CONTRIBUTION FROM DIFFERENT VOC EMISSION SOURCES TO PHOTOCHEMICAL OZONE FORMATION IN EUROPE Dick Derwent rdscientific This work was supported by the UK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Detailed chemical modelling based on the Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM) Mike Jenkin EMMA Group Department of Environmental Science and Technology
Advertisements

Energy and the Environment: Likely Winners & Losers in the Second Obama Administration ACG Breakfast - December 14, 2012 Copyright © by N.W. Bernstein.
University of Khartoum Institute of Environmental Sciences Dip/ M.Sc in Environmental Sciences Semester 2 ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION COURSE By: Dr. Zeinab.
History of the Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM) and its development protocols Mike Jenkin EPSR Group Department of Environmental Science and Technology.
1 The Aerosol Coatings Reactivity-Based Regulation California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
Application of the PTM-MCM to the TORCH-1 campaign Steve Utembe, Mike Jenkin and David Johnson EPSR Group Department of Environmental Science and Technology.
Chris Dore AEA Energy and Environment Uncertainties in the UK Heavy Metal Emissions Inventory UK Emissions Inventory Programme Funded by Defra: RMP2106.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Session 5: Statistics on Air emissions and air quality Workshop on Environment.
LIFE TCY 98/CY/167 Integrated Control of Industrial Pollution and Chemical Substances in Cyprus VOC EMISSIONS By: Dr. Stelios Georghiades Labour Inspection.
MODELLING FUTURE TRENDS IN URBAN NO2 TO 2020: and some questions arising Tim Oxley Helen ApSimon Ayman Elshkaki Tessa Lennartz -Walker UK National Focal.
Air Pollution Nick Meyers-Turner Kourtney bailey.
Air Pollution Grab Bag. Middletown Coke Produce coke from coal which will be used by AK Steel to produce iron Facility will have 100 ovens and produce.
Section 1: What Causes Air Pollution?
History of the Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM) and its development protocols Mike Jenkin Centre for Environmental Policy
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
WHAT IS MISSING IN THE SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF PM? Dick Derwent rdscientific, Newbury APRIL Workshop, Imperial College London April 23 rd 2010 This work.
“Acid” in the Atmosphere Pollution and Impact on Ecosystems.
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright URBAN ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY MODELLING AT THE METEOROLOGICAL OFFICE Dick Derwent Climate Research Urban Air Quality Modelling.
Beispielbild Training Programme Air Quality Monitoring, Emission Inventory and Source Apportionment Studies Source Dispersion Modelling Andreas Kerschbaumer.
VOC Emissions Control from Industrial and Commercial Sources Dr. Miriam Lev-On The LEVON Group, LLC SP7: Current Control Strategies for Industrial Emissions.
Natural Resources.
Atmospheric chemistry Day 4 Air pollution Regional ozone formation.
Katie Page IB ESS Year 2 October 2nd, 2014
Simple Chemical modeling of ozone sensitivity
SOURCE APPORTIONMENT of PARTICULATE MATTER Imperial College 23 rd April 2010 APRIL:Air Pollution Research in London.
Air Quality Management in Mumbai V.K.Phatak MMRDA.
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
1 Air Quality: Potential Impacts of Shale Development in Ohio Kevin Crist, PhD Director & Professor, Center for Air Quality Department of Chemical and.
Air Pollution Dr. R. B. Schultz. Introduction Air pollution Types Air pollution Types Sources of pollutants Sources of pollutants Pollution and weather.
RAINS overview TFIEP Workshop on Emission Projections Thessaloniki, Greece, October, 2006 Zbigniew Klimont EMEP Centre for Integrated Assessment.
Air Pollution By: Diana Moy.
Fuel quality improvement steps towards EU approximation in Macedonia Slavjanka Pejcinovska-Andonova, REC CO Macedonia, Project Manager Szentendre, October.
1 JRC – Ispra DG JRC and EC4MACS IPTS Institute for Prospective Technology Studies - Peter Russ - Antonio Soria - Szabolc Szekeres IES Institute for Environment.
REACTIVITY SCALES AS COMPARATIVE TOOLS FOR CHEMICAL MECHANISMS: SAPRC-07 vs MCM Dick Derwent rdscientific, Newbury, United Kingdom Presentation to Reactivity.
1 René Parra, Pedro Jiménez and José M. Baldasano Environmental Modeling Laboratory, UPC Barcelona, Spain Models-3 Conference, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,
1 IRES, Chapter 8 Energy Balance Vladimir Markhonko United Nations Statistics Division The Oslo Group on Energy Statistics Fifth meeting, Cork, Ireland,
EXHAUSTIBLE NATURAL RESOURCES Limited quantity Likely to be exhausted by human activities E.g.: Wildlife, Forests, Fossil Fuels etc INEXHAUSTIBLE NATURAL.
IIASA International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) An Integrated Assessment Model for Fine Particulate Matter in Europe Markus Amann, M.
Malé Declaration 2 nd emissions inventory workshop AIT, Bangkok, 26 th – 28 th February 2007 Session 3 – Compiling Emissions from Large Point Sources (LPS)
1 EMISSION INVENTORY OF BANGLADESH under Malé Declaration on Control and Prevention of Air Pollution And Its Likely Transboundary Effects for South Asia.
Emission Inventories and EI Data Sets Sarah Kelly, ITEP Les Benedict, St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
Global Ozone Project Curriculum Rev 13 Lesson 6: Oxides of Nitrogen (NO x )
Male Declaration Emission Inventory Workshop Feb.,26,2007 IRAN EMISSION INVENTORY OF 2000.
Air Pollution.
Chemical mechanisms within CHIMERE present and future Matthias BEEKMANN.
The effect of pyro-convective fires on the global troposphere: comparison of TOMCAT modelled fields with observations from ICARTT Sarah Monks Outline:
Workshop on energy balances and energy related GHG emission inventories EEA June 2003 Jytte Boll Illerup and Malene Nielsen National Environmental.
Ozone Reactivity of Air Pollutant Emission Inventories Zachariah Adelman University of North Carolina William Carter University of California at Riverside.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Simulation of London air quality during June 2006 and the effects of emission control scenarios Andrea Fraser NCAS funded.
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT OF OZONE AND ITS SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN EUROPE Dick Derwent rdscientific 2 nd ICAP Workshop Chapel Hill, North Carolina October.
1999 Scott County Emission Inventory Iowa Department of Natural Resources Brian Hutchins.
Stepping Up to Solutions: Ozone and the Clean Air Act.
LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA). As corporations seek to improve their environmental performance they require new methods and tools. LCA is one such tool.
Different Types of Air Pollution
Objectives Name five primary air pollutants, and give sources for each. Name the two major sources of air pollution in urban areas. Describe the way in.
Sulfur and Nitrogen Emission Trends for the U.S. By: Brian Ponczak January 31, 2002 Sustainable Air Quality.
Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC): model framework and anthropogenic emissions Kebin He School of Environment Tsinghua University,
MALÈ DECLARATION SECOND EMISSIONS INVENTORY WORKSHOP 28 th January -1 st February 2008 At Asian Institute of Technology,Thailand COUNTRY PRESENTATION By.
MALÈ DECLARATION SECOND EMISSIONS INVENTORY WORKSHOP 26 th February -2 nd March 2007 AIT Bankok COUNTRY PRESENTATION By R.N.R.Jayaratne and D.S.Bandara.
Social costs of fuel-vehicle pathways
Environmental Science Class Notes 03/02/17
What causes Air Pollution?
What causes Air Pollution?
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
Alison Redington* and Derrick Ryall* Dick Derwent**
UNCERTAINTIES IN ATMOSPHERIC MODELLING
Pollution Management 5.7 Urban Air Pollution.
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Uncertainties in the UK Heavy Metal Emissions Inventory
UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS IN OZONE MODELS
Presentation transcript:

CONTRIBUTION FROM DIFFERENT VOC EMISSION SOURCES TO PHOTOCHEMICAL OZONE FORMATION IN EUROPE Dick Derwent rdscientific This work was supported by the UK Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs under contract number EPG 1/3/200

AIM OF THE PRESENTATION To describe the contribution made by the different VOC emission sources to photochemical ozone formation over Europe.

UK PHOTOCHEMICAL TRAJECTORY MODEL Model description A single air parcel following a trajectory across Europe Emissions of SO 2, NO x, VOCs, CH 4, CO and isoprene From EMEP and UK NAEI inventories Master Chemical Mechanism

UK PHOTOCHEMICAL TRAJECTORY MODEL

MASTER CHEMICAL MECHANISM 137 emitted organic compounds 4,414 reaction products 12,871 chemical reactions Detailed explicit chemical mechanism to represent the contribution made by each individual VOC species. Developed by Michael Jenkin of Imperial College and Michael Pilling of University of Leeds and available at:

MASTER CHEMICAL MECHANISM Generates the same picture of regional ozone formation across Europe as other mechanisms Used here because it is the only mechanism that treats each emitted VOC species in explicit detail VOC source categories can only be treated explicitly with a chemical mechanism that treats each species in detail

COMPARISON OF MCMv3.1 WITH CBM4 MECHANISM

GRIDDED EMISSION INVENTORIES

VOC SPECIATION UK NAEI 248 emission source categories at the SNAP 3 level each has its own profile containing 667 VOC species 248 x 667 matrix UK Photochemical Trajectory Model 248 x 177 matrix of category x species 90% coverage of total VOC mass emissions fractional speciation held constant across Europe

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Base Case Experiment Run with year 2000 VOC, NO x, SO 2, CO, isoprene and CH 4 emissions and year 2000 VOC fractional speciation Ozone at arrival point 87.8 ppb 248 sensitivity cases Run with the emissions from each VOC emission source category increased fractionally Determine by difference the extra ozone formed

SENSITIVITY EXPERIMENTS An additional emission was added in turn from each VOC emission source category across Europe. The extra emission amounted to a 7.3% increase in VOC emissions. The speciation of the extra emission was given the same species profile as the emission source category. The increase in emission was applied everywhere across Europe

INCREMENTAL REACTIVITY OF A VOC EMISSION SOURCE CATEGORY This is the increase in ozone in ppb divided by the fractional increase in the emissions from that source category:  O  VOC VOC Incremental reactivities depend on the environmental conditions and are not geophysical quantities

INCREMENTAL REACTIVITIES Chemical waste incineration53.8 Blast furnaces_Coke-oven gas49.5 Iron & steel (Flaring)_Coke-oven gas49.0 Iron & steel industry_Coke-oven gas48.9 Other industrial combustion_Coke- oven gas48.9 Industrial coatings (drum)47.5 Printing (metal decorating)47.1 Printing (heatset web offset)47.0 Industrial coatings (marine)46.5 Railways (Freight)_Gas oil46.2 Road transport (rigid HGVs)_DERV46.2 Other industrial (off-road)_Gas oil46.0

CONTRIBUTION TO OZONE FORMATION Ozone formation = Incremental Reactivity x Fractional contribution to total VOC emissions

CONTRIBUTION TO OZONE FORMATION % incremental ozone emissions reactivity ppb Road transport (cars without catalysts)_Petrol Road transport (cars with catalysts)_Petrol Onshore loading of crude oil Chemical industry Offshore loading of crude oil Spirit manufacture (maturation) Refineries (process fugitives) Petrol stations (vehicle refuelling with unleaded petrol) Other solvent use Gas leakage Decorative paint (trade decorative) Industrial coatings (metal & plastic) Aerosols (cosmetics and toiletries) Decorative paint (retail decorative) Industrial adhesives

CONTRIBUTION TO OZONE FORMATION Each source category has a different incremental reactivity because of the contribution from the different VOCs that make up its species profile. Each source category makes a different contribution to ozone formation because of its different incremental reactivity and its different contribution to total emissions.

DOES IT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE IF THE INFORMATION ABOUT THE INCREMENTAL REACTIVITIES IS USED IN CONTROL STRATEGIES ? Based on incremental reactivities for 248 source categories Base case 87.8 ppb 4 ppb

DOES IT STILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE AT THE HIGHLY AGGREGATED SNAP 1 LEVEL ? 1.9 ppb Based on incremental reactivities of 11 SNAP 1 source categories Road transport solvents Extraction & distribution of fossil fuels

CONCLUSIONS Incremental reactivities have been constructed for 248 VOC emission source categories. There is a factor of over 30 range in these incremental reactivities which is not represented in the EMEP/RAINS models. These variations in reactivity are caused by the different VOC species profiles for each source category. VOC control strategies targetting the most reactive source categories could be more cost-effective than currently estimated using the EMEP/RAINS models.