1 ESIF Task Force 34 Overview/Status* February, 2006 Mike Fargano, Co-Chair Christian Militeau, Co-Chair

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
웹 서비스 개요.
Advertisements

Next Generation Emergency Services Christian Militeau Intrado,Inc. March 21, 2006.
ESNet Network Reference Model rev 4.4 ( ) Slide 1: ESMI versionSlide 1 Slide 2: EISI versionSlide 2 Slide 3: ENEN versionSlide 3 Slide 4: DefinitionsSlide.
ESNet Network Reference Model rev 4.5 ( ) Slide 1: ESMI versionSlide 1 Slide 2: EISI versionSlide 2 Slide 3: ENEN versionSlide 3 Slide 4: DefinitionsSlide.
ANGEN UPDATE GC911 Conference - October John Ellison, Contractor – Alabama Board.
Working Group 2: Next Generation Alerting December 16, 2011 Co-Chairs: Damon Penn, Asst. Administrator, Nat’l Continuity Programs, DHS-FEMA Scott Tollefsen,
TF-34 and Web Services Presented at ESIF-11 Task Force 34 October 26, 2004 John Sines
OpenFMB Specification Development Plan
Rheeve: A Plug-n-Play Peer- to-Peer Computing Platform Wang-kee Poon and Jiannong Cao Department of Computing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University ICDCSW.
OpenFMB Specification Development Plan
NENA Development Conference | October 2014 | Orlando, Florida ESIND working group Jim Lockard, Joel McCamley Co-Chairs.
August 13-14, 2002 Washington, DC Gary Richenaker Chair ENUM Forum
Interim Text to Information & Training for TelecommunicatorsInformation & Training for Telecommunicators Version 2 August 26, 2013.
Installing software on personal computer
DOCUMENT #:GSC15-PLEN-46 FOR:Presentation SOURCE:ATIS AGENDA ITEM:PLEN 6.9 CONTACT(S):Michael J. Fargano, Qwest,
SIF Association Membership – what does it mean for your district?
NG911 technology Henning Schulzrinne
April 11, 2007 Prepared by the North American Energy Standards Board 1 North American Energy Standards Board Standards Development Process.
PSAP Service Capability Assessment Tool Session A Joint Effort of APCO and NENA Presented June 10, 2009 for Discussion & Feedback by: Tom Breen, ENP.
DOCUMENT #:GSC15-PLEN-48 FOR:Presentation SOURCE: ATIS AGENDA ITEM: PLEN 6.10 CONTACT(S): James McEachern
WORKING GROUP 4A BEST PRACTICES FOR RELIABLE AND E9-1-1 FINAL REPORT CRAIG W. DONALDSON, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT REGULATORY AND GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS,
NENA Next Generation Architecture
Presentation to: Name: Date: ICAO Asia-Pacific AMHS Activities & Status ICAO Asia-Pacific AMHS Activities & Status ATS Message Handling System (AMHS )
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG) December 16, 2010 Tri-Chairs: Laura Dalton, Verizon Communications Natalie McNamer, T-Mobile USA Karen.
Mantychore Oct 2010 WP 7 Andrew Mackarel. Agenda 1. Scope of the WP 2. Mm distribution 3. The WP plan 4. Objectives 5. Deliverables 6. Deadlines 7. Partners.
1 Introduction to Internet Network Management Mi-Jung Choi Dept. of Computer Science KNU
Web Trnsport – Beta Testing and Implementation TUG Roundtable Discussion Elizabeth Rodgers Info Tech, Inc. October 9, 2007.
P. Desjardins Positron Inc. ESIF Emergency Services Interconnection Forum (ESIF) Emergency Services Messaging Interface Task Force (“Task.
1 7th SDO Emergency Services Workshop (ESW7) May 2010 ATIS Emergency Communications Status Update Presented by: Peter Musgrove ATIS WTSC G3GSN Chair
P. Desjardins Positron Inc.July 20, 2005 Emergency Services Interconnection Forum (ESIF) Emergency Services Messaging Interfaces Task Force (“Task Force.
ATIS Emergency Communications (EC) Standards Development DOCUMENT #:GSC13-PLEN-35 FOR:Presentation SOURCE:ATIS AGENDA ITEM:Plenary; 6.2 CONTACT(S):Michael.
Working Group #10: 911 Prioritization September, 2012 Jeanna Green, Network Development 911, Sprint, Co-Chair Thera Bradshaw, CEO, TKC Consulting, Co-Chair.
Working Group #10: 911 Prioritization June 6, 2012 Jeanna Green, Network Development 911, Sprint, Co-Chair Thera Bradshaw, CEO, TKC Consulting, Co-Chair.
International Telecommunication Union Geneva, 9(pm)-10 February 2009 ITU-T Security Standardization on Mobile Web Services Lee, Jae Seung Special Fellow,
Architecting Web Services Unit – II – PART - III.
Steering Committee Working Group 6 Best Practice Implementation October 7, 2010 Stacy Hartman Steve Malphrus Co-Chairs.
State Of California E911 Next Generation Update 2009 Andy Nielsen State of California E9-1-1 Office
Working Group 8 – E9-1-1 Best Practices March 6, 2013 Robin Howard Chair WG 8 – E9-1-1 Best Practices.
XML Web Services Architecture Siddharth Ruchandani CS 6362 – SW Architecture & Design Summer /11/05.
1 NIIF Summary Report Activities since the NIIF #53 meeting June 28, 2006 Cathie CapitaRobert Schafer NIIF Co Chair.
Citizen to Government Communications ATIS’ Emergency Services Interconnection Forum (ESIF) Maureen Napolitano ESIF 1 st Vice Chair ANSI-HSSP Workshop Schaumburg,
ATIS Critical Communications Activities since GSC-18
17 th October 2005CCP4 Database Meeting (York) CCP4(i)/BIOXHIT Database Project: Scope, Aims, Plans, Status and all that jazz Peter Briggs, Wanjuan Yang.
Working Group 1: NG9-1-1 December 16, 2011 Laurie Flaherty Brian Fontes WG 1 Co-Chairs.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UCSD: Engineering Core 2 Portal and Grid Infrastructure.
TANGO TANGO ALTERNATE NETWORK GRAPH ORGANIZER Olof Hellqvist Zak Blacher.
1 ECCF Training 2.0 Implemental Perspective (IP) ECCF Training Working Group January 2011.
1 NIIF Summary Report Activities since the NIIF #61 meeting February 8, 2008 Todd Rodgers Robert Schafer NIIF Co Chair.
NG9-1-1 Core Architecture: i3 v3 TERRY REESE BRIAN ROSEN.
Reconfiguring Nodal Stakeholder Participation Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee Texas Nodal Transition Planning Task Force February.
Jabber Technical Overview Presenter: Ming-Wei Lin.
Protocol Derivation Assistant Matthias Anlauff Kestrel Institute
ATIS: Work on Next Generation Networks (NGN) Presented by: Bill O’Shea Chair, ATIS NGN-FG President, Bell Laboratories & CTO & EVP, Corporate Strategy.
Developing Product Line Components Jan Bosch Professor of Software Engineering University of Groningen, Netherlands
ESIF NGES Work Activities Anand Akundi Co-Chair ESIF NGES (732) Prepared for: Joint SDO Emergency Services Workshop.
1 Presented by Jim Nixon, Breakout Session Moderator December 15, 2005 Report from Breakout Session #2 Individuals/Organizations to Government.
3GPP2 IP Multimedia Domain 3GPP CN Plenary June 5, 2002 Betsy Kidwell Chair, 3GPP2 TSG-N Ph: Fax: Ph: Fax:
The National Grants Partnership March 11, 2008 Michael Pellegrino
Alert Gateway Group (AGG) Status Report to the Commercial Mobile Service Alert Advisory Committee May 16, 2007 Anthony Melone, AGG Leader.
EbXML Semantic Content Management Mark Crawford Logistics Management Institute
U.S. DOT Next Generation Project: A National Framework and Deployment Plan Summit for Large Cities Chicago, IL – May 21, 2009.
ESIF Emergency Services Interconnection Forum (ESIF) Bob Montgomery ESIF 1 st Vice Chair.
1 NIIF Summary Report Activities since the NIIF #55 meeting October 30, 2006 Cathie CapitaRobert Schafer NIIF Co Chair.
Jeju, 13 – 16 May 2013Standards for Shared ICT ATIS Emergency Communications (EC) Standards Development Dr. Farrokh Khatibi Director of Engineering Qualcomm.
Technical Standards: Paving the Way to NG9-1-1
20th CJK UNIOT-WG (Standardization of Mobile IPTV in ITU-T)
ATIS Emergency Services Interconnection Forum (ESIF)
ATIS Emergency Communications (EC) Standards Development
Presentation transcript:

1 ESIF Task Force 34 Overview/Status* February, 2006 Mike Fargano, Co-Chair Christian Militeau, Co-Chair * Link to Latest Overview/Status:

2 Outline Task Force 34 (and Issue 34) Overview Reference Architecture Architectural Configurations Relationship to NENA i2 and i3 Issue 34 – Status Conclusion Task Force 34 Reference Links

3 Task Force 34 – Focus on ESIF Issue 34 Task Force 34 is responsible for deliverables associated with ESIF Issue 34 – thus the name “Task Force 34” Initial ESIF Issue 34 acceptance at ESIF 10 (July 2004) Updated Issue 34 acceptance at ESIF 12 (Jan 2005)

4 American National Standards Focus Issue 34 Deliverables ATIS/ESIF – ANSI Accredited for the production of American National Standards (ANS) Foundation: Openness, Transparency, Due Process – Per ATIS Operating Procedures – based on ANSI Essential Requirements; recognized for diligence; combined with rapid execution. Implementation of ANS are voluntary unless mandated Announcements/Liaison for Coordination: Wide announcement of work; utilizes ESIF/NENA leadership liaisons

5 Task Force 34 Primary Participant List at&t Bellsouth Qwest Intrado Positron HBF Group Telcordia Technologies Verizon Wireless Cingular Sprint Nextel T-Mobile USA Tarrant County 911 District NENA

6 Issue 34 – Overview Drivers Driver: next generation emergency services data messaging needs: –NENA Technical Information Document on Future Models (Future: Based upon standard IP protocols, utilizing XML in a more robust protocol than envisioned by the ALI Bid/ Response model, including support of extensions for supplemental information delivery). –PSAP ALI Interface - Next Generation Needs (see TF34 contributions: ESMI-010, ESMI-011) –Need for Web Services based interface in support of emergency information services –APCO guidance regarding diversity of PSAP needs

7 Issue 34 – Overview Initial Focus (July 2004) Initial Focus: Emergency Services Messaging Interface (ESMI) –Interface for Logical Entities/Agents: Response Gateway (RG) to Conforming Emergency Services Entity (CESE): ESNet (for messaging) to PSAP CPE Interface Provides for well defined TCP/IP persistent connection interface framework for PSAP CPE (next generation emergency services messaging) XML Schemas to be referenced

8 Issue 34 – Overview Current Focus (Updated Jan 2005) Current Focus: ESMI; and Emergency Information Services Interface (EISI) –Interface for Logical Entities/Agents: Response Gateway (RG) to Entities Providing Emergency Services (EPES) for EISI: ESNet (for messaging) to EPES Provides for well defined Web Services based service interface framework for emergency information services (e.g., telematics providers) for next generation emergency services messaging XML Schemas to be referenced or discovered

9 ESNet Emergency Information Service Emergency Information Services Interface; EISI (A2) PSAP CPE Emergency Services Messaging Interface; ESMI (A1) ESNet-to-ESNet Interface; ENEN (A3) Messaging Network Architecture Top Level Note: There is significant flexibility in configurations (e.g., a PSAP can contain ESNet and provide all three interfaces).

10 ESNet instance (1:n) PSAP Entities Providing Emergency Services (EPES) A1 CESE (1:n) RG (1:n) RG (1:n) A3 A2 PSAP A1 A2 ESNet instance (1:n) A1 Conforming Emergency Services Entities (CESE) RG (1:n) CESE (1:n) CESE (1:n) Messaging Network Reference Model

11 Functional Entities CESEConforming Emergency Services Entity RGResponse Gateway EPESEntities Providing Emergency Services Interfaces A1Emergency Services Messaging Interface (ESMI) A2Emergency Information Services Interface (EISI) A3ESNet to ESNet Interface (ENEN) Remarks - The (1:n) notation means “one or more” instances - A1,A2 and A3 interfaces have cardinality 1:1 Messaging Network Reference Architecture - Legend

12 Architectural Configuration Note: CESE and RG are logical entities/agents; instantiations are shown ESNet RG PSAP CESE Call Taker A Call Taker B Call Taker C PSAP Mgr PSAP call taker positions configured as CESEs connected to an ESNet ESMI

13 Architectural Configuration PSAP CPE Proxy Server connection to an ESNet Note: CESE and RG are logical entities/agents; instantiations are shown ESNet RG PSAP Call Taker A Call Taker B Call Taker C PSAP Mgr CESE Proxy Server ESMI

14 Architectural Configuration PSAP CPE implementation of RG Functional Entity ESNet PSAP EISI ESMI

15 ESMI and EISI Service Interaction CESE Response Gateway Service A (EPES) PSAP Service B (EPES) Service C (EPES) ESMI EISI ESNet ALI becomes a special case of a “Service”. Communication to the PSAP is generalized. Service Mgmt EISI

16 Relationship to NENA i2 and i3 Relationship to NENA i2: –ESMI, EISI and ENEN can be used for basic ALI and/or advanced emergency information delivery –Use of various architectural configurations – driven by PSAP needs Relationship to NENA i3: –ESMI, EISI and ENEN can be used for advanced emergency information delivery –Use of various architectural configurations – driven by PSAP needs

17 Issue 34 – Status* Feb 20, 2006 Emergency Services Messaging Interface (ESMI): –Trial Use Standard completed Sept 2005 –Pre-Publication version of ESMI Standard available: ATIS-PP X: Emergency Services Messaging Interface Emergency Information Services Interface (EISI): Stage 1 (Requirements) and Stage 2 (Analysis) are completed; Stage 3 (Detailed Interface Specification) started during ESIF 13. Standards Development is continuing. –EISI Plan: Targeted for completion in July 2006 (with initial Letter Ballot issuance in May 2006) ESNet to ESNet Interface (ENEN): Work not started; no target date set. Will probably be defined as an extension of EISI. See Task Force 34 posted meeting notes for more detail; TF34 Web Site: * Link to Latest Overview/Status:

18 Conclusion Task Force 34 focus is on next generation emergency services data messaging Driven by common understanding of next generation emergency services messaging needs Three interfaces: ESMI, EISI, and ENEN targeted as American National Standards (ANS) Flexible configurations for interested parties – e.g., to meet the needs of various PSAPs Interfaces play well with foreseen future directions of next generation emergency services

19 Task Force 34 Reference Links ATIS: – ESIF: – ESIF Issue 34: – ESIF Task Force 34: – Task Force 34 Terms of Reference: – Task Force 34 Contributions (including Baseline Text): –