Powering of the Superconducting Circuits: Procedures and Strategies for Circuit Validation Antonio Vergara on behalf of the Hardware Commissioning Coordination.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Frédérick BORDRY – LHCMAC 22- 6th December 2007 Review of the experience of LHC powering: short-circuit tests and sector 7-8 and start of powering sector.
Advertisements

1 Commissioning ABT Equipment in the LHC Jan Uythoven ABT TCM 13/01/2015.
Post Mortem Workshop - discussion1 17/1/2007 HWC Requirements GMPMA  Concentrate on pre-beam requirements Post-quench analysis ([semi-] automatic) Integrity.
PIC configuration (maskable/unmaskable circuits) I. Romera MPP meeting –
TE/MPE/MI OP section meeting 29 th September 2009 HCC 2009 Frequently Asked Questions 0v1 M. Zerlauth.
Powering Group of Circuit Doubts and proposals of the procedure reviewing team (Gianluigi, Rob, Sandrine, Matteo, Boris) Ref document: LHC-MPP-HCP-071.
Session th January 2010 R.Schmidt TE/MPE Hardware Commissioning 2010 and beyond R.Schmidt.
Expected Quench Levels of the Machine without Beam: Starting at 7 TeV ? P. Pugnat CERN, Geneva, Switzerland LHC Project Workshop Chamonix XV, Tuesday 24.
LARP Collaboration April 26 th 2006 The Commissioning of the Technical Systems of LHC 1.The final validation that all the collider components/systems.
Operational tools Laurette Ponce BE-OP 1. 2 Powering tests and Safety 23 July 2009  After the 19 th September, a re-enforcement of access control during.
TE-MPE-EP, RD, 06-Dec QPS Data Transmission after LS1 R. Denz, TE-MPE-EP TIMBER PM WinCC OA Tsunami warning:
Chamonix Risks due to UPS malfunctioning Impact on the Superconducting Circuit Protection System Hugues Thiesen Acknowledgments:K. Dahlerup-Petersen,
1 Second LHC Splice Review Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement possible QC tool for consolidated splices H. Thiesen 28 November 2011 K. Brodzinski,
LHC Hardware Commissioning Review May 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 LHC Hardware Commissioning Review Contribution ID: 20 – Quality assurance and.
HC Review, May 2005 Hardware Commissioning Review Hardware Commissioning Review Quality Assurance and Documentation of Results Félix Rodríguez Mateos,
Reliability of the Quench Protection System for the LHC s.c. Elements F. Rodriguez-Mateos and Antonio Vergara (both TS now, AT when the work was done)
Review of Hardware Commissioning May 11-13, 2005 Hardware Commissioning Co-ordination Organisation Roberto Saban the logic day to day organization safety.
Summary and Discussion Rüdiger Schmidt Summary and discussions.
R.Schmidt, HC 28/5/ Access to underground areas during powering Risk: accidental massive helium release (as on 19 September) when superconducting.
Training LHC Powering R. Denz Quench Protection System R. Denz AT-MEL.
AT-MEL-PM, R. Denz, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23 1 QPS system and its risks  Principal risks  General remarks  Quench heater circuits  Quench detection.
HC Review F. Rodriguez-Mateos Powering tests The outcome of the work conducted within HCWG and many discussions among colleagues.
Hardware Commissioning Tools Robin. AB-CO TC 8th February 2007Hardware Commissioning Tools - RJL2 Summary Hardware Commissioning View Slides from Antonio.
Hardware Commissioning  Preparation Documentation MTF Programme  Status The Review The commissioning activity in Resources  Outlook The new.
Power Converters and DC cablesSlide 1/.. LHC - HC review Hugues THIESEN – AB/PO Thursday, 12 May 2005 Water cooled cables warm bus bars power converter.
1 Commissioning and Early Operation – View from Machine Protection Jan Uythoven (AB/BT) Thanks to the members of the MPWG.
BCWG - 16/11/20102 Content WHY do we need a HW Commissioning campaign? WHAT are we going to do? HOW are we going to do it? ElQA QPS Powering Tests Planning.
Andrzej Siemko On behalf of the MPP-GMPMA Task Force: (A. Ballarino, R. Denz, B. Khomenko, A.Perrin, P. Pugnat, A. Rijllart, L. Serio, A. Siemko, A. Vergara.
MP3 List of main Issues during March 2010 MP3 - Team.
OVERVIEW OF THE NEW FEATURES PVSS SCADA SYSTEMS USED DURING HCC MP3 - Frédéric BERNARD.
PM System Architecture Front-Ends, Servers, Triggering Ingredients Workshop on LHC Post Mortem Session 1 – What exists - PM System, Logging, Alarms Robin.
MPE activities within MP3 Arjan Verweij A. Verweij, MPE review, 2 June 2015 The questions: 1. Define the scope of work for your activity 2. Structure of.
AB/CO Review, Interlock team, 20 th September Interlock team – the AB/CO point of view M.Zerlauth, R.Harrison Powering Interlocks A common task.
16-17 January 2007 Post-Mortem Workshop Logging data in relation with Post-Mortem and archiving Ronny Billen AB-CO.
Conclusions on UPS powering test and procedure I. Romera Acknowledgements: V. Chareyre, M. Zerlauth 86 th MPP meeting –
Machine Protection Review, R. Denz, 11-APR Introduction to Magnet Powering and Protection R. Denz, AT-MEL-PM.
Outline of 2014/2015 plans V. Kain, M. Lamont, J. Wenninger 6/18/2013Optics Measurement and Correction Review
MPE Workshop for LS1 Summary of Global Activities Thanks to Speakers Arjan Verweij Hugues Thiesen Zinur Charifoulline Kajetan Fuchsberger.
Training LHC Powering - Markus Zerlauth Powering Interlocks Markus Zerlauth AB/CO/MI.
MPP Workshop Status of Powering Interlocks I. Romera on behalf of MPE-MS MPP Workshop, 12 June 2015, I. Romera (TE-MPE)1.
HWC Review – Sequencer Vito Baggiolini AB/CO, with the team: Carlos Castillo, Daniele Raffo, Roman Gorbonosov.
MPP Meeting 07/03/2007 MPP Main Ring Magnet Performance Panel Meeting Wednesday 7th March 2007 Agenda: 1)Matters arising 2)Recommendations for the case.
An invitation to an open discussion We are team reviewing its performance globally We want to help each other to reach the objectives We know the other.
Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner Software Tools for Commissioning Robin Lauckner 28 th March, 2007.
The prototype test String 2 May 13, 20082Roberto Saban – Academic Training Lecture 1 – Why LHC Hardware Commissioning?
HC Review Follow-up – June 22 nd – 23 rd 2006 What has been going on in the field: a status report F. Rodriguez-Mateos, TS-HDO on behalf of the HCC Team.
 Automation Strategies for LHC System Tests and Re-Commissioning after LS1 Kajetan Fuchsberger TE-MPE LS1 Workshop On behalf of the TE-MPE-MS Software.
AB-CO Review September Session on circuit commissioning Session on circuit commissioning Post-Mortem requirements F. Rodríguez-Mateos on behalf.
Logo area HL LHC IT STRING M. Bajko CERN TE-TM and QXF Review.
Training LHC Powering – Blanca Perea Solano From Individual System Tests to Powering to Nominal Blanca Perea on behalf of Hardware Commissioning Coordination.
Hardware Commissioning Review, R. Denz, 12-May Superconducting circuits: what remains to be done during hardware commissioning R. Denz AT-MEL-PM.
Session 8: What we will do for beam preparation in 2009 G. Arduini, R. Giachino 1Session 8 – Summary - GA24/02/2009.
TC CO July HCC report HCC report Summary of the tests of the LSS8L power converters in short-circuit F. Rodríguez-Mateos on behalf of R.Ballet-Thouble,
NIKHEF Annual Meeting, December 18, The LHC Project Status report to the NIKHEF annual meeting Jos Engelen Based on last week’s reports to CERN.
LHC Post Mortem Workshop - 1, CERN, January 2007 (slide 1/52) AB-CO Measurement & Analysis Present status of the individual.
R. Denz, A. Gomez Alonso, AT-MEL-PM
Powering LHC magnets version 30/3/2007.
Minimum Hardware Commissioning – Disclaimer
600 A circuits resistance measurements
RELIABILITY OF 600 A ENERGY EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
Powering the LHC Magnets
J. Uythoven for the MPE-MI & MS Teams
The Control System For LHC Hardware Commissioning
Powering from short circuit tests up to nominal
Circuits description and requirements - Closed Session-
Detailed global view on protection and detection of the circuits
+ many slides from various colleagues (KH, Rudiger, Paul, …)
Brief report of the hardware commissioning activities
Review of hardware commissioning
Presentation transcript:

Powering of the Superconducting Circuits: Procedures and Strategies for Circuit Validation Antonio Vergara on behalf of the Hardware Commissioning Coordination Team & SACEC

Antonio Vergara Post-Mortem Review – January 16 th 2006 The LHC SC Circuits

Antonio Vergara Post-Mortem Review – January 16 th 2006 The LHC SC Circuits

Antonio Vergara Post-Mortem Review – January 16 th 2006 Commissioning of a SC Circuit 1.Individual System Tests 2.Short-Circuit Tests

Antonio Vergara Post-Mortem Review – January 16 th 2006 Commissioning of a SC Circuit 1.Individual System Tests 2.Short-Circuit Tests 3.Software Control Tests -Control software (Sequencer) debugging -PIC – Power converter – QPS Communication -Post-Mortem data transmission and analysis -Study of parallelisms and interferences between tests -Validation of the estimated testing times

Antonio Vergara Post-Mortem Review – January 16 th 2006 Commissioning of a SC Circuit 1.Individual System Tests 2.Short-Circuit Tests 3.Software Control Tests 4.Interlock Tests PIC1 5.Powering Tests COOL-DOWN Connection Converter-Magnets

Antonio Vergara Post-Mortem Review – January 16 th 2006 Single Circuit Powering Test 350A PIC2 Injection 760A EE SPA FPA Quench 2 kA Loss PP EE Quench 6 kA 8.5 kA 12 kA RB Circuit PM data PM Analysis Results

Antonio Vergara Post-Mortem Review – January 16 th 2006 Circuit Types and Circuit Tests

Antonio Vergara Post-Mortem Review – January 16 th 2006 The Commissioning Scenario: Schedule

Antonio Vergara Post-Mortem Review – January 16 th 2006 The Commissioning Scenario: Schedule SECTOR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN Cool-Down PIC1 Powering Tests weeks Connection to leads 200 SC Circuits

Antonio Vergara Post-Mortem Review – January 16 th 2006 The Commissioning Scenario RB, RQF,RQD IP Q&D Correctors A Inner Triplet Correctors FRONT 1 FRONT 2

Antonio Vergara Post-Mortem Review – January 16 th 2006 Parallelisms and Constraints  The 3 types of parallelisms: Parallelisms between sectors Parallelisms between fronts Parallelisms between circuits – SOC SOC: Set Of Circuits. Battery of circuits commissioned in parallel by the same front

Antonio Vergara Post-Mortem Review – January 16 th 2006 Definitions  The 3 types of parallelisms: Parallelisms between sectors Parallelisms between fronts Parallelisms between circuits – Battery  General Constraints: One Front can commission only one circuit or one battery at a time Tests carried out by one Front should be transparent to the other ones

Antonio Vergara Post-Mortem Review – January 16 th 2006 Constraints on Parallel Commissioning 1.Two sectors cannot test simmultaneously i.Two or more 13kA circuits 2.Two fronts cannot test simmultaneously i.Circuits in the same powering subsector ii.Circuits in the same DFB 3.A SOC ( battery) cannot i.Include circuits above 600A ii.Imply more than one DFB iii.Imply more that two DFB chimenys iv.Include circuits sharing the same QPS controller v.Include circuits from different circuit type (?) vi.Include circuits from different powering subsectors

Antonio Vergara Post-Mortem Review – January 16 th 2006 Developed Tools  The Sequencer  Reference and LSA Databases  Individual Supervision Systems  Alarms – Laser, Logging  Test Management Software: SOC Editor  Post-Mortem Local Analysis Tools  Post-Mortem Global Analysis Tool  MTF

Antonio Vergara Post-Mortem Review – January 16 th 2006 What do we need from the Post-Mortem?  The Post-Mortem data analysis tools should provide to the different experts (MPP, individual equipment experts, Mr Circuit, HCC, etc.): Fast and reliable tools to analyse the behaviour of the different equipment after each commissioning step Information automatically extracted from the Post-Mortem data after each provoked or natural event Both a local and global overview of the systems under test reliable and clear enough to allow the go / no go for the next commissioning step.

Antonio Vergara Post-Mortem Review – January 16 th 2006 …thank you The Post-Mortem analysis is an essential tool, not only for a reliable and safe operation of the LHC, but also for achieving proper commissioning of the LHC super-conducting circuits respecting the current LHC project milestones.