Adrian Neal Contact Point of the European Network for Rural Development Irish NRN Meeting, 1 st December 2009, Dublin, Ireland.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State University – Higher School of Economics
Advertisements

Jean-Michel Courades, DG AGRI Rural Development Networking and Cooperation
Content of the Presentation WHY - What are the benefits of Transnational Projects? HOW- LAG taking a proactive approach -Using the existing mechanisms.
Near East Plant Protection Network for Regional Cooperation & Knowledge Sharing Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations An Overview on.
Identification of critical success factors for implementing NLLS, through collaboration and exchange of expertise IDENTIFY LLP-2008-RO-KA1-KA1NLLS.
Leader as a part of the new CAP
S3 Project aim The main goal, thus expected result, of the S3 project would be to strengthen tools used for Structural Fund policies (SF), through the.
Transnational co-operation to promote new means of combating all forms of discrimination and inequalities in connection with the labour market.
1 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD Rural Development Policy
The implementation of the rural development policy and its impacts on innovation and modernisation of rural economy Christian Vincentini, European Commission.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SUSTAINABLE GROWTH LIFE
Contact Day – Flemish Rural Network 22 April 2008, Brussels The added value of Cooperation under Leader+ Martin Law, Team Leader, Leader+ Observatory Contact.
Guidelines for the administration of axis 4 LEADER 17th July 2014, Nitra Mgr. Veronika Korčeková, MA Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of the.
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 LESSONS FROM THE THEMATIC EVALUATION OF THE TERRITORIAL EMPLOYMENT PACTS Veronica Gaffey, DG Regional.
European Commission Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development EU rural development policy.
Innovation in the Rural Development Networks Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development Matthias Langemeyer & Iman Boot.
1 LEADER and TNC implementation including aspect of networking Kasia Panfil, ENRD Contact Point 25 May 2012, Lithuania.
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
The LEADER approach to integrated rural development in the EU UNDP International Conference, Kosice, 5 October 2009 Jean-Michel COURADES AGRI G1 - Consistency.
Cooperation in the mainstream programmes / article 37-6b example of Limousin (France) inhabitants inhabitants 43 inhabitant / km2 43 inhabitant.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
“Presenting ELARD & its role in promoting TNC” by Stefanos Loukopoulos ELARD Coordination & Communications Officer 1 22 nd of June 2011 “Building Bridges.
Notification of the approval of transnational cooperation projects to the Commission through the Managing Authorities Focus Group 3 Meeting, Estonia 16/02/10.
Results of the Thematic Monitoring Group 2 Development of Skills within Companies, particularly SME’s.
ResearchEuropean Commission FP 6 - Thematic Priority 1 International co-operation.
Green Partnerships Local Partnerships for Greener Cities and Regions 5 th Steering Committee meeting Cyprus, Cyprus 2014 Theocharis Tsoutsos, Assoc.
LEADER Funding tool or philosophy for successful and sustainable development Successful implementation of LEADER with reference to specific cases.
Role of Leader in creating local alliances by Jean–Michel Courades DG Agriculture and rural development, European Commission National Rural Network Annual.
Leader subcommittee meeting- 26/11/ THE CONTACT POINT OF THE EUROPEAN NETWORK FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT Main tasks of the Contact Point in relation to.
1 LIFE+ COUNCIL WORKING GROUP 4 OCTOBER Discussion Points 1. LIFE+ in Context: Environment funding under the Financial Perspectives.
EUROPEAN COOPERATION FAIR: rural development through networking and transnational partnerships Synthesis of the detailed case studies, 27 July 2005 (morning)
Jean-Michel Courades, DG AGRI F3 European Rural Development Network
Leader subcommittee – 26/11/2008 European Network for Rural Development : organisation and specific activities by Gaelle Lhermitte,
“Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between MARIE, GRASP and PEEBPE Projects” Presented by: Thanos Papotis (EUROCONSULTANTS S.A), Technical Consultant of.
HTA Benefits and Risks Dr Bernard Merkel European Commission.
Consortium building PHOENIX Training Course Laulasmaa, Estonia
Guidelines for LDS preparation for Croatian LAG’s Estonian Leader Union Kadri Tillemann and Kristiina Timmo 28 th of September, Zagreb.
COORDINATOR Kick-off meeting/ Bucharest/ Project: FIRST STEP TO FIRST JOB – Innovative methods leading YOUTH to a solid career VS/2012/0017.
DESCRIPTION OF THE MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM IN POLAND Monitoring indicators.
Budapest /08/2001 Annual Report of the European Regional Focal Point. Dominique PLANCHENAULT.
The CLLD/Leader and the Leader Cooperation Participatory Local Development Strategies: + LEADER for Madrid, 29 October 2015 Christian Vincentini.
Focus on Governance and territorial achievements in Leader Plus period European Commission Évora, Portugal, 2007 Jela Tvrdonova.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
Leader+ Observatory Seminar ‘The Legacy of Leader+ at local level: Building the future of rural areas’ April 2007 Cap Corse, Nebbiù è Custera, Corse,
Jela Tvrdonova, The EU priorities:  Use the Leader approach for introducing innovation in the thematic axis  better governance at the local level.
Future outlook and next steps for ESPON The ESPON 2013 Programme OPEN DAYS Bruxelles, 10 October 2007.
1 The Italian “National Rural Network” Workshop on Successful Work of Managing Authorities Budapest – 15th April 2008 Riccardo Passero
EU-China: : Demonstrating Smart Cities achievements Dr Shaun Topham EU eForum.
Statistical Cooperation with ENP-South Twelfth meeting of the Management Group on Statistical Cooperation March 2010 Luxembourg Agenda item 6.1.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
Jean-Michel Courades, DG AGRI Rural Development Advisory Group 18 December 2006 Rural Development Networking
1 Community-led local development: proposals for October 2012 Karolina Jasinska-Mühleck European Commission DG AGRI.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
ARIMNet Presentation ARIMNet A cooperative network for Agricultural Research in the Mediterranean Michel DODET Coordinator.
"The role of Rural Networks as effective tools to promote rural development" TAIEX/Local Administration Facility Seminar on Rural Development Brussels,
COST Action and European GBIF Nodes Anne-Sophie Archambeau.
Principles 7 Main obstacles articulated in implementing the leading ESF Principles  Uncertainty on advantages  Assumed higher administrative costs 
Leader+ Steering Committee Meeting 12 March 2008 in Brussels / Belgium Leader+ Transnational Cooperation database Martin Law, Team Leader, Leader+ Observatory.
Leader Axis Rural Development Policy by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
Coordination committee meeting – 01/10/2008 Presented by: John Lougheed European Network for Rural Development : Legal framework and structures.
Indicators Legislative and financial base support for civil society
The ENI CBC MED Programme Strategy and functioning
European Network for Rural Development (EN RD)
European LEADER Association for Rural Development
International Conference “National Rural Development Network – Joining the Activities for the economic and Social Rural Development“   September 21.
Leader as a part of the new CAP
Technical Working Group meeting 21 March 2012 Brussels
Communicating Rural Development to Citizens Milan, November 2011 Networking, Communication and Stakeholder engagement Rob Peters, Head of Unit for.
Juan Gonzalez eGovernment & CIP operations
European Network for Rural Development : organisation and specific activities by Gaelle Lhermitte, DG AGRI (1) Legal framework.
Presentation transcript:

Adrian Neal Contact Point of the European Network for Rural Development Irish NRN Meeting, 1 st December 2009, Dublin, Ireland

1. EAFRD- European framework for cooperation 2. What is cooperation? 3. Why cooperate? 4. What is a good cooperation project? 5. Cooperation and networking 6. EN RD CP and its tools to support Cooperation 2

3 Axis 1 Axis 2 Axis 3 Axis 4

 Funded under Axis 4 (Leader) of the EAFRD through national or regional rural development programmes from > Part of implementation of local development strategies by local action groups (LAGs)  Transnational cooperation is promoted by the European Commission, but not mandatory > All rural development programmes have foreseen a budget for cooperation within the Leader-axis  Was also part of Leader II and Leader+ initiatives 4

TOTAL (expected) NUMBER OF LAGs  LAGs already selected: 2,003  Expected LAGs to be selected: 2,432 LAGs selection process: state of play  18 / 27 Member States have completed selection process  7 Member States will close the selection process by end 2009  RO and BG will complete the selection process by end 2010 & 2011, respectively 5

6

7

 €265 million = 4.8% of the EAFRD budget for Axis 4 (Leader), Inter-territorial and transnational cooperation  Italy (45,7 million), Spain (33,8 million) and Germany (30,2 million) are the Member States with the highest amounts for cooperation 8

9

10

2. What is cooperation? 11

1. Inter-territorial cooperation - cooperation between different rural areas within a Member State:  Requires at least one LAG selected under the Leader axis  Open to other local groups using a similar participatory approach 2. Transnational cooperation - cooperation between different rural areas from at least two Member States:  Requires at least one LAG selected under the Leader axis  Additional partners may include other local groups using similar participatory approaches  Also possible to extend cooperation to groups in third countries following a similar approach 12

The partner from a third country could be:  Public-private partnership  Local group active in rural development having the capacity to prepare a local development strategy  An open partnership in which wider participation of local actors is encouraged (i.e. from various socio-economic sectors, including associations) 13

Ireland: USA, Canada Italy:Switzerland, Azerbaijan, Lebanon, Canada, Georgia, Syria, Turkey Spain:Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia, Guatemala Portugal: Angola, Argentina, Brazil, Cape Verde, Morocco, Uruguay France: Morocco, Tunisia Austria, Germany, Greece: Switzerland United Kingdom: FYROM, Russia 14

3. Why cooperate? A luxury or a necessity? 15

 Strengthening territorial strategies & local partnerships: Can help to better meet changing needs and challenges in cooperating areas  Reaching critical mass: Pooling resources and expertise, the total benefits are much greater than the sum of individual achievements  Improving competitiveness: Finding new business partners & positioning on new markets help promote local products & area of origin 16

 Promoting innovation through new skills & approaches: Adopting new & improved operational approaches can generate knock-on socio-economic and / or environmental benefits  Developing territorial identity and raising awareness: Helping local people discover their area and history (thereby becoming true ‘ambassadors’ of their areas) 17

 Following a territorial approach, thereby ensuring local relevance and added value  Having a strong and clearly defined project idea that will directly contribute to realising local development strategic objectives  Going beyond simple information exchanges, to include common actions which create tangible results  Planning properly for human resources  Building a strong partnership that will endure beyond the project life 18

 Taking the time to establish relations between actors  Step-by-step approach  Build on common issues/challenges  Early involvement of local decision- makers 19

1. Getting ready to start  Give local stakeholders a reason to get interested/involved in cooperation  Consider creating a local ‘cooperation think tank’ to identify cooperation ideas 2. Preparing a cooperation project  Finding trans-national partner(s)  Meeting your partner(s) and agreeing to cooperate  Preparing a trans-national cooperation application for funding  Preparing a project monitoring framework  Negotiating the financial aspects  Bringing together the required resources (knowledge and technical); and  Getting the financial, legal and administrative structures right 20

3. Implementing the project Ensure:  Cooperation partnership organised (action plan accepted)  Partnership formalised (validated/shared common goals)  Cooperation partnership animated (guide and move project forward) 4. Evaluation and valorisation  Monitoring (agree and use target indicators) and evaluation  Dissemination of results of the cooperation project (so that others can benefit from the experiences) 21

Effective networking can help in: Finding suitable partners Preventing groups from needing to reinvent the wheel Distributing ideas, innovations and information Making issues and challenges transparent and building connections Cooperation & Networking

Article 67 of Regulation 1698/2005 establishes a European Network for Rural Development  To collect, analyse & disseminate information on RD measures/programs  To consolidate good rural development practice  To provide information on developments in rural areas  To support rural expert networks (notably for evaluation);  To support national rural networks  To support trans-national co-operation initiatives 23

Coordination Committee & Leader Sub-Committee Thematic Working Groups Rural stakeholders including LAGS National Rural Networks Managing Authorities DG Agriculture

Thematic Networks Events & workshops Information services Capacity building Publications Newsletter & newsreel Information services Communication tools Coordination Committee Leader Sub-Committee Thematic Groups

27 Results revealed differences in MS’s in:  Timing of decision-making, administrative approaches and solutions.  Format and detail of project applications  Financial support provided for the preparation of TNC projects  Level of technical support provided for the preparation of TNC projects Developing an integrated European Guide to Cooperation – recent survey:

Currently only examples from previous programming period: Leader+ database of transnational cooperation projects Leader+ database of Best Practice Publications of the Leader+ Observatory (Magazine and ‘Best practice’ publications: Copies of the publications can be ordered for free via 28

 ENRD:  DG AGRI – Rural Development:  Summaries of legislation – Rural Development:  European Evaluation Network for Rural Development: _en.htm 29