What’s in the ReStore project for you? David Martin ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GIS Executive Council and Advisory Committee Update November 2010.
Advertisements

SCADM Report Working Paper 10. Overview SCAR Data and Information Management Strategy (DIMS) – endorsed Oct Introduction to the draft SCAR Data.
Clare Madge- University of Leicester. Structure of presentation 1.Background to the project 2.Tour of the site 3.Module detail 4.How can it be used? 5.Evaluation.
CG APPLICATION FOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES STRATEGY FOR RESEARCHERS INCORPORATING THE CHARTER AND THE CODE (HRS4R) EXCELLENCE.
Green Roof Action Project 綠頂行動 Our scheme is not just about physical implementation of green features on top of school buildings, it is about the knowledge.
Implementing SMS in Civil Aviation: the Canadian Perspective.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
ReStore: A sustainable web resources repository Arshad A. Khan National Centre for Research Methods
SAS No. 70 BADM 559 Jong Choi. Overview of SAS 70 Definition ▫SAS 70 helps service auditors to assess operational and technical controls of a service.
Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC Mark Thorley, Natural Environment Research Council Research Outputs: Their Access & Preservation A perspective.
Work Package 3 SEE cluster policy learning platform.
FLC Website — Overview Brent Jacobs February 13, 2007.
The Uses of Blackboard in IDARI
5-7 November 2014 ADLSN - ADLC Practical Digital Content Management from Digital Libraries & Archives Perspective.
Records Managers’ Forum 28 February Draft standard on the appraisal and disposal of State records Catherine Robinson Senior Project Officer, Government.
1 Working Group on Archives and Records Management WGARM.
1 ReStore Workshop: building more sustainable web resources ESRC Research Methods Festival 5 July 2012.
How to use the VSS to design a National Strategy for the Development of Statistics (NSDS) 1.
Financial Systems Needs Assessment Administrator Briefing Spring Quarter 2009.
1 The Technical Standards and Your Bid Sarah Ormes UKOLN University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN is funded by Resource: The Council for Museums, Archives.
Mock-up of ReStore repository site
Sustainability, integrated and impact reporting: Current approaches and new directions John Maddocks - CIPFA.
Overview University Marketing works cooperatively throughout campus to build strong, effective and cohesive marketing strategies for UW-Stout through:
Parish Councils Conference Website Support Workshop.
1 ROADS Services Training Group LOCAL AUTHORITY ROADS CONFERENCE 2014 Reforms, Challenges and Safety Treacys West County Hotel, Ennis, May 2014.
Proposals on standardisation process in ESS, The Hague_ ESS net Preparation of Standardisation 1 Proposals on standardisation process.
A vision of the future: ReStoring online resources David Martin and Kaisa Puustinen ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, University of Southampton.
Clare Madge - Department of Geography Henrietta O’Connor - Centre for Labour Market Studies University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH,
Chapter 4 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT. Introduction Need for organizations to build and sustain competencies that would provide them with competitive advantage.
UK LOCKSS Alliance: Investigation into Private LOCKSS Networks Adam Rusbridge EDINA, University of Edinburgh.
Chapter 3 Strategic Information Systems Planning.
Penn State Electronic Theses and Dissertations Project Graduate Council Library Computing Services Graduate School University Libraries Center for Academic.
1 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY for the 2008 SNA OECD National Accounts Working Party Paris, France 4 to 6 November 2009 Herman Smith UNSD.
National PTA Standards of Affiliation (an SOA required training)
DRAFT EDMC Procedural Directives NOAA Environmental Data Management Committee 12/3/2015 1
A centre of expertise in digital information management 1 UKOLN is supported by: Approaches to Archiving Professional Blogs Hosted in the.
Fourth IABIN Council Meeting Support to Building the Inter-American Biodiversity Information Network.
ISO Registration Common Areas of Nonconformances.
Assessment Entry Module (AEM) Kick-off November 15, 2012 interRAI Preliminary Screener Toronto Central LHIN.
RDA Implementation. Implementation factors Publication of RDA International evaluation Changes in MARC Implementation in library systems.
Inyo-Mono Regional Water Management Group Meeting October 28, 2015.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
University Website Office August 2002 University Web Guidelines ● Objectives ● Outline ● Development Process.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Development of the Basis Document for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
Grant Writing for Digital Projects September 2012 IODE Project Office IODE Project Office Oostende, Belgium Oostende, Belgium Sustainability and.
International Planetary Data Alliance Registry Project Update September 16, 2011.
Meeting of the Parties to the Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers to the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in.
URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION. The URBEM Framework.
UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 9 Slide 1 No EIA EIA Required *Public involvement Scoping Mitigation and impact management EIA Report Proposal Identification.
Group 1 Pages
Implementing SMS in Civil Aviation: the Canadian Perspective
Community Participation in Research
Boating Safety Dashboard - How your state can participate
Project Roles and Responsibilities
Richard Waller NOF Technical Advisor UKOLN is supported by:
"IT principles" Context, roadmap
Marion Kelt, Senior Librarian Digital Development
SISAI STATISTICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE AND INTEGRATION
Nick Bonvoisin Secretary to the Convention on the
WGARM Appraisal Decision Assistance Phase 1, Dec. 2002
Quality Assurance of Assessment Arrangements
Clare Madge- University of Leicester
Progression and Advancement
Guide to the Single Plan for Student Achievement
IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION OF THE RESTITUTION PROGRAMME
Executive Sponsor: Tom Church, Cabinet Secretary
Executive Sponsor: Tom Church, Cabinet Secretary
Presentation transcript:

What’s in the ReStore project for you? David Martin ESRC National Centre for Research Methods

Idea behind ReStore, what it is and what it isn’t Some examples How it works Relevance to RDI award holders Overview

ESRC investments such as RDI producing online resources Completed near to end of project funding Often of great practical value, but immediately begin to decay –Dated content or changed IT environment Lack of maintenance/visibility Why do we need ReStore?

Repository for online resources “Restoring”/enhancing quality and utility Promoting accessibility Sustainable service identity Being implemented as an NCRM activity Why ReStore?

A static web archive A continuation funding model for completed projects A research methods advice service A document repository A virtual learning environment Not aims of the project

Identify candidate resources Work with original resource authors Technical and academic review Assess value and work required Technical and academic updating Transfer into ReStore service Promote use and review How does it work?

Significant online content: not just project sites or documents Main phase – research methods resources from RMP, RDI, NCRM, QMI projects Not being actively maintained elsewhere In future – perhaps triggered by end of awards? Selection of resources for review

Parallel technical, academic and author reviews (i) Technical (ReStore team): site architecture, scripting, portability, broken links, media types, potential IPR issues… (ii) Academic (external reviewers): academic content, rigour, referencing, dated material… (iii) Author: reflective review, cross-cutting technical and academic, esp. re. IPR Review process

Recommendations considered by advisory committee ReStore team assessment of work required Decision sets in train approved package of work If not suitable, alternative strategies considered –Static archiving, maintenance elsewhere, etc. Consideration of reviews

Limited funding for updating and maintenance of sites by original authors or ReStore team Confirmation and sign-off of IPR issues Resources taken on by ReStore for initial period Indexing and promotion by ReStore team Redirection from original location ReStoration

Developing guidance for award holders –Based on practical experience with other cognate resources Input to ESRC strategy formulation with regard to online resources Development of repository practice for research resources Other activities

Consider accessibility –Stay user-focused Plan for sustainability post-award Consider relevant web standards Maintain IPR register –Record all contributors, permissions Monitor usage Guidelines for resource authors

Talk to us about your online resource development –Recent, present or future Take account of ReStore guidance principles –Esp. for any resources not yet completed Make use of online resources that are already available through ReStore What’s in it for you?