Building evaluation capacity – training Ben Barnes Principal Research Scientist July 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LAO PDR Summary Findings from NOSPA Mission and Possible Next Steps.
Advertisements

Methodologies for Assessing Social and Economic Performance in JESSICA Operations Gianni Carbonaro EIB - JESSICA and Investment Funds JESSICA Networking.
Leicestershires Vision for short break transformation Leicestershire is committed to the transformation and expansion of short break services for disabled.
Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
Strategic Management & Planning
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
SEM Planning Model.
Implementing SMS in Civil Aviation: the Canadian Perspective.
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
Viewpoint Consulting – Committed to your success.
Unit 8: Tests, Training, and Exercises Unit Introduction and Overview Unit objectives:  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises. 
1 Module BASICS OF PLANNING. 2 Content Overview Planning principles Gantt charts.
European Public Sector Information Systems Conference -- September 30, 1998 Case Study: Building the Skills that Produce Success - A Case Study from the.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Qatar Planning Council 1 Best Statistical Information to Support Qatar’s Progress Statistical Capacity Building for Information Society in Qatar.
Managing a Training Program Why train? Who will attend the training? What are the learning objectives? Strategies? Coverage? How will the training program.
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events
Integrated Capability Maturity Model (CMMI)
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
‘Positively defined learning outcomes’ Harriet Barnes Standards, Quality and Enhancement 19 June 2015.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
Improving Corporate Governance in Malaysian Capital Markets – The Role of the Audit Committee Role of the Audit Committee in Assessing Audit Quality.
2014 E DUCATIONAL T ECHNOLOGY P LAN P ROJECT K ICKOFF.
The Adaptation Policy Framework Bill Dougherty Stockholm Environment Institute – Boston Center Manila April 2004 An overview of the new UNDP-GEF product.
Developing an IS/IT Strategy
Improving Results Reporting Operations Managers Workshop Kiev, October 2008 Bratislava Regional Center Management Practice.
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
OSF/ISD Project Portfolio Management Framework January 17, 2011.

Better Deal for Business Presentation to LSC West Yorkshire Skills Team Pat Lister Better Deal for Business Officer at Yorkshire Forward.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
Institutional Evaluation of medical faculties Prof. A. Сheminat Arkhangelsk 2012.
1 Process Engineering A Systems Approach to Process Improvement Jeffrey L. Dutton Jacobs Sverdrup Advanced Systems Group Engineering Performance Improvement.
Development of Management Information System for the Forestry Sector in Viet Nam F O R M I S II Annual Work Plan 2014 Tapio Leppänen Chief Technical Adviser.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
USING THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT MODEL OF EXCELLENCE (PPME) TOOL TO IDENTIFY CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS A PRESENTATION BY A.B. ADJEI CHIEF EXECUTIVE – PUBLIC.
INNOWATER Introduction to Business Proposition Toolkit July 2013.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Ex-ante Impact Assessment Anca Ghinea Councilor Public Policy.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
CSI - Introduction General Understanding. What is ITSM and what is its Value? ITSM is a set of specialized organizational capabilities for providing value.
Implementing QI Projects Title I HIV Quality Management Program Case Management Providers Meeting May 26, 2005 Presented by Lynda A. O’Hanlon Title I HIV.
Monitoring and Evaluation of GeSCI’s Activities GeSCI Team Meeting 5-6 Dec 2007.
81 8. Managing Human Resources Managing the IS function Centralized control of IS function Distributed control of IS function Federated control of IS function.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Formulating a Simulation Project Proposal Chapter3.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
Partnering. The West’s response to Japan’s greater efficiency in major manufacturing industries Japan’s approach is based on cooperative, long term relationships.
Chapter 3 Strategic Information Systems Planning.
C4K Overview Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
The implementation programme for the 2008 SNA and supporting statistics UNECE special session on National Accounts for economies in transition Geneva,
Provincial M&E Forum 18 August 2011 The Presidency Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Draft National Evaluation Policy Framework.
Framework for success workshop 1 st October 2009.
Livia Bizikova and Laszlo Pinter
COMPONENT 2: TRAINING ON ADAPTATION AND MITIGATION Vũ Thế Thường Training Officer June 10, 2009.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Changing the way the New Zealand Aid Programme monitors and evaluates its Aid Ingrid van Aalst Principal Evaluation Manager Development Strategy & Effectiveness.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
PROGRESS ON ALIGNMENT OF NSDP, PGDS AND IDPs AS WELL AS GOVERNMNET WIDE M&E Kefiloe Masiteng Presidency.
BIMILACI 2007 Partners for Quality Infrastructure: The FIDIC Vision Washington, May 10, 2007 Dr. Jorge Díaz Padilla FIDIC President.
What is a Service Level Agreement? Service level agreements are part of a quality approach to help teams identify and agree what ‘good quality’ looks like.
CHANGE MANAGEMENT - PART 2 MODULE 7
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Dr. Anubha Rajesh, Early Education Services, ICF January 13, 2016 Invest in Young Children: National Conference on Mother- tongue Based Multilingual Early.
MUHC Innovation Model.
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
The Estonian experience with ex-ante evaluation – set-up and progress
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
Presentation transcript:

Building evaluation capacity – training Ben Barnes Principal Research Scientist July 2015

2 Baseline evaluation skillsHigh level/ specialised skills Plan the evaluation Build evaluation thinking into all aspects of program and policy design Formulate program logics for small/medium projects Identify decisions the evaluation needs to inform Formulate clear evaluation questions Identify potential methodologies, indicators and data sources for answering evaluation questions Incorporate evaluation data requirements into program data collection and reporting systems Develop and plan for suitable timelines Formulate program logics for large scale or complex projects Choose and develop core data for monitoring and measuring progress that may be used across evaluations Implement ethical standards for evaluation Commission the evaluation Understand when to use different evaluation types and methodologies including economic evaluation Formulate tender briefs for external evaluations Select the best tender according to proposed methodology, team and other selection criteria Be a methodological/ technical expert in one or more areas Manage the contract & inform program & policy decisions Review/critique/approve the evaluation framework including methodology Critique the use of data (quant and qual) and the reporting and interpretation of findings Manage ‘actively’ to ensure CRS standards are met Use findings to inform program management Present and/or communicate findings to program delivery partners and ‘across’ the agency Evaluate the evaluation and communicate key lessons Manage complex evaluations Present and communicate findings ‘upwards’ to inform program and policy decisions Synthesise findings across individual evaluations to inform decisions Training – aligned with capability requirements

Co-designed and co-delivered CRS evaluation specialists (Ben Barnes and Rebecca Wilkinson) Duncan Rintoul, Rooftop Social George Argyrous, ANZSOG Presenters with reputation, and tried and tested materials Setting out internal process, working through actual upcoming evaluation projects One behaviour change, one infrastructure program People from different teams, with different perspectives Mix of presentations, facilitated discussions, small group work, homework tasks Feedback at end of each day, for each round, which led to revisions Training – two day course 3

Training – course content 4 Day 1 Overview of evaluation – Evaluation in the policy cycle – Key terms and concepts Introducing program logic – Key concepts – Case study workshop Day 2 Planning the evaluation – Developing an “Evaluation Plan” – Key evaluation questions Commissioning the evaluation Managing the evaluation – The Evaluation Framework – Criteria and standards – Evaluation design/methodology – Data analysis and interpretation – Data collection – Risks and ethics – Key decisions and management – Using the findings Putting it all into practice

Consider a full course … a short course and … and perhaps even a shorter course Tailor to how evaluation occurs in your agency Acknowledge the time investment required Achieve critical mass Training – lessons learned 5

6 Questions?