Royal Statistical Society 2009 Conference Edinburgh, Scotland 7-11 September 2009 Measuring Health Inequalities by an Approach Unaffected by the Overall.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparison of survival following colorectal cancer in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and the Nordic countries using period survival methods Gerda.
Advertisements

How would you explain the smoking paradox. Smokers fair better after an infarction in hospital than non-smokers. This apparently disagrees with the view.
2008 Joint Statistical Meetings Denver, Colorado, August 2-7, 2008 Evaluating the Size of Differences Between Group Rates in Settings of Different Overall.
American Public Health Association 138 th Annual Meeting Denver, Colorado Nov. 6-10, 2010 The Emerging European Acceptance of Scanlan’s Rule in Health.
Departments of Medicine and Biostatistics
Race and Socioeconomic Differences in Health Behavior Trajectories Across the Adult Life Course ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was supported by the grant.
The Misunderstood Relationship Between Declining Mortality and Increasing Racial and Social Disparities in Mortality Rates James P. Scanlan (Presented.
2009 Joint Statistical Meetings Washington, DC August 1-6, 2009 Interpreting Differential Effects in Light of Fundamental Statistical Tendencies James.
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND BIOSTATISTICS DEPT Esimating Population Value with Hypothesis Testing.
Basic Business Statistics, 10e © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 9-1 Chapter 9 Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests Basic Business Statistics.
ELASTICITY 4 CHAPTER. Objectives After studying this chapter, you will be able to  Define, calculate, and explain the factors that influence the price.
Review for Exam 2 Some important themes from Chapters 6-9 Chap. 6. Significance Tests Chap. 7: Comparing Two Groups Chap. 8: Contingency Tables (Categorical.
Health inequalities The most significant health inequalities in Scotland are described in the Long-term Monitoring of Health Inequalities annual report.
Chapter 14 Inferential Data Analysis
Health inequalities Joan Garrod
© Cancer Research UK 2007 Registered charity number Lung cancer and smoking – UK November 2009 The statistics in this presentation are based on.
8/15/2015Slide 1 The only legitimate mathematical operation that we can use with a variable that we treat as categorical is to count the number of cases.
Measures of Central Tendency
Measuring Health and Healthcare Disparities 2013 Research Conference of the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology Washington, DC, Nov. 4-6, 2013.
Think of a topic to study Review the previous literature and research Develop research questions and hypotheses Specify how to measure the variables in.
Measurement Problems in the National Healthcare Disparities Report American Public Health Association 135 th Annual Meeting & Exposition, Nov. 3-7,2007,
Inequalities in coronary heart disease treatment Professor Azeem Majeed University College London.
Broad societal determinants of CVD and health Dubai 6/1/2006.
PIAAC results tell a story about the systemic nature of the skills deficit among U.S. adults. Overview of U.S. Results: Focus on Numeracy.
Population Health: Challenges for Science and Society David Mechanic, Ph.D. Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research Rutgers, the State.
One starting point: Health Inequalities There are inequalities in health between countries and within countries; these are often linked to the wealth of.
Using the Margins Command to Estimate and Interpret Adjusted Predictions and Marginal Effects Richard Williams
Overview of U.S. Results: Focus on Literacy PIAAC results tell a story about the systemic nature of the skills deficit among U.S. adults.
Kansas Department of Health and Environment Center for Health Disparities 2008 Health Disparities Conference Topeka, Kansas, Apr. 1, 2008 Measuring Health.
LECTURE 19 THURSDAY, 14 April STA 291 Spring
Statistics about unknown primary tumors Riccardo Capocaccia National Centre for Epidemiology, Surveillance and Health Promotion Istituto Superiore di Sanità,
January 31 and February 3,  Some formulae are presented in this lecture to provide the general mathematical background to the topic or to demonstrate.
Thinking Mathematically Statistics: 12.5 Problem Solving with the Normal Distribution.
Statistics for clinicians Biostatistics course by Kevin E. Kip, Ph.D., FAHA Professor and Executive Director, Research Center University of South Florida,
1 Health inequalities: underlying factors and different ways of addressing them.
 Using Data for Demographic Analysis Country Course on Analysis and Dissemination of Population and Housing Census Data with Gender Concern October.
Understanding Variations in Group Differences that are the Results of Variations in the Prevalence of an Outcome American Public Health Association 134.
Approaches to the measurement of excess risk 1. Ratio of RISKS 2. Difference in RISKS: –(risk in Exposed)-(risk in Non-Exposed) Risk in Exposed Risk in.
16 th Nordic Demographic Symposium Helsinki, Finland, 5-7 June 2008 Measures of Health Inequalities that are Unaffected by the Prevalence of an Outcome.
Abcd AGEING POPULATION - Burden or Benefit? Demographic Trends Adrian Gallop Edinburgh 21 January 2002.
7 th International Conference on Health Policy Statistics, Philadelphia, PA, January 17-18, 2008 Can We Actually Measure Health Disparities? James P. Scanlan.
Analysis of Qualitative Data Dr Azmi Mohd Tamil Dept of Community Health Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia FK6163.
© Cancer Research UK 2006 Registered charity number Table One: Numbers and rates of new cases for malignant melanoma, UK by country, 2006 EnglandWalesScotlandN.IrelandUK.
University of Colorado March 3, 2015 Support for this research was provided by the U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Family.
Confidence Intervals Lecture 3. Confidence Intervals for the Population Mean (or percentage) For studies with large samples, “approximately 95% of the.
Measuring Healthcare Disparities Third North American Congress of Epidemiology Montreal, Quebec, June 21-24, 2011 James P. Scanlan Attorney at Law Washington,
British Society for Population Studies 2007 Annual Conference St. Andrews, Scotland, Sep 2007 Methodological Issue in Comparing the Size of Differences.
BPS - 5th Ed. Chapter 31 The Normal Distributions.
Essential Statistics Chapter 31 The Normal Distributions.
Chapter 7 Scatterplots, Association, and Correlation.
Section 15.1 Inference for Population Spread AP Statistics
Very low CHD mortality among men aged in several states in the United States Akira Sekikawa, MD, PhD, PhD Lewis H Kuller, MD, DrPH Department of.
Comparing the Means of Two Dependent Populations.
Jump to first page Inferring Sample Findings to the Population and Testing for Differences.
 A standardized value  A number of standard deviations a given value, x, is above or below the mean  z = (score (x) – mean)/s (standard deviation)
Chapter 7: Hypothesis Testing. Learning Objectives Describe the process of hypothesis testing Correctly state hypotheses Distinguish between one-tailed.
Sampling Distributions Chapter 9 Central Limit Theorem.
Unit II: Research Method: Statistics
Epidemiologic Measures of Association
The Misinterpretation of Health Inequalities in the United Kingdom
The Misinterpretation of Health Inequalities in Nordic Countries
A “Scottish effect” for health?
James P. Scanlan Attorney at Law Washington, DC, USA
Review for Exam 2 Some important themes from Chapters 6-9
Sampling Distributions
Basic Practice of Statistics - 3rd Edition The Normal Distributions
James P. Scanlan Attorney at Law Washington, DC, USA
Increasing Disparity: The Scanlan Effect
9th International Conference on Health Policy Statistics
Sampling Distributions
Presentation transcript:

Royal Statistical Society 2009 Conference Edinburgh, Scotland 7-11 September 2009 Measuring Health Inequalities by an Approach Unaffected by the Overall Prevalence of an Outcome James P. Scanlan Attorney at Law Washington, DC, USA

Subjects 1. The problem with standard binary measures of differences between outcome rates (relative differences, absolute differences, odds ratios): that all exhibit patterns of correlation with overall prevalence (i.e., among other things, they tend to change as overall prevalence changes) 2. An alternative approach that avoids the problem with standard measures: a measure that does not change as overall prevalence changes

References Measuring Health Disparities page (especially the Solutions tab) and Scanlan’s Rule page on jpscanlan.com Measuring Health Disparities SolutionsScanlan’s Rule Can We Actually Measure Health Disparities? (Chance 2006) (A12)Chance 2006 Race and Mortality (Society 2000) (A10)Society 2000 The Misinterpretation of Health Inequalities in the United Kingdom (BSPS 2006) (B6)BSPS 2006

Patterns by Which Relative Differences Between Outcome Rates Tend to be Correlated with the Overall Prevalence of an Outcome – Scanlan’s Rule 1 (aka Heuristic Rule X, Interpretive Rule 1) The rarer an outcome, the greater tends to be the relative difference in rates of experiencing it and the smaller tends to be the relative difference in rates of avoiding it.

Fig 1. Ratios of (1) Disadvantaged Group (DG) Fail Rate to Advantaged Group (AG) Fail Rate at Various Cutoff Points Defined by AG Fail Rate

Fig. 2. Ratios of (1) DG Fail Rate to AG Fail Rate and (2) AG Pass Rate to DG Pass Rate at Various Cutoff Points Defined by AG Fail Rate

Patterns by Which Absolute Differences and Odds Ratios Tend to Change as the Overall Prevalence of an Outcome Changes – Scanlan’s Rule 2 As the overall prevalence of an outcome moves toward a range defined by a rate of 50% for one group (Point A) and 50% for the other group (Point B), absolute differences tend to increase; as prevalence moves away from the range so defined, absolute differences tend to decrease; within the range, the patterns are somewhat more complicated. See Scanlan’s Rule page on jpscanlan.com. Scanlan’s Rule Odds ratios tend to change in the opposite direction of absolute differences.

Fig. 3. Absolute Differences Between Rates at Various Cutoff Points Defined by AG Fail Rate AB

Fig 4. Ratios of DG Failure Odds to AG Failure Odds at Various Cutoff Points Defined by AG Fail Rate AB

Fig. 5: Ratios of (1) DG Fail Rate to AG Fail Rate, (2) AG Pass Rate to DG Pass Rate, (3) DG Failure Odds to AG Failure Odds; and (4) Absolute Difference Between Rates ● Zone A

Fig. 6. Ratios of (1) Black to White Rates of Falling Below Percentages of Poverty Line, (2) White to Black Rates of Falling Above the Percentage, (3) Black to White Odds of Falling Below the Percentage: and (4)Absolute Differences Between Rates ●

Fig. 7. Ratios of (1) Black to White Rates of Falling Above Various Systolic Blood Pressure Levels, (2) White to Black Rates of Falling below the Level, (3) Black to White Odds of Falling Above the Level; and (4) Absolute Difference Between Rates (NHANES , , Men 45-64) ●

Solution: Estimated Effect Size (EES) Difference between means of hypothesized underlying normal distributions of risks of experiencing an outcome, in terms of percentage of a standard deviation, derived from any pair of outcome rates.

Table 1. Illustration of Meaning of Various Ratios at Different Prevalence Levels RatioDGFailRateAGFailRateEES %50.0% %15.4% %50.0% %30.0% %20.0% %10.0% %0.5% %9.7% %2.9% %14.7% %4.8% %0.9%0.44

Table 2. Illustration of UK Changes Over Time from Table 4.13 of The Widening Gap (rates per 100,000) CohortYearClass IClass V Mort Ratio Survival RatioAbsDfEES

Table 3. Illustration of UK Differences across Age Groups from Table 4.13 of The Widening Gap YearCohortClass IClass V Mort Ratio Survival RatioAbsDfEES

Table 4. Illustration of Comparisons as to Different Conditions from Lawlor (AJPH 2006) (Aberdeen 1950 birth cohort) (rates are per 10,000) (see D28)D28 CondClass IClass V Adv Ratio Fav RatioAbsDfEES CHD Stroke

Table 5. Illustration of Age Group Comparisons in Whitehall Studies from Marang-van de Mheen (JECH 2001) (rates are per 1,000) AgeHGMRLGMRMortRatioSurvRatioAbsDfEES

Table 6. Illustration Based on Boström and Rosén (SJPH 2003) Data on Mortality by Occupation in Seven European Countries (see D43 caveat)D43 CountryEES EES Denmark England and Wales Finland Ireland Norway Spain Sweden

Problems with the Solution Always practical issues (we do not really know the shape of the underlying distributions) Sometimes fundamental issues (e.g., where we know distributions are not normal because they are truncated portions of larger distributions, see D43 on MHD); cf. BSPS 2007, Fig. 6D43 BSPS 2007 Irreducible minimum issues (A10, B7 (BSPS 2006), D63, D43, Irreducible Minimums Issue page on MHD)A10B7 D63D43Irreducible Minimums Issue

Conclusion If we are mindful of the problems, the approach provides a framework for cautiously appraising the sizes of differences between outcome rates. Regardless of problems, the approach is superior to reliance on standard binary measures of differences between rates without regard to the way those measures tend to be correlated with the overall prevalence of an outcome.