Ecology 8310 Population (and Community) Ecology Patch selection (e.g., Marginal Value Theorem) Prey selection (optimal diet theory) Moving beyond feeding.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optimal Diet Choice Contingency Model Hypothesis: Fitness Increases with Increase Individuals Long-Term Average Rate of Energy Gain Two Prey Types: Specialize.
Advertisements

David McCormick & Simon Harrison
Exponentinal Population Growth. Population Regulation – Anatomy of the logistic growth curve.
Energy/Nutrient Relations (Ch. 7). Lecture Outline 1) Major methods of gaining energy 2) Limitations on energy gain –Plants –Animals.
Announcements. Foraging and prey selection Optimal Foraging theory: Individuals will maximize benefit:cost Model predictions only as good as the parameters.
Community Ecology Definitions: A community is a group of species populations that occur together in the same place and the same time. Community ecology.
Section 5 Professor Donald McFarlane
Fish and Zooplankton Interactions Wetzel Chapter 16, pp
Decision making and optimal foraging Logic Elements Prey choice model Patch choice model.
Predation – Chapter 13. Types of Predators Herbivores – animals that prey on green plants or their seed and fruits. –Plants are usually damaged but not.
PREDATORS AND PREY. LOOK AT THREE ASPECTS: 1. Decisions made by animals in collecting food 2. Behaviour involved in collecting food 3. Ways to avoid being.
Predation Chapter 8. Predation Consumption of one organism (prey) by another (predator), in which the prey is alive when first attacked by the predator.
Functional Response Lab 10 Turn in proposals on front table.
PREDATION One of the least well developed areas of ecological theory Management problems occur with a lack of information –Biological data on predators.
Uroplatus Gecko This has nothing to do with today’s lecture but speaking of cryptic critters…
Foraging Behaviour 9.3, , Bush.
Optimal theory The theory used to generate hypotheses about the adaptive value of characteristics which analyzes the costs and benefits of alternative.
Food webs and trophic cascades in lakes. How to represent trophic relationships? (Paine 1980) 1.Connectedness Based on observations 2.Energy flow web.
Predation. Hypotheses for Patterns of Diversity n Evolutionary Time n Ecological Time n Primary Production n Stability of Primary Production n Structural.
Predator Behavior  Numerical Response –  Predators will gather around a high density prey area  Predators “learn” where prey is (by experience or watching.
Levels of Ecological Organization in Freshwater Systems Population Community Ecosystem.
How To Survive A Drought The bioenergetic efficiency of juvenile Chinook salmon feeding strategies during a drought in the San Joaquin River, California.
FORAGING. ASK THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: 1. WHAT FOOD ITEMS SHOULD A FORAGER EAT? Diet Selection Models Imagine a predator seeking prey: Finds either prey.
Questions in the study of foraging behavior How do animals select prey? 2.When should animals leave one feeding site and.
Adaptive Feeding Behavior -- Chapter 7. The Truth of Life All animals consume food and are potential food for others These two facts shape behavior Efficient.
CurrencyCurrency –What is to be maximized Strategy set (decision)Strategy set (decision) –What the animal can do ConstraintsConstraints –The limits of.
Multispecies Models-II (Including Predation In Population Models)
Optimal Foraging Strategies Trever, Costas and Bill “International team of mystery” Plants Virtuatum computata. Simulate the movement of insects on a ring.
FORAGING (PART II). Foraging Decisions Feeding holes (24/log) -seeds placed in 0, 6, 12, and 24 holes After a bird samples a log, how does it decide to.
Some business to take care of: --Go to your lab this week. Read through Chapter 4, as well as Chapter 12 BEFORE lab. --There is a new lab on Tuesday afternoon.
Tolerance Curves Principle of Allocation Ray Huey.
Learning to describe and quantify animal behavior.
Behavior: Levels of Explanation Recall N. Tinbergen Proximate: Mechanisms (How? Most Biology) Ultimate: Adaptive Significance (Why?) Example, Compare.
Investment Decisions and Capital Budgeting
1 Energy and Nutrient Relations Chapter 6. 2 Energy Sources Organisms can be classified by trophic levels.  Autotrophs use inorganic sources of carbon.
1 Energy Sources Organisms can be classified by trophic levels. – Autotrophs use… ______________: Use CO 2 as carbon source, and sunlight as energy. ______________:
Populations and Communities. A group of individuals of the same species, living in a shared space at a specific point in time = Population.
Perfect Competition. Production and Profit Optimal output rule for price taking firms ▫Price equals marginal cost at the price-taking firm’s optimal quantity.
1) Acclimation (reversible): short-term change in structure or function (biochemical pathways) shift in range of physiological tolerances of an individual.
Neutral Models Landscape Ecology. Questions/Comments.
Predator Behavior Numerical Response – –Predators will gather around a high density prey area Predators “learn” where prey is (by experience or watching.
Vocabulary Review Ch 44- Animal Behavior. A person who specializes in the scientific study of animal behavior Ethologist.
USE OF SPACE: TERRITORY AND HABITAT SELECTION. Some basics of Natural Selection Evolution – pattern of change Natural Selection – process by which evolution.
Optimal Foraging Behavior  Species should forage in an efficient manner that maximizes benefits and minimizes costs  Varies with species and environmental.
Mark J Gibbons, Room 4.102, BCB Department, UWC
BIOL 2041 Midterm Review Biology/Psychology 3750.
- Aquatics - Presented by: Rick Pattenden Mainstream Aquatics Ltd.
1. How are fish classified? 2. Why are planktivores size-selective? 3. How many mating types are there in bluegill? Chapter 3 The Organisms.
Foraging Strategies of Homo Criminalis Lessons From Behavioral Ecology Wim Bernasco — NSCR, the Netherlands, IPAM 2007.
1 Introduction: What Is Ecology ? Chapter 1. 2 Outline Overview of Ecology Ecology of Forest Birds Ecology of Bumblebees Forest Nutrient Budgets Vegetation.
FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE. Fig in Molles 2008.
Population ecology Gauguin. 15 populations (various patch sizes) Time since fire: 0 to >30 years 9 years ( ) >80 individuals per population each.
Foraging Psychology Introduction Foraging has been looked at from a functional angle for a long time Optimality models etc Then you have to look.
Omnivory and Population Dynamics of the White-footed Mouse Peromyscus leucopus in Response to Pulsed Food Resources Pei-Jen Shaner University of Virginia.
Chapter 4 Biotics 1) What general pattern did Brooks and Dodson observe in Connecticut lakes? 2) What is the SEH? Which parts are correct? 3) What.
Optimal foraging theory and risk-sensitive foraging
The Landscape Ecology of Invasive Spread Question: How is spatial pattern expected to affect invasive spread? Premise: Habitat loss and fragmentation leads.
Habitat Fragmentation Process of breaking contiguous unit into smaller pieces; area & distance components.
Ecology 8310 Population (and Community) Ecology Predator-prey Response to Thursday… Empirical patterns: Luckinbill's experiments Huffaker's mites Lake.
Community Ecology BCB331 Mark J Gibbons, Room Z108, BCB Department, UWC Tel: Image acknowledgements –
Ecology 8310 Population (and Community) Ecology Communities in Space (Metacommunities) Island Biogeography (an early view) Evolving views Similarity in.
7.1 Animals find food using a variety of sensory modalities Animals use several sensory modalities when searching for food (e.g., vision, olfaction, hearing)
Biological structure of Fisheries Resources In Space And Time.
SYNTHESIS APPROACH FOUR EXAMPLES
High Parasitoids Parasite Intimacy Low Predator Grazer Low Lethality
Lakes & Large Impoundments Chapter 22
Red Squirrel caching preferences
Chapter 3 Behavioral ecology
Behavioral Ecology (Chapter 53)
Mon. Tues. Wed. Thurs. Fri. Week of Sept. 22
Presentation transcript:

Ecology 8310 Population (and Community) Ecology Patch selection (e.g., Marginal Value Theorem) Prey selection (optimal diet theory) Moving beyond feeding (energy intake): predation risk (u/g)

Patch selection: Consider a forager moving among many patches during a foraging bout (rodent among seed caches, pollinator among flowers, etc.) Which patches does it feed in? For how long? (when does it leave?) How are these decisions altered by patch density? Or the quality of other patches?

Patch selection:

GOAL: Maximize rate of net energy gain (intake – losses / time)

Patch selection: Cumulative energy intake

Patch selection: Marginal Value Theorem: Leave when: dg/dT = E n *

Time Travel Time Search Time in Patch Cumulative Energy gain Slope = Energy gain/Time Point of diminishing returns Time to leave! Another way to look at this (when there is only 1 patch type) Which strategy yields the greatest E/T?

Time Travel Time Search Time in Patch Cumulative Energy gain What if patches are denser (travel time is less)? Leave earlier when travel time is shorter. SparseDense

Patch selection: Predictions of MVT: 1.Leave at a fixed MV (indep. of patch quality 2.Stay in higher quality patches longer 3.Skip patches in which dg/dt| t=0 < E n * 4.As the density of patches increase… a.Reduce residency time b.Drop low quality patches from diet 5.Variants: a.Giving up density (uniform among patches) b.Giving up time (time since last prey taken)

Prey selection:

Consider a forager moving WITHIN a patch Which prey does it attack? How are these decisions altered by prey density? …or the types of prey available? Assume: energy maximization

Prey selection: Assume a forager has T s units of search time available. How can we express the rate of net energy gain to that forager during the foraging bout? Two main components: Net energy gained (intake – losses) Time expended (searching and handling) E n /T = Net energy gained / Time expended

Prey selection:

The solution and insights: Rank prey by e i /h i (=profitability) Predator can only decide on P i 's (attack, don't attack, sometimes attack). Optimal P i is either 0 or 1 (attack or don't attack) RULE: Attack if e i /h i >E*/T; else ignore. [As in MVT] Inclusion of a prey type in the diet is only a function of density of MORE valuable prey. Examine graphically….

From Richardson and Verbeek (1986) A test:

Laboratory test: Bluegill sunfish Based upon Werner and Hall (1974)

Prey selection: Field (lake) From Mittelbach (1981)

Can we use the diet model to predict field patterns (growth and habitat use)?

Habitat selection: "Field" (Ponds) From Werner et al (1983) Open water Vegetation

Problems? Early models were very simple Ignored complexities (e.g., capture probability, search images, nutrients, etc.) Other species ….

Lakes: Open water often the most profitable. Used by large bluegill. BUT small bluegill use the vegetated habitat. Why?

Can we incorporate predation risk into our predictive framework?

Old rule: maximize "g" (growth) New rule: minimize  /g (risk to growth)

Other implications of this work (stage-structure in bluegill)?

Small Bluegill Large Bluegill Littoral Invertebrates Zooplankton

Small Bluegill Large Bluegill Littoral Invertebrates Zooplankton