Overview of a Water Action Plan: California Public Utilities Commission Paul G. Townsley, President Arizona American Water January 18, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Advertisements

RESOLVE, Inc. National Geothermal Collaborative An Overview January 20, 2004.
Public Interest Energy Research –Natural Gas Program Status Presentation to Air Emissions Advisory Committee May 12, 2005 Philip Misemer California Energy.
Regulatory Best Practices for Small Water Companies May 6, 2009 John Hoy Chief Regulatory Officer May 6, 2009 John Hoy Chief Regulatory Officer.
Arizona Energy Policy Update Jeff Schlegel, The Southwest Energy Efficiency Project USGBC Arizona Chapter; March 17, 2011.
Financing “Greenfield” Developments An Overview of Financing Options for a combined Water System Presentation to NARUC Water Committee July 2007 By Keith.
1 Program Performance and Evaluation: Policymaker Expectations 2009 International Education Programs Service Technical Assistance Workshop Eleanor Briscoe.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
California’s Energy Efficiency Shareholder Incentive Mechanism CSEM Policy Conference December 9, 2008 Tom Roberts, Regulatory Analyst
Copyright 2012 Delmar, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 13 Health Information Systems and Strategy.
DRA Advocacy Joe Como, Acting Director. 2 DRA Facts The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference! 3  History: CPUC created DRA (formerly known as the.
Emerging Latino Communities Initiative Webinar Series 2011 June 22, 2011 Presenter: Janet Hernandez, Capacity-Building Coordinator.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Definition of Ecotourism  Ecotourism Kenya defines Ecotourism as, “the involvement of travelers in environmental conservation practices that address.
Less is More: SEE Action and the Power of Efficiency Hon. Phyllis Reha Commissioner, Minnesota PUC Co-Chair, SEE Action Customer Information and Behavior.
1 THE RATE CASE PROCESS A Blend of Science and Superstition Presentation to the Mongolian Energy Regulatory Board By Burl Haar Executive Secretary Minnesota.
2013 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Overview Background Role of SAP Implementation Evaluation process Council feedback Enhancement of SAP.
Regulatory Transparency and Interaction with the Government Dr. Konstantin Petrov Head of Section, Policy and Regulation.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
Determining and Setting Public Utility Rates Bill Wilks, Senior Project Manager November 19, 2014 AGFOA Fall Conference.
1 Improving Federal Rights-of-Way Management to Spur Broadband Deployment Meredith Attwell Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary National Telecommunications.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Copyright © 2009 International Water Association STEP 2 ESTABLISH PRELIMINARY WSP VISION.
Example of Revenue Decoupling Utah Committee of Consumer Services Witness: David Dismukes Docket No T01 CCS Exhibit 1.1 Allowed Revenue per Customer.
City Council October 21, 2013 Strategic Planning Retreat Next Steps.
Housing Element Update Workshop The City of Fillmore is Currently Updating its Housing Element  State law mandates the Housing Element be included.
1 Availability of Aggregated Customer Usage Information: An Overview of D California Public Utilities Commission Presentation before the California.
Realigning Utility Incentives Commissioner Wayne E. Gardner Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Keystone Energy Efficiency Alliance Sept. 20, 2011.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Planning and Community Development Department Housing Element City Council February 03, 2014.
Public Water and Sewer Affordability Meg Neafsey American Water April 30, 2015.
Toby Roy, San Diego County Water Authority Task Force Chair October 9, 2012.
Overview of NER and its Future Business Direction Presentation to Standing Committee on Minerals and Energy Parliament 09 May 2001.
1 Review of CPUC Role with the Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program on Natural Gas Briefing for California Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications.
R “Postage Stamp Rates” OIR LIOB Meeting – January 2012 CPUC – Division of Water and Audits.
Feasibility Study.
NARUC SUMMER COMMITTEE MEETINGS Committee on Water Agenda California Regulatory Initiatives Case History – California American Water B. Kent Turner – President.
Smart Bet? Illinois Courts and Smart Meters Orijit Ghoshal Energy Law 2010.
R&D STRATEGIES IN SUPPORT OF INDUSTRIAL TRANSFORMATION Arm.Dpt. ROMANIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ARMAMENTS DEPARTMENT 01 November 2007.
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION BALANCED RATES RULEMAKING R California Water Association’s Restatement of Goals and Objectives for the.
CPUC Public Agenda 3261 Thursday, September 23, 2010, 10:00 a.m. 505 Van Ness Ave, San Francisco Commissioners: Michael R. Peevey Dian M. Grueneich John.
Working together. Achieving results. Water IOU Drought Management Jack Hawks Joint Agency Workshop on California’s Drought Response Sacramento, CA August.
CPUC Public Agenda 3247 Thursday, January 21, 2010, 10:00 a.m. 505 Van Ness Ave, San Francisco Commissioners: Michael R. Peevey Dian M. Grueneich John.
1 Strategic Plan | May Decisions on rates, budgets, investments, programs and services for six years ( ) The Strategic Plan.
Mbombela Climate Change Workshop 2 5 November 2015 Civic Centre Hall, Mbombela.
Update on work of IUCN Council Private Sector Task Force Diana Shand Regional Councillor and Chair of Private Sector Task Force The International Union.
OPOWER CONFIDENTIAL : DO NOT DISTRIBUTE 1 Energy Policy Innovation Outside VA: Views from NY and CA November 12, 2015.
Conservation Cal Water’s Approach with the California Public Utilities Commission Darin Duncan, Bear Gulch District Manager Low-Income Oversight Board.
1 Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission Report of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission to the Water Resources Study Committee of the Indiana General.
Generation Subcommittee, Day Two Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise, Idaho.
1 Commissioner Catherine Sandoval California Public Utilities Commission August 28, 2015 Joint Agency Workshop on California’s Drought.
 Learn how to identify and categorise stakeholders.  Consider different stakeholder structures and responsibilities in groundwater management.  Get.
INFRASTRUCTURE AND HUMAN SETTLEMENTS Presentation by Delegation of the European Union Consultative Group Meeting Technical Session La Palm, Accra, 23/09/2010.
Regional Planning CCRPC Board Training March 21, 2012.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 2016 Legislative Priorities and Strategy, and Policy Principles Jolene Walsh, Senior Director of Public.
California Energy Efficiency Policy and Goals Beena Morar Southern California Edison June 14, 2016.
Department of Energy Energy Agency Reorganization Plan Little Hoover Commission Hearing on Governor Schwarzenegger’s Plan to Establish a Department of.
May 31, 2016 WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY PRESENTATION 5/9/2016 City of Greenfield, California.
What is OneWater? “One Water is an integrated planning and implementation approach to managing finite water resources for long-term resiliency and reliability,
Economic Regulation of Irish Water
Water Services Training Group
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
VERMONT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LEADERS
The Republic of Iraq .
WATER REGULATORY AUTHORITY
progress of the water reform in bulgaria
WUTC National Sword Update
Topic: Possible Restructuring of the Electricity Distribution Industry
USACE infrastructure team update
Presentation transcript:

Overview of a Water Action Plan: California Public Utilities Commission Paul G. Townsley, President Arizona American Water January 18, 2011

2 Why Have A Water Action Plan? To create a policy vision to help guide Commission and Staff actions. To minimize ad-hoc programs, directions, and decisions. To send clear signals to water companies and other interested parties of the Commission’s long term goals for water. To enable Commissioners to set policy up front, rather than needing to react to a particular rate case at the end of the process.

3 California Public Utilities Commission Water Action Plan

4 Life Before the CPUC Water Action Plan No over-arching policies were in effect at CPUC regarding water utilities. Policy was established based on “conclusions in the last rate case” which led to erratic and sometimes conflicting decisions. Lack of over-arching policies led to decisions based on short-term cost.  Long-term issues such as sustainability, water conservation, and aging infrastructure were not always considered. Inconsistencies between energy utility decisions and water utility decisions led to sub optimization of Commission goals

5 California PUC Water Action Plan Development Water Action Plan development led by the CPUC Executive Director. Workshop participation included CPUC Commissioners, CPUC staff, Consumer Advocate staff, water utilities, and other interested parties. Following workshops, a draft document was circulated to participants for review and comment. Water Action Plan was adopted by the CPUC on December 15, Water Action Plan has guided CPUC on water utility decisions over the past four years.

6 Four Guiding Principles of CPUC Water Action Plan Safe High Quality Water Highly Reliable Water Supplies Efficient Use of Water Reasonable Rates & Viable Utilities

7 Six Objectives of the CPUC Water Action Plan 1.Maintain Highest Standards of Water Quality 2.Strengthen Water Conservation Programs to a Level Comparable to those of Energy Utilities 3.Promote Water Infrastructure Investment 4.Assist Low Income Customers 5.Streamline CPUC Regulatory Decision-making 6.Set Rates that Balance Investment, Conservation, and Affordability

8 Objective 1: Maintain Highest Standards of Water Quality Strengthen inter-agency relations with Department of Health Services Strengthen the CPUC’s role in water quality regulations and monitoring procedures Require water utilities to provide water quality reporting to the CPUC in their General Rate Case Filings Develop alternative funding mechanisms to address water quality infrastructure Provide incentives for acquisition or the operation of small private water utilities by larger private or municipal water utilities

9 Objective 2: Strengthen Water Conservation Programs to a Level Comparable to those of Energy Utilities Encourage implementation of Best Management Practices developed by the California Urban Water Conservation Council. Encourage conservation/efficiency rate designs (such as increasing block rates) to promote greater water conservation. Remove current financial disincentives to water conservation. Establish utility financial incentives for greater conservation. Consider energy usage as an important outcome of all water policy decisions.

10 Objective 3: Promote Water Infrastructure Investment Allow utilities’ CPUC-filed Water Management Program to serve as a basis for approval of needed infrastructure. Consider authorization of a Distribution System Improvement Charge (DSIC) to promote infrastructure improvements. Work with other state and local agencies toward the common goal of maintaining reliable water supplies. Provide timely compensation for water pollution clean-up costs that are due water utilities.

11 Objective 4: Assist Low Income Customers Develop low-income rate assistance programs for water customers taking service from CPUC regulated water utilities. Consider a pooling mechanism as well as a standard low-income rate assistance program based on the results of individual company programs. Examine policy and legislative changes needed to address low-income consumers dwelling in multi-family housing.

12 Objective 5: Streamline CPUC Regulatory Decision-making Adopt incentive regulation where feasible and effective. Streamline the existing process for review of cost of service and rate of return for all classes of water utilities. Evaluate efficiencies of consolidating rate cases. Use Alternative Dispute Resolution in place of time-consuming regulatory processes when a fair and efficient result can be accomplished.

13 Objective 6: Set Rates that Balance Investment, Conservation, and Affordability Review utility rate case revenue requirements from the perspective of long-term investment and conservation, as well as shorter-term rate impacts. Set rates which provide sufficient revenue to promote adequate investment in infrastructure. Authorize a surcharge mechanism for direct reimbursement of Construction Work In Progress prior to plant start-up. Allow valid development costs to be recovered as they occur. Develop innovative policies to develop sources of funding needed for adequate infrastructure.

14 What Has the CPUC Accomplished? Beginning to decouple sales and revenues Institution of tiered rate structures Updating water conservation rules and water service standards Increasing water utility conservation budgets Establishing schedules for general rate case filings Implementing low-income ratepayer assistance programs Initiating water/energy nexus programs The CPUC substantially met 23 of the 29 action items that were described in the Water Action Plan, including:

15 CPUC Water Action Plan 2010 Increased use of recycled water Requiring leak detection programs Examining results of BMP usage Increase penetration of low-income programs Tracking customer service shutoffs Better monitoring of industry developments A new version of the plan, “ Water Action Plan 2020 Update” was approved by the CPUC on October 28, The 4 Guiding Principles and 6 Objectives remain unchanged, and nearly 30 new action items have been added, building on the original document, including:

16 Why Should the Arizona Corporation Commission Develop a Water Action Plan? For the same reasons that the California Public Utilities Commission developed a Water Action Plan: To create a policy vision to help guide Commission and Staff actions. To minimize ad-hoc programs, directions, and decisions. To send clear signals to water companies and other interested parties of the Commission’s long term goals for water. To enable Commissioners to set policy up front, rather than needing to react to a particular rate case at the end of the process.

17 How Can the Arizona Corporation Commission Develop a Water Action Plan? Build on existing efforts rather than reinvesting the wheel. Continue with the Special Open Meetings/Water Workshops that are now being scheduled over the next few months. Using these workshops, focus on developing over-arching policies for the Commission and its water utilities. Use existing documents – such as the California Water Action Plan as a basis for the creation of a Plan for Arizona. Have strong Commissioner involvement throughout the process to ensure “executive level” engagement in policy development.