Pilot Study: Re-screening Adolescent and Young Adult Women for Chlamydia Infection Alison Muse NYSDOH Bureau of STD Control Region II IPP meeting November.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Evaluation of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Field Delivered Therapy San Francisco Dept. of Public Health STD Prevention and Control Services V Davila, CK Kent,

Advertisements

Chlamydia Screening Rates among Pregnancy Test Only Visits in Region I, Andee Krasner, MPH Region I IPP Infrastructure.

Implementing a Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Screening Program in Philadelphia Public High Schools Melinda Salmon Philadelphia Department of Public Health.

Repeat Chlamydia trachomatis: Rate and Predictors among Males Eileen F. Dunne M.D., M.P.H. JB Chapin, C Rietmeijer, CK Kent, J Ellen, C Gaydos, N Willard,

Repeat Infections among Adolescents and Young Adults: Findings From Philadelphia STD Clinics Nicole Liddon, PhD 1 Michael Eberhart, BS 2 Jami Leichliter,

Research activities in Orange Farm Bertran Auvert INSERM University of Versailles, France Country update meeting on scaling - up of male circumcision programmes.

Assessment of Chlamydia Rescreening Practices Kelly Opdyke, MPH Region II IPP Advisory Committee Mtg May 16-17, 2007 Cicatelli Associates Inc.

How to Measure the Effectiveness of the IPP (and all the CT Screening being done)? **Reduce Infertility** Ultimate Goal Reduce PID Reduce Chlamydia Prevalence.

STD Screening in HIV Clinics: Value and Implications Thomas Farley, MD MPH Tulane University Deborah Cohen, MD MPH RAND Corporation.

Impact of a Targeted Provider Intervention to Improve Chlamydia Screening Practices in a Large California Family Planning Program Joan M. Chow 1, MPH,

Region II Infertility Prevention Project Chlamydia Test Turnaround Time Assessment Results March 2007 Region II IPP Meeting, May 2007.

Field Based Treatment of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Nilmarie Guzmán,MD & Michael Sands,MD University of Florida/Jacksonville and the Duval County Health Department.

Revision of Region II IPP Screening Criteria May 16, 2007 Region II IPP Advisory Committee Meeting Cicatelli Associates Inc. New York City.

Once Is Not Enough: Re-screening Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Clinic Patients in Six Months to Detect New STDs Once Is Not Enough: Re-screening Sexually.

Repeat Chlamydial Infections in Region III Family Planning Clinics: Implications for Screening Programs Pamela G. Nathanson, Family Planning Council, Inc.

Chlamydia Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2000 Division of STD Prevention.

Changes in Sex Networks and Repeat STDs among Male Adolescents and Young Adults Jonathan M Ellen 1, Charlotte Gaydos 1, Michelle Chung 1, Nancy Willard.

Screening and Treatment for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia as an HIV Prevention Strategy: Rationale and Implementation Thomas Farley, MD MPH Tulane University.

Sexual Behavior and the Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in Asymptomatic Students in Germany and Spain Christiane Stock 1, Francisco Guillén.

Use of an Internet-Based Self-Screening Program to Screen for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Wendy Voet On Behalf Of Charlotte A. Gaydos and Karen Dwyer, Mathilda.

STD Knowledge and Practices of New York City Providers Meighan E. Rogers, MPH Bureau of STD Control, NYC DOHMH Region II IPP Meeting, May 31-June 1, 2006.

The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the feasibility of conducting a prospective cohort study with sufficient follow-up in a population of.

Increasing Screening in the Private Sector Task Force Gale R Burstein, MD, MPH, FAAP Medical Director Epidemiology and Surveillance and STD & TB Control.

Analysis of Chlamydia Re-testing Rates Massachusetts Family Planning Update.

STEP UP: NYC DOHMH STD School Screening Progress Meighan Rogers, MPH IPP Region II Mtg December, 2007.

Re-Screening of CT Positive Clients in Region X IPP, Goldenkranz S., 1 Fine D. 1 1 Center for Health Training 2010 CDC STD Prevention Meeting,

Region I IPP Infrastructure Updates Advisory Board Meeting November 12, 2009 Boston, MA.

Region I IPP Clinic Staff and Provider Assessment Kim Watson, Jennifer Kawatu.

US Virgin Islands IPP: Use of Limited Resources Taetia Phillips-Dorsett, MS Territorial Director, USVI DOH STD/HIV/TB Program Region II IPP Advisory Meeting.

Region I IPP Infrastructure Updates Advisory Board Meeting June 15, 2010 Boston, MA.

Utilization of Cross-matching Databases to Obtain Chlamydia Re-screening and Re-infection Rates for Family Planning/Infertility Prevention Project Clinics:

EFFICACY OF A STAGE-BASED BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTION TO PROMOTE STI SCREENING IN YOUNG WOMEN: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Chacko MR, Wiemann CM, Kozinetz.

Region II IPP Data & Infrastructure Performance Measures Kelly Opdyke, MPH Region II IPP Advisory Committee Mtg May 16-17, 2007 Cicatelli Associates Inc.

IPP Measures of Effectiveness Utilization of Data to Evaluate and Inform Project Activities December 12, 2007 Kelly Morrison Opdyke, MPH Region II Infertility.

Evaluation of Presumptive Treatment Recommendation for Asymptomatic Anorectal Gonorrhoea and Chlamydia Infections in At-Risk Kenyan MSM IAS 24 July 2012.

Reduce Waiting & No-Shows  Increase Admissions & Continuation Who are We? We are: –Jefferson County, Alabama, Drug Court –Beacon Addiction.

Infrastructure Update Jennifer Kawatu Kim Watson Andee Krasner

Targeting Chlamydia Screening Resources Region II IPP Advisory Meeting May 31, 2006 Kelly Opdyke, MPH Cicatelli Associates Inc.

BASELINE ASSESSMENT OF CHLAMYDIA REINFECTION IN REGION VIII FAMILY PLANNING CLINICS FOR Hamby, Y, JSI Research & Training Institute Donovan,

Reaching Adolescents Michigan’s Infertility Prevention Screening Project.

Predicting Pregnancy Risk among Women Attending an STD Clinic Judith Shlay MD, MSPH Denver Public Health September 21, 2008 CityMatCH Conference.

Philadelphia High School STD Screening Program Declining Disease Prevalence After 4 Years of Screening Lenore Asbel, Melinda Salmon, C. Victor Spain, Christa.

Evaluation Plan Steven Clauser, PhD Chief, Outcomes Research Branch Applied Research Program Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences NCCCP Launch.

Efficacy of a “One-Shot” Computerized, Individualized Intervention to Increase Condom Use and Decrease STDs among Clinic Patients with Main Partners Diane.

NYC DOHMH BSTDC School-Based Education, Screening and Treatment Pilot Program Meighan Rogers, MPH Bureau of STD Control, NYC DOHMH Region II IPP Meeting,

Region I IPP Data Presentation Advisory Board Meeting June 2008 Wells, ME.

NAAT identified chlamydial infections: Enhanced sensitivity, reduced transmissibility? Presenter: Maria Villarroel, MA Authors: Maria A. Villarroel, MA.

Hepatitis Vaccination: Closing the Gaps in New York State Debra Blog, MD, MPH Immunization Program New York State Department of Health National Immunization.

IPP Infrastructure Measures of Effectiveness: Preliminary Data and Next Steps Kelly Morrison Opdyke, MPH Region II Infertility Prevention Project Cicatelli.

ANALYZING THE INTEGRATION OF HIV TESTING INTO THE FLOW OF FAMILY PLANNING CLINICS JANUARY 29, 2009 Rapid Testing & Clinic Flow 1.

Check Your Risk: Increasing School-Based STI Screening Participation Among District of Columbia High School Students Michelle Jasczyński, Ed.M. Public.

CONCLUSIONS New Jersey’s Emergency Department HIV testing sites report higher seroprevalence than non-ED testing sites. Since University Hospital began.

Marion County Health Department 2011–2015 STI Assessment Katarina Ost Public Health Associate Program Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support.

J. Mossong1, N. Majéry2, C. Mardaga3 , M. Muller4, F. Schneider1

Meg Rosenberg, M.D., Montefiore School Health Program

It's not what you know, but who you know: Risk factors for re-infection in the Philadelphia High School STD Screening Program Jennifer Beck, MPH APHA.

Cost of Screening Outside of IPP Chlamydia Screening Guidelines

Mary Koslap-Petraco, MS, CPNP Michael Vallone, AAS, RN Oneek Iftikhar

North Carolina TASC Clinical Series Training

Martin Goldberg1, Daniel R. Newman2, TA Peterman2,

Infertility Prevention Project Coordinator CDC/CCID/NCHHSTP/DSTDP/PTB

Value-Based Payments.

Can Self-collected Vaginal Swabs Facilitate Testing for Repeat Chlamydia trachomatis Infections among STD Clinic Clients Good morning everyone! I am going.

Region I IPP Data Update Region I IPP Advisory Board Meeting

Region II IPP Performance Measure IPP CS1 and IPP CS2 Project Area Trend Report IPP CS1: Timely treatment of women with chlamydia at IPP Family Planning.

Region I IPP Data Update Region I IPP Advisory Board Meeting

Treatment Verification Rates for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea

Value-Based Payments.

Gonorrhea Screening: What Do the Data Tell Us?

March 8, 2006 New ACIP Hepatitis B Recommendations

Presentation transcript:

Pilot Study: Re-screening Adolescent and Young Adult Women for Chlamydia Infection Alison Muse NYSDOH Bureau of STD Control Region II IPP meeting November 1, 2006

Background  Federal recommendation to re-screen women with Ct infection in 3 months  Studies show 11% to 15% of women treated for Ct are re-infected 3-4 months after treatment.

Objectives  Determine incidence of re-infection and associated risk factors  Assess feasibility of implementing re-screening in IPP clinics Assess effectiveness of reminder methods for encouraging clients to return for re-screening Assess effectiveness of reminder methods for encouraging clients to return for re-screening

Methods Design: Prospective, cross sectional study. Setting:Nine IPP STD clinics. Population: year old women testing Ct positive Sept 1, 2005 to Feb 28, 2006 & providing written informed consent.

Methods Reminder Method: R1: Mail R2: Telephone R3: Unassisted Telephone follow-up for no-shows unless R3 specified Incentive:$15 gift card provided at return visit Risk Assessment: Behavioral risk questionnaire administered at baseline and return visit.

Preliminary Results Baseline  1,347 screened, 179 (13.3%) infected  70 (39%) gave informed consent. Re-screening  56 scheduled to return 21 re-screened, 4 (19%) Ct positive 21 re-screened, 4 (19%) Ct positive 12/21 completed risk assessment at follow up 12/21 completed risk assessment at follow up

Preliminary Results: Reminder Method Method* Scheduled (N=70) Return (N=21) R145 6 R218 5 R3 2 1 Not Specified 5 0 Telephone F-U N/A 9 * R1: Mail, R2: Telephone, R3: Unassisted

Preliminary Conclusions  Implementation difficult at clinic level  Mail reminder most popular, least successful  Combined reminder plus incentive has not enhanced return rates.