“Show me what you meant”: Mode-switching prompts in a multi-modal dialog system with distractions Thomas Harris & Hua Ai October 25, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies
Advertisements

Acoustic Echo Cancellation for Low Cost Applications
1 © 2005 CHIL KTH ASIDE 2005, Aalborg, Applications of distributed dialogue systems: The KTH Connector Jens Edlund & Anna Hjalmarsson Applications.
An overview of EMMA— Extensible MultiModal Annotation Michael Johnston AT&T Labs Research 8/9/2006.
MET CS 405/605 Human Computer Interface Design. Week 5 – Design  Interaction Style ~  Command Line  Menu Selection  Form Fill  Direct Manipulation.
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies. 2 FJK User-Centered Design and Development Instructor: Franz J. Kurfess Computer Science Dept.
The Effect of Miscommunication Rate on User Response Preferences Hua Ai, University of Pittsburgh Thomas Harris, Carolyn Penstein Rosé, Carnegie Mellon.
Design Activities in Usability Engineering laura leventhal and julie barnes.
Dialog Styles. The Five Primary Styles of Interaction 4 Menu selection 4 Form fill-in 4 Command language 4 Natural language 4 Direct manipulation.
John Hu Nov. 9, 2004 Multimodal Interfaces Oviatt, S. Multimodal interfaces Mankoff, J., Hudson, S.E., & Abowd, G.D. Interaction techniques for ambiguity.
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies. Usability Testing Emphasizes the property of being usable Key Components –User Pre-Test –User Test –User.
SienceSpace Virtual Realities for Learning Complex and Abstract Scientific Concepts.
Students: Nir Engelberg Ezequiel Hadid Supervisor: Mony Orbach In association with: September 28, Winter 2005.
Stanford hci group / cs376 research topics in human-computer interaction Multimodal Interfaces Scott Klemmer 15 November 2005.
Student – Nathan Beckmann Advisor – Glenn Reinman
Students: Asulin Ofir Heller Itai Supervisor: Mony Orbach In association with: June 16, summer 2006.
People & Devices: (Inputs & Outputs) Startlingly small child using computer History of human-computer interaction Another history video.
Artificial Intelligence Simon Lynch This session what is the subject about? course structure an example AI system.
Presented by: Mohsen Saberi and Sadiq Omarmeli  Language testing has improved parallel to advances in technology.  Two basic questions in testing;
MUSCLE Multimodal e-team related activity Technical University of Crete Speech Processing and Dialog Systems Group Presenter: Prof. Alex Potamianos Technical.
Developing a customer service strategy to support the new regulatory model An introductory paper for the Providers Advisory Group.
Data Exchange Packet switching  Packet switching breaks data in to packets before sending it through a network, then reassembles it at the other end –
Building the Design Studio of the Future Aaron Adler Jacob Eisenstein Michael Oltmans Lisa Guttentag Randall Davis October 23, 2004.
Mobile Multimodal Applications. Dr. Roman Englert, Gregor Glass March 23 rd, 2006.
June 12, 2001 Jeong-Su Han An Autonomous Vehicle for People with Motor Disabilities by G. Bourhis, O.Horn, O.Habert and A. Pruski Paper Review.
Center for Human Computer Communication Department of Computer Science, OG I 1 Designing Robust Multimodal Systems for Diverse Users and Mobile Environments.
Software Evaluation Catherine McKeveney Medical Informatics 1st March 2000.
Today: Our process Assignment 3 Q&A Concept of Control Reading: Framework for Hybrid Experiments Sampling If time, get a start on True Experiments: Single-Factor.
Neural Cross-Correlation For Radio Astronomy Chipo N Ngongoni Supervisor: Professor J Tapson Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Cape Town.
Psychology Research Methods. There are a variety of ways of validating truth Personal experience Intuition Social or cultural consensus Religious scripture.
The Scientific Method in Psychology.  Descriptive Studies: naturalistic observations; case studies. Individuals observed in their environment.  Correlational.
MICROPROCESSOR AND MICRO CONTROLLER LAB
SRL Slides Prepared by Nancy Perry University of British Columbia
ICT 1 A multimodal context aware mobile maintenance terminal for noisy environments Fredrik Vraalsen Research scientist SINTEF MOBIS’04 – Oslo, 15/9-04.
COMMON CHANNEL SIGNALING (CCS#7)
MSE-415: B. Hawrylo Chapter 13 – Robust Design What is robust design/process/product?: A robust product (process) is one that performs as intended even.
Model of the Human  Name Stan  Emotion Happy  Command Watch me  Face Location (x,y,z) = (122, 34, 205)  Hand Locations (x,y,z) = (85, -10, 175) (x,y,z)
 Motivated by desire for natural human-robot interaction  Encapsulates what the robot knows about the human  Identity  Location  Intentions Human.
Attention Grounding: A New Approach to IVIS Implementation Emily Wiese Cognitive Systems Lab Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University.
Architecture of Decision Support System
Evaluation of take-over techniques for limited interaction resources Objectives: Determine the preferred take- over technique Evaluate the impact on the.
AI on the Battlefield: an Experimental Exploration Alexander Kott BBN Technologies Robert Rasch US Army Battle Command Battle Lab Views expressed in this.
L C SL C S The Intelligent Room’s MeetingManager: A Look Forward Alice Oh Stephen Peters Oxygen Workshop, January, 2002.
HOME AUTOMATION: WEB BASED CONTROL Anthony Campbell Eric Poynter EKU, Dept. of Technology Computer Electronic Networking.
HCI 입문 Graphics Korea University HCI System 2005 년 2 학기 김 창 헌.
Chapter 1: Applying Computer Basics – Lesson 1 © 2010, 2006 South-Western, Cengage Learning.
PC Maintenance: Preparing for A+ Certification Chapter 28: Working with Applications.
Today: Student will be able to describe the basics of their class and computing Tell me about you and how you use computers. Lesson 1 Slide 1.
Evaluating VR Systems. Scenario You determine that while looking around virtual worlds is natural and well supported in VR, moving about them is a difficult.
GUI Meets VUI: Some Possible Guidelines James A. Larson VP, Larson Technical Services 4/21/20151© 2015 Larson Technical Services.
Second language learning and life skills By: Zahra Najjarzadeh.
Spoken Dialog Systems Diane J. Litman Professor, Computer Science Department.
Finding Answers. Steps of Sci Method 1.Purpose 2.Hypothesis 3.Experiment 4.Results 5.Conclusion.
Unit 6 of COMP648 User Interface and Interaction Methods Dr Oscar Lin School of Computing and Information Systems Faculty of Science and Technology Athabasca.
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Sensinger JW, Lipsey J, Thomas A, Turner K. Design and evaluation of voluntary.
Stanford hci group / cs376 u Jeffrey Heer · 19 May 2009 Speech & Multimodal Interfaces.
Speech and multimodal Jesse Cirimele. papers “Multimodal interaction” Sharon Oviatt “Designing SpeechActs” Yankelovich et al.
Multimodal and Natural computer interaction Evelina Stanevičienė.
MULTIMODAL AND NATURAL COMPUTER INTERACTION Domas Jonaitis.
Combination of Speech and Tangible Interfaces for Automotive Dialog Systems: An Experimental Study Margarita Pentcheva.
Ten Myths of Multimodal Interaction
or Call Toll-Free for help.
Chapter 6. Data Collection in a Wizard-of-Oz Experiment in Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Dialogue Systems by: Rieser & Lemon. Course: Autonomous.
Contact us to fix AVG Error Code 0xe001f921
Optimizing Multimodal Interfaces for Speech Systems in the Automobile
Input By Team A Section 060 Team A 3/22/2010 March 22, 2010, CIS 120
Multimodal Human-Computer Interaction New Interaction Techniques 22. 1
Chapter 11 Interaction styles
Duo Liu, Bei Hua, Xianghui Hu, and Xinan Tang
Presentation transcript:

“Show me what you meant”: Mode-switching prompts in a multi-modal dialog system with distractions Thomas Harris & Hua Ai October 25, 2005

Motivation A main benefit of multi-modal systems: flexibility. –Hands or eyes busy etc: use speech. –Poor recognition etc: use direct manipulation. The user makes predictions about the interaction and chooses modes accordingly. We would like to inform the user’s predictions/decisions for even more efficient communication. We would also like to dialog with the user to better understand and learn from multi-modal communication.

Questions Under what circumstances does a user switch between speech and direct manipulation? How influential would prompting a modality switch be? Is it useful in some conditions to prompt a modality switch? Can we reliably characterize some modality switches as grounding mechanisms?

Hypotheses Based on (Oviatt 1996), we believe that people switch from speech to direct manipulation only after successive serial speech errors. We believe that strategic mode switching prompts will improve task efficiency as well as subjective measures of the task experience. We also believe that mode switching, when conditioned by system prompts, will lead to reliable parallel signals for multi-modal learning/grounding.

Experimental Setup A common task – manipulating a stereo system while driving. We have –a driving simulator that runs on a pc –an actual shelf stereo system that you can control manually –A dialog system with headset microphone that controls the same stereo system

Potential Dependant Variables How distracting a task. How errorful the recognition. At what point to introduce mode-switching prompts.