Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Airworthiness and/or Operations Potential for Propeller failure 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project Update of Interim Safety Improvement Planning Presentation to Board of Airport.
Advertisements

MAJOR REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Orlando Flight Standards District Office Accident / Incident Review Orlando FSDO Pilot Examiners.
Weather and General Aviation Accidents: A Statistical Perspective Jody James National Weather Service, Lubbock, TX Warning Coordination Meteorologist FAA.
Operational Considerations in the Certification of TAA Slide 1 Operational Considerations in the Certification of Technically Advanced Aircraft (TAA) Robert.
Airport Planning. errata Traditional forecasting techniques are still in play, but are considered archaic. US airlines are focused on international travel.
Federal Aviation Administration HQ pp Airplane Night Vision Goggles A Review of the Operations Specifications and Guidance Presented to: Operations.
Office of Aviation Safety Bob Swaim Airworthiness ABX Air Ground Fire.
Airbus flight control system  The organisation of the Airbus A330/340 flight control system 1Airbus FCS Overview.
ORLANDO FLIGHT STANDARDS DISTRICT OFFICE FLIGHT TRAINING SAFETY & SECURITY PARTNERSHIP.
Downloaded from Maintaining Aging General Aviation Airplanes Presented by: Alabama Northwest Florida Flight Standards District Office.
Airbus flight control system
National Transportation Safety Board- NTSB
Product Recall ETM627 Tuan Doan - Honeywell NZ-2000 Navigation Computer 30 Nov What: Honeywell Flight Management Systems (FMSs) served by Honeywell.
1 July 18, 2011 Runway 19 Dalton Departure Procedure Flight Crews requesting the Dalton 19 Departure MUST possess the chart and adhere strictly to the.
Presented to: Orlando Florida Flying Community By: The FAASTeam - Dennis H. Whitley Date: December 9, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration FAASTeam Orlando.
Presented to: 2012 Pacific Aviation Director’s Workshop, Guam By: Juan S.A. Reyes, A.C.E., ACSI Date: March 13-15, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration.
Office of Aviation Safety Chalk’s Ocean Airways G-73T Seaplane Port of Miami, Florida December 19, 2005.
Presented to: Pilots and Flight Instructors By: National FAASTeam CFI Workshop group Date: November 8th, 2011 Federal Aviation Administration FAASTeam.
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 RTCA Update Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Bremen,
Federal Aviation Administration Southern Region FAASTeam CFI Special Emphasis Program Pilots Airworthiness Responsibilities Presented by: Mark L. Laughridge.
Presented to: SEARAST, NARAST, SARAST By: Glenn Michael Date: November , 2007 Federal Aviation Administration Analytical Unit Call to Action on.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration AIRWORTHINESS General Aircraft Combustion Heaters.
By: FAA Safety Team Date: Federal Aviation Administration Airworthiness Human Factors R1 Human Error = System Failure.
Presented to: sUAS ARC Certification Working Group By: Richard Posey, AIR-200, UAS Experimental Certification Team Lead Date: June 26, 2008 Federal Aviation.
Wadena Municipal Airport Stanley Weitemier, Airport Manager.
LECTURE 6 OTHER POTENTIAL THREATS AVIATION SAFETY AND SECURITY.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Continued Airworthiness Initiatives in the United States June 9, Continued Airworthiness Initiatives in the United.
Federal Aviation Administration Maintenance "Personal Minimums" Federal Aviation Administration DOT/FAA.
Maintenance "Personal Minimums"
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: By: Date: Oversight Throughout the Supply Chain: Is It Adequate? DOT OIG Audit: Assessment of FAA's Risk-Based.
Presented to: Transport Airplane Metallic and Composite Structures Working Group and Airworthiness Authorities By: Walt Sippel and Mike Gruber Date: Sept.
1.04 Documentation References: Canadian Aviation Regulations
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: 2008 US/Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: Robert W. Reich, Asst Manager (Operations), Seattle.
Federal Aviation Administration Plane Sense R1 11/05/2012.
30 th Annual FAA Forecast Conference Phil Boyer President Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association Phil Boyer President Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Downloaded from How to Survive A Ramp Check Aircraft Operator Maintenance Responsibilities.
Presented by: Roger Sultan, FAA Aviation Safety Inspector; AFS-400 Date: February 25, 2015 Federal Aviation Administration Operational impact of §
By Jamin Stewart.  Fatigue is a general lack of alertness and degradation in mental and physical performance. Fatigue in aviation  Fatigue causes a.
Managing Rotorcraft Safety During Frequently Performed Unique Missions September 28, 2005 AHS International Helicopter Safety Symposium 2005 Philip G.
North Florida Flight Standards District Office
American Airlines Boeing :30 PM, Friday, June 2, 2006 at LAX   Doing a high power engine run had a #1 engine HPT failure:  
National Transportation Safety Board Powerplants and Maintenance Issues Dave Keenan Powerplants Group Chairman Dave Keenan Powerplants Group Chairman.
Aviation Metal Fatigue
30 SECOND RULE Clear your mind of all distractions. Focus on your flight. Remember at least one thing you learned at the safety seminar.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration AIRWORTHINESS Positive Safety Culture Failure to Follow Procedures 1 R1.
Federal Aviation Administration Downloaded from Plane Sense R1 11/05/2012.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Organizational Culture Confusing & Unclear Procedures Revision 1, 11/08/2012.
Warm-Up – 1/24 – 10 minutes Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: Describe three main purposes of the aircraft powerplant?
Presented to: International Civil Aviation Organization By: LaGretta Bowser Date: September 2005 Federal Aviation Administration Runway Incursion Severity.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Runway Safety Airport Operations & Collision Avoidance Pacific Aviation Directors Work Shop Chris.
Federal Aviation Administration OSU & NBS Updates 2010 June Materials Meeting Koeln, Germany Materials Working Group Michael Burns, FAA Tech Center June.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration RPD 151 (RPA S5.1) Evaluation of In-Pavement Light Fixture Designs and Performance REDAC Subcommittee.
AIRCRAFT INSPECTION INSPECTION PROCESS. The Art of Inspection What inspection What inspection Who can inspect Who can inspect Phases of inspection Phases.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Produced by AFS-850 National FAA Safety Team Topic of the Month June Aircraft Engine Maintenance.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Orlando Flight Standards District Office Flight Instructor Special Emphasis Program Flight Instructor.
Airworthiness Directives A Lesson By Team A. Introduction An Airworthiness Directive (AD) is a directive issued by the Federal Aviation Administration.
AVIATION HISTORY Lecture 8: Speeds of Flight. Introduction  After the invention of the airplane, designers and engineers created new aircraft for a variety.
1970's DC-10 Disasters By: Clark Mosley.
Inspection of stock materials for defects
Patuxent River Navy Flying Club Membership Briefing January 10, 2016
Aeronautical PUBLICATIONS
Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR)
Airport Planning.
GE 6757 TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
ENGINE PERFORMANCE The performance data for takeoff and landing an aircraft can be obtained from the aircraft's flight manual or pilot's operating handbook.
Aviation Accidents in Alaska
FAA Composite Safety and Certification Initiatives (with emphasis on support from JAMS research and development) Federal Aviation Administration.
What is the Data Telling Us?
Presentation transcript:

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Airworthiness and/or Operations Potential for Propeller failure 1

Federal Aviation Administration 2 Description of Airworthiness Concern On June 18, 2012, a Piper PA , had a liberation of about 6” of the tip of one propeller blade. The event occurred at Peoria Airport in Peoria, IL The propeller is a 2-bladed aluminum propeller.

Federal Aviation Administration Event Aircraft Just After Landing 3

Federal Aviation Administration 4 Leading Edge Damage –The propeller leading edge shows a significant amount of dents and scrapes from impact with small rocks (probably flown out of a gravel strip).

Federal Aviation Administration 5 Fatigue of Cracked Propeller Blade There was significant fatigue evident (about 75% of blade showed fatigue damage), and with only a few hundred hours on the propeller, this leads us to believe the propeller was being operated in a resonant mode.

Federal Aviation Administration 6 Fatigue of Cracked Propeller Blade Dark grey is failure in overload Shiny silver is cyclic fatigue Dull grey is crack initiation site

Federal Aviation Administration 7 Cause of Fatigue There is a known resonant mode with this propeller/engine combination that has it’s highest level between 2200 and 2250 RPM. –An AD had been issued, creating an operating restriction range between 2100 and 2350 RPM. –The propeller manufacturer had provided information to operators to avoid operation below 2500 RPM The president of the flying club said their pilots have been told to operate at 2500 RPM. However, it is possible they have been flying at the more traditional 2400 RPM to save fuel.

Federal Aviation Administration 8 Probable Event Scenario When tested after the event, the airplane’s tachometer was reading 80 rpm higher than actual rotational speed of the propeller. –Tachometer error discovered by NTSB. –If the pilot set the RPM to 2400, then he was probably operating in the restricted range below 2350 RPM.

Federal Aviation Administration Resonant Mode Evaluation 9

Federal Aviation Administration Why does this happen? Mechanical tachometers can loose their accuracy over time. Reports of tachometer errors of 50 rpm are common and they have been seen up to 250 rpm. When the tachometer is out of calibration, you can inadvertently operate in a restricted range, subjecting the propeller to vibration that will cause damage. 10

Federal Aviation Administration What can you do? Check with the propeller manufacturer regarding restricted ranges for your propeller/engine combination Verify the proper RPM restrictions are accurately marked Verify the accuracy of the tachometer readings – and repeat at regular intervals Be vigilant in checking the propeller for damage that can initiate a crack 11

Federal Aviation Administration For more information…… FAA Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin NE-08-21, issued May 14, 2008 FAA Advisory Circular 20-37E, Aircraft Propeller Maintenance, dated September 9,

Federal Aviation Administration Taking these actions will help to ensure that this does not happen to you! 13

Federal Aviation Administration Updated FAA Contact Information For General Propeller issues – Jay Turnberg, Propeller Specialist, Engine and Propeller Directorate, For Hamilton Sunstrand – Michael Schwetz, Boston ACO, For Hartzell Propellers – Chris Richards, Chicago ACO, For Sensenich Propellers (wood) – Gary Wechsler, Atlanta ACO, 14

Federal Aviation Administration Updated FAA Contact Information For Sensenich Propellers (metal) – Ron Segall, New York ACO, For McCauley Propellers – Steven Litke, Wichita ACO, For Aeroproducts/Pacific – Margaret Langsted, Seattle ACO, For Tarver – Jonathan Oxman, Los Angeles ACO, 15