Understanding Disproportionate Minority Contact in Onondaga County A project to reduce racial disparities in Onondaga County’s Juvenile Justice System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Juvenile Justice 40+ Terms, Settings, and Definitions. Scott Scott Bernard Peterson CEO, Global Youth Justice Mobile:
Advertisements

Overview of Juvenile Justice in Michigan John Evans, Director Bureau of Juvenile Justice Michigan Department of Human Services 1.
The Juvenile Criminal Process A General Process Review including Clerk Responsibilities (for Lake County) By: Sheri Woodruff, Supervisor, Criminal Division,
Marion County History and Future Presiding Judge, Marilyn A. Moores Chief Magistrate Gary Chavers Deputy Chief Probation Officer Christina Ball Juvenile.
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
A Presentation by the Technical Assistance Resource Center (TARC) at New Mexico State University. Updated June 2009.
Disproportionality & Producing Better Outcomes June 14, 2013.
The Juvenile Justice System
MILWAUKEE COUNTY’S PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISION PROCESS & PRETRIAL SERVICES RE-DESIGN PRESENTED TO THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COUNCIL JULY 24,
Racial Disparity in New York’s Juvenile Justice System NYC Task Force on Racial Disparity in the Juvenile Justice System.
Karla Munoz Estrada Eric Mendez Juvenile Justice System: Detention.
1 Disproportionate Minority Confinement 2  Provide information on how Pierce County established a DMC reduction agenda  Review lessons learned  Report.
The Dangers of Detention Sue Burrell, Staff Attorney Youth Law Center San Francisco, California.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Advocating for Youth in the Juvenile Justice System Know Your Rights Presented by the Center for Community Alternatives (CCA)
Massachusetts: Juvenile Justice System
State Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention March Board Update 2014.
Juvenile Justice History Review New York House of Refuge – First juvenile detention center – Became a place to put delinquent youth Included kids without.
Give Your Assessment of the philosophy behind your state’s approach to Judicial Waiver “To provide a program of supervision, care and rehabilitation.
Understanding the “System”
Onondaga County DMC Final Report December 13, 2011 Center for Community Alternatives Emily NaPier Juanita Gamble Co-Coordinators.
NYS Office of Children & Family Services Race and Ethnicity: Path Through the Juvenile Justice System Deputy Commissioner Joyce Burrell March 2008.
Monroe County’s DMC Final Report December 13, 2011 Monroe County Probation Leslie S. Barnes, Deputy Chief Probation Officer Anne Goewey, Probation Supervisor.
Slide 1 Promoting and Supporting Status Offense System Reform Presentation to National Conference of State Legislators June 23, 2014 Allie Meyer Vera Institute.
Juvenile Justice System. The Juvenile Justice System, 6 th ed. Dean J. Champion Presented by: D. Romeo 2 The Juvenile Justice System CRCT pp 193 The Juvenile.
Juvenile Justice How and why juvenile justice differs from adult justice.
Chapter 16: Juvenile Justice
Chapter 13 The Juvenile Justice System
The Annie E. Casey Foundation Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative JDAI Council of State Governments May 17, 2009 Rand Young, WA State JDAI Coordinator.
The Juvenile Justice System
Young People and the Law Chapter 15, Section 4
Lori Albin, Director Fiscal Policy Center National Juvenile Justice Network July 2011 Show Us the Money: Calculating the Cost of Juvenile Justice.
Steps in the Adult Criminal Justice Process
Changing the Status Quo for Status Offenders: New York State’s Efforts to Help Troubled Teens Michael Lens, Vera Institute of Justice Annie Salsich, Vera.
10/7/ Welcome Nancy Vaniman Broward Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative Coordinator Florida Department of Juvenile Justice 10/7/20152.
DYS and Arkansas’ Juvenile Justice System Entrance Children age who are proven to have broken the law and are under the authority of a juvenile.
The Juvenile Justice System 4.1 – Introduction to Juvenile Justice System October 1,
Assessing and Addressing Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC) in Juvenile Justice Bill Feyerherm, Ph.D., Vice Provost for Research, April 9, 2007.
Chapter 2 Pretrial Release and Diversion. Pretrial Services Pretrial Services is a department with two overlapping functions: Assisting the court with.
Navigating the Juvenile Justice System.  Taxpayers save $2 million for each child who is prevented from beginning a life of crime  20% of teens live.
Objectives: SWBAT Analyze the impact of recidivism on society Identify key aspects of the Juvenile Justice System 1.
A Test of Fairness The mission of the Connecticut juvenile justice system is to collaboratively promote and administer prevention, justice, and effective.
Disproportionate Minority Confinement
Juvenile Justice Week 1 CJ420.
JUVENILE JUSTICE In Minnesota. History of Juvenile Law  Originally, juvenile offenders were treated the same as adult criminals  Beginning in 1899,
Disproportionate Minority Contact in Connecticut’s Juvenile Justice System  A presentation to the  Commission on Racial & Ethnic Disparity in the Criminal.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
County of San Diego: Probation Department “Protect community safety, reduce crime and assist victims through offender accountability and rehabilitation.”
Procedures in Juvenile Court.  Delinquent or Status Offenses  Police have a broad authority to release or detain the juvenile Minor offense  Issue.
Steps of the Juvenile Justice Process March 15, 2016.
Juvenile Justice. Certification Certification – the proceeding in juvenile court in which the court determines if a juvenile will stand trial as an adult.
Virginia RULES Teens Learn & Live the Law Virginia’s Judicial System.
Youth First Initiative National Survey Results and Analysis.
JUVENILE JUSTICE In Minnesota. History of Juvenile Law  Originally, juvenile offenders were treated the same as adult criminals  Beginning in 1899,
Criminal Justice BHS Law Related Education Chapter 4: A Separate System for Juveniles LESSON OBJECTIVES 4-1 Analyze and define the legal doctrine of parens.
Chapter 16: Part 2. Procedures in Juvenile Court  Custody: Juveniles can be taken into custody for criminal and status offenses ○ Running away, truancy,
7X Wednesday MN Juvenile Justice System Describe the goals, offenses, penalties, long-term consequences, and privacy concerns of Minnesota’s.
At virtually every point in the process, law enforcement personnel are empowered to consider alternative to trials and jail time. However, judges have.
Juvenile Justice System: Detention
Douglas County, KS Criminal Justice Intercept Practices
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
AJS101 (40384) Monday, October 3, 2016 Time Keeper.
Juvenile Justice Reform in Kentucky
Dependency Court Flowchart
JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM
LESSON OBJECTIVES Chapter 4: A Separate System for Juveniles
Disproportionate Minority Confinement
Prince George’s County Juvenile Services Long Term Trends
Presentation transcript:

Understanding Disproportionate Minority Contact in Onondaga County A project to reduce racial disparities in Onondaga County’s Juvenile Justice System Juanita Gamble and Emily NaPier Onondaga County Co-Coordinators Presented by the Center for Community Alternatives (CCA)

What is Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC)? DMC occurs when the proportion of youth of color who pass through the juvenile justice system exceed the proportion of youth of color in the general population. DMC becomes worse as youth of color pass through the system starting with arrest and ending with placement or incarceration.

DMC Nationwide Across the country, low-level offending youth of color and poor youth who come in contact with juvenile justice system are often put in detention even though they do not pose a public safety risk. This racial disparity occurs because the decisions at various points in the juvenile justice system are often based on perception of family and community or a lack of alternative programs.

Definition of Racial Disparity Racial disparity in the justice system exists when the proportion of a racial/ethnic group within the control of the system differs from the proportion of such groups in the general population.

Impact of DMC When low-level offending youth of color and poor youth are jailed, the result is a negative impact on their life outcomes, the local economy, and the community’s public safety because jailed youth are more likely to re-offend.

How Does DMC Happen? DMC can occur at any point in the processing of a case in the juvenile justice system from police contact to placement DMC can occur at any point in the processing of a case in the juvenile justice system from police contact to placement Decision-making based on race can compound throughout the system resulting in cumulative disadvantage for youth of color Decision-making based on race can compound throughout the system resulting in cumulative disadvantage for youth of color

Probation intake and development of diversion plan Probation intake and petition to Family Court Bring directly to court Call Hillbrook to administer the RAI Law Enforcement Options for Juveniles at Initial Contact Warn and Release Appearance Ticket for Probation Intake Detain Pending Court Appearance

Only 31% of the young people in Onondaga County live in Syracuse, but the Syracuse Police Department accounts for 54% of the juvenile arrests made in Onondaga County.

What is Detention? Detention is temporary while the young person’s case is pending. Detention is temporary while the young person’s case is pending. Detention may be secure or non-secure. Detention may be secure or non-secure. The decision to detain a young person may be made by a Family Court judge or by Hillbrook staff and police using a risk assessment instrument (RAI). The decision to detain a young person may be made by a Family Court judge or by Hillbrook staff and police using a risk assessment instrument (RAI).

JD or JO? Juvenile Delinquents Minor Offenses Juvenile Offenders Serious Offenses Definition At least 7 yrs old & less than 16 yrs old A youth 13 to 15 yrs old Where case decided Family Court County or Supreme Court Police Contact Taken into custody Arrested First court appearance Initial appearance Arraignment in Criminal Court Prosecution Deputy County Attorney Assistant District Attorney Custody Options Remand to secure or non secure detention or released Bail, ROR, remand to secure detention Legal Representation Appointed Attorney for the Child Defense Counsel How case decided Fact Finding Hearing Plea/Trial Judicial Options Dispositional Hearing -probation -placement with OCFS -Adjournment in Contemplation of Dismissal (ACD) -conditional discharge -restitution Sentencing, if convicted -probation -confinement in an OCFS secure facility

There were 103 admissions to Hillbrook in Of those, 73% were African American, 18% were White, and 6% were Latino.

On any given day in 2010, black youth made up the majority of JDs at Hillbrook.

Young people were most likely to be detained on felony charges, followed by misdemeanor charges and technical violations of probation. Black youth were overrepresented in all categories except new offenses while on probation and OCFS warrants.

There were 75 African American admissions to Hillbrook compared to only 19 White admissions. African American youth were more likely to be detained on felony charges, while White youth were more likely to be detained on misdemeanor charges. African American youth were more likely to be detained on a technical probation violation than White youth.

Family Court Process Initial Appearance Release HomeDetention Probable Cause Hearing Convert to PINS petition Adjournment in Contemplation of Dismissal Fact Finding Disposition Conditional Discharge Probation Supervision Placement with local service provider Placement with State Office of Children and Family Services

Cumulative Disadvantage Law Enforcement Deployment Appearance Ticket/ Warn & Release Court Appearance/ Police Dropoff Release/ Detention Diversion Petition to Family Court Attorney for the Child Probable Cause Hearing Fact Finding Hearing Disposition Probation Violations Reintegration Services Cumulative Disadvantage

New York State Disparity Black youth are: Arrested 3.13 times more often Detained 4.97 times more often Placed in secure facilities 4.75 times more often than White youth

Onondaga County Disparity Black youth are: Arrested 5.27 times more often Securely detained 1.42 times more often Petitioned to Family Court 1.14 times more often than White youth

Project to Reduce DMC in Onondaga County The NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) has provided funding to the Center for Community Alternatives (CCA) to work on reducing DMC in Onondaga County. The work is part of Onondaga County’s Juvenile Detention Reform Committee that is made up of government agencies and Family Court judges, who are often referred to as System Stakeholders.

Who are “System Stakeholders?” “System” stakeholders represent various junctures in the Juvenile Justice System such as: Public Agencies Public Agencies Government agencies such as Probation Department, Syracuse Police Department, etc. Family Court Family Court Family court judges, attorney for the child, prosecutors

DMC Subcommittee A new DMC subcommittee is being created that will include youth, parents, and other community stakeholders. The DMC subcommittee will report regularly to the Detention Reform Committee and assist with strategies to reduce DMC.

DMC Subcommittee The DMC subcommittee will meet on a monthly basis to identify DMC at various junctures in the Juvenile Justice System and discuss remedies for successful reduction of DMC. The subcommittee will review data from various points in the system so that its recommendations for reform are data-driven.

Who are “Community Stakeholders?” “Community” stakeholders have connections to the Juvenile Justice System and to the neighborhoods that are affected by detention such as: Community Leaders Community Leaders Capable of leveraging power to push the reform process i.e. local clergy, mentors, community organizers, etc. Service Providers Service Providers Have established relationships with youth & families and the ability to provide programmatic options (alternatives to detention services) i.e. Boys & Girls Club, On Point for College, Salvation Army, etc.

Community Stakeholders Youth and Parents Often have directly experienced the juvenile justice system and can provide insight into harmful experiences within the system and what changes/improvements are needed

“ Change will not come if we wait for some other person or some other time. We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are the change that we seek.” President Barack Obama President Barack Obama