1 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval The Virgo FFT code: DarkF Mikael Laval CNRS UMR 6162 ARTEMIS, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, Nice,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Hild, Andreas Freise University of Birmingham Roland Schilling, Jerome Degallaix AEI Hannover January 2008, Virgo week, Pisa Advanced Virgo: Wedges.
Advertisements

Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
FINESSE FINESSE Frequency Domain Interferometer Simulation Versatile simulation software for user-defined interferometer topologies. Fast, easy to use.
19. October 2004 A. Freise Automatic Alignment using the Anderson Technique A. Freise European Gravitational Observatory Roma
1 Detector meeting, October 4 th 2006 M Laval Thermal effects and PR misalignments  Virgo simulations with the input mirror absorption losses calculated.
Dual Recycling for GEO 600 Andreas Freise, Hartmut Grote Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik Universität Hannover Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik.
Hiro Yamamoto LLO April 3, 2014 LIGO-G Core Optics related loss hierarchy of aLIGO Hiro Yamamoto LIGO/Caltech Introduction Loss related to geometry.
Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
LIGO Laboratory1 Thermal Compensation Experience in LIGO Phil Willems- Caltech Virgo/LSC Meeting, Cascina, May 2007 LIGO-G Z.
Marcus Ng Mentor: Alan Weinstein Co-mentor: Robert Ward
COMPUTER MODELING OF LASER SYSTEMS
Optics of GW detectors Jo van den Brand
Optical simulation – March 04 1 Optical Simulation François BONDU VIRGO Tools Goals Example: tuning of modulation frequency A few questions.
Marcus Benna, University of Cambridge Wavefront Sensing in Dual-Recycled Interferometers LIGO What is Wavefront Sensing? How does it work? –Detection of.
rd ILIAS-GW annual general meeting 1 VIRGO Commissioning progress J. Marque (EGO)
Thermally Deformable Mirrors: a new Adaptive Optics scheme for Advanced Gravitational Wave Interferometers Marie Kasprzack Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
Stefan Hild, Andreas Freise, Simon Chelkowski University of Birmingham Roland Schilling, Jerome Degallaix AEI Hannover Maddalena Mantovani EGO, Cascina.
Stefan Hild, Andreas Freise, Simon Chelkowski University of Birmingham Roland Schilling, Jerome Degallaix AEI Hannover Maddalena Mantovani EGO, Cascina.
1 Gravitational wave interferometer OPTICS François BONDU CNRS UMR 6162 ARTEMIS, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, Nice, France EGO, Cascina, Italy May 2006.
23/05/06VESF School1 Gravitational Wave Interferometry Jean-Yves Vinet ARTEMIS Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur Nice (France)
ILIAS WG1 meeting, 19/06/07 IB Faraday Isolator 1 IB in vacuum Faraday isolator E. Genin, S. Hebri, S. Hamdani, P. La Penna, J. Marque EGO.
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
Degeneracy for power-recycling and signal recycling cavities in Advanced Virgo.
Stefan Hild October 2007 LSC-Virgo meeting Hannover Interferometers with detuned arm cavaties.
1 The Status of Melody: An Interferometer Simulation Program Amber Bullington Stanford University Optics Working Group March 17, 2004 G D.
GEO‘s experience with Signal Recycling Harald Lück Perugia,
European Gravitational Observatory12/12/2005 WG1 Hannover 1 Mode Matching of the Fabry-Perrot cavities Julien Marque.
G Z AJW for Marcus Benna, Cambridge Wavefront Sensing for Advanced LIGO Model of wavefront sensing in a dual- recycled interferometer Consequences.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
LSC-VIRGO joint meeting - Pisa1 Input mirrors thermal lensing effect Frequency modulation PRCL length in Virgo Some results from a Finesse simulation.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Scientific Collaboration1 First Results from the Mesa Beam Profile Cavity Prototype Marco Tarallo 26 July 2005 Caltech – LIGO Laboratory.
1 Advanced Virgo Workshop 14/06/2007 M Laval Fabry Perot cavity for LG and Flat modes Mikael Laval (OCA/ARTEMIS) Outlines: Tools: The optical simulation.
1 Thermal noise and high order Laguerre-Gauss modes J-Y. Vinet, B. Mours, E. Tournefier GWADW meeting, Isola d’Elba May 27 th – Jun 2 nd, 2006.
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
LIGO LaboratoryLIGO-G R Coatings and Their Influence on Thermal Lensing and Compensation in LIGO Phil Willems Coating Workshop, March 21, 2008,
Nov 3, 2008 Detection System for AdV 1/8 Detection (DET) Subsystem for AdV  Main tasks and requirements for the subsystem  DC readout  Design for: the.
S. ChelkowskiSlide 1LSC Meeting, Amsterdam 09/2008.
Dual Recycling in GEO 600 H. Grote, A. Freise, M. Malec for the GEO600 team Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik University of Hannover Max-Planck-Institut.
First DR FFT Results on Advanced LIGO Using Perfect and Imperfect Optics By Ken Ganezer, George Jennings, and Sam Wiley CSUDH LIGO-G Z by Ken.
The status of VIRGO Edwige Tournefier (LAPP-Annecy ) for the VIRGO Collaboration HEP2005, 21st- 27th July 2005 The VIRGO experiment and detection of.
Specifications for OMC telescope in AdVirgo R. Gouaty, E. Tournefier Estimation of carrier HOM power at the dark port Constraints on OMC waist and position.
Equivalence relation between non spherical optical cavities and application to advanced G.W. interferometers. Juri Agresti and Erika D’Ambrosio Aims of.
Laguerre-Gauss Modes for Future Gravitational Wave Detectors Keiko Kokeyama University of Birmingham 2 nd ET Annual Erice, Sicily, Italy
1 Locking in Virgo Matteo Barsuglia ILIAS, Cascina, July 7 th 2004.
G Z Mentor: Bill Kells Investigating a Parametric Instability in the LIGO Test Masses Hans Bantilan (Carleton College) for the LIGO Scientific.
Advanced Virgo: Optical Simulation and Design Advanced Virgo review Andreas Freise for the OSD Subsystem.
Some Ideas on Coatingless all-reflective ITF Adalberto Giazotto & Giancarlo Cella INFN- Pisa.
Some considerations on radiative cooling V. Fafone, Y. Minenkov, I. Modena, A. Rocchi INFN Roma Tor Vergata.
Jean-Yves Vinet CNRS-ARTEMIS Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur Effects In cavity mirrors.
ILIAS - Geneve1 Input mirrors thermal lensing effect in Virgo J. Marque.
The VIRGO detection system
FINESSE FINESSE Frequency Domain Interferometer Simulation Andreas Freise European Gravitational Observatory 17. March 2004.
GEO Status and Prospects Harald Lück ILIAS / ETmeeting Cascina November 2008.
Stefan Hild 1GWADW, Elba, May 2006 Experience with Signal- Recycling in GEO 600 Stefan Hild, AEI Hannover for the GEO-team.
1 Cascina – October 19, 2011 ASPERA Forum Laurent Pinard Substrates, Polishing, Coatings and Metrology for the 2 nd generation of GW detector Laurent PINARD.
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
(Some) noise hunting issues at Virgo
Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling
Gravitational wave interferometer OPTICS
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Modeling of Advanced LIGO with Melody
First Results from the Mesa Beam Profile Cavity Prototype
Thermal lensing effect: Experimental measurements - Simulation with DarkF & Finesse J. Marque (Measurements analysis: M. Punturo; DarkF simulation: M.
Heavy IMC end payload requirements
Thermal noise and high order Laguerre-Gauss modes J-Y. Vinet, B
Alignment Investigations towards Advanced Virgo
Some features of NV. Vincent Loriette.
Homodyne detection: understanding the laser noise amplitude transfer function Jérôme Degallaix Ilias meeting – June 2007.
Presentation transcript:

1 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval The Virgo FFT code: DarkF Mikael Laval CNRS UMR 6162 ARTEMIS, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, Nice, France EGO, Cascina, Italy

2 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval Outlines  Introduction  Using DarkF  The three kinds of simulation  The simulation parameters  Mirror maps  Ideal locking position  Results given by an automatic simulation  Examples of DarkF use  Conclusion Phase camera Input mode cleaner Flat modes.vs. LG high order modes

3 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval Introduction DarkF is an optical simulation code using a plane wave decomposition to propagate the wavefronts. It has been written by Jean-Yves Vinet and Mikael Laval (language Fortran90). It uses the Fourier transform method to propagate the beam. Beams and mirrors are sampled on a grid (x,y) and the DarkF resolution is depending of the grid size and of the point number (typically a size of 0.7m (larger than a mirror) with 128*128 points). We can include the mirror surface maps and the thermal effect phase maps in the simulation after correction of the residual tilt and of the piston. We can simulate simple systems such as Fabry Perot cavities (resonant or not), Michelson interferometers or complex systems as Virgo (for the carrier and for the sidebands).

4 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval Using DarkF (1/2) DarkF is complex but it has been coded to have a semi-automatic version. A user’s guide is in the final edition stage. DarkF is composed by a main program, 8 modules and 3 parameter files. The Virgo user will have to modify the parameter list and to choose the kinds of simulation. The “kind of simulation” One of the DarkF parameters is the “kind of simulation”. Three kinds are available but only the first two are automatic.  “Main”: With this parameter, DarkF will simulate the Virgo interferometer but only for the carrier.  “Main&SB”: This second kind will simulate the Virgo interferometer for the carrier and the sidebands.

5 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval  “Free”: It is the expert mode! This mode will be used to obtain a specific results which is not in the result file of the automatic modes or when the user does not want to simulate the Virgo interferometer. But in this mode, the user has to code his simulation in the main program. Consequently this mode is for the users which have a good knowledge of DarkF and of its possibilities. Remark:For the first two kinds of simulation, it is not necessary to compile the code. But for the case “Free”, a new compilation will be essential. Consequently a Makefile has been created for several configurations: Using DarkF (2/2) Fortran compiler: g95 or pathf95 FFT library: FFTW or ACML

6 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval The simulation parameters We have three parameter files for DarkF:  paramsimu.in: This is the parameter file of the simulation (size of the sampling window, number of points of the window, power of the initial beams, waist, kind of simulation, modulation frequency, interferometer lengths,…).  paramfiles.in: This is the parameter file which defines the name of the other parameter files and of the result file.  paramirrors.in: This file contains all the mirror parameters (transmission, losses, tilt, rotation,…) and the name of the mirror maps.

7 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval Mirror maps The mirrors maps can be tilted, rotated by 180° or translated. We can also modify the roughness amplitude to see its effects. For the curved mirrors, the mirror map corresponds to the roughness. Then we add this roughness to a paraboloid. Consequently it is easy to modify the curvature of these mirrors.

8 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval Ideal locking position in DarkF DarkF does not use the same method as Virgo to lock the interferometer. To lock, DarkF uses only the carrier. The locking position is checked when we have the maximum of power in the long arms, in the recycling cavity and the minimum on the output. Tuning of the long arms: Tuning of the dark fringe: Beam Splitter edf1 eref1 edf2 eref2 North arm West arm We calculate α and correct the propagator phase between the beam splitter and the west input mirror by α/2. Tuning of the recycling cavity: Recycling Mirror eref e0tr We calculate α and correct the propagator phase between the beam splitter and the recycling mirror by α/2. We modify the propagator to have a null phase shift after a round trip.

9 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval Results given by an automatic simulation  Result file: The configuration The parameters The results of the simulation (power of the different beams, the losses, the coupling defect, the coupling of the main beams with perfect TEM, the main beam baric center,…)  Beam files: The main beam intensity is saved in different files called as the beams in the code. Consequently we can plot the beam shape with a Matlab code.

10 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval Examples of DarkF use The Virgo Phase Camera (Cold interferometer) In the present phase camera (which is after the antireflective coating of the beam splitter), the contributions of both sidebands are summed. Consequently, we cannot distinguish them. It will be in an up-graded version of the phase camera. Carrier : LSB : USB : Phase camera signal: Virgo signalDarkF simulation Equivalent tilt = 1.6μrad Probably Virgo tilts the mirrors to compensate.

11 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval Examples of DarkF use The Virgo Phase Camera (Warm interferometer) Warm interferometer: dn/dT=0.98 e-5 K-1 Absorption(NI) = 5ppm  P(absorbed)=25mW Absorption(WI) = 13.8ppm  P(absorbed)=69mW Virgo signalDarkF simulation

12 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval Examples of DarkF use The Virgo Phase Camera (Thermalization) As the effects of the thermal compensation system developed by Roma group will be measured only by the phase camera, DarkF should be useful to give many important information.

13 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval DarkF simulation: Sampling step = 0,47mm L=143,573m TEM00 (width w0) Waist on input mirror C03004 radius=3,64cm Rc=179,601m T=5,7ppm Losses=66,2ppm Rotation: 17° Diaphragms: radius=1,75cm d=8,65cm neglected radius=1,96cm T=2457ppm Losses=15ppm radius=1,96cm T=2427ppm Losses=37ppm Input Mode Cleaner Characterization Configuration

14 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval Input Mode Cleaner Characterization Results Nomenclature: IM = Input Mirror; OM = Output Mirror; EM = End Mirror (or curved mirror) L(round trip) = Losses during a round trip, mirror losses not included C = Coupling Sc = Clipping (or Screening) Diaphragm1 = between EM and IM; Diaphragm2 = between OM and EM e0 = injected beam (TEM00) eIMC = intracavity beam Power enhancement341,39 IMC transmission82,85% IMC reflection11,39% L(round trip)346 ppm 1-C(eIMC,e0)0.47% Sc(IM)12 ppm Sc(OM)0 Sc(EM)259 ppm Sc(diaphragm1)76 ppm Sc(diaphragm2)0 General resultsClipping by mirror

15 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval Flat modes.vs. LG high order modes Why using flat modes or Laguerre Gauss high order modes as incoming beam? To have a better distribution of the power on the mirror surfaces. The surface deformations are averaged and the thermal noise contribution to the sensitivity is reduced. The heating of the mirrors will be more uniform and thermal lensing should be less important. Problems:What mirror size is necessary to not have clipping losses? What are the effects of a mismatching? What are the specifications needed for the alignment (tilt and centering of the mirrors)?

16 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval E0 Eref Etr Ecav M1M2 L=3km T=11,8% Losses=0 Rc=3100m radius r E0=LG33 or LG55(matched with the cavity) Waist at the cavity center = 2,29cm Width on the mirror=3,19cm Cavity for LG modes (Finesse=25): Configuration (1/2)

17 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval Configuration (2/2) E0 Eref Etr Ecav M1M2 L Cavity for flat modes (Finesse=25): T=11,8% Losses=0 radius r M1 = perfect flat mirror M2 = conjugate of twice a perfect flat mode argument in L=3km E0 = prefect flat mode = sum of tem00 of waist 3,188cm on a area of radius 11,3cm

18 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval LG mode (LG33)Flat mode Mirror sizer/w > 4.4 w=3.19cm Slightly larger (r/w>1.8) w=11.3cm Incoming beam matchingp(waist position)<200m p(beam width)<7% Weak effect Mirror centering<4mmWeak effect End mirror tiltWeak effect<0.15μrad Other modes2 modes close to FSR/210 modes To have less than 1ppm for the clipping losses or less than 10% decrease of the storage amplification: (p=precision) Results

19 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval Detuning of the cavity LG modes We detune the cavity (end mirror tilted by 0.2μrad ; finesse = 500):

20 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval Detuning of the cavity Flat modes (1/2) We detune the cavity (end mirror tilted by 0.2μrad ; finesse = 500): ,

21 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval Detuning of the cavity Flat modes (2/2)

22 GEO Simulation Workshop, October 25 th 2007 M Laval Conclusion DarkF is now developed enough to be used by the Virgo collaboration. The executable file and the user’s guide will be installed on a computer center. DarkF is used for the Optical Characterization (Virgo phase camera, recycling length, sideband dissymmetry, modulation frequency, input mode cleaner,…) but also for the Advanced Virgo R&D: Study of the flat modes and of the LG high order modes. The development of DarkF will continue: -new method of locking close to the Virgo one -For the R&D, we need to create some large mirror maps