RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
Advertisements

A Joint Code of Practice Objectives and Summary Presentation
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Internal Control–Integrated Framework
Insights for Operators
Joe Killins & Associates, LLC Pipelines & Risk Based Management How Safe is Safe?
CAST IRON INVENTORY DARIN BURK PIPELINE SAFETY PROGRAM MANAGER, IL COMMERCE COMMISSION PAST CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PIPELINE SAFETY REPRESENTATIVES.
Integrity Management Program Special Permits (IMP-SP) Draft Administrative Plan 12/5/2007.
Contractor Safety Management
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Pipeline Replacement Programs Presentation By Frank Radigan Hudson River Energy Group June 26, 2012.
BRC Storage & Distribution Safety and Quality Management System Training Guide
Office of the Secretary of Defense – Comptroller Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness Directorate Unclassified 17 September 2014 GAO Revised “Green.
Overview of Key Rule Features
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION TO HAZID 2.
BRC Food Safety Quality Management System Training Guide
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Pipeline Safety Program Manager.
Western Regional Gas Conference August 25, 2010 Simple, Handy, Risk-based Integrity Management Plan (SHRIMP)
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Harold Winnie, CATS Manager (Central Region) Leak detection for.
Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
Process Safety Management
Occupational Health and Safety
SMS Operation.  Internal safety (SMS) audits are used to ensure that the structure of an SMS is sound.  It is also a formal process to ensure continuous.
SHRIMP: Model Distribution Integrity Management Plan Development Tool John Erickson, PE American Public Gas Association.
Western Regional Gas Conference August 25, 2009 Distribution Integrity Management Programs (DIMP) & SHRIMP.
Creating a Risk-Based CAPA Process
Risk Management - the process of identifying and controlling hazards to protect the force.  It’s five steps represent a logical thought process from.
Distribution Integrity Management John Erickson, PE American Public Gas Association.
Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) Supplier Awareness Training ISR Systems Danbury, CT 2011.
Western Regional Gas Conference August 24, 2010 Distribution Integrity Management Programs (DIMP) Rule.
1 DIMSA A Distribution Integrity Management SME Approach August – 2009.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Stephanie Weidman Austin Regional Manager Oversight and Safety Division Pipeline Safety September 2015.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration National Association of Pipeline Safety Representatives US DOT.
© 2011 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. All rights reserved. This document may not be reproduced or distributed without authorization. ASSET Safety Management.
Pipeline Safety Trust Fort Worth Natural Gas Production Issues John W. Pepper Project Manager Office of Pipeline Safety Southwest Region, Houston, Texas.
Distribution Integrity Management – What To Expect John Erickson, PE American Public Gas Association Western Regional Gas Conference.
Office of Pipeline Safety Integrity Management Inspection Process Louisiana Pipeline Safety Seminar August 2003.
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Stephanie Weidman Oversight and Safety Division September 2015.
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Manager – Pipeline Safety 1.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 6-1 Chapter 6 CHAPTER 6 INTERNAL CONTROL IN A FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT.
Active Corrosion Process Nisource – COH/CKY. Objectives  Understanding the terminology –Active Corrosion –& Suspected Areas of “Active Corrosion”  Developing.
A Framework for Your Pipeline Integrity Program. 2 A Few Thoughts Before Beginning l This rule is new to the pipeline industry although many of the concepts.
What’s Wrong with Integrity Management? How Do We Improve Integrity Management? Terry Boss Senior Vice President Safety Environment and Operations PST.
The Risk Management Process
Pipeline Performance Measures Alan Mayberry New Orleans, Louisiana Pipeline Safety Trust Annual Conference
06/01/20161 Benny Hoff TÜV NORD Sweden AB AFS 2002:1 Use of pressure equipment.
How Old is too Old? Who Makes that Decision? Alan Mayberry New Orleans, Louisiana Pipeline Safety Trust Annual Conference
ISO Registration Common Areas of Nonconformances.
Checking and Corrective Action EPA Regions 9 & 10 and The Federal Network for Sustainability 2005.
Distribution Integrity Management Program
Office of Pipeline Safety Remedial Action Review Protocol Integrity Management Workshop July 23-24, 2002.
1 Compression Fittings. 2 Background Advisory Bulletin ADB Advisory Bulletin PHMSA-RSPA Incidents Other Issues Post Failure Modes Other.
2007 Office of Risk Management Annual Conference 2007 David M. Shapiro Disaster Planning & Recovery Consultants
ON “SOFTWARE ENGINEERING” SUBJECT TOPIC “RISK ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT” MASTER OF COMPUTER APPLICATION (5th Semester) Presented by: ANOOP GANGWAR SRMSCET,
Risk Assessment: A Practical Guide to Assessing Operational Risk
Chapter 6 Internal Control in a Financial Statement Audit McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Managing Project Risk – A simplified approach Presented by : Damian Leonard.
Pipeline Safety Management Systems
Transportation of Class 7 materials: Compliance & Regulatory issues
4.5 Checking and Corrective Action Monitoring and Measurement
Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) Supplier Awareness Training
Safety and Security- From Assessment to Implementation
What’s next for Gas Utilities?
Monitoring Cathodic Protection Effectiveness and Record keeping
2018 MDPB Annual Meeting May 24, 2018
Distribution Integrity
County Wide Safety Program
Management of Change GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-302)
HSE Requirements for Pipeline Operations GROUP HSE GROUPE (CR-GR-HSE-414) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This rule defines the minimum HSE requirements related to the.
Presentation transcript:

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Alan C. Mann Oversight and Safety Division September 2015

BASIC D.I.M.P. Getting The Ball Rolling

Distribution Integrity Management 49 CFR Part (Subpart P) – Gas Distribution Integrity Management (IM) 3

49 CFR 192, Subpart P – Required Elements a)Knowledge b)Threat Identification c)Evaluate and Rank Risk d)Identify and Implement Measures to Reduce Risk e)Measure Performance, Monitor Results, Evaluate Effectiveness f)Periodic Evaluation and Improvement. g)Report Results 4

49 CFR 192, Subpart P (a) KNOWLEDGE: Demonstrate an understanding of your gas distribution system(s) developed from reasonably available information. Records: – (1) Characteristics of the system’s design, operations, and environmental factors. – (2) Information from past design, operations and maintenance. – (3) Identify your “unknowns” and devise a plan to gain that knowledge through normal activities. – (4) Develop and Implement a DIM Plan review/improvement process. (This becomes a record of knowledge.) – (5) Capture and retain records regarding new installations. (Location, Material-Specs, Joining Method, Personnel) 5

49 CFR 192, Subpart P (b) IDENTIFY THREATS: Consider the following categories of threats to each distribution pipeline. CORROSION NATURAL FORCES EXCAVATION DAMAGE OTHER OUTSIDE FORCE DAMAGE MATERIAL OR JOINT FAILURE (including compression couplings) EQUIPMENT FAILURE INCORRECT OPERATION OTHER CONCERNS (which could affect integrity of the pipeline) 6

49 CFR 192, Subpart P (c) EVALUATE and RANK RISK: Determine the relative importance of each threat, estimate, rank risk posed to your pipeline. Must Consider: Current Threats Potential Threats Likelihood of Failure Associated with EACH THREAT Potential Consequences of Such Failures 7

49 CFR 192, Subpart P (c) EVALUATE and RANK RISK: Determine the relative importance of each threat, estimate, rank risk posed to your pipeline. Must Consider: Current Threats Potential Threats Likelihood of Failure Associated with EACH THREAT Potential Consequences of Such Failures You may subdivide your pipeline into regions with similar characteristics, where similar actions would likely be effective. Subdivisions must be contiguous and consist of mains, services and other appurtenances. Areas with common materials or environmental factors. 8

49 CFR 192, Subpart P (d) IDENTIFY and IMPLEMENT Measures to Address Risk. Implementation of plan to reduce the risk of failures within your distribution system. Plan MUST include an EFFECTIVE Leakage Management Program. (Unless all leaks are repaired when found.) 9

49 CFR 192, Subpart P (e) MEASURE PERFORMANCE Monitor Results, Evaluate Effectiveness. Develop and Monitor Performance Measures from an ESTABLISHED BASELINE to evaluate program effectiveness. Plan MUST include: ₪CATEGORIZED BY CAUSE: Number of Hazardous Leaks either ELIMINATED or REPAIRED as required by (c.) or total number of leaks if all leaks are repaired when found. ₪ Number of Excavation Damages. ₪ Number of Excavation Tickets. ₪ Total Number of Leaks by Cause, (eliminated or repaired). ₪ Additional Measures deemed necessary by the operator which are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of the IM program in controlling each identified threat. 10

49 CFR 192, Subpart P (f) PERIODIC EVALUATION and IMPROVEMENT Operator MUST re-evaluate THREATS and RISKS on their pipeline and consider the relevance of threats in one location to other areas. Also, MUST define appropriate period for conducting complete program re-evaluations based on system complexity and changes in factors affecting risk of failure. Program Re-evaluation must be at a minimum of 5 years. Operator MUST consider the results of the performance monitoring in these evaluations. 11

49 CFR 192, Subpart P (g) REPORT RESULTS Report on an ANNUAL basis the results of the measures listed in (e)(1)(i) through (e)(1)(iv) as a part of the annual reporting required by 49 CFR (Also must report this to the Commission). 12

49 CFR 192, Subpart P REPORTING COMPRESSION COUPLING FAILURES Annually to PHMSA and to the Railroad Commission- Information related to Compression Coupling Failure in regard to HAZARDOUS LEAKS. Must include: LOCATION of failures in the system Nominal Pipe Size Material Type Nature of Failure Coupling Manufacturer Lot number and Date of manufacture Other Information found on the coupling’s markings. 13

49 CFR 192, Subpart P REQIRED RECORDS Records Demonstrating Compliance with Subpart P. Records must be maintained for a minimum of 10 years. Records must include copies of previous versions of the DIM plan, including superseded plans developed under Subpart P. 14

49 CFR 192 Subpart P Unwritten Needs: CAPABLE / COMPETENT DIMP MANAGER. AVAILABILITY of ASSETS for DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION and RE-EVALUATION. (MANPOWER, MATERIALS/RESOURCES, TIME) 15

49 CFR Part 192, Subpart P OUTSOURCING: CONTRACTING A PROGRAM DEVELOPER STILL requires you to provide all the information (knowledge) you would normally have with an in-house program. STILL requires you to constantly update the written plan as your system evolves through upgrades and threat mitigation. (This includes having the latest version of a contracted plan.) STILL requires you to maintain and improve records of operations and maintenance pertinent to the DIM Plan. 16

49 CFR 192, Subpart P The DIMP Manager should treat the program like it is his/her baby. The DIMP Manager should look at the distribution system as if it was their castle, eliminating the most likely ways the fortress would be compromised in order of succession (and documenting it), until it is virtually impossible for the enemy (pipeline failures) to storm the walls (or via other routes) and putting the family to the sword. 17

THE PUZZLE WILL COME TOGETHER 18

THE PUZZLE WILL COME TOGETHER 19 Don’t let this be your castle!

THE PUZZLE WILL COME TOGETHER 20 Let this be your castle!

49 CFR 192, Subpart P QUESTIONS ? 21