International School on the Physics of Quark Gluon Plasma June 3-6, 1997, Hiroshima Chemical Property in Heavy Ion Collisions Masashi Kaneta for the NA44.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Mass, Quark-number, Energy Dependence of v 2 and v 4 in Relativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions Yan Lu University of Science and Technology of China Many.

Advertisements

Physics Results of the NA49 exp. on Nucleus – Nucleus Collisions at SPS Energies P. Christakoglou, A. Petridis, M. Vassiliou Athens University HEP2006,

Anisotropic Flow at RHIC Jiayun Chen (for Collaboration) Institute of Particle Physics, HZNU, Wuhan, , P.R.China Brookhaven National Lab, Upton,

K*(892) Resonance Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV & 62.4 GeV Motivation Analysis and Results Summary 1 Sadhana Dash Institute.

1 Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions in NA49-future An introduction for everybody The main goal of studying nucleus-nucleus collisions in NA49-future is the investigation.

Particle Production in p + p Reactions at GeV K. Hagel Cyclotron Institute Texas A & M University for the BRAHMS Collaboration.

DNP03, Tucson, Oct 29, Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Hadron Yields, Hadrochemistry, and Hadronization.

STAR STRANGENESS! K0sK0s    K+K+ (Preliminary)         

STAR Looking Through the “Veil of Hadronization”: Pion Entropy & PSD at RHIC John G. Cramer Department of Physics University of Washington, Seattle, WA,

Nu XuInternational Conference on Strangeness in Quark Matter, UCLA, March , 20061/20 Search for Partonic EoS in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions Nu.

5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.

 PID spectra in STAR  Baryon/anti-baryon ratios  Mixed hadron ratios  Statistical models  Chemical fits  Quark coalescence  Sudden hadronization.

DPG spring meeting, Tübingen, March Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Recent results from STAR at RHIC.

SQM2006, 03/27/2006Haibin Zhang1 Heavy Flavor Measurements at STAR Haibin Zhang Brookhaven National Laboratory for the STAR Collaboration.

Hadronic Resonances in Heavy-Ion Collisions at ALICE A.G. Knospe for the ALICE Collaboration The University of Texas at Austin 25 July 2013.

ISMD31 / Sept. 4, 2001 Toru Sugitate / Hiroshima Univ. The 31 st International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics on 1-7, Sept in Datong, China.

Particle Spectra at AGS, SPS and RHIC Dieter Röhrich Fysisk institutt, Universitetet i Bergen Similarities and differences Rapidity distributions –net.

Masashi Kaneta, LBNL Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. First results from STAR experiment at RHIC - Soft hadron.

Measurements of the Charge Balance Function at RHIC from √s NN = 7.7 to 200 GeV Gary D. Westfall, for the STAR Collaboration (Michigan State University)

One-, Two- and Three-Particle Hadron Spectra Recent Results from CERN/SPS Experiment NA44 Atsushi Sakaguchi (Osaka University) for the NA44 Collaboration.

Parallel Session (Hadron 1) 2/Dec/97 Quark Matter ‘97 Kaon and Proton Ratios from Central Pb+Pb Collisions at the CERN SPS Masashi Kaneta for the NA44.

Thermal Production of particles at RHIC (Test of Chemical Freeze-out at RHIC) Jun Takahashi for the STAR collaboration SQM2008, Beijing, China.

Mark D. Baker What have we learned from RHIC? Mark D. Baker Chemistry Department Thanks to: W. Busza, Axel Drees, J. Katzy, B. Lugo, P. Steinberg, N. Xu,

BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO CNS workshop, Tokyo Univ. Identified Charged Single Particle Spectra at RHIC-PHENIX Tatsuya Chujo (BNL) for the PHENIX.

In-Kwon YOO Pusan National University Busan, Republic of KOREA SPS Results Review.

Matter System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production Sevil Salur Yale University for the STAR Collaboration.

NA57 D. Elia, INFN Bari (Italy)QM2004, Oakland - January 11-17, Energy dependence of K 0 and hyperon production at CERN SPS Domenico Elia INFN -

PHENIX results and prospects regarding strangeness and charm David Morrison (Brookhaven National Laboratory) for the PHENIX Collaboration.

M. Oldenburg Strange Quark Matter 2006 — March 26–31, Los Angeles, California 1 Centrality Dependence of Azimuthal Anisotropy of Strange Hadrons in 200.

Lecture 10 : Statistical thermal model Hadron multiplicities and their correlations and fluctuations (event-by-event) are observables which can provide.

Recent results on Quark Gluon Plasma and Future Plans

Introduction The statistical model approach is established by analysis of particle ratios of the high energy heavy ion collisions in GSI-SIS to CERN-SPS.

1 Jeffery T. Mitchell – Quark Matter /17/12 The RHIC Beam Energy Scan Program: Results from the PHENIX Experiment Jeffery T. Mitchell Brookhaven.

STAR Helen Caines The Ohio State University QM 2001 Jan 2001 Strangeness Production at RHIC.

Strangeness production in Au+Au collisions at RHIC Jens Ivar Jørdre University of Bergen, Norway.

1 Results from the BRAHMS experiment at RHIC Dieter Röhrich Fysisk institutt, Universitetet i Bergen for the BRAHMS collaboration Experimental setup Stopping.

System size dependence of freeze-out properties at RHIC Quark Matter 2006 Shanghai-China Nov System size dependence of freeze-out properties.

HIGHLIGHTS BRAHMS I.G. Bearden, Niels Bohr Institute QM'06 Shanghai 2 Outline BRAHMS Intermediate PT Soft physics.

Masashi Kaneta, First joint Meeting of the Nuclear Physics Divisions of APS and JPS 1 / Masashi Kaneta LBNL

INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON STRANGENESS IN QUARK MATTER 1997 Particle Ratios from Central Pb+Pb Collisions at the CERN SPS Masashi Kaneta for the NA44 collaboration.

9 th June 2008 Seminar at UC Riverside Probing the QCD Phase Diagram Aneta Iordanova.

Masashi Kaneta, LBL Hadron Spectra in Au+Au Collisions by STAR Experiment at RHIC Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration LBNL.

Two freeze-out model for the hadrons produced in the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions. New Frontiers in QCD 28 Oct, 2011, Yonsei Univ., Seoul, Korea Suk.

Heavy-Ion Physics - Hydrodynamic Approach Introduction Hydrodynamic aspect Observables explained Recombination model Summary 전남대 이강석 HIM

School of Collective Dynamics in High-Energy CollisionsLevente Molnar, Purdue University 1 Effect of resonance decays on the extracted kinetic freeze-out.

R. Lednicky: Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia I.P. Lokhtin, A.M. Snigirev, L.V. Malinina: Moscow State University, Institute of Nuclear.

Itzhak Tserruya Initial Conditions at RHIC: an Experimental Perspective RHIC-INT Workshop LBNL, May31 – June 2, 2001 Itzhak Tserruya Weizmann.

24 Nov 2006 Kentaro MIKI University of Tsukuba “electron / photon flow” Elliptic flow measurement of direct photon in √s NN =200GeV Au+Au collisions at.

Charged and Neutral Kaon correlations in Au-Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV using the solenoidal tracker at RHIC (STAR) Selemon Bekele The Ohio State.

Strangeness in PHENIX Charles F. Maguire Vanderbilt University for the PHENIX Collaboration.

Rapidity dependence of charged particle yields with BRAHMS for Au+Au at 200 GeV Djamel Ouerdane for the BRAHMS collaboration Quark Matter 2002 Nantes,

Systematic Study of Elliptic Flow at RHIC Maya SHIMOMURA University of Tsukuba ATHIC 2008 University of Tsukuba, Japan October 13-15, 2008.

BNL/ Tatsuya CHUJO JPS RHIC symposium, Chuo Univ., Tokyo Hadron Production at RHIC-PHENIX Tatsuya Chujo (BNL) for the PHENIX Collaboration.

QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo Saturation of E T /N ch and Freeze-out Criteria in Heavy Ion Collisions Raghunath Sahoo Institute of.

Christina Markert 22 nd Winter Workshop, San Diego, March Christina Markert Kent State University Resonance Production in RHIC collisions Motivation.

24 June 2007 Strangeness in Quark Matter 2007 STAR 2S0Q0M72S0Q0M7 Strangeness and bulk freeze- out properties at RHIC Aneta Iordanova.

Japanese Physics Society meeting, Hokkaido Univ. 23/Sep/2007, JPS meeting, Sapporo, JapanShinIchi Esumi, Inst. of Physics, Univ. of Tsukuba1 Collective.

Toru Sugitate / Hiroshima / PHX032 / The JHF Workshop at KEK on Dec , 2001 Physics at High Baryon Density Region Toru Sugitate Hiroshima University.

Kaon Production in Central Au+Au Collisions at 200 and 63 GeV Djamel Ouerdane Niels Bohr Institute for the BRAHMS Collaboration Strange Quark Matter 2004.

Global and Collective Dynamics at PHENIX Takafumi Niida for the PHENIX Collaboration University of Tsukuba “Heavy Ion collisions in the LHC era” in Quy.

PHENIX Results from the RHIC Beam Energy Scan Brett Fadem for the PHENIX Collaboration Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics 2016.

Hadron Spectra and Yields Experimental Overview Julia Velkovska INT/RHIC Winter Workshop, Dec 13-15, 2002.

BRAHMS Heavy Ion Results and Perspectives Erik Bjorn Johnson RHIC & AGS Users Meeting June 8, 2006.

STAR Helen Caines The Ohio State University QM 2001 Jan 2001 Strangeness Production at RHIC.

Al+Au Analysis Plan Why study asymmetric systems like Al+Au (or Cu+Au as was recently done at RHIC)? Collisions of symmetric heavy ions do not create a.

1 Strange Resonance Production in p+p and Au+Au Collisions at RHIC energies. Christina Markert, Yale University for the STAR Collaboration QM2004,

HAW Sep Maui, Hawaii Ramiro Debbe BNL Physics Department The excess of positive charged particles measured at forward rapidities in d+Au.

Eun-Joo Kim University of Kansas For the BRAHMS collaboration

Collective Dynamics at RHIC

Summary Model Data from RHIC experiments Introduction

Presentation transcript:

International School on the Physics of Quark Gluon Plasma June 3-6, 1997, Hiroshima Chemical Property in Heavy Ion Collisions Masashi Kaneta for the NA44 collaboration Department of Physics, Hiroshima University ① Introduction ② Particle Ratios from NA44 Ratios as a function of centrality and P T Chemical property ③ Chemical freeze-out ④ Thermal freeze-out ⑤ Summary

International School on the Physics of Quark Gluon Plasma June 3-6, 1997, Hiroshima Masashi Kaneta / Hiroshima univ. 2 Particle ratios –Sensitivity to collision dynamics –Check chemical equilibrium assumption A Scenario Motivations Collisions Thermal freeze-out Chemical freeze-out ？ E x p a n s i o n

International School on the Physics of Quark Gluon Plasma June 3-6, 1997, Hiroshima Masashi Kaneta / Hiroshima univ. 3 I. G. Bearden 1, H. Bøggild 1, J. Boissevain 2, J. Dodd 3, B. Erazmus 4, S.Esumi 5,A, C. W. Fabjan 6, D. Ferenc 7,D. E. Fields 2, A. Franz 6, J.J. Gaardhøje 1, A.G. Hansen 1,O. Hansen 1, D. Hardtke 8, H. van Hecke 2, E.B. Holzer 9, T.J. Humanic 8, P. Hummel 9, B.V. Jacak 2, R. Jayanti 8, M. Kaneta 5, M. Kopytine 2, M. Leltchouk 3, A. Ljubicic 7, B. Lörstad 10, N. Maeda 5,B, A. Medvedev 3, M. Murray 11, S. Nishimura 5,C, H. Ohnishi 5, G. Paic 4,6, S.U. Pandey 8, F. Piuz 6, J. Pluta 4, V. Polychronakos 12, M. Potekhin 3, G. Poulard 6, D. Reichhold 8, A. Sakaguchi 5,D, J. Simmon-Gillo 2, J. Schmidt-Sørensen 10, W. Sondheim 2, M. Spegel 9, T. Sugitate 5, J. P. Sullivan 2, Y. Sumi 5, W.J. Willis 3, K. Wolf 11, N. Xu 2,E and D.S. Zachary 8 A Now at Universität Heidelberg, Physikalisches Institut, Heidelberg, Germany. B Now at Department of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL , USA. C Now at Institute of Physics, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan. D Now at Department of Physics, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560, Japan. E Now at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. 1 Niels Bohr Institute, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. 2 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM USA. 3 Department of Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA. 4 Nuclear Physics Laboratory of Nantes, Nantes, France. 5 Department of Physics, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739, Japan. 6 CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland. 7 Rudjer Boskovic Institute, Zagreb, Croatia. 8 Department of Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. 9 Technical University, A-1040, Vienna, Austria. 10 Department of Physics, University of Lund, S Lund, Sweden. 11 Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA. 12 Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA. The NA44 Collaboration

International School on the Physics of Quark Gluon Plasma June 3-6, 1997, Hiroshima Masashi Kaneta / Hiroshima univ. 4 CERN experiment NA44 Study the space-time evolution and temperature of nuclear collisions Measure one- and two-particle distributions of charged hadron  around mid-rapidity ( y lab  3 )  0  P T  1.6 GeV/c  TOF resolution  100ps   P/P  0.5% nominal P = 8GeV) Recent publications –Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1996) 2080 Collective expansion in high energy heavy ion collisions –Phys. Lett. B388 (1996) 431 Mid-rapidity protons in 158 A GeV Pb+Pb collisions –Phys. Lett. B372 (1996) 339 Coulomb effect in Single Particle Distributions

International School on the Physics of Quark Gluon Plasma June 3-6, 1997, Hiroshima Masashi Kaneta / Hiroshima univ. 5

International School on the Physics of Quark Gluon Plasma June 3-6, 1997, Hiroshima Masashi Kaneta / Hiroshima univ. 6 PID Selection between K and p

International School on the Physics of Quark Gluon Plasma June 3-6, 1997, Hiroshima Masashi Kaneta / Hiroshima univ. 7 NA44 acceptance

International School on the Physics of Quark Gluon Plasma June 3-6, 1997, Hiroshima Masashi Kaneta / Hiroshima univ. 8 Selection of centrality

International School on the Physics of Quark Gluon Plasma June 3-6, 1997, Hiroshima Masashi Kaneta / Hiroshima univ. 9 Ratios as a function of P T and centrality †Those ratios are measured downstream (~20m) from collision point.  The feed-down from resonance is included in it.  correction factor for p/p: 0.9 ± 0.1

International School on the Physics of Quark Gluon Plasma June 3-6, 1997, Hiroshima Masashi Kaneta / Hiroshima univ. 10 Strangeness neutral hadron gas

International School on the Physics of Quark Gluon Plasma June 3-6, 1997, Hiroshima Masashi Kaneta / Hiroshima univ. 11 Comparison ratios with model prediction

International School on the Physics of Quark Gluon Plasma June 3-6, 1997, Hiroshima Masashi Kaneta / Hiroshima univ. 12 Chemical freeze-out There is model dependence for chemical freeze-out temperature and chemical potential. In general, –the system in SPS energy is higher chemical freeze-out temperature and lower baryon density than one in AGS energy

International School on the Physics of Quark Gluon Plasma June 3-6, 1997, Hiroshima Masashi Kaneta / Hiroshima univ. 13 Thermal freeze-out (a) Positive (b) Negative The dashed lines in figure are fits to the function : Boltzmann distribution The slope parameter T depends on particle mass Transverse mass distributions Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1996) 2080

International School on the Physics of Quark Gluon Plasma June 3-6, 1997, Hiroshima Masashi Kaneta / Hiroshima univ. 14 Thermal freeze-out temperature Slope parameter T and particle mass m may be described by the relation ship T = T fo + m 2 T fo : freeze-out temperature : averaged collective flow velocity At SPS At AGS T fo = 140±10 MeV T fo = 145±15 MeV Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1996) 2080

International School on the Physics of Quark Gluon Plasma June 3-6, 1997, Hiroshima Masashi Kaneta / Hiroshima univ. 15 Summary Ratios –K - /K + and p/p ratios are flat as a function of P t –Ratios are insensitive in the central region (top 8.5%) Chemical properties –Assuming the system is in chemical equilibrium state  Temperature T ch ~ 175MeV  Chemical potential  q ~ 80MeV,  s ~ 30MeV  T ch  T f0 In Pb+Pb central collisions from SPS Chemical freeze-out and Thermal freeze-out temperatures SPS: AGS: T ch [MeV] T fo [MeV] 170 ～～ ±10 145±15

International School on the Physics of Quark Gluon Plasma June 3-6, 1997, Hiroshima Masashi Kaneta / Hiroshima univ. 16 Effect of decayed particles Tools –RQMD : y, p T distribution –MC simulation : effect of acceptance As first step, lambda decay effect to proton yield is studied pass p, p, ,  through NA44 detectors Example of P t distribution dN/dy: ±30% m t slope: ±10% As systematic error { Correction factor for p/p ratio

International School on the Physics of Quark Gluon Plasma June 3-6, 1997, Hiroshima Masashi Kaneta / Hiroshima univ. 17 Absolute ratio and ratio around mid rapidity NA44 acceptance for Kaons and protons are around mid rapidity.  compare ratios as a function of rapidity and absolute ratios in RQMD. NA44 preliminary RQMD ver 1.08 (b<2fm) ( average) : ratios around the mid rapidity is the same with absolute ratio. Kaons protons : both ratios are close in the region  y  1.6.