OC 3 : Benchmark Exercise of Aero-elastic Offshore Wind Turbine Codes J A Nichols and T R Camp, Garrad Hassan and Partners Ltd. J Jonkman and S Butterfield,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scour holes/Scour protection: Effect on wave loads EWEC 2007 MILANO Erik Asp Hansen Erik Damgaard Christensen.
Advertisements

Project 2.1 Cost-Benefit Framework: Secondary Benefits and Ancillary Services MIKE QUASHIE AND GEZA JOOS (MCGILL UNIVERSITY)
Optimising Site Investigations for Offshore Wind Farm Projects Mark Finch Geotechnical Engineering Manager Hydrosearch Associates, Aberdeen UK Offshore.
Delft University of Technology Aeroelastic Modeling and Comparison of Advanced Active Flap Control Concepts for Load Reduction on the Upwind.
Overview of Loads ON and IN Structures / Machines
European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition 2010 Warsaw, Poland EWEC 2010 Warsaw April 2010 Aeroelastic Analysis of Pre-Curved Rotor Blades V.A.Riziotis,S.G.Voutsinas.
Presentation outline Product development process: =>Design for Six Sigma =>Advanced modelling tools Practical examples => SKF quiet running bearing.
Disturbance Accommodating Control of Floating Wind Turbines
Hazim Namik Department of Mechanical Engineering
Gireesh Ramachandran Amy Robertson Jason Jonkman Marco Masciola
Quantifying risk through a rigorous analytical approach to the real world challenge of offshore wind construction – downtime, constraints and sequencing.
Process Industries Benchmarking Professor Munir Ahmad School of Science and Engineering Teesside University NEPIC Presentation.
Adaptive Composite Blades for Horizontal Axis Tidal Turbines R.F. Nicholls-Lee, S.R. Turnock and S.W. Boyd Fluid Structure Interactions Research Group,
DEFLECTIONS (Chapter 8) WHY? FACTORS IN DESIGN Safety Esthetics Serviceability Environment Economy DETERMINACY Determinate Structures Equations of Equilibrium.
Structure Analysis I. Lecture 8 Internal Loading Developed in Structural Members Shear & Moment diagram Ch.4 in text book.
ENGR 225 Section
PROJECTS WITH POTENTIAL FUNDING
ECIV 320 Structural Analysis I
1 Residual Vectors & Error Estimation in Substructure based Model Reduction - A PPLICATION TO WIND TURBINE ENGINEERING - MSc. Presentation Bas Nortier.
Power Systems Consulting and Software 4 March 2004 BWEA Conference: UK Offshore Wind 2004 Integration of Offshore Wind Farms into the Local Distribution.
10 Pure Bending.
1 EWEC 2007: UpWind Workshop WP 4 Offshore Support Structures Martin Kühn, et al. Endowed Chair of Wind Energy University of Stuttgart Thanks to the co-authors.
Computational Modelling of Unsteady Rotor Effects Duncan McNae – PhD candidate Professor J Michael R Graham.
Wind Modeling Studies by Dr. Xu at Tennessee State University
Aerodynamics and Aeroelastics, WP 2
Some effects of large blade deflections on aeroelastic stability Bjarne S. Kallesøe Morten H. Hansen.
The Centre For S USTAINABLE E LECTRICITY & D ISTRIBUTED G ENERATION Creation of SEDG The Centre for Sustainable Electricity and Distributed Generation,
NREL – Jason Jonkman MARINTEK – Ivar Fylling Risø-DTU – Torben Larsen
A Quantitative Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbines
Tolerance Synthesis “ Relationship between Geometrical Tolerancing and Product Function ” Irfan A Manarvi Prof. Neal P Juster DMEM, CAD Centre University.
3D Dynamic Stall Modelling on the NREL phase VI Parked Blade ALVARO GONZALEZ XABIER MUNDUATE 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit Orlando,
Accuracy of calculation procedures for offshore wind turbine support structures Pauline de Valk – 27 th of August 2013.
Institute for Steel Construction – Leibniz University of Hannover 2. PhD Seminar on Wind Energy in Europe October 4th and 5th 2006 at Risø National Laboratory,
Review of IEA Wind Task 23 OC3 Project Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by the Alliance for.
Current Offshore Wind Energy Technology and Deployment Activities Robert Thresher National Renewable Energy Laboratory National Wind Technology Center,
6. SLOPE DEFLECTION METHOD. 6.1 SLOPE DEFLECTION METHOD - AN OVERVIEW 6.2 INTRODUCTION 6.3 DETAILS OF SLOPE DEFLECTION METHOD 6.4 SOLUTION OF PROBLEMS.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Melbourne Finite Element Modelling Applications (Notes prepared by A. Hira – modified.
Smart Rotor Control of Wind Turbines Using Trailing Edge Flaps Matthew A. Lackner and Gijs van Kuik January 6, 2009 Technical University of Delft University.
Innovation for Our Energy FutureNational Renewable Energy Laboratory 1 Gunjit Bir National Renewable Energy Laboratory 47 th AIAA Aerospace Meetings Orlando,
Department of Tool and Materials Engineering Investigation of hot deformation characteristics of AISI 4340 steel using processing map.
Wind Energy Program School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Computational Studies of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:
Institute for Steel Construction – Leibniz University of Hannover 2. PhD Seminar on Wind Energy in Europe October 4th and 5th 2006 at Risø National Laboratory,
Integrated Dynamic Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines EWEC2007 Milan, Italy 7-10 May 2007 B. Skaare 1, T. D. Hanson 1, F.G. Nielsen 1, R. Yttervik.
REDUCTION OF TEETER ANGLE EXCURSIONS FOR A TWO-BLADED DOWNWIND ROTOR USING CYCLIC PITCH CONTROL Torben Juul Larsen, Helge Aagaard Madsen, Kenneth Thomsen,
DOE Peer Review May 10, 2006 Golden, CO Walt Musial Leader-Offshore Projects National Renewable Energy Laboratory Offshore Wind.
FY 2006 DOE Wind and Hydropower Program Peer Review Denver Marriot West, Golden CO, USA May 9-11, 2006 Walt Musial Leader-Offshore Projects National Wind.
NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF WIND TURBINE AERODYNAMICS Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California Davis OUTLINE Challenges in Wind Turbine Flows The Analysis.
European Wind Energy Conference Milan, Italy May 7-11, 2007 Improving Wind Turbine Gearbox Reliability Walt Musial National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Authorities point of view How TOSCA can be a relevant tool for antipollution control? -> Commissaire Général (Ret) Alain VERDEAUX, PREMAR MED Authorities.
Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services.
Forging new generations of engineers
ANSYS/LS-DYNA Drop Test Module
Modal Dynamics of Wind Turbines with Anisotropic Rotors Peter F
DEWEK 2004 Lecture by Aero Dynamik Consult GmbH, Dipl. Ing. Stefan Kleinhansl ADCoS – A Nonlinear Aeroelastic Code for the Complete Dynamic Simulation.
Wind Energy Program School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Computational Studies of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:
Advanced Controls Research Alan D. Wright Lee Fingersh Maureen Hand Jason Jonkman Gunjit Bir 2006 Wind Program Peer Review May 10, 2006.
Introduction to System Analysis and Design MADE BY: SIR NASEEM AHMED KHAN DOW VOCATIONAL & TECHNICAL TRAINING CENTRE.
RANS-VOF Modelling of Floating Tidal Turbine Concepts Edward Ransley* and Scott Brown School of Marine Science and Engineering University of Plymouth
Verification and Validation of Offshore Wind Modeling Tools through IEA Wind Tasks 23 and 30 IEA Wind TEM# 76: "Floating Offshore Wind Plants“ April 28,
ICOWEOE October 31, 2011 Beijing China Amy Robertson, Ph.D.
Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration, Continued (IEA Task 30): Phase II Results of a Floating Semisubmersible Wind System EWEA Offshore Conference November.
Bassam A. Izzuddin* and Bassam A. Burgan†
The Peninsula Research Institute for Marine Renewable Energy
Structural design and dynamic analysis of a tension leg platform wind turbine, considering elasticity in the hull NTNU supervisor: Erin Bachynski TUD.
Breaking waves on the offshore wind turbine monopiles and the effects of boundary layer
INVESTIGATION OF IDLING INSTABILITIES IN WIND TURBINE SIMULATIONS
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Overview of Loads ON and IN Structures / Machines
Rotors in Complex Inflow, AVATAR, WP2
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
Presentation transcript:

OC 3 : Benchmark Exercise of Aero-elastic Offshore Wind Turbine Codes J A Nichols and T R Camp, Garrad Hassan and Partners Ltd. J Jonkman and S Butterfield, NREL T Larsen and Anders Hansen, Risø J Azcona, A Martinez and X Munduate, CENER F Vorpahl and S Kleinhansl, CWMT M Kohlmeier, T Kossel and C Böker, Leibniz University of Hannover D Kaufer, SWE University of Stuttgart

Outline Background and partners Objectives Project phases and approach Phase III: offshore tripod Results Future work

Background and Partners The Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration (OCCC) has been coordinated within the IEA Wind Annex XXIII by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Project group consists of research bodies, universities and partners from industry. Phase III includes contributions from: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) (USA) Endowed Chair of Wind Energy of the Universität Stuttgart (D) Garrad Hassan (UK) Risø National Laboratory (DK) National Renewable Energies Center (CENER) (ESP). Fraunhofer Centre for Wind Energy and Maritime Engineering (D) Leibniz University of Hannover (D) Simulation tools: Bladed, Flex5, FAST, HAWC2, ADCoS, WaveLoads and ANSYS

Objectives Establishment of a suite of benchmark simulations to test new codes and for training of new analysts Identification and verification of code capabilities and limitations of implemented theories Investigation and refinement of applied analysis methodologies Investigation on the accuracy and reliability of results obtained by simulations to establish confidence in the predictive capabilities of the codes Identification of further research and development needs

Project Phases Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV

Approach At each stage simulations are selected to highlight different areas of interest To start with, only basic models are used Then more features are added This facilitates identifying the differences between the different codes Basic StructureWind LoadsWave LoadsFull simulationDynamicsStatic Simulation

Phase III: Offshore Tripod Significant jump in complexity from monopile substructure. Statically indeterminate Loads influenced by relative deflection of members

Modelling – wave loads Importance of modelling the structure near the sea surface in detail Without a fine discretisation, sharp jumps are seen in load signals Axial Force (kN)

Modelling – overlapping members It is important to take account of the overlapping regions when structure members join at nodes In this case, the volume which could be double- counted would be 8% of the total volume below sea level having a significant effect on buoyancy and wave loads.

Modelling – shear deflection Bernoulli-Euler theory only considers pure bending of a beam. One side is compressed while the other is stretched. In real beams, there is some shear deformation of the material. This becomes important once relative deflection of joined members becomes important. x M P l

Modelling – shear deflection

Results - Eigenanalysis

Results – Output Locations

Results – bending moments due to wave loads

Results – shear forces due to wave loads

Results – axial forces due to wave loads

Motion of the dynamic support structure

Future Work Phase IV beginning Floating spar-buoy structure Stretching the limits of existing wind turbine codes Involvement of codes used by oil and gas companies to model offshore structures

Conclusions Identification of important issues for space-frame offshore support structures. Encouragement for the development of existing codes to incorporate these features. Establishment of baseline load calculations and results for new codes to be tested against. A number of engineers are now equipped with experience of modelling offshore structures with greater knowledge of the factors which influence loading results.