Status of the MEG Experiment  → e  On behalf of the MEG collaboration Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 A.Baldini 23 sett CSN I Lecce Stato dellesperimento MEG Stato dellesperimento (LXe, T.C., Trigger a parte) Schedule Budget MoU Richieste finanziarie.
Advertisements

MEG 1  e  search at PSI: SUGRA indications SUSY SU(5) predictions BR (  e  )   SUSY SO(10) predictions BR SO(10)  100 BR SU(5) R.
Status of the MEG Experiment W. Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo for the MEG collaboration.
LEPTON-FLAVOUR VIOLATION AND NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS
03 Aug NP041 KOPIO Experiment Measurement of K L    Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO collaborations Contents Physics Motivation.
A. Baldini PSI July 04 General Introduction Work done in the past 4 months presented in the individual sub-detectors talks: highlights Construction is.
LFV and LUV at CLEO Lepton-Flavor Violation: –Probe non-SM physics and/or SM extensions –Here, report on Upsilon(1S)   Complements other studies MEG.
Shuei YAMADA, ICEPP, University of tau04 Nara, Sep. 15, Search for the Lepton Flavor Violating Decay  e  in the MEG Experiment Shuei YAMADA.
MEG 1  e  search at PSI: SUGRA indications SUSY SU(5) predictions BR (  e  )   SUSY SO(10) predictions BR SO(10)  100 BR SU(5) R.
3 Feb. 2006Shuei YAMADA 1 MEG Software MEG Software Group.
May 9, 2002 TRIUMF Canada1 A new   e  experiment at PSI For the MUEGAMMA collaboration Stefan Ritt (Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland) Motivation.
12 Sepetmber 2008 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 Perspectives beyond MEG Paolo Walter Cattaneo INFN Pavia Neutrino Oscillation Workshop Conca Specchiulla, Otranto,
Conveneers: M. Grassi (INFN, Pisa), K. Ishida (RIKEN), Y. Semertzidis (BNL) Summary of WG4, Part Two. Yannis Semertzidis, BNL 1 August, 2004 Most muon.
2 1/March/2015 日本物理学会大70回年次大会@早稲田大学 東大ICEPP 内山雄祐 他 MEG II collaboration.
1 Muon Physics Project X Workshop Fermilab 17 November 2007.
MEG positron spectrometer Oleg Kiselev, PSI on behalf of MEG collaboration.
14 February 2007Fabrizio Cei1 INFN and University of Pisa PSI Review Meeting PSI, 14 February 2007 Status of MEG Software.
Status of E391a Search for K L    decay G.Y.Lim IPNS, 32nd ICHEP 19 th August 2004 Beijing.
M. Grassi – INFN Pisa La Thuile - March 15 th, A sensitive search fordecay: the MEG experiment Marco Grassi INFN, Pisa on behalf of the MEG Collaboration.
19 April 2006Fabrizio Cei1 The Liquid Xenon Calorimeter of the MEG Experiment Fabrizio Cei INFN and Universita’ di Pisa Incontri di Fisica delle Alte Energie.
March 2002, JINR Dubna1 A new   e  experiment at PSI For the MUEGAMMA collaboration Stefan Ritt (Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland) Introduction.
ER01/JA01, th Session of the JINR Scientific Council Dubna, March 27, 2006 Participation of JINR scientists in joint experiments at Paul Scherrer.
1 fact03 NY June 6 th 2003 Particle physics with intense muon beams A.M. Baldini - INFN Pisa.
March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk1 Electronics for the  e  experiment at PSI Short introduction Trigger electronics DAQ electronics Slow Control For the.
06 February 2007Fabrizio Cei1 INFN and University of Pisa INFN Scientific Commission I Rome, 06 February 2007 Status of MEG Software.
The DRS2 Chip: A 4.5 GHz Waveform Digitizing Chip for the MEG Experiment Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
Ю.Г. Куденко 1 Редкие распады каонов Дубна, 12 мая 2004 Вторые Марковские чтения Дубна-Москва, мая 2004 г. Институт ядерных исследований РАН CKM.
Dec. 8th, 2000NOON A new   e  experiment at PSI For the MUEGAMMA collaboration Stefan Ritt (Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland) Introduction.
Lepton Flavor Violation: Goals and Status of the MEG Experiment at PSI Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
The MEG Experiment T. Mori for the MEG Collaboration.
Lepton Flavour Violation: an experimental review Donato Nicolò Università & INFN, Pisa Neutrino 2010, Athens 16 June 2010.
Current status of MEG Experiment Yasuko HISAMATSU ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo ICEPP Symposium.
G-2, EDM, COMET muon particle physics programmes at J-PARC Mu_01 Satoshi MIHARA IPNS, KEK FKPPL-FJPPL workshop, Yonesei Univ.
Douglas Bryman University of British Columbia Seeking New Physics with Rare Decays Early Adventures at TRIUMF and Future Prospects JMP Retirement Symposium.
Overview of the experiment Collaboration (about 30 physicists at this meeting) Budget Realistic schedule and general status (few words) of each sub-detector.
COMET and DeeMe. Mu-e conversion search at J-PARC COMET Target sensitivity 10 C.L. using aluminum target – SINDRUM II 7x – MEG 2.4x
TYPE1 BOARD Type1 boards are compliant with 6U VME standard. Each board receives 16 analog signals from experimental devices. These signals are digitized.
Lepton Flavor Violation Search via Muon to Electron Conversion W. Molzon, University of California, Irvine B-L International Workshop Berkeley September.
Douglas Bryman University of British Columbia APS May 3, 2011.
Liquid Xe detector for m +  e + g search Kenji Ozone ( ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo, Japan ) Introduction prototype R&D ー PMTs ー small & large type summary Outline.
Particle Physics Experiments at PSI Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
Collaboration Meeting Feb. 9 th / 10 th 2004 How may go to Oase for dinner? Register ONLY at MEG web page, not at PSI guesthouse! Register early enough,
Search for Lepton Flavor Violation (LFV) in e+e– interaction (review of experimental results) M.N. Achasov International Workshop on e+e– collisions from.
Upgrade of the MEG liquid xenon calorimeter with VUV-light sensitive large area SiPMs Kei Ieki for the MEG-II collaboration 1 II.
The Mu2e experiment at Fermilab Finding a needle in a trillion haystacks Bertrand Echenard California Institute of Technology APS Meeting – April 2013.
Status and perspectives of the MEG Experiment Fabrizio Cei INFN & University of Pisa On behalf of the MEG Collaboration FCCP 2015 Workshop Capri,
New cLFV search experiments using the mu-e conversion process Satoshi MIHARA KEK, Japan.
MEG  e  search at PSI: SUGRA indications SUSY SU(5) predictions BR (  e  )   SUSY SO(10) predictions BR SO(10)  100 BR SU(5) R.
A New Sensitive Search for Muon to Electron Conversion Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab Mu2e Collaboration: Boston U, BNL, UC Berkeley & LBNL, UC Irvine, CUNY,
The MEG Experiment at PSI: a sensitive search for m eg decay
Search for CLFV at COMET experiment muon to electron conversion
The WaveDAQ System for the MEG II Upgrade
Cecilia Voena INFN Roma on behalf of the MEG collaboration
Liquid Xenon Detector for the MEG Experiment
New experiment to search for mge g at PSI status and prospects
Viacheslav Duk, INFN Perugia
大強度
Prospects for CLFV experiments
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
-LFV and related topics
Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
Status of the experiment in Italy
Liquid Xenon Scintillation Detector for the MEG Experiment
The MEG Detector to Search for m -> eg Decays
COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
Decay Angular Measurement in the MEG Experiment
Presentation transcript:

Status of the MEG Experiment  → e  On behalf of the MEG collaboration Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland

/15 March 2nd, LVF in the charged sector d t b Generation Quarks Leptons   e c u s e   Energy Quark mixing (CKM) Neutrino Oscillations Mixing in the charged Lepton sector?

/15 March 2nd, LFV in the SM vs. SUSY SM SUSY probes slepton mixing matrix ≈ LFV in the SM is immeasurable small SUSY models predicts BR(  → e  ) just below the current experimental limit of 1.2 x Decay  → e  is free of “SM background” (no hadronic corrections) LFV in the SM is immeasurable small SUSY models predicts BR(  → e  ) just below the current experimental limit of 1.2 x Decay  → e  is free of “SM background” (no hadronic corrections) The discovery of  → e  would by physics beyond the SM

/15 March 2nd, Summary of LFV experiments  → e   → eA  → eee SUSY SU(5) BR(   e  ) =   A  eA =  BR(     ) = SUSY SU(5) BR(   e  ) =   A  eA =  BR(     ) = Current Limits: BR(  +  e +  ) < 1.2 x (MEGA) 1)  Ti → eTi < 7 x (SINDRUM II) 2) Current Limits: BR(  +  e +  ) < 1.2 x (MEGA) 1)  Ti → eTi < 7 x (SINDRUM II) 2) 1) hep-ex/ ) A. van der Schaaf, priv. comm. BR Year MEG “Supersymmetric parameterspace accessible by LHC” W. Buchmueller, DESY, priv. comm.

/15 March 2nd,  – e Conversion: Sindrum PSI  - Ti  e - Ti : 4.3 x (90% C.L.)  - Au → e - Au : <7 x (90% C.L.)  - Ti  e - Ti : 4.3 x (90% C.L.)  - Au → e - Au : <7 x (90% C.L.) B  e = Limited by  decay in flight

/15 March 2nd,  – e Conversion: Future  – e Conversion down to RSVP program at BNL Terminated in August 2005 PRISM/PRIME at J-PARC  – e Conversion down to –  /sec pulsed beam  /  < Magnet construction -2008

/15 March 2nd, Univ. of Tokyo Y. Hisamatsu, T. Iwamoto, T. Mashimo, S. Mihara, T. Mori, Y. Morita, H. Natori, H. Nishiguchi, Y. Nishimura, W. Ootani, K. Ozone, R. Sawada, Y. Uchiyama, S. Yamashita KEK T. Haruyama, K. Kasami, A. Maki, Y. Makida, A. Yamamoto, K. Yoshimura Waseda Univ. K. Deguchi, T. Doke, J. Kikuchi, S. Suzuki, K. Terasawa INFN Pisa A. Baldini, C. Bemporad, F. Cei, L.del Frate, L. Galli, G. Gallucci, M. Grassi, F. Morsani, D. Nicolò, A. Papa, R. Pazzi, F. Raffaelli, F. Sergiampietri, G. Signorelli INFN and Univ. of Genova S. Cuneo, D. Bondi, S. Dussoni, F. Gatti, S. Minutoli, P. Musico, P. Ottonello, R. Valle INFN and Univ. of Pavia O.Barnaba, G. Boca, P. W. Cattaneo, G. Cecchet, A. De Bari, P. Liguori, G. Musitelli, R. Nardò, M. Rossella, A.Vicini INFN and Univ. of Roma I A. Barchiesi, D. Zanello INFN and Univ. of Lecce M. Panareo Paul Scherrer Institute J. Egger, M. Hildebrandt, P.-R. Kettle, S. Ritt, M. Schneebeli BINP Novosibirsk L. M. Barkov, A. A. Grebenuk, D. N. Grigoriev, B. I. Khazin, N. M. Ryskulov JINR Dubna A. Korenchenko, N. Kravchuk, A. Moiseenko, D. Mzavia Univ. of California, Irvine W. Molzon, M. Hebert, P. Huwe, J. Perry, V. Tumakov, F. Xiao, S. Yamada MEG  ~40 FTEs

/15 March 2nd, Decay topology e     e  180º  → e  signal very clean E g = E e = 52.8 MeV   e = 180º e and  in time e    e  e    e  Annihilation in flight Main background Good energy resolution Good spatial resolution Excellent timing resolution Good pile-up rejection

/15 March 2nd, The MEG Detector 10 7 – 10 8  /sec, 100% duty factor LXe for efficient  detection Solenoidal magnetic spectrometer 10 7 – 10 8  /sec, 100% duty factor LXe for efficient  detection Solenoidal magnetic spectrometer

/15 March 2nd, Detector parts LXe calorimeter prototype“COBRA” solenoid Timing counter

/15 March 2nd, Drift chamber for positrons

/15 March 2nd, Experimental set-up Detailed studies to minimize background from annihilation in flight  E5 beamline  Currently the highest intensity  beam: 10 8  /sec.

/15 March 2nd, Pile-up rejection with the DRS chip 4 GHz sampling 12 bits 32 channels on VME board ~ 100 € per channel Licensed to CAEN, Italy 4 GHz sampling 12 bits 32 channels on VME board ~ 100 € per channel Licensed to CAEN, Italy 11 MeV  + 42 MeV   T=15ns Only use waveform Digitizing for the whole experiment ~3000 channels (no ADC, TDC, …) Only use waveform Digitizing for the whole experiment ~3000 channels (no ADC, TDC, …)  shower  source

/15 March 2nd, Current sensitivity estimation Subject to future improvements

March 2nd, Plans Data taking from 2007 on to reach sensitivity (90% CL) Obtain a “significant” result before the LHC era Eventual reach during LHC era Plans Data taking from 2007 on to reach sensitivity (90% CL) Obtain a “significant” result before the LHC era Eventual reach during LHC era R&D Engineering Data