CSA Driver Training. Who is subject?  Carriers and their drivers are subject if the carrier:  has a U.S. DOT Number; and  operates commercial motor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hours of service Supervisor Training for Property-Carrying Vehicles.
Advertisements

Highway / Office of Traffic Safety or Web Request 5% Report County or City Specific Reports.
Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop Michael S. Griffith, Director FMCSA Office of Research and Analysis TRB Transportation Safety Planning Working Group.
Potential SMS Improvements for MCSAC CSA Subcommittee April 2014.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Industry Briefing, August 2010 FMC-CSA Comprehensive Safety Analysis.
Carrier Oversight National Transportation Safety Board Truck and Bus Safety: A Decade of Progress May 10-11, 2011.
Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations.
Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010.
 No new CSA driver regulations  No new CSA vehicle regulations  NO new CSA recordkeeping regulations  Not a system to “throw” 250,000 drivers off.
OPERATING SAFELY AND IN COMPLIANCE James Daulerio CDS CDT Senior Risk Consultant.
CSA and Roadside Inspections Trooper John Sova Motor Carrier Operations Division North Dakota Highway Patrol.
1 Successful Compliance Reviews for Industry - First-hand perspective from a Safety Investigator Keith Kerns Member of CVSA International Safety Team Safety.
Texas Division NTEPS Presentation September 24, 2009.
Transportation Safety Assessments Commodor E. Hall, CDS ISRI Transportation Safety Manager
Managing Your CSA Scores This webcast will cover... The new regulatory environment How FMCSA is looking at improving the regulation How fleets are using.
Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations.
Driver Briefing | December 2012 FMC-CSA CSA: A Way to Measure and Address Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Driver Briefing December 2012.
1 FSWG Compliance Safety Accountability 1 FMCSA Duluth Superior Transportation Association March 21, 2012 Dan Drexler.
Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010 A New Way To Measure and Address Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety April 2010 Joe Darby Doug Dickinson.
Dial-in: , Pass Code: #; Tech Support: , Webinar ID: Comprehensive Safety Analysis Regulatory Changes,
USDOT Numbers USDOT 123. What is a USDOT #? The USDOT # is the number that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) assigns to each commercial.
U.S. Department of Transportation Airport Ground Transportation Association Conference Henderson, Nevada October 8, 2012a Loretta G. Bitner, Chief Commercial.
■ This Training Module is designed to educate Management on FMCSA Compliance Review (CR).
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Industry Briefing, October 2009 Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and Hazardous Materials Regulations : How they apply to You the Roofing Contractor Todd Olney, CDS, ARM.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration CMV Driver Briefing, December 2010 FMC-CSA CSA  Compliance, Safety,
Office of Highway Safety Motor Carrier Operations Jim LeBerte.
1 Comprehensive Safety Analysis CSA 2010 January 28, 2009.
Comprehensive Safety Analysis 2010 Update Arkansas Trucking Association Safety Management Council Don Holman, Tyson Foods, Inc. Corporate Director of Transportation.
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration & DOT Safety Regulations Updates.
CSA 2010 Comprehensive Safety Analysis Scheduled Implementation Dates July 2010 through December 2010.
1 Violation to Crash Risk Relationship Dave Madsen, Volpe Center Motor Carrier Safety Advisory Committee (MCSAC) for Compliance, Safety, Accountability.
Safety Programs Require Focus and Planning Pete Trimble, CDS Corporate Safety & Claims Director Keen Transport, Inc.
 Why Change?  What is CSA?  Field Test & National Rollout  Summary.
Indiana Motor Transport Association September 8, 2009 Indianapolis, IN Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010.
CVEO 3 Larry Pasco Spokane Washington State Patrol Commercial Vehicle Division District Supervisor 1.
Compliance, Safety, Accountability Update to MCSAC October 28, 2014.
Transportation & Logistics Anthony P. Gallo, CFA(410) office, (410) mobile Michael R. Busche(704)
Overview of the Evaluation of CSA 2010 Operational Model Test Daniel Blower December 5, 2012.
U.S. Department of Transportation Airport Ground Transportation Association March 12, 2012 Orlando, Florida Peter Chandler, Team Leader Commercial Passenger.
Click to edit Master title style 1. 2 FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is part of the.
Dial-in: , Pass Code: #; Tech Support: , Webinar ID: Preparing for CSA Interventions This webcast will cover...
June 2009 | U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010 Overview and Oversize/Overweight.
CSA 2010 Update:. FMCSA’s Challenge: Industry Volume Significantly more carriers than federal/state investigators –FMCSA regulates ~725,000 interstate.
Intro to SMS | March FMC-CSA CSA: Introduction to the Safety Measurement System Version 3.0 March 2013.
What It Means for Great Dane Customers Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010.
Training & Trends Jay Wommack Peter Charboneau. Current Economic Environment Impact on Transportation/ Trucking Impact on Transportation/ School Bus Do.
CSA 2010 DRIVER INFORMATION 11/27/ WHAT IS CSA 2010? CSA 2010 is a government initiative to make roads safer by contacting motor carriers sooner.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Listening Session #2 12/10/2009 Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010.
CSA 2010 Overview Presented by Brandon Putz Loss Control & Safety Representative.
Company: Viewing Company Information CSA Phase II Release x, Month Year vx.x FMCSA Portal.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration – Agency Overview
FMCSA Update TTA Middle Tennessee ELD and SFD Update
MCSAC| February Motor Carrier Safety Advisory Council February 12, 2014.
SBA Roundtable| February 14, Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) Small Business Administration February 2012.
CSA 2010: The Driver Impact. The Impact. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is in the process of implementing a revised safety inspection.
COMPLIANCE SAFETY ACCOUNTABILTY FMCSA ANALYSIS & INFORMATION ONLINE.
The FMCSA Program Effectiveness Study How Effective Are Compliance Reviews?
Overview: Analysis & Information Online & Driver Information Resource (DIR) 2007 Eastern In-Service Training Williamsburg, VA August 2007.
FMCSA Data for Safety Stakeholders| December FMCSA Data for Safety Stakeholders.
CSA 2010 A New Way To Measure and Address Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety.
Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) and Drivers Winter 2016.
Virginia Ready Mixed Concrete Association Spring Convention
Who We Are: The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) Commercial Carrier Journal Forum Scottsdale, Arizona December 2012.
“We are not a trucking company”
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.
CSA 2010 The New Approach.
Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010 Supplemental Slides to discuss Data Preview with Motor Carriers U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Motor.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.
Presentation transcript:

CSA Driver Training

Who is subject?  Carriers and their drivers are subject if the carrier:  has a U.S. DOT Number; and  operates commercial motor vehicles as defined in 49 CFR in interstate commerce; or  Transports placarded hazmat in intrastate commerce

Who is subject?  A commercial motor vehicle is defined in §390.5 as:  having a gross vehicle weight rating or gross combination weight rating of 10,001 pounds (4,537 kilograms) or more;  designed to transport 16 or more passengers including the driver; or  transporting hazardous materials in a type and quantity which require placarding

Who is subject?  Intrastate commerce carriers and drivers are not subject to CSA’s enforcement model unless hauling placarded hazmat  Intrastate commerce enforcement models are determined by the state

Safety Measurement System  Safety Measurement System (SMS) replaced SafeStat and its methodology  Information originates from the Motor Carrier Management Information System (MCMIS) as it did under SafeStat

Safety Measurement System  MCMIS:  State and federal enforcement personnel enter results of roadside inspections, crashes, and investigations  All violations appearing in the CSA severity tables and noted on a roadside inspection report are included in the CSA system  MCMIS contains Motor Carrier Census data appearing on the carrier’s MCS-150

Safety Measurement System  SMS includes two systems:  Carrier Safety Measurement System (CSMS) scores the previous 24 months of carrier data in MCMIS  Driver Safety Measurement System (DSMS) scores the previous 36 months of driver data in MCMIS

Safety Measurement System  Information on the driver’s MVR is not included  This is a completely different database and reporting system

Safety Measurement System  CSMS:  has both a public and private view  categorizes violations and scores them using a set of algorithms

Safety Measurement System  DSMS:  Employers and insurers do not have access — only enforcement personnel, and only during the course of a carrier audit

Safety Measurement System  Violations and crashes:  remain in the DSMS even when the driver switches employers  are only removed from the driver’s record with the passage of time

Safety Measurement System  New employers do not inherit a driver’s safety history from another employer in the CSMS  Only those safety-related events occurring under their U.S. DOT number are calculated into the carrier’s CSMS scores

BASICs  Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories (BASICs):  replaced SafeStat’s Safety Evaluation Areas (SEAs)  categorize and weight violations by severity and how old they are

BASICs  BASICs include:  Unsafe Driving (Part 392, 397, and traffic laws)  Hours-of-Service (HOS) Compliance (Parts 392 and 395)  Driver Fitness (Parts 383 and 391)  Controlled Substances/Alcohol (Parts 382 and 392)

BASICs  BASICs include (continued):  Vehicle Maintenance (Parts 393 and 396)  Hazardous Materials (HM) Compliance (HM regulations & Part 397)  Crash Indicator (accidents appearing on the accident register, §390.15)

CSA Scoring of Violations  Roadside inspection violations are placed into one of six BASICs  Each violation is given a severity weight:  a point value of 1-10 based on relationship to crash causation, and  2 additional points added if it resulted in an out-of-service order (just for some BASICs, not all)

CSA Scoring of Violations  Severity weighting is capped at 30 for one single BASIC for one single roadside inspection  Multiple violations of the same regulation during a single roadside inspection are only counted as one violation, instead of being stacked (e.g., tire tread low on all tires)

CSA Scoring of Violations  Carriers: all inspections, violations, and crashes are “time-weighted” using the following weighting:  0 to 6 months = 3  7 to 12 months = 2  months = 1

CSA Scoring of Violations  Drivers: all inspections, violations, and crashes are “time-weighted” using the following weighting:  0 to 12 months = 3  13 to 24 months = 2  months = 1

CSA Scoring of Violations  Each BASIC is totaled  The BASIC “measure” is determined by dividing total of event scores by a “normalizing factor”

CSA Scoring of Violations  Normalizing factors for carriers include:  Number of power units and vehicle miles traveled: Unsafe Driving, and Crash BASICs  Total of all time-weighted relevant inspections: HOS Compliance, Driver Fitness, HM Compliance, Vehicle Maintenance, and Controlled Substances/Alcohol BASICs

CSA Scoring of Violations  Normalizing factors for drivers :  Total of all time-weighted driver inspections: HOS Compliance and Driver Fitness BASICs  Total of all time-weighted vehicle inspections: Vehicle Maintenance and HM Compliance BASICs  The Unsafe Driving, Drugs/Alcohol, and Crash BASICs do not have a normalizing factor

CSA Scoring of Violations  BASIC Score for carriers  Carriers divided into Safety Event Groups (peer groups)  Percentile Ranking (0%-100%) assigned inside each Safety Event Group  Percentile Ranking is the “BASIC Score”

CSA Scoring for Violations  BASIC Score for drivers  Drivers compared to driver peer groups based on Normalizing Factor used earlier  For Unsafe Driving, Drugs/Alcohol, and Crash BASICs, they are compared against all drivers with at least one violation in that BASIC  Percentile Ranking assigned; this is the “BASIC Score”

CSA Scoring of Crashes  Severity weight for both CSMS and DSMS:  Tow-away, but no injury or fatality: 1  Injury or fatality: 2  Hazmat release: Add 1 point to applicable severity weight above

CSA Scoring of Crashes  Time weight for crashes for CSMS:  0 to 6 months = 3  7 to 12 months = 2  months = 1

CSA Scoring of Crashes  Time weight for crashes for DSMS:  0 to 12 months = 3  13 to 24 months = 2  months = 1

CSA Scoring of Crashes  Carriers are normalized using Average Power Units and Vehicle Miles Traveled and compared against those with the same range of power units and assigned a percentile ranking  Drivers are ranked amongst all drivers that have had at least one crash and are assigned a percentile ranking

Challenging Inaccurate Data  Review the information within MCMIS that the FMCSA has on you:  DSMS: Drivers must use the Freedom of Information Act or purchase a Pre- employment Screening Program Report (BASIC Scoring not included in either)  CSMS: Motor carriers can use the public and private views online

Challenging Inaccurate Data  Challenges to MCMIS data can be done through FMCSA’s DataQs portal at:  FMCSA acts as mediator with state, but the state’s final determination stands

Interventions  Based on a carrier’s BASIC Scores, it may become a candidate for an intervention  Thresholds vary depending on type of carrier and the BASIC

Interventions  Interventions include:  Warning letter  Targeted roadside enforcement (ISS)  Focused off-site investigation  Focused on-site investigation  Comprehensive review (compliance review)  Cooperative (corrective) safety plan  Notice of Violation  Notice of Claim/Consent Agreement

Interventions  Any intervention may be used at any time for carriers  Not necessarily used “in order”

Interventions  Drivers are currently only subject to a Notice of Violation and Notice of Claim issued in conjunction with an investigation of a current or former employer