VIOXX ™ Gastrointestinal Outcome Research (VIGOR) Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting February 8, 2001 Lourdes Villalba, M.D. DAAODP, CDER, FDA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statistical Considerations for Implementing the FDA CV Guidance for T2DM Craig Wilson, PhD NIC-ASA Fall Meeting October 15, 2009.
Advertisements

Update on Anti-platelets Gabriel A. Vidal, MD Vascular Neurology Ochsner Medical Center October 14 th, 2009.
1. 2 The primary Objective of IDEAL LDL-C Simvastatin mg/d Atorvastatin 80 mg/d risk CHD In stable CHD patients IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease.
The INSIGHT study - Reliable blood pressure control and additional benefits for hypertensive patients Anthony M Heagerty Department of Medicine Manchester.
FDA Reprimands Merck for the Release: “…you fail to disclose that your explanation is hypothetical, has not been demonstrated by substantial evidence,
CAPRIE: Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at risk of Ischemic Events Purpose To assess the relative efficacy of the antiplatelet drugs clopidogrel.
TNT: Study Design Treating to New Targets 2 5 years 10,001 Patients Clinically evident CHD LDL-C 130  250 mg/dL following up to 8-week washout and 8-week.
COX-2 FDA Advisory Committee Meeting 2005 Rofecoxib
Women’s Health Study: Vitamin E in Primary Prevention Presented at American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions 2005 Presented by Dr. Julie E. Buring.
AA-7-1 René Belder, MD Executive Director Clinical Development and Life Cycle Management Cardiovascular / Metabolics 7asdf.
Women's Health Study: Low-Dose Aspirin in Primary Prevention Presented at American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions 2005 Presented by Dr. Dr.
1 Therapies Not Indicated Andrew P. DeFilippis, Ty J. Gluckman, James Mudd, Catherine Campbell, Gregg Fonarow & Roger S. Blumenthal.
Supervisor: Vs 余垣斌 Presenter: CR 周益聖. INTRODUCTION.
Presenter Disclosure Information
BEAUTI f UL: morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I f inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction Purpose.
An Update on NSAID Labeling and Data Review DSaRM Advisory Committee February 10, 2006 Sharon Hertz, M.D. Deputy Director Division of Anesthesia, Analgesia,
Vascular issues associated with bevacizumab Stuart M. Lichtman, MD, FACP 65+ Clinical Geriatric Program Associate Attending Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer.
Clinical implications. Burden of coronary disease 56 millions deaths worldwide in millions deaths worldwide in % due to CV disease (~ 16.
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease Presented at Late Breaking Clinical Trials AHA 2002 PROSPER.
VBWG CHARISMA Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance trial.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
The Vioxx Withdrawal What Happened? John A. Baron Dartmouth Medical School for the APPROVe Investigators.
1 Statin treatment is associated with improved prognosis in patients with AF-related stroke G. Ntaios, V. Papavasileiou, K.Makaritsis, A.Karagiannaki,
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
Joint Meeting of Anti-Infective Drugs & Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committees December 14-15, 2006 Ketek  (telithromycin) Regulatory History.
1 ENTEREG ® (Alvimopan) Special Safety Section Marjorie Dannis, M.D. Division of Gastroenterology Products Office of Drug Evaluation III CDER, FDA The.
Gastrointestinal Review Highlights of the VIGOR Trial Lawrence Goldkind M.D.
Aspirin Resistance: Significance, Detection and Clinical Management of This Real Phenomenon Webcast May 10 th, 2004 Sponsored by.
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
Regulatory History of Aspirin Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting Michelle M. Jackson, Ph.D. Division of Over-The-Counter Drug Products.
Cardiovascular Risk and NSAIDs Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting November 29, 2006 Sharon Hertz, M.D. Deputy Director Division of Analgesia, Anesthesia,
* Based on post hoc analysis of individual outcome events (N=19,185). 1 Data on file, Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2 Gent M. Circulation. 1997; 96 (suppl):
Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee May 18-19, Overview of Drug Safety Challenges Gerald J. Dal Pan, MD, MHS Director Division of.
Cardiovascular Risk and NSAIDs Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting April 12, 2007 Sharon Hertz, M.D. Deputy Director Division of Analgesia, Anesthesia,
Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration An updated collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy among high-risk patients.
B-1 Pravastatin-Aspirin Combination René Belder, M.D. Executive Director Clinical Design and Evaluation, Metabolics Pharmaceutical Research Institute Bristol-Myers.
Advisory Committee Presentation on Vioxx (Rofecoxib) Discussion on the meta analyses for cardiovascular risk assessment Qian Li, Sc. D.
AGGRENOX TM Safety Head, Drug Surveillance and Information Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Ridgefield, Connecticut Kenneth Rakowski, MD.
NDAs /772 Etoricoxib Robert B. Shibuya, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anesthesia, Analgesia, and Rheumatology Products.
Oxypurinol for Symptomatic Gout in Allopurinol Intolerant Patients Lourdes Villalba, M.D. DAAODP, CDER, FDA Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting June 2,
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents FDA-Mandated CV Safety Trials 1.
Hypothesis: baseline risk status of the patients and proximity to a recent cardiovascular event influence the response to dual anti-platelet therapy. Patients.
What about VIOXX?. Adenomatous Polyp Prevention on Vioxx (APPROVe) Vioxx (rofecoxib) versus Placebo Basic Clinical Trial Objective: Assess whether Vioxx.
ESPS-2: European Stroke Prevention Study s Multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial s 6,602 patients randomized within 3 months.
Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research 1 COX-2 CV Safety valdecoxib-parecoxib James Witter MD, PhD DAAODP/ODE.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
Drug Regulation in Controversy: Vioxx November 10, 2004 Sandra L. Kweder, M.D. Deputy Director, Office of New Drugs Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Department of Health and Human Services Center for Drug Evaluation and Research 1 Issues in Projecting Increased Risk of Cardiovascular Events to the Exposed.
CHEST 2013; 144(3): R3 김유진 / Prof. 장나은. Introduction 2  Cardiovascular diseases  common, serious comorbid conditions in patients with COPD cardiac.
Angela Aziz Donnelly April 5, 2016
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Clinical Trial Commentary
Low-Dose Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis  Stavros Stavrakis, MD  The American Journal.
A Comparison of RE-LY and ROCKET AF Trial Designs and Outcomes
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease
First time a CETP inhibitor shows reduction of serious CV events
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
ASCEND Randomized placebo-controlled trial of aspirin 100 mg daily in 15,480 patients with diabetes and no baseline cardiovascular disease Jane Armitage.
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
Jane Armitage on behalf of the HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group
George E. Kikano, MD, Marie T. Brown, MD  Mayo Clinic Proceedings 
Coxibs—Beyond the GI Tract
ASPIRE CLASS 6: Interpreting Results and Writing an Abstract
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
Ramy Abdelrahman, MD Division of Pediatric and Maternal Health (DPMH)
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
INTRO AMI. INTEGRILIN AND. REDUCED DOSE. OF THROMBOLYTIC IN. ACUTE
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
Presentation transcript:

VIOXX ™ Gastrointestinal Outcome Research (VIGOR) Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting February 8, 2001 Lourdes Villalba, M.D. DAAODP, CDER, FDA

Rofecoxib Overall Safety  VIGOR - General safety  CV safety in other databases  Risk/benefit assessment - Co-use of ASA  Post-marketing safety  Conclusions

VIGOR General Safety  Evaluation of routine safety parameters  Deaths  Serious Clinical AE’s  Dropouts due to Clinical AE’s  Laboratory AE’s  Number of Hospitalizations  Pre-specified NSAID-related AE’s

VIGOR General Safety Deaths Rofecoxib (N=4047) 22 (0.5%) 9 cardiovascular 5 pneumonia 4 worsening ILD 2 GI bleeding 1 gastric malignancy 1 unknown (CHF?) Naproxen (N=4029) 15 (0.4 %) 7 cardiovascular 3 pneumonia 1 worsening ILD 1 GI bleeding 1 hepatic necrosis 2 malignant neoplasm

Definition of Serious AE’s  Death  Life threatening  Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity  Results in or prolongs patient hospitalization  Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect  Cancer  The result of an overdose  Or event may jeopardize the patient and require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above

VIGOR General Safety Serious AE’s (  >1%) Rofecoxib Naproxen N=4047 (%) N=4029 (%) Any * 378 (9.3) 315 (7.8) CV * 101 (2.5) 46 (1.1) Digestive * 48 (1.2) 97 (2.4 ) MS 1 83 (2.1) 70 (1.7) Resp 52 (1.3) 39 (1.0) * p < MS: musculo-skeletal

VIGOR General Safety Dropouts due to AE’s (  >1%) Rofecoxib Naproxen N=4047 (%) N=4029 (%) Any 643 (15.9) 635 (15.8) CV* 109 (2.7) 33 (0.8) Digestive 292 (7.2) 392 (9.7) Nervous* 44 (1.1) 24 (0.6) Body (2.5) 107 (2.7) * p < Body: body as a whole

VIGOR General Safety Lab AE’s Rofecoxib Naproxen N=4047 (%) N=4029 (%) Any 418 (10.4) 368 (9.2) Dropouts 22 (0.6) 12 (0.3) Serious 3 (<0.1) 0

VIGOR General Safety Hospitalizations Rofecoxib Naproxen N=4047 N=4029 Any CV GI Hematologic 7 6 Hepatobiliary 12 8 Renal 6 6 Other

VIGOR General Safety Pre-specified NSAID-related AE’s Rofecoxib Naproxen p-value N=4047 N=4029  Dropouts GI + abdom. pain <0.001 Edema-related HTN-related 28 6 <0.001 Liver-related Renal-related  CHF-related

VIGOR General Safety Summary  GI safety favored rofecoxib  Overall, general safety parameters trended in favor of naproxen, particularly due to the excess in serious cardiovascular events in the rofecoxib group.

Rofecoxib Overall Safety  VIGOR - General Safety  CV safety in other databases  Risk/benefit assessment - Co-use of ASA  Post-marketing safety  Conclusions

Time to event plot. Adjudicated serious CV thrombotic events in VIGOR RR = 2.37 (R vs. N)

Serious CV/thrombotic Events Definitions 1) Investigator reported 2) Adjudicated: confirmed by the CV Case Review Committees (Pre-specified analysis in SOP)(excludes hemorrhagic stroke) 3) APTC: Anti-platelet Trialists’ Collaboration composite endpoint: cardiac death, non- fatal MI and stroke (includes hemorrhagic stroke and excludes peripheral events)

VIGOR Adjudicated Serious CV thrombotic Events Included for Analyses  Cardiac Event  Acute myocardial infarction  Unstable angina  Sudden cardiac death  Cerebrovascular Event  Ischemic CVA stroke with documentation  Transient ischemic attack (TIA)  Peripheral Vascular Event  Peripheral arterial thrombosis  Peripheral venous thrombosis

VIGOR Serious CV thrombotic events Three Different Endpoints InvestigatorAdjudicatedAPTC 1 # patients with events rofecoxib naproxen APTC 1: Anti-platelet Trialists’ Collaboration composite

VIGOR CV Safety Hypotheses  Pro-thrombotic effect with rofecoxib? (biological plausibility)  Cardio-protective effect of naproxen? (biological plausibility)  Unknown factors?

VIGOR CV Safety Hypotheses (2)  Cardio-protective effect of naproxen? – Adjudication criteria: RR = 0.42 N vs. R – APTC combined endpoint: RR = 0.51 N vs. R (8,000 patients, median f.u. 9 months, population of patients with no recent CV/thrombotic event)  No controlled studies of naproxen vs. placebo for CV prophylaxis.

Rofecoxib CV Safety Important Limitations to Sponsor’s Meta-analysis –Studies of different length ( weeks)  Most patients exposed < 6 months –Different doses (rofecoxib 12.5, 25 and 50 mg)  Most patients exposed  25 mg –Multiple comparators which may be associated with different risk of CV events. –Different diseases that may be associated with different risk of CV events.

Rofecoxib Exposure Data from Meta Analysis Data Sets  Total number included in sponsor’s meta- analysis: 28,349 patients  Exposure to rofecoxib 50 mg/day for at least 6 months in studies other than VIGOR: 638 patients

Rofecoxib CV Safety Summary  Cardiovascular Safety in VIGOR favored naproxen (CV/thrombotic, HTN and CHF)  HTN/fluid retention/edema for rofecoxib: dose dependent (signal present in original NDA)  CV/thrombotic events: –Original NDA small database –Sponsor’s meta-analysis has serious methodological limitations to answer the question

Rofecoxib Overall Safety  VIGOR - General Safety  CV safety in other studies  Risk/benefit assessment - Co-use of ASA  Post-marketing safety  Conclusions

Rofecoxib Risk/benefit Assessment  Patients at increased risk of certain CV thrombotic events should be on concomitant low dose ASA  The effect of concomitant use of rofecoxib with low dose ASA on GI and CV risk is unknown. Studies that allowed ASA from the start were small and short in duration, except for study 102 (“Advantage” study)

Study Preliminary safety data Rofecoxib* Naproxen* 25 mg 1000 mg N=2785 N=2771 Serious CV Cardiac 7 1 MI 5 1 Sudden death 2 0 Ischemic CVA 0 6 Other events Confirmed UGI week 2 APTC terms 3 Arterial rupture, hemorrhagic CVA, unknown cause of death * 1 2 % low dose ASA

Rofecoxib Risk/benefit Assessment Co-use with low dose ASA Summary  Insufficient data on concomitant ASA use.

Rofecoxib Overall Safety  VIGOR - General Safety  CV safety in other studies  Risk/benefit assessment - Co-use of ASA  Post-marketing safety  Conclusions

Rofecoxib Overall Safety Post-marketing Surveillance  Post-marketing reports include: –GI –Renal –Liver –Anaphylactoid reactions –Prothrombin time prolongation with coumadin co-use

Rofecoxib Overall Safety  VIGOR - General Safety  CV Safety in other studies  Risk/benefit assessment - Co-use of ASA  Post-marketing safety  Conclusions

Rofecoxib Overall Safety Conclusions (1)  VIGOR: GI Safety favored rofecoxib vs. naproxen (in a population of patients not taking ASA)  VIGOR: Overall, no safety superiority of rofecoxib over naproxen due to an excess of serious CV events in the rofecoxib group compared to the naproxen group  Rofecoxib 50 mg is twice the upper dose labeled for chronic use in OA. The chronic use of the 50 mg dose is not recommended.

Rofecoxib Overall Safety Conclusions (2)  Post-marketing safety: risk of serious GI events still a concern in high risk population  Questions raised in VIGOR: –Is there a pro-thrombotic effect of rofecoxib? –What would be the impact of chronic co-use of low dose ASA in GI and CV events?