Third Party In-Kind Contributions as Match for FHWA Planning Funds Michigan Transportation Planning Association Conference Flint, Michigan July 15, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Regulatory Requirements 2. Written Policies & Procedures 3. Documentation of Expenses 4. Managing Cash 5. Efficient Accounting System 6. Budget Controls.
Advertisements

MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
OMB Regulatory Requirements Regulatory Requirements 2. Written Policies & Procedures 3. Documen- tation of Expenses 4. Managing Cash 5. Efficient.
Fiscal Monitoring: Ensuring Accountability of Your Sub-Grantees
Alaska is required to contribute a dollar-for-dollar match for ACMP funds received from the federal government. Coastal District Match The State does not.
PLENARY SESSION Financial Management and Accountability Accountability and Grants Management: Connecting the Dots U.S. Department of Labor, ETA, Region.
Cost Share Fundamentals. Learning Objectives Todays presentation will focus on: Cost share – The What and Why The different types of cost sharing Sponsor.
CENTRALIZED PERSONNEL PLAN
Documentation, Cash & In-Kind Match. Session Objectives Gather information on proper documentation Allowable, allocable & reasonable costs Gain knowledge.
Page 1 Discretionary Grant Administration. Page 2  Overview of ED financial policies  Managing budget  Avoiding audit problems  Identifying key resources.
Documenting Expenses & In-Kind Contributions. 2 Donations that Aren ’ t Dollars: In-Kind Contributions Session Objectives: Have participants understand:
Volunteer Fire Assistance State of Alaska Division of Forestry November 2011.
More Than You Ever Wanted to Know About Administrative Costs Leveraged Resources Accrued Expenditures & Unliquidated Obligations MoHealthWINs.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
Project Application Process September 15th, 2013 Michelle Sandoz-Dennis Cares Inc.
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
Contractors’ Day, June 2008 to the Framework Partnership Agreement & the Specific Grant Agreement Financial Guidelines for co-ordinators and co-partners.
Marcy Mealy Procurement Specialist CDBG Program
FINANCIAL PLAN AND FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT FOR FTIPS AND FSTIP FINANCIAL PLAN AND REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS 2013 FTIP/FSTIP WORKSHOP January 17, 2012 Wade Hobbs,
Reimbursements for Local Programs Taylor Rossetti Local Government Coordinator Local Programs Team Sara Janes Local Programs Coordinator.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
How to Prepare a Grant Budget Presented by: The Office of Sponsored Programs.
Staff Timesheets 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
July 2014 National School Lunch Program. ADE Health & Nutrition Initiates Administrative Review of schools’ lunch program & follows up with any findings.
Prepare + Prevent + Respond + Recover + Mitigate What is the match? 1.
Head Start Non-Federal Share Training
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
Program and Fiscal Compliance Issues Geri Baucom, Fiscal/Contracts Specialist Johnna Meyer, Policy Manager California Department of Aging.
1 COST SHARING CReATE ver. 04/13 © 2013 Florida State University. All rights reserved Objective: To understand the requirements related to cost sharing.
PROGRAM INCOME / IN-KIND ASSISTANCE / IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION
Match & Leveraged Resources. Non-Federal Share AKA Match.
Solving the Matching Dilemma Session 32 Tuesday, May 24, 2011 National Extension and Research Officers Administrative Conference Anchorage, Alaska.
Completing the State Aid Payment Request (SAPR). Tips Each spring check on the State Aid Finance web page for the current version of the State Aid Pay.
“Establishing Internal Financial Controls” Presented by: Fred Thomas, Bureau Chief of Administration.
Grant Financial Management U.S. Department of Commerce Officer of the Inspector General 1.
Effective Grant Writing For YTP Keith Ozols Vocational Rehabilitation Keith Ozols Vocational Rehabilitation.
2 Donations that Aren’t Dollars: In Kind Contributions Session Objectives Have participants understand: Implication of in-kind contributions as related.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
2008 California AmeriCorps Conference1 Federal and Grants Management for Program and Fiscal Staff.
Charter School 2015 Annual Finance Seminar Grant Management Office of Grants Fiscal September 11, 2015.
COST SHARE Neta Fernandez Director, Grants and Contracts.
Let’s Talk Cost Sharing Sherrelle Vaughn Sponsored Programs Accounting and Reporting July 17, 2012.
June 3, 2007NTIA PSIC Public Meeting1 How to Avoid Audit Problems: Matching Share and Cost Principles National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Financial reporting Linda Wormö, MA Per Dahlström, MA 1st October,2015 Kuopio, Finland.
Introduction to the Tribal Child Support Enforcement Program.
COMMUNITY FOOD COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM Award Information Webinar Thursday, October 22, 2015 Awards Management Division Office of Grants and Financial.
Local Programs “How To” Taylor Rossetti Local Government Coordinator Local Programs Team Sara Janes Local Programs Coordinator.
Indirect Cost Rates 101 CNCS Uniform Guidance § Indirect Costs.
Technical Assistance Office 1 SOCRATES - MINERVA GRANT AGREEMENT 2004 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook.
Arkansas Department of Emergency Management Arkansas’ Homeland Security & Preparedness Agency Sandy Recovery Improvement Act of 2013 Public Assistance.
Kiev, Ukraine October 2009 Cost Share. Objectives  Understand the definition of Cost Share  Identify USAID regulations that apply to Cost Share.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
NRCS Grants and Agreements Overview of Grants, Cooperative and Contribution Agreements Arizona State Office October 30, 2013.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Matching and Cost-Share Requirements Allowable Items and Accounting for Cost Share.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
YouthBuild Learning Exchange January 13-15, 2009 Leveraged Resources and Match.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: November 3, 2015 Presented by: Office of Grants.
“The Matching Game” Session 44 Tuesday, May 22, 2012 National Extension and Research Administrative Officer’s Conference Morgantown, West Virginia.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Office of Sponsored Research and Programs (OSRP)
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Completing the State Aid Payment Request
2016 AmeriCorps Texas All-Grantee Meeting February 25-26, 2016
2014 Project Application Process
Regional healthcare coalition match documentation
Office of Sponsored Research and Programs (OSRP)
Presentation transcript:

Third Party In-Kind Contributions as Match for FHWA Planning Funds Michigan Transportation Planning Association Conference Flint, Michigan July 15, 2011 How to Fund a Transportation Planning Program in Trying Times Connie Morrison, MDOT Rachael Tupica, FHWA

How FHWA Planning (PL) Funds are Awarded Federal Government State/Grantee MPO/Subgrantee Local Agency/Third PartyContractor

Definitions Grantee – the government to which a grant is awarded and which is accountable for the use of the funds provided. (MDOT) Subgrantee – the government or other legal entity to which a subgrant is awarded and which is accountable to the grantee for the use of funds provided. (MPO)

Definitions Third Party – An entity (other than the grantee/subgrantee/Federal government) that is not party to a Federal-aid project agreement, but who may have an interest in the project. ◦ As a grantee, a State cannot be considered a third party ◦ Third Parties:  Local Government (Road Commissions, Municipalities)  Individual/Private Entity  Indian Tribe  Transit Agencies

Federal Aid Match Requirements 23 USC 120 – 80% with sliding scale ◦ Michigan is 81.85% Fed and 18.15% Non-Fed 49 CFR Part 18 – Common Grant Rule ◦ Establishes uniform administrative rules for Federal grants and cooperative agreements to State, local, and Indian tribal governments. ◦ 49 CFR – Matching or Cost Sharing requirements

49 CFR 18.24(a) - A matching requirement may be satisfied by either or both of the following: ◦ (1) Cash donations from non-Federal third parties ◦ (2) The value of third party in-kind contributions  AKA: Contributions, Donations, Non-Monetary Match, Flexible Match A combination of the two can be used meet the non-Federal match requirement In-kind contributions can be applied to a total UPWP basis (recommended) or for specific line items or projects. Federal Aid Match Requirements

Third Party In-Kind Contributions The value of hours of donated services of a third party that is used to cover the non-federal cost of a project or program Supports the Activities and Products in the UWP Allows a wide variety of public and private contributions to be counted toward the non- Federal match of Federal-aid projects Individual/ Private Entity Local Govt. Indian Tribe State Govt. Federal Agency Property & Materials Allowed Not Allowed ServicesAllowed Not Allowed Not Allowed

Eligible In-Kind Contributions Rule of Thumb: If the MPO did the work, would it be an eligible cost? If not, it’s probably not eligible Exercise: What’s eligible? ◦ Cost of paving a road ◦ Cost of traffic count data collection ◦ Cost of local master plan development ◦ Aggressive go-kart driving

Requirements Third party must agree to allow the value of the work to be used as the match Cost of the third party work must not be borne by other Federal funds Third party contributions must not be used as a match for other Federally funded grants/subgrants Third party work must be an eligible and necessary activity that benefits the Federally funded work and must be identified in the UWP

Requirements The third party costs must be allowable under the 2 CFR 225 The third party work must be performed during the period to which the matching requirement applies The third party in-kind contributions must be verifiable from the records Records must show how the value placed on the third party in-kind contributions was derived Prior approval from FHWA must be obtained before the program year

Valuation of In-Kind Contributions 49 CFR 18.24(c) Value the donated services ◦ (1) Volunteer Services – Valued at rates consistent with rates of pay consistent with those ordinarily paid for similar work in the MPO’s organization or in the labor market. A reasonable amount of fringe benefits may be included ◦ (2) Employees of Other Organizations – If donations are for work of an employee in their normal line of work, the services will be valued at the employee’s regular rate of pay exclusive of fringe benefits or overhead costs

Valuation Methodology #1 Services of Employees of Other Organizations: ◦ Historical hourly wage information x estimated number of hours to be contributed (fringe benefits not eligible) For Fiscal Year 2012 City X in Michigan Engineering Department Staff Hourly Rates based on past wage history – prior year EmployeeHourly Rate City Engineer$53.00 Asst. City Engineer$44.00 Engineering Staff 1$33.00 Engineering Staff 2$32.00 Summer Tech$9.50

Valuation Methodology #1 Hours estimated based on comparable activities in prior years Total Estimated Value Planning Activities-Work Item – Number* City Eng Asst City Eng Staff 1 Eng Staff 2 Summer Tech TSM Technical Assistance – Nonmotorized $3,388 TSM Technical Assistance – Intermodal Safety Conscious Planning – $8,548 Data Monitoring and Reporting $7,295 Transp. Improvement Program (TIP) $18,486 Total Hours Cost per Person$14,204$7,568$4,554$8,256$3,135$37,717 Computation Table

Valuation Methodology #2 For Volunteer Services: ◦ Value of volunteer services when performing comparable work in professional capacity, OR ◦ Statewide wage rate, such as those provided by Bureau of Labor statistics For Fiscal Year _____________ City X in Michigan Volunteer Time, Work Item: TIP Development Volunteer Name ProfessionVolunteer ServicesVolunteer Rate Trip WhireGraphic DesignerBrochure for public participation $200 Herb IvoreEditorProofread TIP$14 Paige TurnerLibrarianCopy TIP$12.50 Use valuation table from Methodology #1

Documenting In-Kind Contributions Valuing In-Kind Contributions ◦ Documentation of the methodology for valuing estimated in-kind contributions  Required for the project authorization phase ◦ Documentation of actual in-kind contributions  Required for the progress billing and audit phases Activities and Products

MPO Process for In-Kind Contributions Step 1: Preliminary Discussions and Request Read MDOT Guidance Discussion with your committees Ensure MPO and third parties can meet requirements Notify MDOT of your intent to use in-kind; your Pre-UWP meeting is a good time for this Get MPO approval to use in-kind contributions Have each third party fill out and sign “Statements and Assurances” Officially request prior-approval

MPO Process for In-Kind Contributions Step 2: Include in UWP Discuss use of flexible match in introductory section of UWP or within discussion of finances Indicate (in work item detail) how local agency contributions will produce specified products within relevant program categories Include flexible match worksheets in UWP (pages 11 and 12 of MDOT guidance)

MPO Process for In-Kind Contributions Step 2, continued… Show flexible match in summary budgets or tables of UWP Document MPO Committee approval Include copies of “Statement of Notification and Assurances” for each third party Provide copy of FHWA letter approving use of third party in-kind contributions

MPO Process for In-Kind Contributions Step 3: Check federal regulations! Ensure use of flexible match meets requirements of federal regulations

MPO Process for In-Kind Contributions Step 4: Document Methodology Compile documentation as the flexible match is contributed ◦ Value of donated time ◦ Time sheets ◦ Service descriptions, showing relevance to program activity Review eligibility ◦ Ask: if MPO did this work, would it be reimbursable?

MPO Process for In-Kind Contributions Step 5: Identify and document flexible match in progress billings Value of flexible match donated throughout the billing period is part of total cost Provide copies of documentation to MDOT Program Manager In lieu of providing copies, a letter of agreement may be signed by both the MPO and MDOT staff allowing in-person inspection of documentation Track value of flexible match donated throughout the program period, in order to compare to estimates at beginning of program

MPO Process for In-Kind Contributions Step 5 continued… Invoices submitted by the MPO to MDOT should show total expenditures by MPO and the third party. MDOT would then reimburse the MPO for the Federal share, not to exceed the MPO’s portion of the expenditures. If the total amount of third party expenditures at the end of the program period is not sufficient to match the total expenditure of Federal funds by the MPO, the MPO will need to make up any shortfall with its own funds.

MPO Process for In-Kind Contributions Step 6: Identify and document flexible match in Final Acceptance Report Reconcile value of actual donated services to beginning estimated value ◦ If actual value less than amount needed to cover end-of- year local share, difference must be made up in cash. ◦ If actual value is greater than the amount applied, excess cannot be reimbursed in cash or used as flexible match on another grant.

Thank you!