Coppell ISD Coppell, Texas October 8, 2012 Download slides and files at: Thomasrye.weebly.com Thomas Rye ASCD / Ferris High School Spokane, WA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Costa’s Levels of Questioning
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
Thinking Skills and Personal Capabilities Unit 1
Provincial Report Cards Mathematics Grades 1 to 12.
(From AVID Tutorial Support Curriculum Resource Guide)
Department of Mathematics and Science
1 SESSION 3 FORMAL ASSESSMENT TASKS CAT and IT ASSESSMENT TOOLS.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
Understanding the Smarter BalanceD Math Summative Assessment
Costa’s Level of Question and Thinking
Understanding by Design 2012 Allen Parish March 12 & 13, 2012.
Curriculum Instruction & Assessment Part I - Alignment By Tina Waddy.
MODULE 3 1st 2nd 3rd. The Backward Design Learning Objectives What is the purpose of doing an assessment? How to determine what kind of evidences to.
The mere imparting of information is not education. Above all things, the effort must result in helping a person think and do for himself/herself. Carter.
Authentic Assessment Abdelmoneim A. Hassan. Welcome Authentic Assessment Qatar University Workshop.
1.  com com  And click on the “ASCD Presentations” tab  Tamalpais August 8-9 Day Two.
Internet password: aea8success Conceptbasedinstruction.weebly.com Password: Consortium1.
SUNITA RAI PRINCIPAL KV AJNI
Thinking, reasoning and working mathematically
Coach J. What’s the big deal?  Learning takes place when you produce knowledge not re produce it.  Recognize a higher-level thinking question: Colleges.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
 Inquiry-Based Learning Instructional Strategies Link to Video.
Teaching Through Problem Solving Part 2 – Bermuda Framework for Teaching Mathematics Gilbert Institute Ongoing PD commencing the week of March 3, 2014.
Lesson Planning. Teachers Need Lesson Plans So that they know that they are teaching the curriculum standards required by the county and state So that.
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
5 E’s Lesson Model.
Costa’s Levels of Questioning
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Advantages of Using Children’s Literature provides a motivating introduction to complex curriculum topics mathematical vocabulary can be reinforced and.
Authentic Learning and Assessment Erin Gibbons Five Standards of Authentic Instruction  Higher-Order Thinking  Depth of Knowledge  Connectedness to.
Building Assessments with Differentiation in Mind Fonda Vadnais
Inquiry-based Learning Linking Teaching with Learning.
Community Context Series of Community Math Nights Leadership Development for Math Support Team Mathematics Content Courses for K-20 Teachers Ongoing support.
Narrowing the Challenge: Revisiting Understanding by Design Cherie McCollough VaNTH-PER Professional Development June 1, 2004.
Cornell note taking stimulates critical thinking skills. Note taking helps students remember what is said in class. A good set of notes can help students.
Pennsylvania Standard J. Geometry Standard
Math Professional Development Day What is a learner's profile? 2.How do you differentiate in your classroom? 3.Rate the level of comfort with.
Problem-Solving Approach of Allied Health Learning Community.
Understanding By Design
Costa’s Levels of Questioning. What do young children do when they want to know something? They ask A LOT of questions!
Costa’s Levels of Questioning. What do young children do when they want to know something? Well, they ask A LOT of questions. What do people do in heaven?
Stage 2 Understanding by Design Assessment Evidence.
Selecting Appropriate Assessment Measures for Student Learning Outcomes October 27, 2015 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment Office of Assessment and.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
3 Stages of Backward Design 1. Identify desired results. 2. Determine acceptable evidence. 3. Plan learning experiences & instruction.
CREATING AN ACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Using Inquiry and Primary Sources.
Questioning Without strong questioning you are just a passenger on someone else ’ s tour bus. You may be on the highway but someone else is doing the driveway.
How to Teach Science using an Inquiry Approach (ESCI 215 – Chapter 1)
Three Levels of Questions
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
Welcome to Island Ecology for Educators!. “If we are going to save the environment, then we must save an endangered indicator species: the child in nature.”
Understanding by Design Stage 2: Determining Acceptable Evidence Summer UBD Workshop, Day 2 August 13, 2014.
Tia Juana Malone, English Professor Ruth Ronan, Course Developer Assessment Strategies That Promote Student Engagement.
Stage 1 – Desired Results Level I – Quarter 1 – Art History Established Goals Enduring Understanding: The Elements & Principles of Design are found throughout.
Self Starter How did you feel tutorials went last class period? Explain why you feel that way.
Lenape School District Day 3 June 27, Teaching for Understanding- Stage 3 What are the instructional strategies that support understanding based.
Backwards Design Lesson Planning
Costa’s Levels of Questioning
Creating an Active Learning environment
Costa’s Levels of Questioning
Costa’s Levels of Questioning
Understanding by Design Ensuring Learning through Lesson Design
Costa’s Levels of Questioning
Common Core Standards in the Classroom
Costa’s Levels of Questioning
Costa’s Levels of Questioning
Costa’s Levels of Questioning
Presentation transcript:

Coppell ISD Coppell, Texas October 8, 2012 Download slides and files at: Thomasrye.weebly.com Thomas Rye ASCD / Ferris High School Spokane, WA

Introduction and a math problem Review of August and self-assessment Stage 2 Assessment Assessment Audit Acquisition, Meaning Making, and Transfer Writing the Performance Task Rubrics Peer Review Stage 3 Introduction Questioning

Writing of Stage 1 Transfer Goals Understandings Essential Questions Knowledge and Skills

What is mathematical understanding? Why teach mathematics? How can we assess mathematical understanding? What would we expect to see in math classrooms where teaching for understanding is consistent? How do we get students to transfer?

Consider the most appropriate and efficient way to determine if a student “gets”… Enduring Understandings Knowledge Skills Acquisition Meaning Making Transfer

What are all the things you do to assess students? Both at the end and throughout Brainstorm a list

To what extent does the assessment reflect your desired results? Code questions to stage 1 Sample from Statistics

To what extent does the assessment reflect acquisition, meaning making and transfer? Code questions as A, M, or T This is a cognitive demand model – others… Samples Google search a test! Try algebra quadratics test filetype: Algebra II exponential

Could a student be successful on the assessment package without truly understanding? Could a student truly understand, yet not be able to be successful?

Consider how students might be able to demonstrate their understanding. What things will they do? In what formats or settings?

During this stage… You will outline a performance task for your unit. Sketch out a rubric to assess the performance task.

Determine methods of assessment Performance task Products / Performances Prompts Other evidence Quizzes, tests, prompts, work samples Observations Student self-assessment

Determine types of assessment Diagnostic Formative Summative

How can I assess a lifelong understanding and transfer goals before the end of the semester? Students DO mathematics If a student understands and has the knowledge and skills, what can they do with them?

Given the focus on understanding, a unit or course should be anchored by a performance task(s). Performance tasks provide evidence that students are able to use knowledge in context understand what they know

Diverse performances or products Differing contexts Engaging Authentic

Differing contexts Engaging Authentic

Performance Tasks / Prompts Relevant Open-ended Ambiguity Require exploration Demand “uncoverage” Involve research

Sample Tasks Solar Cooker Bus Routes Statistical Studies Tuning Musical Instruments

ways-to-apply-algebra-with-the-new-york-times/ ways-to-apply-algebra-with-the-new-york-times/

Sample Student Work Students are doing mathematics Students create professional work

Create a performance task or prompt for your unit. Could a student be successful on the assessment package without truly understanding? Could a student truly understand, yet not be able to be successful? Is the assessment a meaningful and authentic application of the understanding?

Create a rubric for assessing/grading your performance tasks. Students self-evaluate Student generated rubrics Differentiation Assessing the same understandings Choice

C85&sp=yes& C85&sp=yes&

4321 Understanding Knowledge & Skill

Filters Could a student successfully complete the task without truly understanding? Could a student understand yet not be able to successfully complete the task?

Designers provide an overview Designers turn their backs while reviewers discuss understandings, questions, performance task, rubric and alignment Discuss strengths first, then weaknesses (I wonder, I notice) Open discussion with reviewers and designers

Focused Questions To what extent does the unit identify important, transferable ideas worth understanding? Is the unit framed by a few engaging, thought-provoking questions? How well are the understandings aligned with the knowledge, skills and TEKS? To what extent does the assessment align with stage 1? Is the performance task an authentic, transfer task? Does the rubric insure that the assessment provides evidence of understanding?

Higher-level questions are essential to facilitating conceptual understanding. The inquiry process is facilitated by skillful questioning and provides students with the opportunity to become independent thinkers who master their own learning.

Level One: The answer can be found in the text (either directly or indirectly) Very concrete and pertains only to the text. Asks for facts about what has been heard or read Information is recalled in the exact manner/form it was heard

Level Two: The answer can be inferred from the text. Although more abstract than a Level One question, deals only with the text Information can be broken down into parts Involves examining in detail, analyzing motives or causes, making inferences, finding information to support generalizations or decision making Questions combine information in a new way

Level Three: The answer goes beyond the text. Is abstract and does not pertain to the text Ask that judgments be made from information Gives opinions about issues, judges the validity of ideas or other products, justifies opinions and ideas

LEVEL ONE: Define Describe Identify List Name Observe Recite Scan LEVEL TWO: Analyze Compare Contrast Group Infer Sequence Synthesize LEVEL THREE: Apply Evaluate Hypothesize Imagine Judge Predict Speculate

Gather and Recall Information (Gathering/Input) Ask Level 1 questions to identify what students know about the problem or question and connect to prior knowledge. What do you know about your problem? What does __________mean? What did you record from your class notes about ____? What is the formula or mnemonic device (ex. P-E-M- D-A-S) that will help you identify the steps necessary to solve the problem?

Make Sense Out of Information Gathered (Processing) Ask Level 2 questions to begin processing the information gathered, make connections and create relationships. Can you break down the problem into smaller parts? What would the parts be? How can you organize the information? What can you infer from the data? Can you find a problem/question similar to this to use as an example?

Apply and Evaluate Actions/ Solutions (Applying/Output) Ask Level 3 questions to apply knowledge acquired and connections made to predict, judge, hypothesize or evaluate. How do you know the solution is correct? How could you check your answer? Is there more than one way to solve the problem? Could there be other correct answers? Is there a real life situation where this can be applied or used? Can you explain it in a new and different way? Could the method of solving this problem work for other problems? How would you teach this to a friend?

What is mathematical understanding? Why teach mathematics? How can we assess mathematical understanding? What would we expect to see in math classrooms where teaching for understanding is consistent? How do we get students to transfer?

Continue the conversation Continue the planning Collaboratively assess student work Use AMT in your daily planning and reflection Contact Information Tom Rye

Below is a link to ASCD’s online Professional Development Feedback Survey. We encourage all participants to complete the online evaluation within the next ten (10) days. All responses will be anonymously reported to ASCD. ID=98K2mpl Thank you for taking the time to honestly evaluate the program. The results we receive help us to improve the quality of services you receive