Meet the transmon and his friends

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits T. Yamamoto, Yu. A. Pashkin, O. Astafiev, Y. Nakamura & J. S. Tsai Presented.
Advertisements

Technological issues of superconducting charge qubits Oleg Astafiev Tsuyoshi Yamamoto Yasunobu Nakamura Jaw-Shen Tsai Dmitri Averin NEC Tsukuba - SUNY.
Non-equilibrium dynamics in the Dicke model Izabella Lovas Supervisor: Balázs Dóra Budapest University of Technology and Economics
Depts. of Applied Physics & Physics Yale University expt. Andreas Wallraff David Schuster Luigi Frunzio Andrew Houck Joe Schreier Hannes Majer Blake Johnson.
Superinductor with Tunable Non-Linearity M.E. Gershenson M.T. Bell, I.A. Sadovskyy, L.B. Ioffe, and A.Yu. Kitaev * Department of Physics and Astronomy,
Quantum Optics in Circuit QED:
Small Josephson Junctions in Resonant Cavities David G. Stroud, Ohio State Univ. Collaborators: W. A. Al-Saidi, Ivan Tornes, E. Almaas Work supported by.
Five criteria for physical implementation of a quantum computer 1.Well defined extendible qubit array -stable memory 2.Preparable in the “000…” state 3.Long.
Operating in Charge-Phase Regime, Ideal for Superconducting Qubits M. H. S. Amin D-Wave Systems Inc. THE QUANTUM COMPUTING COMPANY TM D-Wave Systems Inc.,
D-Wave Systems Inc. THE QUANTUM COMPUTING COMPANY TM A.M. Zagoskin (D-Wave Systems and UBC) Tunable coupling of superconducting qubits Quantum Mechanics.
Depts. of Applied Physics & Physics Yale University expt. K. Lehnert L. Spietz D. Schuster B. Turek Chalmers University K.Bladh D. Gunnarsson P. Delsing.
Universal Optical Operations in Quantum Information Processing Wei-Min Zhang ( Physics Dept, NCKU )
Josephson Junctions, What are they?
“Quantum computation with quantum dots and terahertz cavity quantum electrodynamics” Sherwin, et al. Phys. Rev A. 60, 3508 (1999) Norm Moulton LPS.
REVIEW OF SOLID STATE QUANTUM BIT CIRCUITS
Quantum Computing with Superconducting Circuits Rob Schoelkopf Yale Applied Physics QIS Workshop, Virginia April 23, 2009.
Long coherence times with dense trapped atoms collisional narrowing and dynamical decoupling Nir Davidson Yoav Sagi, Ido Almog, Rami Pugatch, Miri Brook.
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME Xiangning Luo EE 698A Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame Superconducting Devices for Quantum Computation.
Coherence and decoherence in Josephson junction qubits Yasunobu Nakamura, Fumiki Yoshihara, Khalil Harrabi Antti Niskanen, JawShen Tsai NEC Fundamental.
1 0 Fluctuating environment -during free evolution -during driven evolution A -meter AC drive Decoherence of Josephson Qubits : G. Ithier et al.: Decoherence.

Interfacing quantum optical and solid state qubits Cambridge, Sept 2004 Lin Tian Universität Innsbruck Motivation: ion trap quantum computing; future roads.
Superconducting Qubits Kyle Garton Physics C191 Fall 2009.
Single atom lasing of a dressed flux qubit
Dressed state amplification by a superconducting qubit E. Il‘ichev, Outline Introduction: Qubit-resonator system Parametric amplification Quantum amplifier.
Quantum Devices (or, How to Build Your Own Quantum Computer)
Quantum computation with solid state devices - “Theoretical aspects of superconducting qubits” Quantum Computers, Algorithms and Chaos, Varenna 5-15 July.
P. Bertet Quantum Transport Group, Kavli Institute for Nanoscience, TU Delft, Lorentzweg 1, 2628CJ Delft, The Netherlands A. ter Haar A. Lupascu J. Plantenberg.
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL Feb. 16 th, 2004 Aspen Meeting Kentaro Somiya LIGO-G Z.
SPEC, CEA Saclay (France),
Introduction to Circuit QED: Part II Josephson junction qubits
IQC Lev S Bishop Strong driving in Circuit QED TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: A AAAA A A.
V. Brosco1, R. Fazio2 , F. W. J. Hekking3, J. P. Pekola4
Quantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: ‘Circuit QED’
Non-linear driving and Entanglement of a quantum bit with a quantum readout Irinel Chiorescu Delft University of Technology.
Quantum measurement and superconducting qubits Yuriy Makhlin (Landau Institute) STMP-09, St. Petersburg 2009, July 3-8.
What's super about superconducting qubits? Jens Koch Departments of Physics and Applied Physics, Yale University Chalmers University of Technology, Feb.
D.Giuliano (Cosenza), P. Sodano (Perugia) Local Pairing of Cooper pairs in Josephson junction networks Obergurgl, June 2010.
Superfluid dynamics of BEC in a periodic potential Augusto Smerzi INFM-BEC & Department of Physics, Trento LANL, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos.
Alireza Shabani, Jan Roden, Birgitta Whaley
Strong light-matter coupling: coherent parametric interactions in a cavity and free space Strong light-matter coupling: coherent parametric interactions.
Two Level Systems and Kondo-like traps as possible sources of decoherence in superconducting qubits Lara Faoro and Lev Ioffe Rutgers University (USA)
Noise and decoherence in the Josephson Charge Qubits Oleg Astafiev, Yuri Pashkin, Tsuyoshi Yamamoto, Yasunobu Nakamura, Jaw-Shen Tsai RIKEN Frontier Research.
Macroscopic quantum dynamics in superconducting nanocircuits Jens Siewert Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Regensburg, Germany Imperial College,
Quantum computation with solid state devices - “Theoretical aspects of superconducting qubits” Quantum Computers, Algorithms and Chaos, Varenna 5-15 July.
Entanglement for two qubits interacting with a thermal field Mikhail Mastyugin The XXII International Workshop High Energy Physics and Quantum Field Theory.
Adiabatic Quantum Computation with Noisy Qubits M.H.S. Amin D-Wave Systems Inc., Vancouver, Canada.
Gang Shu  Basic concepts  QC with Optical Driven Excitens  Spin-based QDQC with Optical Methods  Conclusions.
Pablo Barberis Blostein y Marc Bienert
Measuring Quantum Coherence in the Cooper-Pair Box
On Decoherence in Solid-State Qubits Josephson charge qubits Classification of noise, relaxation/decoherence Josephson qubits as noise spectrometers Decoherence.
Simulation of Superconducting Qubits Using COMSOL
|| Quantum Systems for Information Technology FS2016 Quantum feedback control Moritz Businger & Max Melchner
Quantum dynamics in nano Josephson junctions Equipe cohérence quantique CNRS – Université Joseph Fourier Institut Néel GRENOBLE Wiebke Guichard Olivier.
Violation of a Bell’s inequality in time with weak measurement SPEC CEA-Saclay IRFU, CEA, Jan A.Korotkov University of California, Riverside A. Palacios-Laloy.
Per Delsing Chalmers University of Technology Quantum Device Physics Interaction between artificial atoms and microwaves Experiments: IoChun Hoi, Chris.
Departments of Physics and Applied Physics, Yale University
Circuit QED Experiment
Pitch and Catch of Non-Classical Microwaves
Superconducting Qubits
Quantum Phase Transition of Light: A Renormalization Group Study
Coherent interactions at a distance provide a powerful tool for quantum simulation and computation. The most common approach to realize an effective long-distance.
S. V. Remizov, A. A. Zhukov, D. S. Shapiro, W. V. Pogosov, Yu. E. Lozovik All-Russia Research Institute of Automatics, Moscow Parametrically driven hybrid.
Stabilization of entanglement in qubits- photon systems: Effects of parametric driving and inhomogeneous broadening S. V. Remizov 1,2, A. A. Zhukov 1,3,
dark matter Properties stable non-relativistic non-baryonic
Coupled atom-cavity system
Strong Coupling of a Spin Ensemble to a Superconducting Resonator
Josephson Flux Qubits in Charge-Phase Regime
Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics for Superconducting Electrical Circuits
Dynamics of a superconducting qubit coupled to quantum two-level systems in its environment Robert Johansson (RIKEN, The Institute of Physical and Chemical.
Presentation transcript:

Meet the transmon and his friends Departments of Physics and Applied Physics, Yale University Chalmers University of Technology, Feb. 2009 Meet the transmon and his friends Jens Koch

Outline Transmon qubit Circuit QED with the transmon – examples ► from the CPB to the transmon ► advantages of the transmon ► theoretical predictions vs. experimental data Circuit QED with the transmon – examples Bullwinkle

Review: Cooper pair box 3 parameters: offset charge (tunable by gate) Josephson energy (tunable by flux in split CPB) charging energy (fixed by geometry) charge basis: numerical diagonalization phase basis: exact solution with Mathieu functions

CPB as a charge qubit Charge limit: comment on the rewriting of E_J \cos \phi in the charge basis here

CPB as a charge qubit Charge limit: big small perturbation

Noise from the environment Superconducting qubits are affected by charge noise flux noise critical current noise Noise can lead to energy relaxation ( ) dephasing ( ) Persistent problem with superconducting qubits: short bad for qubit! Reduce noise itself Reduce sensitivity to noise ► materials science approach ► eliminate two-level fluctuators J. Martinis et al., PRL 95, 210503 (2005) ► design improved quantum circuits ► find smart ways to beat the noise! Paradigmatic example: sweet spot for the Cooper Pair Box

Outsmarting noise: CPB sweet spot ◄ charge fluctuations energy sweet spot only sensitive to 2nd order fluctuations in gate charge! energy ng (gate charge) Vion et al., Science 296, 886 (2002) ng

CPB sweet spot: the good and the bad Linear noise T2 ~ 1 nanosecond (e.g. Nakamura) Sweet spot T2 > 0.5 microsecond (e.g. Saclay, Yale) disadvantages: ► need feedback ► still no good long-term stability ► does not help with “violent” charge fluctuations How to make a sweeter spot?

Towards the transmon: increasing EJ/EC ► charge dispersion becomes flat (peak to peak) ► anharmonicity decreases sweet spot everywhere!

Harmonic oscillator approximation quantum rotor (charged, in constant magnetic field ) Consequences of ► strong “gravitational pull” ► small angles dominate expand ignore periodic boundary conditions eliminate vector potential by “gauge” transformation

Harmonic oscillator approximation resulting Schrödinger equation: ► harmonic spectrum ► no charge dispersion

Anharmonic oscillator Anharmonic oscillator approximation expand like before perturbation Perturbation theory in quartic term anharmonic spectrum still no charge dispersion

Charge dispersion ► full 2p rotation, Aharonov-Bohm type phase ► quantum tunneling with periodic boundary conditions - WKB with periodic b.c. - instantons - asymptotics of Mathieu characteristic values WKB valid if relative change of the local classical momentum over the de Brogie wavelength is small. In other words, V(x) varies slowly on the scale of the de Broglie wavelength.

Coherence and operation times charge regime T2 from 1/f charge noise at sweet spot Top due to anharmonicity transmon regime the “anharmonicity barrier” at EJ/EC = 9

Increase EJ/EC Increase the ratio by decreasing Island volume ~1000 times bigger than conventional CPB island

Experimental characterization of the transmon Reduction of charge dispersion: Improved coherence times theory Strong coupling 2g ~ 350 MHz vacuum Rabi splitting THEORY: J. Koch et al., PRA 76, 042319 (2007), EXPERIMENT: J. A. Schreier et al., Phys. Rev. B 77, 180502(R) (2008)

Cavity & circuit quantum electrodynamics ►coupling an atom to discrete mode of EM field cavity QED Haroche (ENS), Kimble (Caltech) J.M. Raimond, M. Brun, S. Haroche, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 565 (2001) circuit QED A. Blais et al., Phys. Rev. A 69, 062320 (2004) A. Wallraff et al., Nature 431,162 (2004) R. J. Schoelkopf, S.M. Girvin, Nature 451, 664 (2008) 2g = vacuum Rabi freq. k = cavity decay rate Describe diagram Describe each rate Describe each term in Hamiltonian Discuss strong coupling g = “transverse” decay rate Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian resonator mode atom/qubit coupling

Circuit QED integrated on microchip atom artificial atom: SC qubit cavity 2D transmission line resonator integrated on microchip paradigm for study of open quantum systems ► coherent control ► quantum information processing ► conditional quantum evolution ► quantum feedback ► decoherence Describe diagram Describe each rate Describe each term in Hamiltonian Discuss strong coupling

Coupling transmon - resonator qubit resonator mode Cooper pair box / transmon: coupling to resonator:

Control and QND readout: the dispersive limit Control and readout of the qubit: (detune qubit from resonator) dispersive limit : detuning canonical transformation dynamical Stark shift Hamiltonian dispersive shift:

Circuit QED with transmons 2006/7 Probing photon states via the numbersplitting effect ►transmon as a detector for photon states J. Gambetta et al., PRA 74, 042318 (2006); D. Schuster et al., Nature 445, 515 (2007) 2007 Realization of a two-qubit gate ► two transmons coupled via exchange of virtual photons J. Majer et al., Nature 449, 443 (2007) 2008 Observing the √n nonlinearity of the JC ladder A. Wallraff et al. (ETH Zurich) L. S. Bishop et al. (Yale)

Rob Schoelkopf Steve Girvin Michel Devoret