1 Officer Evaluation System. 2 Overview  Elements of the OES  Performance Feedback  Performance Reporting  The Evaluation Process  OPR  Inappropriate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Feedback.
Advertisements

People are our business USAF First Sergeant Academy PERSONNEL EVALUATION AND AND RECOGNITION PROGRAMS RECOGNITION PROGRAMS Reference: AFI & AFI.
Member in School Supervisor writes Narrative-Only PRF/ coords SR approval SR/appointee gives copy of approved N-O PRF (sealed if necessary) to individual.
Feedback. Definition / Objective Types of Feedback Feedback Process Raters Errors Avoiding Raters Errors Requirements Explanation of Forms Used Overview.
Performance Management
Performance Feedback.
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Performance Evaluation
1. Set expectations and measure performance ◦ What employees are expected to do for their organization in return for pay and benefits ◦ Allows employees.
Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.
BLSDM Evaluation Training (AFI , MPFM & 07-45, AFI )
Performance Evaluations BUPERSINST B
Enlisted Evaluation System
Performance Management 2012 Conducting Performance Evaluations Office of Human Resources UMW: “Putting U First”
Performance Feedback. Overview Definition / Objective Types of Feedback Feedback Process Rater Errors Avoiding Rater Errors Requirements Feedback Forms.
Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER) Counseling.
1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of The Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management Human Resources Center The Department of Labor’s Performance.
Revised Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Reporting System
Who Should Be Evaluated? All HEO EMPLOYEES  13.3b  One year appointment  Two year appointment  Substitute.
Annual Self Assessment Workshop for Employees
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
OFFICER PERFORMANCE REPORTS YOU ON A PIECE OF PAPER OfficerPerformanceReport PromotionRecommendationForm.
NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. Evaluation.
United States Fire Administration Chief Officer Training Curriculum Human Resource Development Module 6: Managing the Workforce.
REVIEW AND QUALITY CONTROL
Lecture 23.
Enlisted Evaluation System
Association for the Improvement of Minorities-IRS Career Assistance Mentoring Program – CAMP 2011 C.A.M.P. ORIENTATION March 25, 2011.
The Enlisted Force Structure
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Counseling and Evaluations for the Noncommissioned Officer 1.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
OVERVIEW  Program Objectives  Feedback Procedures  First Sergeant’s Role.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Officer Professional Development and Mentorship.
Frequently asked Questions ( FAQs) How much time does a board spend reviewing my file? (A) Depending on the size of the board (total population) and your.
VGT 2 Counseling Subordinate-centered communication that outlines actions necessary for subordinates to achieve individual and organizational goals. 3.
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
PRF Process Member selected for School For AF Officers
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Jessica Garner
OVERVIEW  Objectives  Individual Responsibilities  Performance Feedback  EPR Management AFI Officer & Enlisted Evaluation Systems AFI
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Supervising Military Personnel HR for Supervisors.
Officer Evaluation System
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Navigating the Performance Review Process
Performance Management
Performance Management
TOPS TRAINING.
Performance Evaluations
Teacher Evaluation Process
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Performance Management System
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Army DACM Office Program Application Helpful Hints
Performance Management Training: Year-End Review
Enlisted Evaluation System
Employee Performance Management System
Officer Evaluation System
The Individual Development Plan (IDP)
Employee Performance Management System (EPMS)
Professional Review Panel
Improving the Sailor Performance Evaluation Journey
Improving the Sailor Performance Evaluation Journey
Presentation transcript:

1 Officer Evaluation System

2 Overview  Elements of the OES  Performance Feedback  Performance Reporting  The Evaluation Process  OPR  Inappropriate Comments  Other Types of Performance Reports  The Appeal Process  Career Progression

3 Officer Evaluation System PFW OPR PRF

4 Performance Feedback  Feedback is the single most important means for changing behavior

5 Types of Feedback  Day-to-day pats on the back  Performance Feedback Sessions (PFS)  A scheduled session between the rater & ratee  Documented on a form  Signed by both individuals, original goes to ratee

6 Officer Evaluation System PFW OPR PRF

7  The Evaluation Process  Observation  Evaluation  Documentation Performance Reporting

8  Observation  Requires planning & preparation  Requires communication  Requires feedback  Evaluation  Judge observed performance vs:  Predetermined standards  Performance of others  Members of the same “AFSC and Grade” Performance Reporting

9  Documentation  Records the results  Provides a long term record of an officer’s professional development  Primary instrument for identifying best qualified

10  Officer Performance Report (OPR)  Completed Annually  Change of Reporting Official (CRO)  Minimum 120 days of supervision  AF Form 707 Performance Reporting

11 AF FORM 707 Front Back

12 AF FORM 707  Performance standards are the same for all grades  Performance factors summarized on front of form Mark “Does Not Meet” if evaluator’s comments make the report referral, or if a performance factor in Section IX on reverse is marked “Does Not Meet Standards”  Fitness exemption captured on the front of the form

13 AF FORM 707  Rater Overall Assessment 6 lines Must be bullet format

14 AF FORM 707  Performance Factors Same for all ranks Only mark if officer does not meet the standard

15 AF FORM 707  Referral Letter Included on back of report

16 Inappropriate Comments  Inappropriate Comments  Charges/investigations not completed or acquittals  Recommendations for decorations  Race, gender, age, religion, etc. of ratee  Drug/Alcohol abuse rehabilitation programs  Previous ratings or reports  Developmental education (completion or enrollment)  Advanced academic education  Promotion recommendations Performance Reporting

17  Other Types of Performance Reports  Training Report (AF Form 475)  Used for training of 8 weeks or more  Filed upon completion, interruption, or elimination from training  Letter of Evaluation (AF Form 77)  Used when ratee is away from reporting official  CRO with less than 120 days of supervision  Under supervision of someone other than your supervisor  Provides input to rater Performance Reporting

18  Uses of Performance Reports  Promotions  Assignments  Investigations  Disciplinary/Legal Actions  NOT used as counseling tools Performance Reporting

19  The Appeal Process  Ratee must prove that report is inaccurate or unjust  Rating can be upgraded or removed  MPF will assist in preparing package  Decided by AFPC  Have up to three years to contest a report Performance Reporting

20 Officer Evaluation System PFW OPR PRF

21 Career Progression System  Objective  To provide the rank/grade commensurate with each position’s responsibility and leadership requirement

22 Officer Promotion System Desired Objectives for Promotion 0-2 (1st Lt) 2 Years 0-3 (Capt)4 Years 0-4 (Maj) 11 Years 0-5 (Lt Col) 16 Years 0-6 (Col) Years

23 Officer Promotion System (Continued)  Fully Qualified: For promotion from 2d Lt to 1st Lt & 1st Lt to Capt  Best Qualified: For promotion to Maj thru Col  Promotion Zones  Below the Primary Zone (BPZ)  First opportunity is promotion to O-5 (Lt Col)  In the Primary Zone (IPZ)  Above the Primary Zone (APZ)

24 Promotion Recommendations  Prepared by Senior Rater  “Best Qualified” Based on Performance and Performance - Based Potential  No earlier than 60 Days before the Selection Board

Promotion Recommendations  “Definitely Promote”- strength of performance and potential warrants promotion  “Promote”- qualified for promotion, compete on basis of performance, potential, etc...  “Do Not Promote”- promotion not warranted

26 Summary  Elements of the OES  Performance Feedback  Performance Reporting  The Evaluation Process  OPR  Inappropriate Comments  Other Types of Performance Reports  The Appeal Process  Career Progression