UP NISMED The Pilot Intel® Teach Pedagogical Support System MONALISA M. TE-SASING & CELIA R. BALBIN 6 September 2006 UP NISMED.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
The Teacher Preparation World Cafe September 26, 2008 Statewide Meeting Results and Recommendations New York Higher Education Support Center Task Force.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
PORTFOLIO.
Preparing New A.P.S. Workers for the Field The Supervisor as Trainer.
The e-Learning Club as a Support Strategy in Technology Integration Presented at the 1 st National ICTs in Basic Education Congress 6-7 December 2004 Cebu.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
THE IMPACT OF THE INTEL TEACH TO THE FUTURE PRESERVICE PROGRAM ON SELECTED BEED STUDENTS’ LEARNING Melissa Alma R. Orencia College of Education Philippine.
Learning and Teaching Using ICT Conferences Summer 2004.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Techmentoring The Partners in Learning Way SHERLITA L. DAGUISONAN & MANUEL O. CABERTE 6 September 2006.
Strategic Leadership of ICT
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
INTEL CONFIDENTIAL, FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 1 Intel Teach Essentials Program Curriculum Roundtable – Oxford – July 2013.
GHANA SHS CONNECTIVITY PROJECT The Ghana SHS Connectivity Project Project Overview.
The Teaching Role of Librarians Dr. Rolando A. Taha Education Supervisor DepEd, Puerto Princesa City.
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Intel ® Teach Essentials ICT in the Classroom Conference St John's College, Johannesburg 5-7 July 2011 Workshop by Claire Dean Senior Trainer SchoolNet.
ICT in Education UNESCO Bangkok Looking Forward: Sustaining the Momentum Building a system to sustain the capability building efforts Mel Tan Programme.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Health Career Recruitment and Retention Service-Based Learning.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Technology Leadership
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Schoolwide Preparation for English Language Learners: Teacher Community and Inquiry-Based Professional Development.
1 Intel ® Teach ST & ITA Summit Copyright © 2010 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Learning Objective III: Diverse Learners Teacher candidates and candidates for other professional school personnel roles exhibit knowledge, competence,
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Technology Standards in Teacher Education Proficiencies and Assessment Ellen Hoffman Eastern Michigan University MDE Workshop October 10, 2003.
A Professional Development Model for Teachers in Child- Care Centers CEC National Conference April 2, 2009 Seattle, WA Madelyn James UIC PhD student in.
Excellence in Vocational Teaching Symposium 23 & 24 September 2013 Qingdao, P.R. China.
The University for business and the professions Neal Sumner Instructional Designer E Learning Unit City University WebCT Regional Users Group meeting
Presidential National Commission on Information Society and Development (PNC on ISAD)  Government commitment to information society Accelerated Shared.
Intel ® Teach Program Thinking with Technology Course Pn. Idawati Che Mat Jabatan Teknologi Pendidikan
Re-envisioning Teacher Preparation: Stage II September 16, 2011.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Nónio Competence Centre 21 st Century Setúbal Higher School of Education STUDY VISIT ICT Group - Education and Training 2010 Setúbal, April,19 th, 2004.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Evaluating Teacher Training changing classroom practices Richard Lambert, Ph.D.
Presented by: LORNA DIG-DINO 20 th National ManCom Meeting NEAP- Region XI, Davao City February 23, 2010.
STARTALK: Our mission, accomplishments and direction ILR November 12, 2010.
New Scheme Teachers A Stress Free Accreditation!?! NSW Geography Teachers Association Workshop at Cockatoo Island 23 March 2007 Elizabeth Riley Covenant.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
THE NEED TO TRAIN THE TRAINERS. Who University lecturers /academics Teaching assistants (such as research students who do tutoring etc) Senior academics.
Preparing Future Teachers for 21 st Century Learning Partnerships that enhance the capacity of pre-service education 2008 Deakin University Faculty of.
STEM EDUCATION TRANSFORMATION Barbara McAllister May 2013 INTEL’S MODEL FOR.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Copyright © 2008 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
Programs of the Intel® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation. Copyright © 2007 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
INTEL CONFIDENTIAL, FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 1 Education Transformation L ondon, 8 th September 2011 Danny Arati Education Manager Europe, Intel.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
CBME in MESAU Institutions, Uganda Sarah Kiguli MakCHS 7 th August 2013.
Unit 3 The National English Curriculum
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers
The National Diploma in Teaching Adults
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Chapter 8 Further Concerns in Developing ICT in Language Learning
Univ. Prof Dr Viktor Jakupec
Presentation transcript:

UP NISMED The Pilot Intel® Teach Pedagogical Support System MONALISA M. TE-SASING & CELIA R. BALBIN 6 September 2006 UP NISMED

Goal creation of the Intel® Teach to the Future Community of Learning, where teachers and teacher educators integrate themselves and establish a support system within their community to dynamically sustain use of technology in school curricula and maximize student outcomes

UP NISMED Objectives 1.enhance the Unit Plan they developed during training; 2.implement the Unit Plan; 3.reflect on and evaluate implementation; and 4.revise the Unit Plan for future implementation

UP NISMED Pedagogical Support Process enhance Unit Plan implement reflect & evaluate revise Stage 1Stage 2Stage 3

UP NISMED Scope & Tools Project ran from October 2005 to May 2006 Tools: –A portfolio review guide –MT journals for Stages 1 and 2 –SP journals for Stages 1 and 2 –Class Observation Form –Guide for conducting debriefing sessions –SP Progress checklists for Stages 1 to 3

UP NISMED Beneficiaries 68 new MTs trained last May 2005 from Regions III, IV-CALABARZON, XI, ARMM, and NCR

UP NISMED Distribution of MTs by Stage of Support Received

UP NISMED Support Providers DepED – Intel® Teach Regional Trainers and Enhanced Master Trainers Intel® Teach Pre-service faculty from Teacher Education Institutions (TEIs) implementing pre-service Intel Teach to the Future UP NISMED

Accomplishments 66 (97%) MTs implemented their Unit Plans 2 (3%) will implement in SY

UP NISMED MTs Who Implemented their Unit Plans by Division DivisionTotal No. of MTs MTs who implemented their Unit Plans No.% Bulacan33100 Tarlac Batangas Province Laguna88100 Cavite22100 Davao City77100 Malabang11100 Makati City Quezon City San Juan22100 Total %

UP NISMED Challenges Unit Plan Enhancement and Implementation (MTs) lack of resources difficulty in –selecting the technology tools appropriate for a given student activity –formulating and matching Curriculum-Framing Questions with learning objectives –designing/adapting and properly sequencing activities –developing a new Unit Plan technical and logistical problems students’ poor ICT skills monitoring student progress and providing them with appropriate and timely assistance

UP NISMED Challenges Provision of Support (SPs) reviewing and suggesting enhancements to Unit Plans in learning areas other than their own scheduling and conducting face-to-face meetings with MTs encouraging the MTs to continue with Unit Plan implementation helping MTs apply effective classroom management techniques during implementation preparing individual reports for each MT supported

UP NISMED Learnings Factors Affecting Technology Integration Access to technological resources is a critical element that affects the way the MTs implemented application of computers in their classrooms. Administrative support and encouragement is essential and facilitative. Designing and implementing pedagogical strategies made possible by integrating technology requires flexibility in organizing and delivering the curriculum. Content and pedagogical competencies affected MTs’ ability to meaningfully integrate technology.

UP NISMED Learnings Impact of Using Technology in Class Implementing a technology-supported unit has improved teachers’ skills and confidence in using technology and increased their interest to innovate with technology in their classes. Integration of technology in learning activities improved student outcomes.

UP NISMED Learnings Provision of Support Effective pedagogical support requires content expertise and know-how of current best practices in the learning area. Post-training support entails time and utilizes multiple activities to address the MTs’ diverse needs. MTs became enabled when they learn from and are supported by a strong community of experts and co-learners.

UP NISMED Implications Administrative support and cooperation from the entire system Selection of teachers for professional development programs Participation of academic supervisors in supporting teachers on ICT-pedagogy integration Assessment and evaluation of student outcomes

UP NISMED Conclusion Post-training support scheme enabled newly trained teachers to implement the Unit Plan they developed during training. Educational change with technology in schools is a complex process. Utilizing learnings from an ICT-pedagogy integration training necessitates an enabling school environment coupled with support from the wider community of experts and co-learners.

UP NISMED References Intel® Teach to the Future Pilot Pedagogical Support System. Technical Report. UP NISMED. July Intel® Teach to the Future Program Evaluation Results. Presented in PowerPoint last April 2004 during the Intel Teach Enhancement Workshop at UP NISMED by SEAMEO Innotech.