Cost & Benefit Analysis Executive Overview David F. Rico.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing CMMI® for Development Version 1.3
Advertisements

Copyright © 2003 by Cooliemon TM, LLC 1 Causal Analysis & Resolution (CAR) at Level 1 Presenter: Ralph Williams, President SEI Authorized CBA IPI Lead.
SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT “Never Stop Learning”
Team Software Process By: Bryan Peterson. Presentation Topics History Brief overview of the Team Software Process (TSP) TSP Team Launch Team-working Conclusion.
SEP1 - 1 Introduction to Software Engineering Processes SWENET SEP1 Module Developed with support from the National Science Foundation.
This material is approved for public release. Distribution is limited by the Software Engineering Institute to attendees. Sponsored by the U.S. Department.
Pittsburgh, PA CMMI Acquisition Module - Page M7-1 CMMI ® Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense © 2005 by Carnegie Mellon University This.
Zádor Dániel Kelemen, Dr. Katalin Balla, Gábor Bóka The project is sponsored by SQI Hungarian Software Quality Consulting Institute Ltd. (project TST-GVOP-2004-K+F-
Total Productive Maintenance (TPM)
Chapter 9 Training for Organizations The Training Proposal: Putting Plans Into Writing.
1 - Sudhir P, Balasubrahmanyam P Leveraging TSP SM /PSP SM Metrics to drive Predictability and Quality of product releases An Intuit Perspective.
Practical Metrics and Models for Return on Investment David F. Rico ® SW-CMM and CMMI are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by Carnegie.
Software Development Process Models. The Waterfall Development Model.
Software Process Improvement in Small Organizations A Case Study.
SEI White Paper: Process Maturity Model Present by Hui Huang November 16, 2000 ® CMM is Registered in the US Patent and Trademark Office.
Glen Knight, PMP, CSP President How Mature Do You Think Your Are? The Project Management Maturity Model.
Software Process CS 414 – Software Engineering I Donald J. Bagert Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology December 17, 2002.
Organizational Project Management Maturity: Roadmap to Success
Using A Defined and Measured Personal Software Process Watts S. Humphrey CS 5391 Article 8.
Managing Project Quality
This material is approved for public release. Distribution is limited by the Software Engineering Institute to attendees. Sponsored by the U.S. Department.
Prof Barry Dwolatzky JCSE at Wits University Government CIO Summit Towards reducing costs of doing business in government and contributing towards achieving.
©Ian Sommerville 1995 Software Engineering, 5th edition. Chapter 31 Slide 1 Process Improvement u Understanding, Modelling and Improving the Software Process.
Software Process Improvement Impacting the Bottom Line by using Powerful “Solutions” David F. Rico.
SQA System Overview Chapter 4. Where we have been so far, Where we are going Where do software errors come from? What is quality? How can quality be measured?
This material is approved for public release. Distribution is limited by the Software Engineering Institute to attendees. Sponsored by the U.S. Department.
This material is approved for public release. Distribution is limited by the Software Engineering Institute to attendees. Sponsored by the U.S. Department.
Lecture: The Personal Software Process. 2 Overview  Personal Software Process assumptions process stages measures and quality strategy results.
EngMat/JWS.PPT 10/17/ CMMI ® Today – The Current State CMMI ® Technology Conference 2003 November 18, 2003 Ron Paulson Vice President, Engineering.
© 1998 Carnegie Mellon UniversityTutorial The Personal Software Process (PSP) The overview of the PSP that follows has been built from material made.
Application of the CMMI SM to Plan and Control Life Cycle Costs Dr. Mary Anne Herndon Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) November, 2003.
CSE4002CMMI Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) CMMI is replacing the well established CMM rating for software developers and systems engineers.
PSP Quality Strategy [SE-280 Dr. Mark L. Hornick 1.
Process Improvement. It is not necessary to change. Survival is not mandatory. »W. Edwards Deming Both change and stability are fundamental to process.
This material is approved for public release. Distribution is limited by the Software Engineering Institute to attendees. Sponsored by the U.S. Department.
 Copyright ProcessVelocity, LLP Slides intended for informational purposes only. CMM and Capability Maturity Model are registered in the U.S. Patent.
Watts Humphrey IBM director of programming and vice-president of technical development Joined CMU Software Engineering Institute in 1986 Initiator and.
This material is approved for public release. Distribution is limited by the Software Engineering Institute to attendees. Sponsored by the U.S. Department.
Personal Software Process sm (PSP sm ) Executive Overview David F. Rico sm Personal Software Process and PSP are service marks of Carnegie Mellon University.
PMI is a registered trademark of the Project Management Institute Knowledge Exchange Forum October 28, 2003 Assessing Project Management in Your Organization.
Copyright © 2003 by Cooliemon TM, LLC 1 Presenter: Ralph Williams, President SEI Authorized CBA IPI Lead Assessor (CMM ® ) SCAMPI Lead Appraiser SM (CMMI.
Cost and Benefit Analysis Choosing a SPI Method for Maximum Return on Investment (ROI) David F. Rico.
Personal Software Process PSP--Personal Software Process.
Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute © 2006 by Carnegie Mellon University Software Process Performance Measures James Over Software Engineering.
Jet algorithm and Jet FPGA by Attila Hidvégi. Content Status of the Jet algorithm New design for the Jet FPGA on JEM-1.0 Jet CMM firmware Summary Outlook.
Structuring a Business Plan EMBA Class of Why Create a Business Plan?
Pittsburgh, PA CMMI Acquisition Module - Page M5-1 CMMI ® Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense © 2005 by Carnegie Mellon University This.
CMMI The quality of a software product is only as good as the process used to develop and maintain it. Whether a software organization is competing in.
PROPRIETARY  2003 Data Research Analysis & Consultancy Solutions All Rights Reserved. This is achieved by: Improving availability / reducing stock outs.
Copyright © by Quality Improvement Consultants, Inc. (QIC) Slide 1 World-Class Quality Measurably Improving Your Requirements Based on the CMMI.
1 These slides are designed to accompany Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7/e (McGraw-Hill 2009). Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.
Strategic Information Initiatives Week 5 Analysis Framework.
Watts Humphrey IBM director of programming and vice-president of technical development Joined CMU Software Engineering Institute in 1986 Initiator and.
Staged or Continuous: Which Model Should I Choose?
A Program of Training for CMMI®-based Process Improvement
Successful Verification
Process Maturity Profile
Software Quality assurance SQA – SWE 333
A possible solution: Personal Software Process (PSP)
Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)
Interpretive Guidance Project: What We Know CMMI User’s Conference
مجتمع المعلومات ودوره في التنمية والبناء
THE SOFTWARE PROCESS (revisited)
Chapter # 8 Quality Management Standards
ADDITIVE VS. MULTIPLICATIVE RELATIONSHIPS
Acknowledgment of achievement
Copyright © by Quality Improvement Consultants, Inc. (QIC) 1 World-Class Quality Staged or Continuous: Which Model Should I Choose? ® CMM is.
Metrics That Work for You
Capability Maturity Model
Presentation transcript:

Cost & Benefit Analysis Executive Overview David F. Rico

2 Table of Contents Methodology Breakeven Point Analysis Actual Costs & Benefits Normalized Costs & Benefits Normalized Benefits Category Costs & Benefits Summary of Costs & Benefits Conclusion

Methodology

4 Origin of Cost & Benefit Analysis Software Process Improvement (SPI) Study –Using Cost Benefit Analyses to Develop a Pluralistic Methodology for Selecting from Multiple Prescriptive Software Process Improvement (SPI) Strategies –David F. Rico (April 30, 1999) Full text, graphics, data, spreadsheets, and algorithms available online –

5 Analytical Methodology

6 Defect Removal Model

7 Return-on-Investment (ROI) Model sm Personal Software Process and PSP are service marks of Carnegie Mellon University.

8 Rico’s Inspection Cost Model

9 PSP & Inspection Cost Models

10 Software Cost Models

11 Rico’s Breakeven Point Model

Breakeven Point Analysis

13 Breakeven Point Models

14 Test vs. Ad Hoc

15 Inspection vs. Ad Hoc

16 PSP vs. Ad Hoc

17 Inspection vs. Test

18 PSP vs. Test

19 PSP vs. Inspection

Actual Costs & Benefits

21 Overall ® Capability Maturity Model and CMM are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

22 Personal Software Process (PSP)

23 Clean Room Methodology

24 Software Reuse

25 Software Defect Prevention

26 Software Inspection Process

27 Software Testing

28 Capability Maturity Model (CMM)

29 ISO 9000

Normalized Costs & Benefits

31 Normalized Costs & Benefits

32 Normalized Costs & Benefits

33 Breakeven Hours

34 Training Hours/Person

35 Training Cost/Person

36 Effort (Hours)

37 Cycle Time Reduction

38 Productivity Increase

39 Quality Increase

40 Return-on-Investment (ROI)

Normalized Benefits

42 Normalized Benefits

43 Normalized Benefits

44 Average Benefits

45 Worst Normalized Benefits

46 Worst Normalized Benefits

47 Worst Average Benefits

48 Poorest Normalized Benefits

49 Poorest Normalized Benefits

50 Poorest Average Benefits

Category Costs & Benefits

52 Actual Costs & Benefits

53 Normalized Costs & Benefits

54 Normalized Costs & Benefits

55 Average Costs & Benefits

56 Normalized Benefits

57 Normalized Benefits

58 Average Benefits

59 Worst Normalized Benefits

60 Worst Normalized Benefits

61 Worst Average Benefits

Summary of Costs & Benefits

63 Summary of Alternatives

64 Summary of Worst Alternatives

65 Summary of Poorest Alternatives

66 Summary of Categories

Conclusion

68 PSP Surpasses Competition PSP exhibits astonishing benefits –82:1 cycle time reduction over CMM and ISO 9000 –55:1 productivity increase over CMM and ISO 9000 –30:1 quality increase over CMM and ISO 9000 –258:1 return on investment over CMM and ISO 9000 –1,290:1 return on investment over ordinary approaches CMM and ISO 9000 among worst software process improvement (SPI) approaches CMMi and ISO may perform worse than the Software CMM v1.1 or ISO