A SSESSMENT A CTIVITIES WITH P URPOSIVE P ARTNERSHIPS : S OLIDIFYING THE M AP FOR C ONTINUOUS I MPROVEMENT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Advertisements

The HR Paradigm Shift Discover Stakeholder Value for the Human Resources Function.
The Professional Teacher Learner-Centered Education EveryTeacher Teacher Development Planning Team June 14, 2004.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Conceptual Framework What It Is and How It Works Kathe Rasch, Maryville University Donna M. Gollnick, NCATE October 2005.
DPS Educator Effectiveness: Stakeholder Engagement Lessons Learned February 6, 2013.
Ohhhhh, Christopher Robin, I am not the right one for this job... The House on Pooh Corner, A.A. Milne.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
Session Materials  Wiki
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Embedded Assessment M.Ed. In Curriculum & Instruction with a Specialization in Language & Literacy.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.
Measurement: Regional PDS Network Assessment System 1 Carol Wood, PhD, Star Weaver, PhD & Stacie Siers, MEd.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Classroom Management Self-efficacy in a Teacher Preparation Program Presentation at NERA, October 2013 University of Connecticut - Neag School of Education.
SOCIAL SCIENCES STANDARDS REVIEW AND REVISION February 2009-June 2011 PRESENTATION TO THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION.
Transforming Teacher Education The Debate on Teacher Education and Teacher Quality “There is little evidence that education school course work leads.
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
ASSESSING CANDIDATE PERFORMANCE William Sharpton Richard Hall University of New Orleans Project Directors’ Meeting July 2007.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Marion H. Martinez, Ed.D. Associate Commissioner for Teaching, Learning and Instructional Leadership August 25,
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
Plenary Session 7: Technologies and Principles of Learning in Support of Teaching Delwyn L. Harnisch University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Teacher competencies. Professional competence with ICT Draw on appropriate ICT applications to enhance personal and professional effectiveness  Using.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Expectations What do you expect from: C&I Faculty? Yourself and other students? The Bachelor of Science in Education Program?
Darla Stynen. The subject matter I am teaching in my classroom, as prescribed by the school district.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Leading Beyond the Institution: Graduates as Learners, Leaders, and Scholarly Practitioners Drs. Ron Zambo, Debby Zambo, Ray R. Buss.
Developing Educational Leaders Who Create Tomorrow’s Opportunities: Issues for Partner Instructors in the College of Education April 10, 2008.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Moving from Partnerships to Professional Development Schools (PDS) Building Blocks For Success Leslie K. Day PDS Director SUNY Buffalo State.
Valley City State University School of Education and Graduate Studies Aggregate Assessment Data Please click on the action boxes to navigate your way through.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
North Carolina Standard for School Executives Standard 1 By: Barbara Bumgardner Aleen Besmer James Westbrook Kristy Christenberry.
1| | The International Classroom; safe and open? Franka van den Hende Project manager International Classroom Policy advisor in internationalization.
+ Priory Curriculum & Instruction Faculty Inservice, August 2014.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Outcome: Participants will be able to identify and apply teacher behaviors that support a learner-centered environment. Indicator: Participants will explore.
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
Measuring Course Quality: Development of a Micro-Analysis Tool
NJCU College of Education
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

A SSESSMENT A CTIVITIES WITH P URPOSIVE P ARTNERSHIPS : S OLIDIFYING THE M AP FOR C ONTINUOUS I MPROVEMENT

University of Connecticut - Neag School of Education Marijke Kehrhahn, Associate Dean Robin Hands, Director of Partnerships Mary E. Yakimowski, Director of Assessments

3 “Partnerships are commonly defined as voluntary and collaborative relationships between various parties in which all participants agree to work together to achieve a common purpose or undertake a specific task and to share risks, responsibilities, resources, competencies and benefits.” Towards Global Partnership Report of the Secretary General United Nations, 2011

4 Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships “require a high level of flexibility, spontaneity and innovation, [and] … a clear “strategic framework” (Malena, 2004) ….a shared goal, empathy, patience, and quick recovery from communication breakdowns! stakeholders/

5 Multiple Stakeholders in Assessment Students Alumni University faculty Clinic teachers Cooperating teachers Student teaching supervisors Partner school administrators University administrators Employers Accreditation team State department of education team

6 Research-Based Clear vision of what good teaching is (standards -> outcomes) Rigorous core curriculum Problem-solving methods (case studies, portfolios) 30+ weeks of carefully planned clinical experiences Coherence/connection between coursework/clinic Linda Darling-Hammond CADREI Meeting 10/2010

7 Synergy Assessment --- Evidenced-based Decisions

An Assessment Culture Characteristics  Have a key contact who is accessible  Communication is vital  Opportunities provided to discuss assessment  Publications that provide both a local/global context for assessment  Identifying a group who may serve as assessment exemplars  Listen to faculty to find out how they currently assess students  Try to be somewhat pro-active, yet flexible, with assessment planning and initiatives

9 S YNERGY Strategic & Stakeholders Involvement Neag Assessment Committee Subcommittees – e.g., Teacher Education Subcommittee on Assessment Faculty from School and Other Schools Faculty from Other Disciplines Students / Alumni State Department Practitioners

10 S YNERGY Y Your School’s Assessment Plan & Assessment Plan Per Field The 1 st edition: pages to the assessment plan 95 + % on text/data on Teacher Education Subsequent editions, we strived for: More representative More succinctly articulate plan Take out data Under 30 pages More alignment with accreditation

11 S YNERGY N New knowledge Stakeholder “participatory involvement” Information/Communication  One-on-one Meetings  Program Meetings  Departmental Meetings  Schoolwide Meetings  Colloquia  Conferences/Forums  Committee Meeting  s, Web, etc.

12 E Electronicize) S YNERGY

Teacher Education Use of Online Application Common Entrance Survey Common Exit Survey Alumni Survey Employer Survey Clinic Evaluations Clinic Feedback Survey PDS Feedback Survey Teacher Interest Survey

S YNERGY Research Research Common Core Classroom management ELL Students with disabilities Working with parents Graduate placement/pupil performance

S YNERGY Good-natured Good-natured I am learning the wisdom of being a tortoise ….” “Be good-natured and patient --- Try to enact small, incremental steps while keeping your focus on long term goals. Move too fast, too soon and you may overwhelm your participants, support systems, stakeholders, etc. … I am learning the wisdom of being a tortoise ….” Arcuria, 2008

S YNERGY Be Strategic Embrace Stakeholders Your A-Plan Counts Electronicize Research Good nature Why?

17 Synergy into Clinic Partnerships

18 Integrated Bachelor’s/Master’s Program (IB/M) Teacher Education Built on Sound Principles Strong Liberal Arts Education Developing Reflective Practitioners Clinic-based Learning Clinic-based Learning Subject and Grade-specific Pedagogy Common core of Pedagogical Knowledge Quality Teacher Preparation

19 Using Data to Inform Clinical Practices Input from partnership schools, teacher candidates and faculty members Exit Surveys Formal and Informal Conversations – Schools as Clinics Committee and Lead Teacher/Site Coordinators Ad Hoc Committees to Revise Evaluation Tools

20 Professional Practices Observed DataObserver’s CommentsCandidate’s Reflection Observer will place name and date in these boxes. 1. Uses engaging ways to begin a new unit of study or lesson. 2. Builds on students’ prior knowledge and experience. 3. Uses instructional technology appropriately. Professional Practices Observation Tool

A SSESSMENT A CTIVITIES WITH P URPOSIVE P ARTNERSHIPS : S OLIDIFYING THE M AP FOR C ONTINUOUS I MPROVEMENT