USPS Mailer Technology Study MTAC February 5, 2004 Jeffrey Freeman Manager, Mail Technology Strategy Intelligent Mail and Address Quality
2 USPS Mailer Technology Study | February 5, 2004 Agenda Purpose of Technology Study Study Overview Findings Closing
3 USPS Mailer Technology Study | February 5, 2004 Purpose of Technology Study To understand the mailing industry’s potential to print advanced barcodes Identify industry trends that increase likelihood of adoption
4 USPS Mailer Technology Study | February 5, 2004 Study Approach Mailer site visits Vendor interviews Mail preparer survey
5 USPS Mailer Technology Study | February 5, 2004 Survey Overview Target audience –Commercial and non-profit mail preparers Questionnaire –Covered demographics, key technology, information management, industry trends, benefits and challenges Interviews –Over 5,000 candidates screened; Over 300 interviews completed
6 USPS Mailer Technology Study | February 5, 2004 Respondent Demographics 311 mail preparers participated Account Types represented fairly evenly Twelve industry segments represented
7 USPS Mailer Technology Study | February 5, 2004 Respondent Demographics All three shapes represented: letters, flats, and parcels Letter mail predominant shape 85% of respondents report that they prepare two or more shapes
8 USPS Mailer Technology Study | February 5, 2004 Findings – Perceived Benefits 83% of respondents identified one or more benefits in adopting an advanced barcode –Customer demand for track and trace and customer relationship management are the top two benefits at 68% and 58% –35% identified inventory/job management as a potential benefit
9 USPS Mailer Technology Study | February 5, 2004 Findings – Potential Demand 54% of all locations already uniquely identify mailpieces and/or unit loads 42% of high volume locations use barcodes for production control/sortation –Top three uses: sortation, job tracking and customized insertion Preparers are experimenting with advanced barcodes
10 USPS Mailer Technology Study | February 5, 2004 Findings – Technology Factors Major technology factors to consider –Printer type –Printing resolution –Barcode readers
11 USPS Mailer Technology Study | February 5, 2004 Findings – Technology The ability to print complex barcodes is dependent on technology and resolution 63% of locations print most barcodes and addresses at resolution of 300 dpi and higher Technology and Resolution at Preparer Locations
12 USPS Mailer Technology Study | February 5, 2004 Findings – Technology Use of inkjet printers –59% of locations use inkjet printers for the majority of their mail Note: Six percent of respondents did not report a dominant printer type.
13 USPS Mailer Technology Study | February 5, 2004 Findings – Technology Use of continuous forms printers –25% of high volume locations use continuous forms printers on the majority of mail Use of POSTNET –High volume mail locations print POSTNET codes on the majority of letters (96%) and flats (79%) –The current resolution for printing the POSTNET code could already support the printing of some advanced barcodes
14 USPS Mailer Technology Study | February 5, 2004 Findings – Technology Barcode readers –26% of locations use barcodes for production control and/or sortation; 59% of these locations use USPS barcodes for this purpose –Mail preparers are twice as likely to use laser scanners than imagers to read barcodes *
15 USPS Mailer Technology Study | February 5, 2004 Findings – Technology Replacement patterns –Half of respondents are replacing the majority of their hardware & associated software over the next 5 years –38% will be replacing the majority of their readers in this same timeframe
16 USPS Mailer Technology Study | February 5, 2004 Findings – Other Factors Tradeoff in print resolution with production speed Process changes Interaction of ink with paper
17 USPS Mailer Technology Study | February 5, 2004 Closing There is a demand and interest in uniquely identifying mail pieces and unit loads Technology is available today to print advanced barcodes Further examination of the Study’s findings and additional research is necessary