T. Beechie, D. Sear, J. Olden, G. Pess, J. Buffington, H. Moir, P. Roni, M. Pollock 2010, BioScience, v. 60.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Upper Toppenish Watershed Restoration Project ( ) Yakama Nation Division of Natural Resources.
Advertisements

Ecosystem Flows Hydrology and Connectivity Joe Trungale October 2, 2006.
A section has been added regarding Stream Restoration Design Criteria: A. Designs for stream restoration try to mimic natural conditions present in stable.
Managing Flooding Hard and Soft Engineering LO: to understand the types of hard and soft engineering used to control rivers and the advantages and disadvantages.
Rivers and Streams Chapter 6.1 and 6.2.
1 Floodplain Management Session 13 Biology Management and restoration of floodplain ecology Prepared by Susan Bolton, PhD, PE.
Birds as Indicators. Healthy water bodies for a healthy planet.
Lake Status Indicator Selection and Use in SLICE David F. Staples.
Lake Status Indicator Selection David F. Staples Ray Valley.
ENSC 202 – 2004 Lab 1 - Introduction Watershed Assessment (ENSC 202) Lab 1 Extracted from Vermont ANR Stream Geomorphic Assessment Protocols Handbook -
Stream Geomorphic Protocols Introduction Vermont Stream Geomorphic Assessment Protocols Extracted from Vermont ANR Stream Geomorphic Assessment Protocols.
Hoover Dam – Colorado River. Reasons for Dams Flood Control 39,000 dams worldwide higher than 15 m (ICOLD, 1988)
Some potential impacts of climate change and altered runoff regimes on riverine ecosystems Tim Beechie (NOAA) Bob Naiman (UW) Coastal Rivers Research Consortium.
Freshwater Ecosystems By: Jerrene and Nica. Rivers What is River? 1 A river is a body of water with current moving in one general direction. They can.
Overview of Exercise Module 1 – Geologic Setting Module 2 – Flow Regimes Module 3 – Downstream Effects.
Biological Objectives Tied to Physical Processes Dr. William Trush Scott McBain Arcata, CA.
Department of Forestry 2004 Stream Habitat Restoration Guidelines
Ganga Basin Hydrologic Regime – Environmental Flow Perspective World Bank and INRM Consultants New Delhi February, 2015.
A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds North American Journal.
Environmental flows in Europe Mike Acreman. Green and pleasant land? Thames basin 10,000 km mm rainfall 15 million people significant water stress.
Watershed Assessment and River Restoration Strategies
Alluvial Fan 8-7 Delta.
King County Normative Flow Project Parametrix, King County, Herrera, & Foster Wheeler Normative Flow Studies King County Department of Natural Resources.
Reintroduction of Native Fish Species to Coal Creek.
Tim Beechie NOAA Fisheries, Seattle Incorporating climate change into restoration planning.
Hancock Springs A natural lab for studying the roles of physical habitat, nutrient availability, and non-native species to inform river restoration John.
Suggested Guidelines for Geomorphic aspects of Anadromous Salmonid Habitat Restoration proposals G. Mathias Kondolf.
Conceptual Ecological Model of San Acacia Reach of Middle Rio Grande River – 2/13/07 1 st Draft Ibis Ecosystem Associates, Inc. Diversion & Regulation.
Review Vocab: Aquatic Environments 4-1. a slow-moving body of water where the water seems to stand still; lakes, ponds; and wetlands lentic.
Georgia’s Water Plan June 17, /09/08 Page 2 Agenda Plan Development Plan Overview.
Fishery Biology. Fisheries Management n Provide people with a sustained, high, and ever-increasing benefit from their use of aquatic resources n Problems.
Unimpaired connectivity between active channel and floodplain Eliminated connectivity between active channel and floodplain Impaired connectivity between.
Standards for Ecologically Successful River Restoration Palmer et al., 2005, Standards for Ecologically Successful River Restoration Palmer et al., 2005,
Channel Modification Washington Dept. Forestry, 2004, Channel Modification Techniques Katie Halvorson.
Stream Processes and Habitat Ryan Johnson. Overview Watershed Processes – Factors and their effects on the watershed as a whole Stream Processes – Factors.
Greg Jennings, PhD, PE Professor, Biological & Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University BAE 579: Stream Restoration Lesson.
Normative Flow Studies Project Briefing (web version) October 28, 2002.
FreshwaterJeopardy $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100$100$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 Freshwater Systems and Resources How We Use Water Quantity of Freshwater Freshwater.
Agricultural Headwater Streams and Restoration Opportunities Bradley Wright Bradley Wright City of Ottawa City of Ottawa February 25, 2011.
City of Bellingham Habitat Restoration Master Plan TAG Meeting December 5, 2012 ESA | VEDA Environmental | Northwest Ecological Services.
Fish Assemblages of the Wabash River Mark Pyron. Wabash River Fishes 1.Large river 2.High diversity 3.History of human impact 4.Fish assemblages respond.
Stream Order 4.12.A. Physical Methods Stream order is a measure of the relative size of streams. Range from smallest, first- order, to the largest, the.
Surface Water An Erosional-Depositional System. Running Water When running water is confined to a channel, it is called a stream Smaller streams called.
Considering Ecosystem Services in Restoration Decisions on the Upper Mississippi River System ACES, 2008 K. S. Lubinski K. Barr J. Barko S. Bartell R.
Urban Watershed Restoration: Putting Plans Into Action Tanis Douglas Bowker Creek Initiative Coordinator Capital Regional District, Victoria BC.
Additional Primary Headwater Habitat Stream Parameters.
Setting Goals for Stream “Health:” The Next Generation of Watershed Plans? The Waterlands Group San Francisco Estuary Institute Aquatic Science Center.
Chapter 3: The Big Picture: Systems of Change. Systems A system is a set of components or parts that function together to act as a whole. –E.g. Body,
Christie Beeman and Jeff Haltiner Philip Williams & Associates Hydrograph Modification: An Introduction and.
Lake Roosevelt Rainbow Trout Habitat/Passage Improvement Project No Jason McLellan Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation January.
EPA HWI Comments on CA Assessment June 26, 2013 HSP Call 2 major categories of comments: – Report writing (we will work on this) – Content/Analysis/Discussion.
Direct vs. Indirect Water Usage Direct Drinking water Shower Watering your lawn Indirect Food Clothes.
1 Scenario formulation Scenario-based planning is a structured way of thinking about what might happen in the future Scenarios are descriptions of possible.
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
Presented by Jon Traum, P.E.
Validating Integrated Assessment Framework
Department of Forestry 2004 Stream Habitat Restoration Guidelines
A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds North American Journal.
Global Best Practice Examples for Integrated Water
Historic (post-European) Conditions
Warm-up What are four things that impact INFILTRATION? (the answer is in your notes) After you finish the warm-up put your river basin project in the inbox.
Techniques for restoring biodiversity: What works
Issues of Scale in Restoration
Healthy Rivers & River Restoration
Mitigation.
Rivers and Streams Chapter 6.1 and 6.2.
Module # 17 Overview of Geomorphic Channel Design Practice
Kristel Riddervold Environmental Sustainability Manager
Module # 8 Channel Evolution Implications & Drivers of Instability
Ecological Restoration
Presentation transcript:

T. Beechie, D. Sear, J. Olden, G. Pess, J. Buffington, H. Moir, P. Roni, M. Pollock 2010, BioScience, v. 60

Purpose of the Paper River and land management causing decline of river health Exponential rise in stress on ecosystem Constant increase in human demand for water and land Need to synthesize restoration concepts and practice Guiding principles for sustainable river restoration Explanation of process-based restoration and its advantages

Overview What is process-based restoration? Advantages of process-based restoration Four principles of process-based restoration Classes of restoration

What is process-based restoration? Restoration of normative rates and magnitudes of processes Physical Chemical Biological Focus on correcting anthropogenic disruptions Minimal corrective intervention

Advantages Control vs. Restore Popular methods Tend to follow legal mandates Restore narrowly-defined aspects of river ecosystems Creates habitats that conform to a standard “Good” habitat Controls processes to create habitat Results in artificial and unnaturally static habitats

Process-based Method Works with sediment and discharge regimes Identifies driving processes of stream degradation Restores processes to promote self-restoration of stream

The Principles Four guidelines 1. Target the root causes of habitat and ecosystem change 2. Tailor restoration actions to local potential 3. Match the scale of restoration to the scale of physical and biological processes 4. Be explicit about expected outcomes, including recovery time

1 st Principle - Target Don’t deal with symptoms; deal with the cause(s) A “good” habitat may have unaddressed system drivers Designed to correct human alterations

2 nd Principle - Tailor Each reach is unique Relatively narrow range of channel and riparian conditions Restoration should follow unique conditions Identify natural potential Historical analysis Assessment of disruptions to primary driving processes

3 rd Principle - Scale Actions must affect entirety of afflicted area On both a physical scale and biological scale Most restoration projects at reach scale or smaller Most processes at reach scale or larger Most restoration projects at headwaters or small tributaries Most severe habitat changes at lowland floodplains and deltas

4 th Principle - Predict Use quantitative predictions Helps set appropriate expectations of project Provide general range of possible outcomes Often difficult to predict outcome, but helps provide expectations as well

Applying Principles Need to put the right projects in the right places Provide the greatest ecosystem benefit at the least cost Set appropriate expectations for ecosystem response Planning based on two questions: 1. How have changes in riverine habitats affected biota? 2. What are the ultimate causes of changes in riverine habitats?

Classes Three restoration classes Full restoration Preferred Partial restoration Normally best achievable goal, but still good Habitat creation Last resort

Full Restoration Return river to natural regime Restore all natural processes Sustainment of habitats and biota Examples Blocking drainage channels Increases flooding Adding wood structures at natural jam points Forms pools and overbank flooding Removing nonnative trees Restore nature riparian vegitation

Partial Restoration Restore select processes Mimic essential components of natural hydrograph Most common class Optimal for areas with limitations from land use or other human activity Example Managing flow regime in a dammed river Improves ecosystem health

Habitat Creation Treatment of symptoms, but not causes Not process-based Sometimes only option in urbanized and heavy land use areas Results in a static imitation of a habitat that could naturally exist Example Reintroduction of wood into river system Treats loss of wood but not cause of wood loss

Conclusion Process-based restoration Treats causes of degradation, not just symptoms Restoration of natural river regime Principles Provides guidelines for sustainable restoration efforts Target, Tailor, Scale, Predict Restoration classes Determined by type and magnitude of land use