19 November 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Computing ATLAS Computing - issues for 1999 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also on:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRT LAr Tilecal MDT-RPC BOS Pixels&SCT 1 The Atlas combined testbeam Thijs Cornelissen, NIKHEF Jamboree, Nijmegen, December 2004.
Advertisements

1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova 1 Part V The lesson learned Summary and conclusions.
Information Systems and Data Acquisition for ATLAS What was achievedWhat is proposedTasks Database Access DCS TDAQ Athena ConditionsDB Time varying data.
Report from the Lecce’s Offline Group Rome 6-Feb-2006 The Achievements The People Future Plans.
Simulation Project Organization update & review of recommendations Gabriele Cosmo, CERN/PH-SFT Application Area Internal.
1 Raw Event : ByteStream implementation Muon Workshop, April 2002 A. Nisati, for the Muon Trigger group.
August 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Software Workshop Ann Arbor ATLAS Computing Planning ATLAS Software Workshop August 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also.
Argonne National Laboratory ATLAS Core Database Software U.S. ATLAS Collaboration Meeting New York 22 July 1999 David Malon
CLAS12 CalCom Activity CLAS Collaboration Meeting, March 6 th 2014.
REVIEW OF NA61 SOFTWRE UPGRADE PROPOSAL. Mandate The NA61 experiment is contemplating to rewrite its fortran software in modern technology and are requesting.
Summary DCS Workshop - L.Jirdén1 Summary of DCS Workshop 28/29 May 01 u Aim of workshop u Program u Summary of presentations u Conclusion.
ARGONNE  CHICAGO Ian Foster Discussion Points l Maintaining the right balance between research and development l Maintaining focus vs. accepting broader.
Fermilab User Facility US-CMS User Facility and Regional Center at Fermilab Matthias Kasemann FNAL.
Offline Coordinators  CMSSW_7_1_0 release: 17 June 2014  Usage:  Generation and Simulation samples for run 2 startup  Limited digitization and reconstruction.
Software workshop summary Helge Meinhard / CERN-EP Atlas software workshop 21 May 1999.
LHC Computing Review - Resources ATLAS Resource Issues John Huth Harvard University.
Event Data Model in ATLAS Edward Moyse (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration CHEP 2004, Interlaken.
David N. Brown Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Representing the BaBar Collaboration The BaBar Mini  BaBar  BaBar’s Data Formats  Design of the Mini 
ATLAS and GridPP GridPP Collaboration Meeting, Edinburgh, 5 th November 2001 RWL Jones, Lancaster University.
ATLAS, U.S. ATLAS, and Databases David Malon Argonne National Laboratory DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National Laboratory.
5 May 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch Computing Planning for ATLAS ATLAS Software Week 5 May 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also on:
1 Planning for Reuse (based on some ideas currently being discussed in LHCb ) m Obstacles to reuse m Process for reuse m Project organisation for reuse.
Gnam Monitoring Overview M. Della Pietra, D. della Volpe (Napoli), A. Di Girolamo (Roma1), R. Ferrari, G. Gaudio, W. Vandelli (Pavia) D. Salvatore, P.
Fabiola Gianotti, 31/8/’99 PHYSICS and SOFTWARE ATLAS Software Week 31/8/’99 Fabiola Gianotti Software requirements of physics groups What should Detector.
9 November 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Computing Overview of ATLAS Computing Jürgen Knobloch Slides also on:
Atlas Simulation Activities What is Geant 4 Atlas Strategy.
ATLAS Data Challenges US ATLAS Physics & Computing ANL October 30th 2001 Gilbert Poulard CERN EP-ATC.
November 2013 Review Talks Morning Plenary Talk – CLAS12 Software Overview and Progress ( ) Current Status with Emphasis on Past Year’s Progress:
Detector Simulation Presentation # 3 Nafisa Tasneem CHEP,KNU  How to do HEP experiment  What is detector simulation?
CMS Computing and Core-Software USCMS CB Riverside, May 19, 2001 David Stickland, Princeton University CMS Computing and Core-Software Deputy PM.
Databases in CMS Conditions DB workshop 8 th /9 th December 2003 Frank Glege.
GDB Meeting - 10 June 2003 ATLAS Offline Software David R. Quarrie Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
The CMS Simulation Software Julia Yarba, Fermilab on behalf of CMS Collaboration 22 m long, 15 m in diameter Over a million geometrical volumes Many complex.
1 MuonGeoModel status report focus on issues relevant to , 20 Access to Condition DB with M. Verducci, R. Harrington MDT deformations with I. Logashenco.
- Early Adopters (09mar00) May 2000 Prototype Framework Early Adopters Craig E. Tull HCG/NERSC/LBNL ATLAS Arch CERN March 9, 2000.
CASE (Computer-Aided Software Engineering) Tools Software that is used to support software process activities. Provides software process support by:- –
CMS Computing and Core-Software Report to USCMS-AB (Building a Project Plan for CCS) USCMS AB Riverside, May 18, 2001 David Stickland, Princeton University.
NOVA A Networked Object-Based EnVironment for Analysis “Framework Components for Distributed Computing” Pavel Nevski, Sasha Vanyashin, Torre Wenaus US.
Status of the LAr OO Reconstruction Srini Rajagopalan ATLAS Larg Week December 7, 1999.
Computing R&D and Milestones LHCb Plenary June 18th, 1998 These slides are on WWW at:
23/2/2000Status of GAUDI 1 P. Mato / CERN Computing meeting, LHCb Week 23 February 2000.
Calorimeter Simulation Infrastructure Norman Graf Arlington ‘03.
1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.
Workshop decisions Helge Meinhard / CERN-EP Atlas software workshop 08 May 1998.
Introduction S. Rajagopalan August 28, 2003 US ATLAS Computing Meeting.
Prospects for Integrating Veloroot into GAUDI D. Steele - 24/11/1999.
Predrag Buncic CERN Future of the Offline. Data Preparation Group.
The MEG Offline Project General Architecture Offline Organization Responsibilities Milestones PSI 2/7/2004Corrado Gatto INFN.
Software Week - 8/12/98G. Poulard - CERN EP/ATC1 Status of Software for Physics TDR Atlas Software Week 8 December 1998 G. Poulard.
9 Dec. 1998Atlas Software WS1 CHAOS OO-Simulation for Atlas Atlas Software Workshop H.Kurashige Kobe Univ.
August 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Software Workshop Ann Arbor ACOS Report ATLAS Software Workshop December 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also on:
Detector SimOOlation activities in ATLAS A.Dell’Acqua CERN-EP/ATC May 19th, 1999.
L. Perini DATAGRID WP8 Use-cases 19 Dec ATLAS short term grid use-cases The “production” activities foreseen till mid-2001 and the tools to be used.
J. Knobloch, SW meeting ACOS Agenda Corrections to the Minutes, Matters arising. 2.Discussion and decisions arising from the Software.
VI/ CERN Dec 4 CMS Software Architecture vs Hybrid Store Vincenzo Innocente CMS Week CERN, Dec
12 March, 2002 LCG Applications Area - Introduction slide 1 LCG Applications Session LCG Launch Workshop March 12, 2002 John Harvey, CERN LHCb Computing.
Marco Cattaneo, 3-June Event Reconstruction for LHCb  What is the scope of the project?  What are the goals (short+medium term)?  How do we organise.
1 SLAC simulation workshop, May 2003 Ties Behnke Mokka and LCDG4 Ties Behnke, DESY and SLAC MOKKA: european (france) developed GEANT4 based simulation.
1 GlueX Software Oct. 21, 2004 D. Lawrence, JLab.
Marco Cattaneo, 20-May Event Reconstruction for LHCb  What is the scope of the project?  What are the goals (short+medium term)?  How do we organise.
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
Online Monitoring : Detector and Performance check
S. Rajagopalan August 28, 2003 US ATLAS Computing Meeting
OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS
US ATLAS Physics & Computing
Simulation Framework Subproject cern
Simulation and Physics
Muon Group Software Report
ATLAS DC2 & Continuous production
Presentation transcript:

19 November 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Computing ATLAS Computing - issues for 1999 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also on: Workshop What is planned What needs improvement ATLAS Software Week December 1998

19 November 98 2 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Computing Critical issues - Choices  Choices made –OO paradigm –C++ –OODBMS –Software Process - ASP –cvs/SRT –Case tools - StP –GEANT4 –LHC++ (part of it) –Operating systems  Choices to be made/confirmed –Objectivity –LHC++ (part of it)  No choice is made for the eternity  Some choices last longer than others  Most of the choices are controversial  We take it seriously that we have to justify each of the choices…  … but choices have to be made in order to make progress!

19 November 98 3 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Computing Critical issues - People  Several key people are overworked and split their effort over several tasks  Need backup for key tasks  Need a (small) number of “computing professionals”  Need to manage distributed development, maintaining a coherent strategy  Have to set up standard and distributed training in chosen technologies  Need people for reviews –their own benefit –ATLAS benefit  Direct the community (in particular people working on combined performance studies) towards OO developments  Provide “help desk” during the working hours of the collaboration, I.e. 24hours/day

19 November 98 4 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Computing Domains and People FTE nowFTE required  Management, general support616 –Coordinators, Librarian, Software process support  Reconstruction25  Simulation25  Event domain35  Graphics46  Analysis tools13  Field, alignment, calibration14  Detector description13  System Domains:3644 –Trigger Simulation, Inner Detector, Muon Spectrometer, Calorimeters _________________________________________________ SUM5691

19 November 98 5 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Computing Manpower evolution Re-direct people from physics studies in FORTRAN to developments in OO technology. In addition need software professionals for key tasks: Software process support, framework, data base: ~25 + support of regional centers + R&D ATLAS Computing Workforce Integral : 900 person/years FORTRAN OO

19 November 98 6 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Computing Milestones for Reconstruction  01/99 –ID, Muon, Lar data in Arve  02/99 –Event display of raw data  05/99 –Detector descriptions in ARVE  06/99 –Test beam reconstructions  07/99 –IPATREC, xKalman in ARVE –Calorimeter reconstruction >first version  08/99 –MUON reconstruction –AOD, ESD first definition and implementation –Reading of G4 events  12/99 –Comparison with ATRECON –First public alpha-release

19 November 98 7 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Computing Milestones for Simulation  01/99 –First release of prototype simulation framework based on ARVE –Provide ATLAS examples (Si, TileCal, TGC,…) –Histograms, visualization, hits storage  02/99 –Detector component envelopes –Interface to magnetic field  05/99 –Interface to detector description data base –Comparison with beam test >demonstrate correctness and feasibility of G4 >have concrete examples being used by the detector communities  07/99 –First internal version of full ATLAS geometry –First internal version of all sensitive Detectors  12/99 –Comparison with G3(DICE) –First public alpha-release

19 November 98 8 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Computing  1 Tbyte milestone - 12/98: –Event storage: GEANT3, GEANT4, test-beam –Performance report - space and speed  Detector description database –Generic and explicit models developed –Using muons (AMDB) as first example –Continue with Inner Detector –To be used by in Simulation and Reconstruction in May 99 ATLAS OO projects - Data Bases

19 November 98 9 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Computing Have to improve...  Training –Common LHC items >SPIDER? –ATLAS specific >World wide training plan –Examples  Communication –Virtual room >Software meetings >DIG –Between communities >Computing >Event filter >Physics  ATLAS Software process –Needs speed-up –Needs more participation >Training >Remove thresholds –Improvement >Discussion started in DIG >Learn from experience >Understand role of walk- throughs >See where the process can be made lighter without endangering the goal –New ASP document >Read and comment!

19 November Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Computing Conclusions  We have achieved most of what was in the global plan of the CTP for  Aim to have releases of OO Simulation and Reconstruction by end 99  Support test beam work with simulation and analysis during 99  Establish training  Improve communication  Improve the process