2009/2010 DSTP/AYP Review

DSTP and AYP Review Appoquinimink and Statewide Trends AYP Status for Appoquinimink Schools Appoquinimink Key Areas of Focus

2010 DSTP Results

Appoquinimink and Statewide Trends Graphs indicate percentage that meets or exceeds the standard in math and reading for grades 3,5,8, and 10. Two lines, one indicating Appoquinimink’s percentage of students who meet or exceed the standard, the other indicates the State of Delaware’s.

3 rd Grade Reading DSTP

5th Grade Reading DSTP

8 th Grade Reading DSTP

10th Grade Reading DSTP

Grade by Grade Reading Rankings (% Meets) Reading GradeRankDistricts Above Appo 25CR, Cape, IR, Lake Forest 37CR, Cape, IR, Lake Forest, Milford, Woodbridge 43IR, Milford 54IR, Milford, Smyrna 65CR, Cape, IR, Milford 73IR, Milford 81 95IR, Milford, Polytech, Sussex Tech 103Polytech, Sussex Tech

3rd Grade Math DSTP

5th Grade Math DSTP

8th Grade Math DSTP

10th Grade Math DSTP

Grade by Grade Math Rankings (% Meets) Math GradeRankDistricts Above Appo 27Cape, IR, Lake Forest, Milford, Smyrna, Woodbridge 38CR, Cape, IR, Lake Forest, Milford, Smyrna, Woodbridge 44CR, IR, Milford 55 62Milford Delmar, Polytech, Sussex Tech 104Polytech, Red Clay, Sussex Tech

Context is Important: 2009/2010 was a Unique Year Reading Accommodation Changes Shorter Instructional Window due to Unusual Winter Weather (one and a half weeks lost) Professional Development Days Eliminated New Reading Curriculum for Grades 1-6 Higher Percentage of Low Income Students

Percentage of Low Income Students

Relationship between Poverty and DSTP Pass Rates

2010 AYP Determinations

2 Key Factors Impacting AYP Rising Performance Standards Cell Counts

Rising Performance Standards 75% 84%

School Performance

Rising Performance Standards Superior Academic Review

Cell Counts School “A” % Meeting the Standard 2010 Goal All Students85%80% White85%80% Black86%80% Special Education 77% 80% Low Income81%80% School “B” % Meeting the Standard 2010 Goal All Students85%80% White85%80% Black86%80% Special Education 45%80% Low Income75%80% Which School Missed AYP?

MUST HAVE >40 STUDENTS TO COUNT School “A” % Meeting the Standard Number of students Result? All Students85%400GOOD White85%240GOOD Black86%150GOOD Special Education 77%100MISS Low Income81%100GOOD School “B” % Meeting the Standard Number of students Result? All Students85%200GOOD White85%100GOOD Black86%50GOOD Special Education 45%25 DOES NOT COUNT Low Income75%38 DOES NOT COUNT

Statewide AYP-Meeting Schools by Type Type# MeetingTotalPercent Elementary Schools % Middle Schools 33110% High Schools33010%

School/Program Evaluation Demographics (Enrollment; Attendance; Grad. Rate; Ethnicity; Gender; College Attendance) Perceptions (Values, Beliefs, Attitudes Regarding the Learning Environment) Student Learning (Standardized Tests; Norm Referenced Tests; Portfolios; Curriculum Benchmarks) School Processes (Descriptions of School Programs)

MHS: Commendable Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Meets AsianN/A HispanicN/A WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.N/A LowIncomeN/A

AHS: Academic Review Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Below AsianN/A HispanicN/A WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.N/A LowIncomeN/A

AGW: Superior Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Meets AsianMeets HispanicN/A WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.Meets LowIncomeMeets

MMS: Academic Progress Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Meets AsianN/A HispanicMeets WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.Below LowIncomeMeets

RMS: Academic Progress Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Meets AsianMeets HispanicMeets WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.Below LowIncomeMeets

BHE: Superior Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Meets AsianN/A HispanicN/A WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.N/A LowIncomeMeets

BME: Superior Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Meets AsianN/A HispanicN/A WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.N/A LowIncomeMeets

CLE: Superior Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Meets AsianN/A HispanicN/A WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.N/A LowIncomeMeets

OBL: Superior Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Meets AsianMeets HispanicN/A WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.N/A LowIncomeMeets

SLE: Academic Watch Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.BelowMeets AsianN/A HispanicN/A WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.N/A LowIncomeMeets

TES: Superior Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Meets AsianN/A HispanicN/A WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.N/A LowIncomeMeets

Percentage Low Income by Appo School

2010 Key Areas of Focus

Appoquinimink Key Areas of Focus New Student Performance Elementary Special Education Performance High Performing Students

The Scope of the Number of New Students Entering For the 2010 DSTP testing session, 6363 students were tested. 661 were not enrolled in Appoquinimink School District last year. That’s roughly 1 in 10 students new to the District, or about 2 or 3 per class.

New Student Reading Performance

New Student Math Performance

Special Education Percentage that Meets the Standard ReadingAppo % MeetsState % Meets Elementary30%42% Middle39%33% High37%21% All35%34% MathAppo % MeetsState % Meets Elementary31%44% Middle35%27% High32%17% All33%31%

Reading National Percentile Ranks Spring 2010 from MAP Assessment

Math National Percentile Ranks Spring 2010 (from MAP Assessment )

Thank You