11. 22 3 Allocation of Conserved Water Program Presented By Dwight French 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Webinar: June 6, :00am – 11:30am EDT The Community Eligibility Option.
Advertisements

Idaho Conjunctive Management Rules & Ground Water District Formation
Fixed price contract: A contract that provides a price for each procurement item obtained under the contract.
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview of Our Community’s New Storm Water Management Program.
WATER RIGHTS 101: OVERVIEW OF UTAH WATER LAW Legislative Water Task Force June 15, 2004.
7:00 pmWelcome and introductions 7:05pmHLWD planning overview Plan update process 7:25 pmStakeholder involvement Watershed problems 7:40 pmPublic comment.
PROPOSAL TO ADJUST CURRENT WATER RATES Goal: Address frequently expressed concerns of citizens  Simplicity  Understandability  Fairness  Liability.
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview of Pennsylvania’s New Storm Water Management Program.
MRWA 2013 ANNUAL CONFERENCE MAINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM.
Narragansett Bay Estuary Program Narragansett Bay CCMP  Original done 1992  Stakedholder-developed goals, objectives, actions  Many key actions implemented.
Presented By: Gareth Leonard (DEP) Presented To: Florida Oceans and Coastal Council Date: October 30, 2012 DRAFT.
1 School Funding Discussion November 15, 2007 Brighton Area Schools.
Tribal Consultations. Topics FY12 Extensions and IRR Program Funding MAP-21 Programs and Funding.
Thank you for participating in our experiment. Through the decisions you make today, you will have the opportunity to earn monetary rewards. You will be.
San Joaquin River NWR Proposed Expansion Planning Process Summer 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Summer 2012 Public Input Public Input Prepare Draft Environmental.
Active Water Resource Management in the Lower Rio Grande
Conjunctive Management in Idaho A State Perspective Rexburg, Idaho December 9, 2014Mat Weaver, IDWR.
FORM 1014HD – NOTICE OF SURFACE DISCHARGE OF HYDROSTATIC TEST WATER.
AB 86: Adult Education Webinar Series
Area of Notice Bannock Creek Drainage All surface and ground water rights in drainage Approximately 80 – 90 notices sent.
Chapter 17 Conservation and “Protection” of Natural Resources Rosalie Bleasdale.
Chapter 13. The Economics of Water The Value of Water Water as a Public versus a Private Good Water Affordability Water Marketing Water Banking Pollution.
The impact of budgetary resources of financing investment decision.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 The Recovery and Your Family Small Business/Self-Employed Division Date.
Economic Analysis of Water Supply and Water Quality Benefits IRWM Round 2 Roger Mann Lorraine Marsh Steve Hatchett Jerry Horner.
Municipal Tax Increment Financing
Creation of Water District No. 110 Karl J. Dreher Director Idaho Department of Water Resources December 5, 2005 Background Information.
Taking Care of Your Water Rights: Permits, Extensions & Certificates Oregon Association of Water Utilities August 2013 Lisa Jaramillo Water Right Services.
Columbia River Water Management Program (CRWMP) Review of Year One Upper Crab Creek Planning Unit Meeting April 17, 2007.
Division Of State Funding Charter Schools For School Year Nora T. Rainey, Program Specialist Phone Number (512) Fax Number (512)
Oconee County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Kickoff Meeting Brian Laughlin Hazard Mitigation Planner Georgia Emergency.
Money Handling Procedures Updated by Roger Sparrow, Karen Ramage & David Herbst April 2014.
Review of the Nipissar Lake Replenishment Project, Rankin Inlet, Nunavut September 25, 2014 NWB Hearing Presentation Type A Water License Amendment Application.
LOWER L’ANGUILLE WATERSHED COST SHARE PATRICIA PERRY ST. FRANCIS COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT.
Sediment & Nutrient Management in the L’Anguille River Watershed St. Francis County Cost Share Project Patricia Perry St. Francis County Conservation.
Water Markets and Good Watershed Governance: An Inherent Conflict? John Janmaat Economics UBC Okanagan.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
Distribution of Water Rights Jared Manning, P.E. Utah Division of Water Rights March 17, 2014.
IDWR PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING March 19 & 27, 2013 Mountain Home & Idaho City, ID.
Sustainable Development Innovations Fund. Fund Overview Created in October 1989 Provides financial assistance for development, implementation and promotion.
Central Valley Project Cost Allocation Study -- Irrigation and Municipal & Industrial (M&I) Benefits Public Meeting August 9, 2013.
1 Water Resources Management - DEQ’s Role in Water Supply - State Water Commission October 1, 2002.
UTAH WATER USERS WORKSHOP March 15, 2011 HOW FAR CAN I STRETCH MY CFS? Kent L. Jones P.E. Utah State Engineer Utah Division of Water Rights.
Overview of Proposed Alaska National Wildlife Refuges Regulatory Changes U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Request for Proposals from the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Water 2025 Western Water Initiative Challenge Grant Program for.
Water Right Transfers OAR Chapter 690 Divisions 380, 382, 385, 77 CWRE Workshops – October, 2012 Susan Douthit District Analyst.
Multi-objective Optimization
Gulf Restoration Update Erin L. Deady, AICP, Esq. November 8, 2013 Erin L. Deady, AICP, Esq. November 8, 2013.
Strategies for Colorado River Water Management Jaci Gould Deputy Regional Director Lower Colorado Region.
British Columbia’s Water Sustainability Act and regulations Southern Interior Local Government Association April 22, 2016 Tina Neale Ministry of Environment.
A Jurisprudential Model for Sustainable Water Resources Governance By Professor D. E. Fisher.
Vernon-Verona-Sherrill Preliminary Smart School Investment Plan Public Hearing May 4 th, 2016.
permitting.
Continuing Authorities Program
Thorp Mill Ditch Assessment ( )
Texas Military Preparedness Commission
Texas Water Resources Institute
Interpreting Water Rights
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP)
District Board Meetings Local Work Group Meetings
MENU OF TOOL TOPICS (Choose 4 out of the 11 listed)
Lisa Jaramillo Transfer and Conservation Section Manager Kelly Starnes
Washington State Infrastructure Financing
Nebraska Water Infrastructure Funding and Financing Programs
Property Tax Levy – Taxes Payable 2019
Water Allocation Strategies
Menu of Tool Topics (Choose 4 out of the 11 listed)
Water Law and Management
Presentation transcript:

11

22

3 Allocation of Conserved Water Program Presented By Dwight French 3

4

5 Program Overview Voluntary program The program is intended to provide incentives to encourage water users to improve the efficiency of their irrigation systems. Allows use of “conserved water” for other purposes: Portion for applicant to use on other lands, etc. Portion to state for instream right Provides more water for the ecosystem without any impairment to water users 5

6 Allocation of Conserved Water (ACW) Projects are physical improvements to the water delivery or application systems, which improve the efficiency of the system and result in a measurable quantity of “conserved water.” 6

7 Common ACW Projects Delivery System Projects Installation of headgates Locating the diversion closer to the place of use lining ditches and canals Addition variable speed, variable pressure or booster pumps Additional meters, valves, flow controls Remote monitoring, control and leak detection systems Application System Projects Converting Flood to Sprinkler System Upgrading the type of sprinkler system High pressure to low pressure, low flow Replacing large sprinklers with low flow drop tube Moisture monitoring systems 7

8 What is Conserved Water? The amount of water that results from conservation measures, measured as the difference between: (a) the smaller of the amount stated on the water right or the maximum amount of water that can be diverted using the existing facilities; and (b) the amount of water needed after implementation of conservation measures Pre-Project Water Right After Project Water Need Conserved Water - = 8

9 9 The ACW Program Benefits The Applicant Agriculture The Community The Environment

10 Benefits to Applicant In the absence of this law, water users would not be entitled to use any conserved water to meet new needs. ACW projects provide economic return on efficiency improvements by: Allowing water for use on additional lands Allowing for new uses of water Allowing for the sale or lease of conserved water 10

11 Agricultural Benefits Often provides the only way land owners can apply water to new lands Provides water for dry land Reduces field erosion and reduces runoff liability Cuts down on costs Reduction of power costs Reduction of fertilizer quantity Reduction of labor costs associated with moving hand lines and managing flood irrigation ditches

12 Community Benefits Provides opportunity for boost in local economy and creation of jobs Conservation of a scarce resource for future generations Enhances Instream Public Uses

13 Enhances Instream Public Uses Navigation Recreation Conservation, aquatic and fish life, wildlife, fish and wildlife habitat Pollution abatement

14 Why the Program Works The ACW program works because it provides new benefits to the water user, the environment and the public without detriment to existing water uses. Division of the conserved water is generally : 75% applicant choice: Use of water on additional lands 25% goes to State: receives instream water right

15 Who Gets What? How much water does the applicant get to keep? Allocation of the conserved water depends on a few factors: Amount of non-reimbursable funding received from Federal or State government Amount of water, if any, needed to mitigate injury

16 * The applicant may agree to receive a lesser amount of the conserved water to donate or sell for instream use Allocation of Conserved Water Allocation formula Project Costs Paid by Government (non- reimbursable) Conserved Water to State Conserved Water to Applicant* < 25%25%75% % % >75%75%25%

17 * The applicant may choose to donate, lease or sell a greater portion of the conserved water for instream use Allocation of Conserved Water Project Costs Paid by Government (non-reimbursable) Conserved Water to State Conserved Water to Applicant* IF < 25% Then 25%75% % % >75%75%25%

18 The Split Calculation Total quantity of conserved water reduced to mitigate for injury, if necessary At a minimum, 25% of the remaining conserved water is returned to the State as an instream water right. Pro-rated reduction for public funds Portion of project funded by the public, if any becomes the new instream water right Only non-reimbursable public funds counted The remaining portion of conserved water is available for the applicant’s choice of use The applicant is always entitled at least 25% of the conserved water

19 The Split Calculation The total quantity of conserved water is reduced by: Quantity of water required to mitigate injury After mitigation for injury, the remaining portion is reduced the portion of public funds used to finance the project The remaining portion of goes to the applicant

20 Mitigate for Injury Before any conserved water may be applied to any new use the applicant must ensure the project will not injure any other water right Injury occurs when the project results in any reduction in the quantity of water that would have been legally available to another user if the project had not been performed Mitigation is the reduction in the quantity of conserved water required to prevent injury

21 State’s Share After mitigating for injury, if required The State is entitled to a minimum of 25% plus the percentage of any public money used to fund the project Only State and Federal non-reimbursable funds are counted Public funds reduction capped at 75% Even if 100% of the project cost is from public funds, the applicant is entitled to a minimum of 25% of the conserved water.

22 Applicant’s Share After reductions to mitigate for injury; and Reductions to account for the State’s Share The remaining quantity of conserved water is may be used according to the applicant’s preference of: New place of use New character of use

23 Allocation Schematic 10 cfs 6 cfs 4 cfs Original Right Remaining Right Conserved Water 1 cfs 2.25 cfs 0.75 cfs Mitigation to prevent injury (if needed) 3 cfs Conserved Water Instream Right Applicant’s Share

24 Allocation Schematic 30.0 AF 20.0 AF 10.0 AF Original Right Remaining Right Conserved Water 0.0 AF 7.75 AF 2.25 AF Mitigation to prevent injury (if needed) 10.0 AF Conserved Water Instream Right Applicant’s Share

25 Choice of Priority Date The applicant may choose either of the following priority dates for the conserved water: One minute junior to the originating right; or The same as the originating right Both the new use and instream rights must have the same priority

26 Who Can Apply Generally? Any person or group of persons holding a water use subject to transfer as defined in ORS may submit an application If a person proposes conservation measures within the boundaries of a district, the person must also submit evidence that the district has approved the application

27 Best to submit application prior to starting project But applications may be submitted up to 5-years after implementation of conservation measures

28 Allocation of Conserved Water Process Application Submittal Public Notice 2 weeks in local newspaper 35 Day Comment Period 60 Day Protest Period WRD Review Proposed Final Order Final Order Public Comment Protests & Protest Resolution WRD Goal: Proposed Final Order within 9 months

29 Questions? Please contact Kody Thurgood for more information: Call: (503)