Dog( leg )s of War Eric Prebys Run II Meeting March 13, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PIP and the Booster Notch Bob Zwaska October 12, 2011 PIP Meeting.
Advertisements

Alexandr Drozhdin March 16, 2005 MI-10 Injection.
Buck Regulator Architectures
Linac4 Beam Commissioning Committee PSB Beam Optics and Painting Schemes 9 th December 2010 Beam Optics and Painting Schemes C. Bracco, C. Carli, B. Goddard,
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
March A. Chancé, J. Payet DAPNIA/SACM / Beta-beam ECFA/BENE Workshop The Decay Ring -First Design- A. Chancé, J.Payet CEA/DSM/DAPNIA/SACM.
AGS Polarized Proton Development toward Run-9 Oct. 3, 2008 Haixin Huang.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
Proton Plan Director’s Review 8/15/06 Prebys 2006 Shutdown Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
Proton Planning Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division.
DESY GDE Meeting Global Design Effort 1 / 12 Status of RTML Design and Tuning Studies PT SLAC.
Experimenter Contributions to Booster Improvements Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division.
Proton Study Meeting 4/19/05 Eric Prebys 1 Proton Plan Stage I Eric Prebys.
Booster Operation in Support of the Collider Program
Proton Source Meeting March 12, Agenda MiniBooNE Champaign Goal Achieved What is it? Who did it? How was it done? WBS coming; Budget Codes going.
Extraction from the Delivery Ring November 19, 2013 J. Morgan.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
The “Run II Era” The proton source is very close the the specifications in the Run II Handbook. Although it’s the highest priority, support of collider.
Booster Issues for NuMI Eric Prebys FNAL Beams Division.
F AAC Review, May 10, Prebys 1 Answer to Question  What is the analysis backing up the claim that the losses will be reduced with the new corrector.
Booster Acceptance, Apertures, and Alignment Kiyomi Seiya Proton Source WorkshopDecember 07, 2010.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
AP2 Line & Debuncher Studies Status Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source January 9, 2006 Many people involved with providing the hardware and software that.
Proton Source 1/12/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Delivery Because MiniBooNE is off.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 2 Jun 03 Weeks in Review: 05/19/03 –06/02/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
What’s Up in the Booster Eric Prebys February 27, 2002 and March 6, 2003.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
Proton Planning – Major Projects, Schedule, Decisions, and Projections Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division.
Status of the AP2 Optics Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Department November 19, 2004.
Proton Plan PMG 2/22/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status January Eric Prebys.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
High Intensity Booster Operations William Pellico PIP II collaboration Nov. 9 th 2015.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
Proton Planning Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division.
Proton Plan PMG 10/13/05 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status September Report Eric Prebys.
Setting BLM Limits in the Booster The Booster is now delivering all the protons needed by the collider program, and about 40% of the protons needed by.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
ORBUMP Power Supply... 16x3 SCR’s Pulse Forming Network (PFN) - looks like a very slow transmission line. Flat top ~ (10 usec)*(number of cells). Reduced.
Beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is.
Proton Source July 21, 2006 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Meeting Agenda:  Review of parameter list: Prebys, Kourbanis  Status of writing assignments Prebys,
Mu2e Meeting, FNAL, September 15-16, 2006 E Prebys 1 Radiation and Slow Extraction Issues* (work in progress) Eric Prebys, FNAL/AD.
Proton Plan PMG 4/18/05 E Prebys/J. Sims 1 Proton Plan Status March Report Eric Prebys Jeff Sims.
Toward a Proton Plan Eric Prebys Fermilab Accelerator Division.
BooNE Meeting, January 15, Prebys 1 How are we doing? Best running Power loss (W) Protons (p/min) Energy Lost (W-min/p) Best running again ? Mysterious.
PAC Meeting, December 12, Prebys 1 The Problem.
Run II Status Keith Gollwitzer Temple Review July 1, 2003.
Intensity Dependent Quad Ramps We know that in order to get the most intensity, the quad ramps must be tuned for a particular intensity. The way this is.
RHIC Status April 8, 2011 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
Limitations to Total Booster Flux Total protons per batch: 4E12 with decent beam loss, 5E12 max. Average rep rate of the machine: –Injection bump magnets.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
Hybrid Fast-Ramping Synchrotron to 750 GeV/c J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory MAP Collaboration Meeting March 5, 2012.
Booster Status, September 4, 2003 – E. Prebys 1 Frantic Shutdown Preparations Continue…
Booster lattice measurement and correction with LOCO C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya Booster workshop 23 Nov 2015.
Simulation of Extinction Channel Eric Prebys Mu2e Extinction Technical Design Review 2 November 2015.
Proton Economics Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division.
A Compact FFAG for Radioisotope Production D. Bruton R. Barlow, R. Edgecock, and C.J. Johnstone.
Booster Corrector Review, Oct. 10 th, 2006 E. Prebys Introduction/Specifications Eric Prebys Proton Plan Manager.
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
Threading / LTC/ JW1 How difficult is threading at the LHC ? When MADX meets the control system … J. Wenninger AB-OP &
Toward an Improved Model of the Fermilab Booster Synchrotron A. Drozhdin, J.-F. Ostiguy and W. Chou Beam Physics Department Introduction The Booster is.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
Large Booster and Collider Ring
LCLS-II Lattice 26FEB16: updates in the areas from bypass to dump
FCC-hh injection group 7
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Presentation transcript:

Dog( leg )s of War Eric Prebys Run II Meeting March 13, 2003

Dogleg Problem Each of the two Booster extraction septa has a set of vertical dogleg magnets to steer the beam around it during acceleration. More powerful doglegs were installed in 1998 to reduce losses early in the cycle. These magnets have an edge focusing effect which distorts the horizontal injection lattice: 50% increase in maximum  100% increase in maximum dispersion. Harmonic contributions. Effect goes like I 2. Now tune to minimize. Recently got an unusual opportunity to explore potential improvements from fixing the problem. Working on schemes to reduce or remove problem. Septum Dogleg Magnets

Parasitic Focusing vertical focusing if beam has component into page vertical focusing if beam has component out of page Side View Top View  /2 ff Rectangular (RBEND) magnet: Focusing in non-bend plane!! Always focusing!!

Parasitic Focusing (cont’d) Sector (SBEND) magnet: B ~constant Nominal L Longer L Shorter L Focusing in bend plane!! Exit angle Non-bend plane focusing bend plane focusing SBEND RBEND Trade-off:

Predicted Effect of Doglegs xx DxDx xx DxDx Ideal Lattice Add Doglegs

Preliminary Study: Dispersion Measured dispersion for different dogleg currents:

Preliminary Study: Tune 100% Dogleg Current 60% Dogleg Current Tuneshift ~ prediction

Dead Dog Studies Took advantage of recent TeV Magnet failure to raise the Long 13 (dump) septum and turn off the associated dogleg. Doglegs almost exactly add, so this should reduce the effect by almost half. The mode of operation prevents short batching, booster study cycles and RDF operation. Had about 36 hours of study in this mode. Bottom Line: major improvement.

Transmission After Tuning March 3, 7 turns, both dogs March 6, 7 turns, 1 dog

Transmission with One Dogleg Injected Charge (E12) %

Record Running w/o Dogleg

Booster Performance Over Time Total Booster Output (protons/minute) Energy Lost per Proton (W-min/proton) MiniBooNE Discovered Problem: tune to reduce dogleg currents Test with one dogleg off (halfway to MiniBooNE goal!)

Comments We have verified the dogleg effect and that it is a problem. We’ve tuned in our present configuration for 5 years, and were able to achieve record performance with only 36 hours of tuning in the one dog configuration. Almost certainly more room for improvement. Remember, only one dogleg was removed! Now, how fix the problem: –Short term: ameliorate problem ASAP –Long term (~2005): eliminate problem.

Short Term Solutions Tune to minimize current? –helped so far, but near limit. –Maybe raise L13 septum a bit? Motorize L13 septum to switch modes quickly? –Operational nightmare Eliminate L13? –Find another way to short-batch –Make a dump in MI-8 for Booster study cycles? Correctors?: –These don’t look like quads, so can’t find a fix – yet. Spread out doglegs (effect goes down with square of separation): –Not a lot of room. Maybe separate downstream magnets? Three-legged dog? –Turn of the third of the four magnets. –Need to increase first two reduces net improvement.

Long Term Solutions Large Aperture Lattice Magnets? –Obviously the “right” idea. –Must match lattice AND (preferrably work with existing resonant circuit). –Potential for big screw-up. Pulsed extraction bump (Lackey)? New ideas welcome –Brainstorming session tomorrow at 10:30

Final Comments After several false starts, Beam Physics began to get seriously involved with Booster matters in late This problem was almost immediately found. What other surprises await?