Virgo Upgrades Toward Virgo+ Michele Punturo Virgo Collaboration INFN Perugia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of the Virgo Commissioning G.Losurdo – INFN Firenze/Urbino for the Virgo Collaboration.
Advertisements

September 21, 2005Virgo Status – ESF Workshop1 Status of Virgo B. Mours.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
T1 task- update Mike Plissi. 2 Collaboration Groups actively involved INFN-VIRGO MAT IGR-Glasgow Groups that have expressed interest INFN-AURIGA CNRS-LKB.
VIRGO: WHERE WE COME FROM WHERE WE ARE GOING GIOVANNI LOSURDO - INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Project Leader for the Virgo Collaboration (and the LIGO Scientific.
1 Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay.
Virgo commissioning update - VSR1 first month summary E. Tournefier WG1 meeting, Cascina June 20 th,2007.
F. Frasconi I.N.F.N. Pisa for the Virgo Collaboration TAUP2007 Sendai, September 11-15, 2007 VIRGO EXPERIMENT VIRGO: a large interferometer for Gravitational.
1 Virgo Commissioning progress and plans ILIAS, Jan 23 rd 2007 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.
VSR1 summary - post VSR1 Commissioning plans E. Tournefier (LAPP-CNRS) LSC-Virgo meeting Oct 22 nd, 2007.
rd ILIAS-GW annual general meeting 1 VIRGO Commissioning progress J. Marque (EGO)
COMMISSIONING PROGRESS G.LOSURDO – INFN Firenze for the Virgo Collaboration.
September 8, 2015 THE MONOLITHIC SUSPENSION STATUS FOR THE VIRGO INTERFEROMETER THE MONOLITHIC SUSPENSION STATUS FOR THE VIRGO INTERFEROMETER Helios Vocca.
1 Virgo commissioning since the end of VSR1 E. Tournefier for the commissioning team ILIAS WG1, Cascina March 5 th,2008.
Virgo Control Noise Reduction
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
G D Initial LIGO improvements & Advanced LIGO P Fritschel PAC Meeting LLO, 18 May 2005.
September 22, 2005 ESF Workshop-Perugia 1 Virgo Control Electronic upgrade Annecy/Pisa/EGO B.Mours.
1 Ist Virgo+ review Cascina H. Heitmann Alignment: Virgo+ changes.
Status of Virgo Gabriele Vajente INFN Pisa and Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa On behalf of the Virgo Collaboration 11 th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis.
Plans for Advanced Virgo
Intermediate review - ERC – February 9, 2009 – L. Pinard 1 Mirrors Sub-System Overview  Introduction  Scope of the subsystem, main tasks  Job done since.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
March 17, 2008LSC-Virgo meeting1/12 Virgo Status B. Mours.
Design study for ET 3rd generation Gravitational Wave Interferometer Work Package 2 Suspension, Thermal noise and Cryogenics Piero Rapagnani
Virgo Commissioning update Gabriele Vajente for the Virgo Collaboration LSC/VIRGO Meeting – MIT 2007, July LIGO-G Z.
VIRGO Control System Upgrade: Multi-DSP Board Alberto Gennai INFN Pisa LIGO-G Z.
Advanced VIRGO WG1: Status VIRGO, Cascina Andreas Freise University of Birmingham.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
LISA October 3, 2005 LISA Laser Interferometer Space Antenna Gravitational Physics Program Technical implications Jo van.
Status of Virgo A. Viceré INFN-Firenze – Università di Urbino.
1 Virgo commissioning: Next steps December 12 st 2005 Hannover, ILIAS-GWA WG1 Matteo Barsuglia, LAL/CNRS.
1 Virgo Commissioning progress ILIAS, Nov 13 th 2006 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
LSC-VIRGO joint meeting - Pisa1 Input mirrors thermal lensing effect Frequency modulation PRCL length in Virgo Some results from a Finesse simulation.
January 12, 2006ILIAS-WG3 Frascati1 Virgo+ & Advanced Virgo B. Mours With material from G. Losurdo, M. Punturo, A. Viceré and others.
G D Commissioning Progress and Plans Hanford Observatory LSC Meeting, March 21, 2005 Stefan Ballmer.
Pre-stabilized laser (PSL) for AdV Scope of the system Main tasks Requirements Reference solution and status of the design Plans towards completion Technical.
Paolo La Penna Injection optics for Advanced VirgoLSC/VIRGO joint meeting, Cascina, 25/05/ Advanced VIRGO Input optics LIGO-G Z.
1 The Virgo noise budget Romain Gouaty For the Virgo collaboration GWADW 2006, Isola d’Elba.
Nov 3, 2008 Detection System for AdV 1/8 Detection (DET) Subsystem for AdV  Main tasks and requirements for the subsystem  DC readout  Design for: the.
LIGO-G Z The Status of VIRGO E. Tournefier for the Virgo Collaboration GWADW 2004, Aspen From the CITF to VIRGO Commissioning of the Fabry-Perot.
1 LESSONS FROM VIRGO+ May 17th 2010 E. Calloni for the Virgo collaboration.
Virgo+ Commissioning Status. Main upgrades and activities Laser system: from 10  25 watt output power at the IMC TCS: ring + Central Heating Electronics:
The status of VIRGO Edwige Tournefier (LAPP-Annecy ) for the VIRGO Collaboration HEP2005, 21st- 27th July 2005 The VIRGO experiment and detection of.
1 Virgo Commissioning Status WG1 meeting Potsdam, 21 st July 2006.
The VIRGO Suspensions Control System Alberto Gennai The VIRGO Collaboration.
“Detector activities” after the IB upgrade Michele Punturo.
WG3 Report Michele Punturo Harald Lück. WG3 composition Co-Chairmen M.Punturo INFN Perugia, Italy H.Lück MPI für Gravitationsphysik, AEI, Hannover, Germany.
Paolo La Penna ILIAS N5-WP1 meeting Commissioning Progress Hannover, July 2004 VIRGO commissioning progress report.
STREGA & ET - 4th ILIAS-GW general meeting 1 STREGA legacy for ET Michele Punturo INFN Perugia.
Status of Virgo GWDAW12 Status of Virgo GWDAW Dec Leone B. Bosi INFN and University of Perugia (Italy) On behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
Status of Virgo a short update Michele Punturo. A bit of History July 29 – August –C6 run Duty cycle: Locking 89%, Science Mode 86% September.
Cascina, Nov. 4 th, 2008 AdV review 1 AdV Injection system E. Genin European Gravitational Observatory.
Caltech, February 12th1 Virgo central interferometer: commissioning and engineering runs Matteo Barsuglia Laboratoire de l’Accelerateur Lineaire, Orsay.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
Advanced Towards Advanced Virgo Giovanni Losurdo – INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Coordinator on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
Advanced Advanced Virgo BASELINE DESIGN advanced Giovanni Losurdo – INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Coordinator for the Virgo Collaboration.
GEO Status and Prospects Harald Lück ILIAS / ETmeeting Cascina November 2008.
MG 11 - Berlin Virgo status Marie-Anne Bizouard (LAL-Orsay) on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
Edwige Tournefier for the Virgo Collaboration The status of Virgo.
THE NEXT GENERATIONS OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTORS (*) Giovanni Losurdo INFN Firenze – Virgo collaboration (*) GROUND BASED, INTERFEROMETRIC.
Evolution of the Virgo detector: The Virgo+ plans
Status of Virgo GWDAW Dec 13-16
Signal recycling R&D at LAL: Influence in Virgo
Advanced VIRGO Experiment
Virgo Update B. Mours LIGO-G Z August 15, 2006 LSC meeting.
The views of Virgo collaboration groups on upgraded/advanced Virgo
Status at the Prague meeting
Talk prepared by Stefan Hild AEI Hannover for the GEO-team
Presentation transcript:

Virgo Upgrades Toward Virgo+ Michele Punturo Virgo Collaboration INFN Perugia

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting2 Upgrades Motivations The motivations of these upgrades (including the Virgo+ packages) are (obviously) science-driven –To understand it let start from the current sensitivity and budget noise Longitudinal and actuation control noises Shot noise dominated Un-modeled To reduce these noise sources we need: –Commissioning –Upgrades

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting3 Overall strategy Virgo+ needs a series of preliminary upgrades interlaced with the commissioning activity –Coil drivers, thermal compensation, fast centering quadrant PHD, … The Virgo+ upgrade strategy must respect the following –Aim: To maximize the detection probability –To maximize the coincidences with eLIGO –Constrains: Need of an intense and “enough long” commissioning after VSR1 to understand the low-medium frequency noise of Virgo Have an enough long (~1 year) post-upgrade commissioning period Be back in science mode in (middle) 2009 Have a Virgo+ sensitivity comparable with eLIGO in a wide frequency range

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting4 Plan Construction 06/09 Science mode in parallel with eLIGO VSR1 10/07 ~1 year of Commissioning after the last “major” upgrade 07/08 ~6-7 Months of commissioning and upgrading to understand our noise budget, recover as much as possible the nominal sensitivity and prepare the future upgrades 05/08 Major upgrades time window

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting5 Post VSR1-Commissioning (2007) Aim –Understanding of the machine and reduction of the noises that could make inefficacy the foreseen Virgo+ upgrades Foreseen activities: –See Bas talk

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting6 Virgo+ upgrades Let start again from the noise budget: Causes of the discrepancy: –Lower power recycling factor –OMC matching –Lower injected power Laser max power 21W Laser power at the LB exit: 17W Currently injected power 12.5W Power after the IMC: 8W Power loss in the IMC Thermal effects

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting7 New IMC payload The motivations requiring the replacement of the current IMC end mirror payload are antecedent to the VIRGO+ project: –Certified bad substrate quality is the main culprit of the power loss and scattering in the ISYS The contribution of the other mirrors is unknown –The very light substrate causes many troubles (solved) in the control due to the deviation by a simple pendulum transfer function and to the spring effect of the radiation pressure New payload under construction New mirror polished The replacement of the IMC end mirror will occur in parallel to the installation of the laser amplifier

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting8 Thermal lensing and sidebands The main limitation to the injected power increase is the thermal lensing in the input mirrors Correlation between sidebands ratio and injected power

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting9 Thermal lensing mitigation The first action to reduce the thermal lensing is the reduction of the absorbed power: –Input mirror cleaning Under evaluation with the experts –Some technical difficulty –Temporary and uncertain solution –“Final solution”: TCS (Thermal compensation system) Solution already adopted in LIGO –Similar principle, but original implementation because of different geometry –Implementation expected in Jan2008 Error signal generation –Use a holed mirror and a couple of PHD –Implementation expected before end 2007 (Nov)

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting10 Status TCS Preliminary Design presented at the June detector meeting Updated design: next detector meeting (12/9) Final design: 16/10 at the Virgo+ 2 nd review meeting Installation: Jan 2008

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting11 Thermal related upgrades A set of upgrades are foreseen to mitigate the other thermal effects we are suffering in Virgo The installation of these upgrades, before the increase of the laser power, will simplify our transition to the Virgo+ design –Remote tuning of the injected laser power A remotely controlled /2 waveplate will be installed in the laser bench to adjust the injected power according to the detector needs –Remote adjustment of the suspended Faraday Isolator Optical isolation of the suspended FI is lower (10 3 instead 10 4 ) because of some thermal effect (Verdet’s constant) –A solution as been designed and it will work also in Virgo+ FI thermal lensing in Virgo+ is expect to be corrigible through the telescope adjustment (but further solution under design)

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting12 Virgo+ upgrade: Laser Amplifier The new laser amplifier is the core upgrade that will permit the reduction of the shot noise at high frequency below the nominal sensitivity It is a “standard” device (produced by LZH/GEO and adopted also in eLIGO) 4 pump diodes fiber 4 Nd-YVO4 modules "Passive" cooling (H 2 0) 20W seed 50W out Already available and under test in the Nice labs –Installation in May-June 08 For nominal amplifier pumping Seed = 1W, amplifier output = 24W, 90 % in TEM00 Seed = 10W, amplifier output =50W, 93% in TEM00 Seed = 20W, amplifier output =65W, 94% in TEM00 Reduced amplifier pumping (72% from nominal) Seed = 20W, amplifier output = 50W, 73% in TEM00

13 Cascade effect on the ITF Obviously the laser power increase will affects all the ITF Reshuffling of the LB: Pre-MC, new FIs, remote tuning of the injected power Reshuffling of the EIB Remote tuning of the FI, Thermal lensing issues, dihedron modification? Heavier mirror and payload, better quality mirror Cleaner mirror & thermal compensation, New mirrors Red: new activities Black: already needed in Virgo

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting14 Virgo+ amplifier related activity: new mirrors In the Hz range the high power gain is completely spoiled by the thermal noise expected for the Virgo Herasil end mirrors We need to change the mirrors if we want to profit of the larger injected power, but the replacement of the mirrors is suggested also by the cited contamination issues and by some effect (etalon effect), measured during the VSR1

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting15 New mirrors and coatings New Suprasil end and input mirrors –Under polishing at the GO Delivery expected for end 2007-beginning 2008 –According to the Penn’s noise model the loss angle expected for this material is of about 10 -9, opening a new window in the intermediate frequency regime To exploit this window an higher finesse is needed: F=150 instead of the current 50. New coatings alchemy (lower mechanical dissipation) New cleanliness procedures –Special protecting film provided by the coaters (Lyon) NSNS: 69.8 (27.9) BHBH: 355 (142)

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting16 New payloads The need to have new payloads is driven by many motivations –Since we have to replace the payloads, could we profit to foresee the installation a new kind of suspension? Reduction of the shot noise High power laser and higher finesse Reduction of the mirror thermal noise New mirrors Right magnet orientation in the input mirrors. Etalon effects New payloads Eddy currents Thermal noise solution New reference masses

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting17 Virgo+ upgrade: monolithic suspensions Monolithic fused silica suspension development is an heavy activity in Virgo (and in LIGO) –Joint effort of the Perugia, Roma 1, Firenze labs with the EGO and LMA support –Trial suspension almost successful, but still many delicates points: Robustness of the suspension Controllability –Angular-to-translation coupling Cleanliness Recoverability after a failure –Activity progressing thanks the full immersion of the involved groups, but there are strong indications that the needed time is incompatible with the overall Virgo+ planning

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting18 Virgo+ upgrade: monolithic suspensions Decisional flux diagram Design and Engineering development Design of a (dielectric) RM compatible both with the monolithic and the traditional suspension (last detector meeting) Full monolithic package passes the review filter? no Install a Traditional suspension with a new RM Continue the design and engineering development in a Virgo++ or advVirgo framework yes Install a full monolithic suspension Restart the design and engineering development in an advVirgo framework 06/07 10/07 05/08 06/08 Not only readiness, but also “scientific contribution”

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting19 Sensitivity with Monolithic suspensions Thermal noise reduction due the monolithic FS suspension We should take in account the Newtonian noise limit But, mainly, we should take in account our experience with the detector: the actuation noise In the low frequency the current sensitivity is locally limited by the actuation noise mainly because of non linear effects this is known and a progressive reduction of the actuation noise has been performed in the past through: –Insertion of a resistor in series to the coil –Introduction of an emphasis filter These patches are converging to the production of a new model of coil drivers

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting20 Contribution to the sensitivity The role of the actuation noise is and will be important in the Virgo+ expected sensitivity Since the determination of the expected noise level of the new coil drivers is still under investigation, we report a conservative evaluation (DAC/3 instead of DAC/8) NSNS: 122 (49) Mpc BHBH: 626 (250)MPc

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting21 Control & DAQ electronics New DSP development in Pisa (important for the low frequency part), and a series of upgrades of the DAQ electronics has been foreseen and supported by EGO Design activity progressing in Annecy: –Development of new timing system (obsolescence of the hardware) GPS receiver/signal generator (tested, patched and ready; more boxes to be purchased) TDBox (Timing distribution box): design ready for production MUX/DeMUX: router for the optical links between TOLM and ADC boards. Prototype available. Production and tests on September-October 2007 TOLM: A prototype available and used for ADC tests, TOLM /DSP interface tested. Two versions expected to be produced: PMC and PCI64 formats. Production expected for the March –ADC: ADC selection done (AD kHz); 16 differentials channels with analog anti-alias filter at 400KHz. Digital anti-alias filters in embedded DSPs( 4 channels per DSP ) Several production steps foreseen, but final production expected to end in March-April –Tests of regular PCs: These tests have shown that the main Virgo control loop (photodiode readout and global control) could run up to 40 KHz on a commercial PC running a real time version of Linux. This will provide more computing resource for various control loops (global and local). Installation: –Foreseen in May 2008

Planning

ILIAS-GW 4th general meeting23 Planning status A planning is available since many months, but is still unfrozen. Currently: –220 tasks (commissioning + Virgo+ installations) –22 macro-activities A first man power budget has been evaluated –62 physicists/engineers involved in the activities –Amount affected by the lack of response of some team A money (EGO) budget is available Why the planning is unfrozen? –t 0 is depending by the end of the S5-VSR1 run Just concluded –t 0 is depending by the content of the post-VSR1 commissioning Now defined –t 0 is depending by the outcomes of the 2nd review meeting October 2007