem (25%) Biggest terrestrial ecosystem (25%) Mountain as Water.
Brainstorming meeting House of Catalonia, Bruxelles 26 March 2014 Territorial Vision and Pathways 2050.
Territorial and urban aspects of migration and refugee inflow Sandra Di Biaggio ESPON Seminar A world without borders.
Macro regions and macro regional strategies: an outlook ESPON SEMINAR Luxembourg, 8-9 December 2015.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Stakeholder Workshop Brussels – 5 February 2014 INTERREG EUROPE Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer INTERREG IVC.
ESPON Workshop at the Open Days 2012 “Creating Results informed by Territorial Evidence” Brussels, 10 October 2012 Introduction to ESPON Piera Petruzzi,
ESPON GOVERNANCE OF TERRITORIAL AND URBAN POLICIES FROM EU TO LOCAL LEVEL Luxembourg, 18 May 2005 Joaquín Farinós Dasí University of Valencia.
ESPON Seminar Liège – 17 November 2010 Erik Gløersen Department of Geography – University of Geneva.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
The EU Strategy for the Alpine Region (EUSALP) Dr. Andrea Mairate Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, European Commission.
ESPON Open Seminar 14 June 2012, Aalborg Hy Dao, Pauline Plagnat Cantoreggi, Vanessa Rousseaux University of Geneva INTERCO Indicators of Territorial Cohesion.
Project “Eco-pedological Map for the Alpine Region” APAT- Agency for Environmental Protection and Technical Services Harmonization of Soil Information.
1 Second call for proposals – National Information Day EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Benoît Dalbert, Project Officer, Joint Technical Secretariat.
© BBR Bonn 2003 Metropolitan regions in Europe, IAU Ile de France Europe, Brussels 22. September 2011 Dr. Karl Peter Schön © BBR Bonn 2003 Dr. Karl Peter.
Short overview of the legal framework of protected sites and status of existing ecological networks in Serbia.
. 1 Property regimes in the context of multi-level biodiversity governance Decision-making over the forest management in protected areas in Slovak Republic.
MONDAY, MARCH 21 STATES & SHAPES. MONDAY, MARCH 21 REVIEW TERMS!!
The Initiative Landscape Character Assessment
Targeted Analysis to “ESPON EGTC” Territorial and Urban Potential Connected to Migration and Refugees Flows Let’s practice capitalisation! Rome, 8 June.
New opportunities for cooperation
Palace of the Parliament
Palace of the Parliament
The role of Territorial Cooperation in IWT and integrated planning
Tailor made reports with the latest news from
COST Connect event, Multilateral call in the Danube Region

Strategic Guidelines for EU Territorial Cooperation Programmes Post-2020 Introductory notes. Malta: 26 April Eduardo medeiros 2017.
ESPON Workshop 15 May 2013, Bruxelles Stepping into the sea.
// Alps 2050 ESPON seminar Iași “The role of functional areas for territorial cohesion”
Presentation transcript:

How Regional is Regional Environmental Governance? Comparing Regional Environmental Governance in East Asia and Europe EE-REG Kyoto 24-25th January 2013 Prof Juliet J. Fall

Two questions What is a region, and how is/are they made? What ‘environment’ are we talking about when we talk about regional environmental governance?

WHAT IS A REGION? 1. If we are talking about framing regional environmental governance, then…

Regionalisation?

Ex.: How was the Carpathian Convention built around a natural geographical object? Defining the boundaries to the Carpathians was a contested political process. Ex.: 120 page report to decide boundaries (2006) – National Definitions – UE, UNEP, WWF definitions of ‘mountains’ etc. – Should Serbia / Montenegro be part of it? Where should the Secretariat be located? Who should fund it? Fall, J.J. & Egerer, H., 2004, Constructing the Carpathians: the Carpathian Convention and the search for a spatial ideal, Revue de Géographie Alpine / Journal of Alpine Research, 92 (2),

How do we construct regions? Beyond the state… 1. Natural regions 2. Supranational organisations 3. Decentralized affiliates of global organizations 4. Social configurations 5. Hybrid entities

Research projects  Following regionalization processes in the Carpathians, the Balkans, the Danube Strategy, and local (bottom-up) initiatives, and comparing them to the Alpine experiences.  Analysing the identification of natural entities (mountains, river basins, bioregions, etc.) in projects, international cooperation designs and data processing D. DjordjevicRaphael PieroniJuliet FallSimon GaberellGilles RudazIsabelle MauzJoerg BalsigerB. Debarbieux C. Del Biaggio

Living with a flexible definition “Region” and “regionalization” refer to spatial entities that are constructed at particular levels (i.e. subnational, supranational or transnational) The question is how are such regions framed (“how are they constructed”, and by whom) >>> literature on the politics of scale; on New Regional Geography; and Political ecology

The Carpathians from environmental data to institution building Glo-Rete: example

WHAT ENVIRONMENTS ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? 2. If we are regionalisation environmental governance, then do we all agree that we know…

Cultiver son jardin ? Environmental issues require thinking beyond clearly contained political spaces … but how can we rethink such multi-level and flexible regional environmental governance?

Transgressions

Nature without boundaries?

Diversity of science and culture Example: Transboundary protected area between Germany and France, well-established Interreg projects between two European Union countries: “It is not easy to agree what the natural vegetation is here” (‘Kathrin’, park manager in Pfälzerwald, Germany, interview with J. Fall, 2002) Different scientific opinions about what the climactic forest vegetation is in the Pfälzerwald/ Vosges du nord, Different cultural conceptions of what is worth conserving. Fall, J.J Drawing the Line: Nature, Hybridity and Politics in Transboundary Spaces, Border Regions Series, Ashgate, Abingdon

Diversity of nature(s) Natures ? ‘Nature’ for ecologists ‘Nature’ for Germans ‘Nature’ for French ‘Nature’ for biologists ‘Nature’ for foresters ‘Nature’ for l’UNESCO ‘Nature’ for Ministry Environment ‘Nature’ for local officials ‘Nature’ for local people

WHERE DO WE GO FROM NOW? 3. If we are talking about governance working across scales and regions, then…

For example… GEOSPECS GE Geographic specificities GIRAUT FREDERIC EU-ESPON 12/31/121,259,930 ESPON INTERCO Indicateurs de cohésion territoriale DAO QUOC-HY EU-ESPON 12/31/ ,600 Comparable and reliable indicators and indices that can be used to measure territorial cohesion, complex territorial development, structural issues, territorial challenges and opportunities Past trends, and potential future developments of geographical specificities for territorial policy and regional development.

Thank you for your attention, and greetings from the whole team for the success of the meeting! D. DjordjevicRaphael PieroniJuliet FallSimon GaberellGilles RudazIsabelle MauzJoerg BalsigerB. Debarbieux C. Del Biaggio