Measuring of the time consumption of the WLAN’s security functions Jaroslav Kadlec, Radek Kuchta, Radimír Vrba Dept. of Microelectronics.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

SECURING WIRELESS LANS PRESENTED BY VICTOR C. NWALA CS555 Department of Computer Science Old Dominion University.

Advertisements

Security in Wireless Networks Juan Camilo Quintero D

IEEE i IT443 Broadband Communications Philip MacCabe October 5, 2005

CSE  Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) ◦ first security protocol defined in  Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) ◦ defined by Wi-Fi Alliance 

WEP 1 WEP WEP 2 WEP  WEP == Wired Equivalent Privacy  The stated goal of WEP is to make wireless LAN as secure as a wired LAN  According to Tanenbaum:

Wireless Security Ryan Hayles Jonathan Hawes. Introduction  WEP –Protocol Basics –Vulnerability –Attacks –Video  WPA –Overview –Key Hierarchy –Encryption/Decryption.

16-1 Last time Internet Application Security and Privacy Authentication Security controls using cryptography Link-layer security: WEP.

Final Presentation Presented By: Gal Leibovich Liran Manor Supervisor: Hai Vortman.

WiFi Security. What is WiFi ? Originally, Wi-Fi was a marketing term. The Wi-Fi certified logo means that the product has passed interoperability tests.

Wireless LAN Security Jerry Usery CS 522 December 6 th, 2006.

1 Enhancing Wireless Security with WPA CS-265 Project Section: 2 (11:30 – 12:20) Shefali Jariwala Student ID

MITP | Master of Information Technology Program Securing Wireless LAN using Cisco-based technology Campus Crew Study Group Paul Matijevic Ed McCulloch.

Intercepting Mobiles Communications: The Insecurity of Danny Bickson ACNS Course, IDC Spring 2007.

W i reless LAN Security Presented by: Pallavi Priyadarshini Student ID

Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP)

Vulnerability In Wi-Fi By Angus U CS 265 Section 2 Instructor: Mark Stamp.

Department of Computer Science Southern Illinois University Carbondale Wireless and Network Security Lecture 9: IEEE

Wireless Security Presentation by Paul Petty and Sooner Brooks-Heath.

15 November Wireless Security Issues Cheyenne Hollow Horn SFS Presentation 2004.

WIRELESS NETWORK SECURITY. Hackers Ad-hoc networks War Driving Man-in-the-Middle Caffe Latte attack.

Improving Security. Networking Terms Node –Any device on a network Protocol –Communication standards Host –A node on a network Workstation 1.A PC 2.A.

Wireless Security Issues Implementing a wireless LAN without compromising your network Marshall Breeding Director for Innovative Technologies and Research.

WLAN security S Wireless Personal, Local, Metropolitan, and Wide Area Networks1 Contents WEP (Wired Equivalent Privacy) No key management Authentication.

Wireless Security Issues David E. Hudak, Ph.D. Senior Software Architect Karlnet, Inc.

WLAN What is WLAN? Physical vs. Wireless LAN

A Methodology for Evaluating Wireless Network Security Protocols David Rager Kandaraj Piamrat.

Mobile and Wireless Communication Security By Jason Gratto.

Wireless security & privacy Authors: M. Borsc and H. Shinde Source: IEEE International Conference on Personal Wireless Communications 2005 (ICPWC 2005),

ECE 424 Embedded Systems Design Networking Connectivity Chapter 12 Ning Weng.

Wireless Networking.

A History of WEP The Ups and Downs of Wireless Security.

Wireless Security Beyond WEP. Wireless Security Privacy Authorization (access control) Data Integrity (checksum, anti-tampering)

COEN 350 Mobile Security. Wireless Security Wireless offers additional challenges: Physical media can easily be sniffed. War Driving Legal? U.S. federal.

Wireless Networking Concepts By: Forrest Finkler Computer Science 484 Networking Concepts.

1 C-DAC/Kolkata C-DAC All Rights Reserved Computer Security.

Done By : Ahmad Al-Asmar Wireless LAN Security Risks and Solutions.

IEEE i WPA2. IEEE i (WPA2) IEEE i, is an amendment to the standard specifying security mechanisms for wireless networks. The.

WEP Protocol Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities

WEP AND WPA by Kunmun Garabadu. Wireless LAN Hot Spot : Hotspot is a readily available wireless connection.  Access Point : It serves as the communication.

WEP, WPA, and EAP Drew Kalina. Overview  Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP)  Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA)  Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP)

WLANs & Security Standards (802.11) b - up to 11 Mbps, several hundred feet g - up to 54 Mbps, backward compatible, same frequency a.

IEEE i Aniss Zakaria Survey Fall 2004 Friday, Dec 3, 2004

National Institute of Science & Technology WIRELESS LAN SECURITY Swagat Sourav [1] Wireless LAN Security Presented By SWAGAT SOURAV Roll # EE

Encryption Protocols used in Wireless Networks Derrick Grooms.

Wireless Security: The need for WPA and i By Abuzar Amini CS 265 Section 1.

Wireless Security Rick Anderson Pat Demko. Wireless Medium Open medium Broadcast in every direction Anyone within range can listen in No Privacy Weak.

 Houses  In businesses  Local institutions  WEP – Wired Equivalent Privacy -Use of Initialization Vectors (IVs) -RC4 Traffic Key (creates keystreams)

Wireless security Wi–Fi (802.11) Security

Wireless Security John Himmelein Erick Andrew Christian Adam Varun Bapna.

Authentication has three means of authentication Verifies user has permission to access network 1.Open authentication : Each WLAN client can be.

802.11b Security CSEP 590 TU Osama Mazahir. Introduction Packets are sent out into the air for anyone to receive Eavesdropping is a much larger concern.

IEEE Security Specifically WEP, WPA, and WPA2 Brett Boge, Presenter CS 450/650 University of Nevada, Reno.

WLAN Security1 Security of WLAN Máté Szalay

Wireless Hacking Lesson 13. Reminder As a reminder, remember that the tools and techniques that you learn this semester are only to be used on systems.

By Billy Ripple.  Security requirements  Authentication  Integrity  Privacy  Security concerns  Security techniques  WEP  WPA/WPA2  Conclusion.

EECS  Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) ◦ first security protocol defined in  Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) ◦ defined by Wi-Fi Alliance 

Tightening Wireless Networks By Andrew Cohen. Question Why more and more businesses aren’t converting their wired networks into wireless networks?

Understand Wireless Security LESSON Security Fundamentals.

Module 48 (Wireless Hacking)

OSA vs WEP WPA and WPA II Tools for hacking

Wireless Protocols WEP, WPA & WPA2.

We will talking about : What is WAP ? What is WAP2 ? Is there secure ?

WEP & WPA Mandy Kershishnik.

Wireless LAN Security 4.3 Wireless LAN Security.

ANALYSIS OF WIRED EQUIVALENT PRIVACY

IEEE i Dohwan Kim.

Wireless Network Security

Security Of Wireless Sensor Networks

Security of Wireless Sensor Networks

Presentation transcript:

Measuring of the time consumption of the WLAN’s security functions Jaroslav Kadlec, Radek Kuchta, Radimír Vrba Dept. of Microelectronics Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication Technologies, Brno, Czech Republic

Content Introduction Measuring scenario Results ▫WEP 64 ▫WEP 128 ▫WPA ▫WPA2 Conclusion

Introduction Wireless digital communication starts to increase its prominence for the industrial automation domain. Still more and more producers of automation systems try to offer complete wireless solution. Problems with: ▫harsh noise environment, ▫undefined network parameters, ▫real-time applications. To design remote mechanisms (telemonitoring, teleservice etc.) using wireless communication, an increasing number of communication technologies is available, ▫limited by strict quality of service and performance requirements.

Introduction Automation application ▫Hard real-time ▫Soft real-time ▫Non real-time  Standard wireless communication protocols (WiFi, ZigBee etc.) ▫Communication speed X Security level ▫Manufacturers don’t provide information about time parameters

Measuring scenario Measurement scenario is mixture of: ▫software based packet sniffers, ▫special network development boards. For controlling these boards a special software was written. Lowest network function handling allows us to have precise control of all packets in the network. This packet size 146 bytes (100 bytes payload and 46 bytes packet header) was determined as an optimal value by several tests. ASUS WL-566gM

Measuring scenario

Results WEP 64-bit Stream cipher RC4 ▫64-bit key  IV 24-bit  Key 40-bit CRC-32 checksum Average latency = 142 ms. Time = 12,8 ms

Results WEP 128-bit Stream cipher RC4 ▫128-bit key  IV 24-bit  Key 104-bit CRC-32 checksum Average latency = 146 ms. Time = 16,8 ms

Results WPA RC4 ▫128-bit key  IV 48-bit  Key 80-bit TKIP – Wired Equivalent Privacy Michael checksum algorithm ▫Using sender and receiver MAC addresses Average latency = 152 ms Time = 22,3 ms

Results WPA2 AES block cipher ▫128-bit key CCMP (Counter mode with Cipher Block Chining Message Authentication Protocol) Average latency = 177 ms Time = 47,9 ms

Results Security function Mean [ms] Deviation [ms] Time consumption [ms] WEP64142, ,94812,799 WEP128146, ,57816,836 WPA152, ,71022,396 WPA2177, ,76147,983 No encryption129, ,390-

Results

Conclusions A sophisticated tool with high precision resolution and absolute control of network traffic was created. Our measured results are unique due to their precision. ▫Manufacturers of wireless network devices do not provide this kind of measurements which are very important for real time automation applications. We can simply decide for which level of real time application measured device can be applied. Based on those findings it is possible to develop wireless automation system with well defined parameters of wireless communication link.