Wednesday, January 16 Questions about the class and syllabus? Introduce our process-based approach to scientific writing Defining your writing project IPHY 3700 Writing Process Map

Process Activity: Analyzing Your Writing Task Carefully attend to the assignment instructions. Make checklists and take notes on instructions and guidelines that aren’t your “defaults.” Seek clarification on ambiguous or missing instructions and guidelines. Seek feedback on your plans for applying instructions and guidelines.

Carefully attend to the assignment instructions "Instructions to Authors" Documents: The American Physiological Society: Author Information and Instructions Conservation Biology Instructions to IPHY 3700 Authors

Make checklists and take notes on instructions and guidelines that aren’t your “defaults” A helpful strategy is to extract from the written assignment only those instructions that you don't normally follow. If, for example, your instructions are to double-space your paper and you always do that naturally, don't sweat the detail. But if your word processor's default for line spacing is set at 1, make a note to remind yourself to change the spacing when you sit down to draft. Sample Task Analysis Checklists and Notes (downloads as Microsoft Word document)

Seek Clarification and Feedback on Your Understanding of the Writing Task Dear Professor Amby Guious, I'm planning to write my term paper on the effects of lead- contaminated river sediment on nervous system diseases in Canadian geese. Reading over the assignment that you gave us, I'm not exactly sure if I clearly understand the instruction to "illustrate the relationship between the pollutant and a number of health outcomes in the species." For that part of my paper I'm planning to discuss how lead exposure can cause oxidative stress in the brain, which destroys brain cells and leads to several nervous system disorders and diseases. I'm interpreting your instruction to mean that we should write about the causal relationships between the pollutant and the health outcomes. Would you please let me know if my plan is on the right track for the assignment? Thank you, Justine Pierce

Our Writing Assignment What to write: The assignment is to write what we'll call a "discussion essay" based on the methods and results of the study reported in this document. You won't be writing the entire discussion section of a standard research paper. Instead, you'll write parts of a discussion section, adapting the content and structure to meet criteria that we'll discuss in upcoming class meetings. Paper length: The maximum length for the first draft and final paper is 1,500 words. To have the potential for an excellent grade, you must not exceed the maximum word count. You should, however, try to get as close to the limit as possible on both your first draft and final paper. Audiences: Your primary audiences are upper-division integrative physiology majors (who are not in IPHY 3700 this semester) and me. We'll devote class time to talking about how to tailor your paper's content, structure, and language by considering the needs, expectations, and values of your readers. Grading criteria: In many class meetings over the first half of the semester, I'll talk extensively about the criteria by which I'll grade final papers. Style, format, and paper submission guidelines: Guidelines for preparing and submitting papers are in the handout, "Instructions to IPHY 3700 Authors." You'll find a link to this handout in the "Everyday Stuff" menu on the course Web site.

Our Results for Weight Statistical Analyses for Body Weight (p <.01) 1. Within-group/Conventional: All values were significantly different from one another. 2. Within-group/Low-CHO: All values were significantly different from one another. 3. Between-group: No significant difference at baseline; after baseline, all monthly comparisons were significantly different.

Our Results for Body Fat Composition Statistical Analyses for Body Composition (p <.01) 1. Within-group/Conventional: All values were significantly different from one another. 2. Within-group/Low-CHO: All values were significantly different from one another. 3. Between-group: No significant difference at baseline; after baseline, all monthly comparisons were significantly different.

Our Results for Energy Intake Statistical Analyses for Energy Intake (p <.01) 1. Within-group/Conventional: The baseline value was significantly greater than the values for months 1-6; the values for months 1-6 were not significantly different from one another. 2. Within-group/Low-CHO: The baseline value was significantly greater than the values for months 1-6; the values for months 1-6 were not significantly different from one another. 3. Between-group: No significant differences in values at baseline and for months 1-6.