AIRPACT-3 status and near- term objectives Joe Vaughan Brian Lamb Jeremy Avise Jack Chen Matt Porter Li Wang.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
Advertisements

Limei Ran 1, Uma Shankar 1, Ellen Cooter 2, Aijun Xiu 1, Neil Davis 1 1 Center for Environmental Modeling for Policy Development, Institute for the Environment,
VISTAS Modeling Overview May 25, 2004 Mt. Cammerer, Great Smoky Mtns. National Park.
A PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE ETA - CMAQ AIR QUALITY FORECAST MODEL FOR THE SUMMER OF 2004 CMAS Workshop Chapel Hill, NC 20 October, 2004.
Georgia Institute of Technology Evaluation of CMAQ with FAQS Episode of August 11 th -20 th, 2000 Yongtao Hu, M. Talat Odman, Maudood Khan and Armistead.
Multi-scale and Ensemble Modeling of the Effects of Global Change on Air Quality in the US NW –AIRQUEST Annual Meeting Washington State University Pullman,
Analysis of nitrate in the Columbia Basin Ranil Dhammapala WA Dept of Ecology.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
BlueSky-EM, SMOKE and Data Linkages Andy Holland Carolina Environmental Program Symposium on Climate, Forest Growth, Fire and Air Quality Interactions.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
4-km AIRPACT vs 12-km AIRPACT Both with dynamic boundary conditions from MOZART-4 Figures created on 5/29/2011 (corrected corrupted JPROC input file)
Climate, Fire and Air Quality Climate Impacts Group June 1, 2006.
Short-Term Air Quality Forecasts for the Pacific Northwest and Long-Range Global Change Predictions for the US Jack Chen Committee Members: Brian Lamb,
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
The ClearSky Field-Burning Decision Support System Joe Vaughan, Charleston Ramos, Brian Lamb Laboratory for Atmospheric Research WSU-Pullman NW-AIRQUEST.
BlueSky Implementation in CANSAC Julide Kahyaoglu-Koracin Desert Research Institute - CEFA CANSAC Workshop Riverside, CA May 2006 Julide Kahyaoglu-Koracin.
Regional Air Quality Modeling: Long Range Global Change Simulations.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Integrating Cropland Management into.
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
Evaluation of the AIRPACT2 modeling system for the Pacific Northwest Abdullah Mahmud MS Student, CEE Washington State University.
Transitioning CMAQ for NWS Operational AQ Forecasting Jeff McQueen*, Pius Lee*, Marina Tsildulko*, G. DiMego*, B. Katz* R. Mathur,T. Otte, J. Pleim, J.
Near Real Time analyzed maps of air quality in Europe Cécile Honoré, Laurence Rouïl.
University of California Riverside, ENVIRON Corporation, MCNC WRAP Regional Modeling Center WRAP Regional Haze CMAQ 1996 Model Performance and for Section.
Calculating Statistics: Concentration Related Performance Goals James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources PM Model Performance Workshop Chapel.
Available Analytical Approaches for Estimating Fire Impacts on Ozone Formation Stephen Reid Sean Raffuse Hilary Hafner Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma,
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS 2011 Modeling Update University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International.
Advances in Support of the CMAQ Bidirectional Science Option for the Estimation of Ammonia Flux from Agricultural cropland Ellen Cooter U.S. EPA, National.
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: Initial CAMx Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation October.
AIRPACT and ClearSky Activity Report Joe Vaughan, Farren Herron-Thorpe, Serena Chung and Brian Lamb NW-AIRQUEST Annual Meeting June 2, 2011 Pullman, WA.
Evaluation and Application of Air Quality Model System in Shanghai Qian Wang 1, Qingyan Fu 1, Yufei Zou 1, Yanmin Huang 1, Huxiong Cui 1, Junming Zhao.
Development and Preliminary Results of Image Processing Tools for Meteorology and Air Quality Modeling Limei Ran Center for Environmental Modeling for.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation 2 T. W. Tesche Dennis.
PM Model Performance & Grid Resolution Kirk Baker Midwest Regional Planning Organization November 2003.
Northwest-AIRQUEST & AIRPACT-3 Regional Modeling Studies Joseph Vaughan, Farren Thorpe, Ying Xie, Serena Chung, Brian Lamb and George Mount Laboratory.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
Steve Edburg Assistant Research Professor Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Washington State University
OThree Chemistry Modeling of the Sept ’00 CCOS Ozone Episode: Diagnostic Experiments--Round 3 Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation.
A Comparative Performance Evaluation of the AURAMS and CMAQ Air Quality Modelling Systems Steven C. Smyth, Weimin Jiang, Helmut Roth, and Fuquan Yang ICPET,
Analysis of Ozone Modeling for May – July 2006 in PNW using AIRPACT3 (CMAQ) and CAMx. Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. EPA Region 10 Nov CMAQ O 3 Prediction.
1 Aika Yano, Yongtao Hu, M. Talat Odman, Armistead Russell Georgia Institute of Technology October 15, th annual CMAS conference.
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
Denver 2004 TGP1 PM2.5 Emissions Inventory Workshop Denver, CO March 2004 Thompson G. Pace USEPA Emissions Estimation for Wildland Fires.
AN EVALUATION OF THE ETA-CMAQ AIR QUALITY FORECAST MODEL AS PART OF NOAA’S NATIONAL PROGRAM CMAQ AIRNOW AIRNOW Brian Eder* Daiwen Kang * Ken Schere* Ken.
AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 WRAP 2002 Visibility Modeling: Summary of 2005 Modeling Results Gail Tonnesen, Zion Wang, Mohammad Omary, Chao-Jung.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS 2011 CAMx Model Performance Evaluation University of North Carolina (UNC-IE)
Air Quality Modeling of PM2.5 Species Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium & Midwest RPO 10/21/2002.
WRAP RMC Phase II Wind Blown Dust Project Results & Status ENVIRON International Corporation and University of California, Riverside Dust Emission Joint.
1 Preliminary evaluation of the 2002 Base B1 CMAQ simulation: Temporal Analysis A more complete statistical evaluation, including diurnal variations, of.
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW) Model Performance Evaluation CAMx and CMAQ 2011b University of North Carolina (UNC-IE)
3 YEARS’ OPERATION OF AIR QUALITY FORECAST SYSTEM Hyun Cheol Kim, Daewon Byun, DaeGyun Lee, Soontae Kim, and Fong Ngan University of Houston The Institute.
Georgia Institute of Technology Evaluation of the 2006 Air Quality Forecasting Operation in Georgia Talat Odman, Yongtao Hu, Ted Russell School of Civil.
1 National Air Quality Forecasting Capability: Progress and Plans June 20, 2005 Paula M Davidson NWS Program Manager for Air Quality Forecasting.
NW-AIRQUEST projects on Agricultural and Wildfire Smoke in the Inland Northwest: ClearSky and AIRPACT-3 presented by: Joe Vaughan WSU-LAR contributors:
Advances in Support of the CMAQ Bidirectional Science Option for the Estimation of Ammonia Flux from Agricultural cropland Ellen Cooter U.S. EPA, National.
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: CAMx Sensitivity Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation.
Preliminary Evaluation of the June 2002 Version of CMAQ Brian Eder Shaocai Yu Robin Dennis Jonathan Pleim Ken Schere Atmospheric Modeling Division* National.
Ellen Cooter1, Limei Ran1, Verel Benson2, Dongmei Yang3,
Potential use of TEMPO AOD & NO2 retrievals to support wild fire plume & O3 & PM2.5 forecast in National Air Quality Forecasting Capability (NAQFC) Pius.
New Developments in Wildfire Emission and Dispersion Forecasting with FireWork – The Operational Canadian AQ Forecast System with Near-Real-Time Biomass-Burning.
Preliminary evaluation of the 2002 Base B1 CMAQ simulation: Spatial Analysis A more complete statistical evaluation, including diurnal variations, of the.
A New Method for Evaluating Regional Air Quality Forecasts
Recent Improvements to FireWork: Environment and Climate Change Canada’s Operational Air Quality Forecast System with Near-real-time Wildfire Emissions.
Policy-driven priorities for improvements to the CMAQ photochemical modeling system Heather Simon, Kristen Foley, Sharon Phillips, Norm Possiel, Shawn.
10th CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC 2010 October 11-13
Update on 2016 AQ Modeling by EPA
AIRPACT-5 Fire Emissions Processing Methodology
Presented by: Brian Lamb, WSU-LAR Contributors:
Current Research on 3-D Air Quality Modeling: wildfire!
Presentation transcript:

AIRPACT-3 status and near- term objectives Joe Vaughan Brian Lamb Jeremy Avise Jack Chen Matt Porter Li Wang

Outline: Status: –Reliability –Dairy Ammonia emissions –BlueSky wildfire emissions (PM 2.5 & CO) –(Adjusted Mozart Boundary conditions) –(QuickLook Verification) –Off-line & selective Hg modeling –Dec 2005 PM 2.5 Analysis

Near-Term Objectives and work in progress Convert rainier AIRPACT operations to new Linux box Re & Development of web sites WEPS integration Aug-Nov 2004 Evaluation (& Pathfinding) Push Forecasts out to 48 or 72 hrs? Nest to higher resolution sub-domains?

Who’s working on what Re & Development of web sites: Jennifer Hinds Hg, N, S deposition (RGI): Matt Porter Wind Erosion Prediction System: Li Wang AIRPACT-3(+) evaluation for 2004Jack Chen Conversion to new linux system: Joe Vaughan Satellite data retrieval: Farren Thorpe Wildfire emissions: Jeremy Avise and Jack Chen

Reliability –November 2006? Only Nov 26 run CMAQ failed to complete Failsafe’s operation ran successfully for retrieving EPA CMAQ results Only to fail on disk space in graphics generation… –CMAQ and forecast graphics generally complete by 4 AM.

Dairy NH3 Emission Module WA Dairy NH3 (ton/yr) Housing8,634 Storage5,441 Application4,364 Total18,439 OR Dairy NH3 (ton/yr) Housing9,469 Storage5,079 Application3,420 Total17,967

BlueSky/AIRPACT-3 Wildfire Smoke Modeling MODIS Image for Sept BlueSky System at Forest Service Observed Fire Events AIRPACT retrieves: fire location, fire size, heat flux, emissions Predicted 24-hr PM2.5 for Aug WSU Pullman

Preliminary Evaluation of BlueSky/AIRPACT-3 Wildfire PM2.5 at Pullman during the Columbia Complex Fire Event Observed Pullman PM2.5 Aug. 20 th – Sept. 10 th, 2006 µ g/m 3 Hourly24-hr Avg. Mean14 Max7044 EPA Standard:35 Fire Started Aug 22

EVALUATION OF THE AIRPACT-3 AIR QUALITY FORECAST SYSTEM FOR A WINTERTIME PM2.5 EPISODE By ALICIA K. TONEY

EVALUATION OF THE AIRPACT-3 AIR QUALITY FORECAST SYSTEM FOR A WINTERTIME PM2.5 EPISODE

Moving rainier operations to new linux box Rainier is (1990s era) DEC-Compaq-HP alpha-based w/ Unix New box is AMD w/ Debian Linux Issues: –compiler switches –routine name ‘mangling’ –library creation –path changes –testing

Re & Development of Web Sites WSU Publication’s Content Mgmt System Putting web authoring control in LAR Strategy -- –Shorten cycle for updating project contents. –Standardize web code/technology across projects. –Get standard content in place, then –Focus on data graphics generation, tools, and downloads.

WEPS-AIRPACT-3 Databases Development Guanglong Feng and Li Wang Land Use & Soil Management

Landuse Management Database

BELD3 Dry Crop Type and Percentage

Developed and Gridded Soil Database

Evaluation of AIRPACT-3+ for Aug –– Nov 2004 reruns by Jack Chen MCIP v3.1 at 21 layers CMAQ v4.6 Aerosol v4 w/ Sea salt Pathfinder for next upgrades for AIRPACT-3, to be implemented once running on new Linux box.

EPA AQS O3 Stations Hourly O3 for Aug – Sep 2004

8-Hr Daily Max O3 Paired by Site/Time Num of Points1855 MB6.5 ME9.2 NB25% NE30% NMB18% NME25% FB19% FE25% RMSE11.2 R0.6 CTMMAX87.1 CTMAVG41.9 OBSMAX78.8 OBSAVG36.6

8-Hr Daily Max O3 Paired by Site/Time

Hour Difference Between OBS. and CTM. Peak Daily 8-Hr O3 Data Paired by Site and Date Number of Data Points: 2265

IMPROVE / EPA-AQS PM Stations Aug – Nov 2004

Fractional Error By Site and PM Species for Sep – Nov 2004

Fractional Bias By Site and PM Species for Sep – Nov 2004

Based on results of evaluations… should we… Push forecasts out to 48 or 72 hrs? Nest to higher resolution sub-domains?