AIRPACT and ClearSky Activity Report Joe Vaughan, Farren Herron-Thorpe, Serena Chung and Brian Lamb NW-AIRQUEST Annual Meeting June 2, 2011 Pullman, WA.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

A PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE ETA - CMAQ AIR QUALITY FORECAST MODEL FOR THE SUMMER OF 2004 CMAS Workshop Chapel Hill, NC 20 October, 2004.

Advertisements

Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS Revised 2011 Modeling Protocol Reflecting Reviewer Comments University of.

2011 NW-AIRQUEST Annual Meeting Pullman, WA -- June 2, 2011 Status of the ClearSky Online Gaming Tool Joe Vaughan, Brian Lamb and Jen Hinds Laboratory.

Template Development and Testing of PinG and VBS modules in CMAQ 5.01 Prakash Karamchandani, Bonyoung Koo, Greg Yarwood and Jeremiah Johnson ENVIRON International.

‘NASA OMI Project’ MOZART Ozone Tracer Tracking for AIRPACT-4 CMAQ Joseph Vaughan,George Mount, Serena Chung, Brian Lamb, Rui Zhang, Louisa Emmons and.

CO budget and variability over the U.S. using the WRF-Chem regional model Anne Boynard, Gabriele Pfister, David Edwards National Center for Atmospheric.

Multi-scale and Ensemble Modeling of the Effects of Global Change on Air Quality in the US NW –AIRQUEST Annual Meeting Washington State University Pullman,

DTC AOP GSI October 1, FY09 Funding Resource/Tasks AFWA (February January 2010): – GSI code management and support (1.1FTE)

Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS Technical Scope of Work: Tom Moore, WESTAR/WRAP on behalf of University.

Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.

PREV ’AIR : An operational system for large scale air quality monitoring and forecasting over Europe

Climate, Fire and Air Quality Climate Impacts Group June 1, 2006.

The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,

Ozone and Aerosols in US and East Asia between 2001 and 2002 Yun-Fat Lam 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Zuopan Li 1, Carey Jang 2, Rokjin Park 3 and Daniel J. Jacob.

A Comparative Dynamic Evaluation of the AURAMS and CMAQ Air Quality Modeling Systems Steven Smyth a,b, Michael Moran c, Weimin Jiang a, Fuquan Yang a,

PREV ’AIR : An operational system for air quality monitoring and forecasting Laurence ROUÏL.

The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,

Evaluation of the AIRPACT2 modeling system for the Pacific Northwest Abdullah Mahmud MS Student, CEE Washington State University.

Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling Division, Applied Modeling Research Branch October 8, 2008.

CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.

Background Air Quality in the United States Under Current and Future Emissions Scenarios Zachariah Adelman, Meridith Fry, J. Jason West Department of Environmental.

Muntaseer Billah, Satoru Chatani and Kengo Sudo Department of Earth and Environmental Science Graduate School of Environmental Studies Nagoya University,

Sensitivity Modeling Update University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International Corporation (ENVIRON) April 29, 2015 Western States Air Quality.

Examination of the impact of recent laboratory evidence of photoexcited NO 2 chemistry on simulated summer-time regional air quality Golam Sarwar, Robert.

2004 Workplan WRAP Regional Modeling Center Prepared by: Gail Tonnesen, University of California Riverside Ralph Morris, ENVIRON Corporation Zac Adelman,

PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.

Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Mercury Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference Research.

1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.

Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System CMAQ Air Quality Data Summit February 2008.

THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble (TIGGE) China Meteorological Administration TIGGE-WG meeting, Boulder, June Progress on TIGGE Archive Center.

A Proposal - Assimilation of Himawari Aerosol Information for Air Quality Forecasting Michael Hewson CSC PhD Research Fellow uq.edu.au Remote.

AIRPACT-3 status and near- term objectives Joe Vaughan Brian Lamb Jeremy Avise Jack Chen Matt Porter Li Wang.

Evaluation and Application of Air Quality Model System in Shanghai Qian Wang 1, Qingyan Fu 1, Yufei Zou 1, Yanmin Huang 1, Huxiong Cui 1, Junming Zhao.

Georgia Environmental Protection Division IMPACTS OF MODELING CHOICES ON RELATIVE RESPONSE FACTORS IN ATLANTA, GA Byeong-Uk Kim, Maudood Khan, Amit Marmur,

Source-Specific Forecasting of Air Quality Impacts with Dynamic Emissions Updating & Source Impact Reanalysis Georgia Institute of Technology Yongtao Hu.

On using process-based statistical models of air pollutants to meet regulatory and research needs Amy Nail, Ph.D. Honestat, LLC Statistics & Analytics.

Western States Air Quality Study Background Air Quality Modeling University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International Corporation (ENVIRON) May.

Northwest-AIRQUEST & AIRPACT-3 Regional Modeling Studies Joseph Vaughan, Farren Thorpe, Ying Xie, Serena Chung, Brian Lamb and George Mount Laboratory.

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Using Dynamical Downscaling to Project.

Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.

Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.

U.S. EPA and WIST Rob Gilliam *NOAA/**U.S. EPA

An Exploration of Model Concentration Differences Between CMAQ and CAMx Brian Timin, Karen Wesson, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Sharon Phillips EPA/OAQPS.

Do better aerosol forecasts improve weather forecasts? A regional modeling and assimilation study. Mariusz Pagowski Stuart McKeen Georg Grell Ming Hu NOAA/ESRL,

GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.

Post-processing air quality model predictions of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) at NCEP James Wilczak, Irina Djalalova, Dave Allured (ESRL) Jianping Huang,

Analysis of Ozone Modeling for May – July 2006 in PNW using AIRPACT3 (CMAQ) and CAMx. Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. EPA Region 10 Nov CMAQ O 3 Prediction.

G-IDAS Richard Engelen.

Evaluation of Models-3 CMAQ I. Results from the 2003 Release II. Plans for the 2004 Release Model Evaluation Team Members Prakash Bhave, Robin Dennis,

A Five-Year Performance Evaluation of Environment Canada’s Operational Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System M.D. Moran 1, J. Zhang 1, R.

Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS Pilot Project Modeling Overview University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON.

MOPITT during INTEX David Edwards Louisa Emmons, Gabriele Pfister, John Gille, Dan Ziskin, Debbie Mao Atmospheric Chemistry Division NCAR.

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Environmental Programs Community Modeling and Analysis System (CMAS) Year 3 Adel Hanna Director, CMAS.

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division October 21, 2009 Evaluation of CMAQ.

Evaluation of CMAQ Driven by Downscaled Historical Meteorological Fields Karl Seltzer 1, Chris Nolte 2, Tanya Spero 2, Wyat Appel 2, Jia Xing 2 14th Annual.

Operational Evaluation and Model Response Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ for Ozone & PM2.5 Kirk Baker, Brian Timin, Sharon Phillips U.S. Environmental Protection.

Carolina Environmental Program Status of SMOKE Catherine Seppanen Carolina Environmental Program University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill.

Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW) Model Performance Evaluation CAMx and CMAQ 2011b University of North Carolina (UNC-IE)

Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.

Georgia Institute of Technology Evaluation of the 2006 Air Quality Forecasting Operation in Georgia Talat Odman, Yongtao Hu, Ted Russell School of Civil.

NW-AIRQUEST projects on Agricultural and Wildfire Smoke in the Inland Northwest: ClearSky and AIRPACT-3 presented by: Joe Vaughan WSU-LAR contributors:

Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.

Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2013

High-resolution air quality forecasting for Hong Kong

Overview of WRAP 2014 Platform develop and Shake-Out project update

Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.

AIRPACT-5 Fire Emissions Processing Methodology

Presented by: Brian Lamb, WSU-LAR Contributors:

Current Research on 3-D Air Quality Modeling: wildfire!

Presentation transcript:

AIRPACT and ClearSky Activity Report Joe Vaughan, Farren Herron-Thorpe, Serena Chung and Brian Lamb NW-AIRQUEST Annual Meeting June 2, 2011 Pullman, WA

AIRPACT Status Topics Contract period: July June 2011 GOALS WORKPLAN DELIVERABLES Other AIRPACT related activity / progress

AIRPACT GOALS Improve Model Performance Maintain AIRNow data stream Keep 2 years of results available graphically Keep 2 weeks of gridded output files Consult with NW-AIRQUEST on improvements Support of analyses (Nitrate in Basin, Boise Study) Maintained Original graphics since 6/08 & Flash since 3/09. Kept! Archival/backup performed monthly. Responsive to NW-AIRQUEST ‘consultation’?

AIRPACT WORKPLAN Provide daily forecasts and real-time verification statistics and access to underlying data. Update emissions inventory and processing: SMOKE v2.4, New EI, SMARTFIRE, and Woodstove experiments. Update CMAQ to 4.7 Implement a Change Log Identify New Users Reports on progress and state of model

AIRPACT SMOKE v2.7 being used for AIRPACT-4 New EI files being used for AIRPACT-4 SMARTFIRE (work partially complete…but issues) CMAQ update to for AIRPACT-4 Change Log -- Implemented online for both AIRPACT- 3 and AIRPACT-4 at … sites.google.com/site/airpactchangelog Change log is linked to AIRPACT sidebar.

AIRPACT Deliverables Graphical AQ fcsts by 7 AM PST Daily (95%). Archival of runs and results. Semi-annual report submitted January 31, State-of-the-Model report due July 30, 2011.

AIRPACT Graphical AQ forecasts by 6 AM Daily (95%)? rsynch failure at UW WRF operation Network failures in scp Interprocess com fault in cluster Late-running WRF Disk space maxed out Library missing

AIRPACT Archival of runs and results: Graphics available online for 2 years plus. Deposition results online for 2 years plus. Archival conducted monthly at LAR: -- for 25 hrs of MCIP and CCTM output files -- to removable drives (1.5 and 2 Tb) in usb-mounted disk-docks. -- ICON files also archived ( , & partial)

Presentation to the CMAS 2010 Conference 10/11/2010, Chapel Hill, NC Incorporation of Dynamic Boundary Conditions into the AIRPACT regional air quality forecast system Joseph Vaughan, Serena Chung, Farren Herron-Thorpe, Brian Lamb, & Louisa Emmons (NCAR) Louisa Emmons assimilates MOPITT CO for hours observed, globally, adjusting MOZART-4 run VCD CO throughout profiles. AIRPACT gets hourly MOZART results for all species, all four boundaries, and converts to SAPRC chemistry. Made live in AIRPACT-3 February 1, 2011

AIRPACT-3 Work Going forward? Solve SMARTFIRE and blend wildfire emissions with other for summer and fall runs. Run in parallel with AIRPACT-4 for how long? W126 exposure metric development? (-3 and -4)? Other metrics such as selected emissions and concentrations ratios? Summer undergraduate research project: Evaluation for O3 by Breon ShanKara, DePauw Univ.

Discussion?