Level 2 Algorithm. Definition of Product Levels LevelDescription Level 1 1A Reconstructed unprocessed instrument data 1B Geolocated, calibrated sensor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analysis of AMSR-E C & X-band Tb data dependencies with wind & wave characteristics.
Advertisements

SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity – Reprocessing Level 2 Ocean Salinity Reprocessing 17 September 2008.
F. Wentz, T. Meissner, J. Scott and K. Hilburn Remote Sensing Systems 2014 Aquarius / SAC-D Science Team Meeting November ,
L1a to L2 Aquarius Processor Frank Wentz and Thomas Meissner Aquarius Algorithm Workshop, Santa Rosa, CA, March 9-11, 2010.
Level-1A to Level-1B Spacecraft data to Geolocation Data and Antenna Temperature Level-1B to Level-2A Antenna Temperatures Converted to TOA Brightness.
Communicating Uncertainties for Microwave-Based ESDRs Frank J. Wentz, Carl A. Mears, and Deborah K. Smith Remote Sensing Systems, Santa Rosa CA Supported.
Aquarius Status Salinity Retrieval and Applications D. M. Le Vine NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD E. P. Dinnat, G. Lagerloef, P. de Matthaeis, H. Kao, F.
The Aquarius Salinity Retrieval Algorithm Frank J. Wentz and Thomas Meissner, Remote Sensing Systems Gary S. Lagerloef, Earth and Space Research David.
Combined Active & Passive Rain Retrieval for QuikSCAT Satellite Khalil A. Ahmad Central Florida Remote Sensing Laboratory University of Central Florida.
Maintaining and Improving the AMSR-E and WindSat Ocean Products Frank J. Wentz Remote Sensing Systems, Santa Rosa CA AMSR TIM Agenda 4-5 September 2013.
Sea water dielectric constant, temperature and remote sensing of Sea Surface Salinity E. P. Dinnat 1,2, D. M. Le Vine 1, J. Boutin 3, X. Yin 3, 1 Cryospheric.
Frank J. Wentz and Thomas Meissner Remote Sensing Systems Aquarius Salinity Algorithm and Simulations Aquarius/SAC-D Science Workshop July 2010,
Scatterometer Algorithm Simon Yueh, Alex Fore, Adam Freedman, Julian Chaubell Aquarius Scatterometer Algorithm Team July 19, 2010 Seattle.
Roughness Correction Working Group Report July 21, 2010 Seattle 6 th Aquarius/SAC-D Science Team meeting.
Aquarius/SAC-D Mission Validation Working Group Summary Gary Lagerloef 6 th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010.
Aquarius/SAC-D Mission Mission Simulators - Gary Lagerloef 6 th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010.
Aquarius/SAC-D Mission Error Validation and Early Orbit Corrections Gary Lagerloef 6 th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010.
Aquarius/SAC-D Mission Error Validation and Early Orbit Corrections Gary Lagerloef 6 th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010.
MWR Algorithms (Wentz): Provide and validate wind, rain and sea ice [TBD] retrieval algorithms for MWR data Between now and launch (April 2011) 1. In-orbit.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 NOAA Operational Geostationary Sea Surface Temperature Products from NOAA.
Determining the accuracy of MODIS Sea- Surface Temperatures – an Essential Climate Variable Peter J. Minnett & Robert H. Evans Meteorology and Physical.
Ifremer Planning of Cal/Val Activities during In orbit commisioning Phase N. Reul, J. Tenerelli, S. Brachet, F. Paul & F. Gaillard, ESL & GLOSCAL teams.
SMOS Validation Rehearsal Campaign Workshop, 18-19/11/2008, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands SMOS Validation Rehearsal Campaign Mediterranean flights C.
Galactic noise model adjustment Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Jacqueline Boutin (LOCEAN) Xiaobin Yin (LOCEAN)
Aquarius Algorithm Meeting To Do Lists. From Frank Wentz:  Implement Ruf RFI flagging  Implement other QC flags  Further test review, and finalize.
MWR Roughness Correction Algorithm for the Aquarius SSS Retrieval W. Linwood Jones, Yazan Hejazin, Salem Al-Nimri Central Florida Remote Sensing Lab University.
SMOS QWG-5, 30 May- 1 June 2011, ESRIN Ocean Salinity 1 1.Commissioning reprocessing analysis 2.New processor version: improvements and problems detected/solved.
Aquarius Algorithm Workshop March 2007 College of Engineering Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic & Space Sciences Chris Ruf Space Physics Research.
Calibration and Validation Studies for Aquarius Salinity Retrieval PI: Shannon Brown Co-Is: Shailen Desai and Anthony Scodary Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
SCIENCE PROCESSING OVERVIEW David Le Vine Aquarius Deputy PI 07 July 2009.
A. Montuori 1, M. Portabella 2, S. Guimbard 2, C. Gabarrò 2, M. Migliaccio 1 1 Dipartimento per le Tecnologie (DiT), University of Naples Parthenope, Italy.
25 June 2009 Dawn Conway, AMSR-E TLSCF Lead Software Engineer AMSR-E Team Leader Science Computing Facility.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity L2OS planning 2 July 2014 ARGANS & SMOS L2OS ESL 1.
1 / 13 Current activities at ICM-SMOS-BEC J. Gourrion, C. Gabarró, R. Sabia, M. Talone, V. González, S. Montero, S. Guimbard, F. Pérez, J. Martínez, M.
T. Meissner, F. Wentz, J. Scott, K. Hilburn Remote Sensing Systems ESA Ocean Salinity Science and Salinity Remote Sensing Workshop November.
SPCM-9, Esac, May 3 rd, 2012 MODEL-INDEPENDENT ESTIMATION OF SYSTEMATIC ERRORS IN SMOS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE IMAGES J. Gourrion, S. Guimbard, R. Sabia,
OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 OTT sensitivity study and Sun correction impact J. Gourrion and the SMOS-BEC team SMOS-BEC, ICM/CSIC.
Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Characterization of scattered celestial signals in SMOS observations over the Ocean J. Gourrion 1, J.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity v63x product design evolution 22 April 2015 ARGANS & SMOS L2OS ESL 1.
Sea Surface Salinity from Space Simulation of Aquarius brightness temperature, Tb, at spacecraft during one orbit Top Panel –Ground track (red) –Outer.
USING SMOS POLARIMETRIC BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURES TO CORRECT FOR ROUGH SURFACE EMISSION BEFORE SALINITY INVERSION.
Workshop Agenda: Day One 9:30 IntroductionLagerloef / Le Vine 9:45 Workshop objectivesG. Feldman 10:00 Overview of the Aquarius Data Processing System:G.
Cal/Val Discussion. Summary No large errors in rain, freshening observed by Aquarius can be significant and real (up to about 3 hours on average after.
A New Inter-Comparison of Three Global Monthly SSM/I Precipitation Datasets Matt Sapiano, Phil Arkin and Tom Smith Earth Systems Science Interdisciplinary.
Simulator Wish-List Gary Lagerloef Aquarius Principal Investigator Cal/Val/Algorithm Workshop March GSFC.
2014 Aquarius / SACD Science Team Meeting Agenda and Objectives Summarize the completion of NASA’s Aquarius 3-year prime salinity measurement mission (November.
High Quality Wind Retrievals for Hurricanes Using the SeaWinds Scatterometer W. Linwood Jones and Ian Adams Central Florida Remote Sensing Lab Univ. of.
SMOS QWG-9, ESRIN October 2012 L2OS: Product performance summary v550 highlights 1 The SMOS L2 OS Team.
Improved Aquarius Salinity Retrievals using Auxiliary Products from the CONAE Microwave Radiometer (MWR) W. Linwood Jones Central Florida Remote Sensing.
Mission Operations Review February 8-10, 2010 Cordoba, ARGENTINA SECTION 16.x Aquarius Science Commissioning and Acceptance Draft 2 Prepared by: Gary Lagerloef,
AMSR-E Ocean Rainfall Algorithm Status AMSR-E Science Team Meeting Asheville, NC June, 2011 C. Kummerow Colorado State University.
Faraday Rotation David Le Vine Aquarius Algorithm Workshop March 9-11, 2010.
T. Meissner and F. Wentz Remote Sensing Systems 2014 Aquarius / SAC-D Science Team Meeting November , 2014 Seattle. Washington,
Challenge Volume: Over 100 satellite-years of observations Calibration Each sensor has its own unique set of Sensor Calibration Problems Precision: High.
Use of AMSR-E Land Parameter Modeling and Retrievals for SMAP Algorithm Development Steven Chan Eni Njoku Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting Telluride, Colorado.
Level 2 Scatterometer Processing Alex Fore Julian Chaubell Adam Freedman Simon Yueh.
Aquarius Simulation Studies Gary Lagerloef Aquarius Principal Investigator Algorithm Workshop 9-11 March 2010.
ADPS Science Software Development Bryan Franz NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group Aquarius Data Processing Workshop, NASA/GSFC, March 2007.
The Inter-Calibration of AMSR-E with WindSat, F13 SSM/I, and F17 SSM/IS Frank J. Wentz Remote Sensing Systems 1 Presented to the AMSR-E Science Team June.
Geophysical Ocean Products from AMSR-E & WindSAT Chelle L. Gentemann, Frank Wentz, Thomas Meissner, Kyle Hilburn, Deborah Smith, and Marty Brewer
South Pole North Pole South Pole DD, K CONAE Microwave Radiometer (MWR) Counts to Tb Algorithm and On orbit Validation Zoubair Ghazi 1, Andrea Santos-Garcia.
SMOS Science Meeting September 2011 Arles, FR Simulating Aquarius by Resampling SMOS Gary Lagerloef, Yann Kerr & Eric Anterrieu and Initial Results.
Impact of sea surface roughness on SMOS measurements A new empirical model S. Guimbard & SMOS-BEC Team SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre Pg. Marítim de la Barceloneta.
Dependence of SMOS/MIRAS brightness temperatures on wind speed: sea surface effect and latitudinal biases Xiaobin Yin, Jacqueline Boutin LOCEAN.
September 11-12, 2012Dawn Conway, AMSR-E TLSCF Lead Software Engineer AMSR-E Team Leader Science Computing Facility New Browse Images Current Science Software.
Ocean Vector Winds in Storms from the SMAP L-Band Radiometer
GPM Microwave Radiometer Vicarious Cold Calibration
Roughness Correction for Aquarius (AQ) Sea Surface Salinity (SSS) Algorithm using MicroWave Radiometer (MWR) W. Linwood Jones, Yazan Hejazin Central FL.
Extreme Wind Speed Measurements from NASA’s SMAP L-Band Radiometer
Frank Wentz and Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems, Santa Rosa CA, USA
Presentation transcript:

Level 2 Algorithm

Definition of Product Levels LevelDescription Level 1 1A Reconstructed unprocessed instrument data 1B Geolocated, calibrated sensor units at 0.12 / 0.18 sec; RFI flag and then averaged and output at 1.44 seconds. Level 2 2A TOA to surface: Geolocated, calibrated sensor units at surface at 1.44 sec. Correct for Faraday rot; Antenna pattern, Sun, etc. 2B TB to SSS: Geolocated SSS from L2A and averaged to a 5.76 sec. Roughness correction from Scatterometer. Level 3 Re-grid and smooth: Time-space objectively analyzed SSS on a standard Earth Projection; 150 km at 7days and monthly. Calibration Collect Level 2B data at points coinciding with surface measurements and average to remove biases. Validation Match L2B data with in situ ocean measurements (SSS, SST, winds, sea state, etc) and compare at 150 km monthly

Science Algorithm Levels Level 1 –1A: Reconstructed instrument data –1B: Instrument units at TOA RFI Flag Avg over one cal cycle (1.44 sec) Level 2 –2A: T A at TOA to surface Flags (solar flares, rain, land, etc) Faraday rotation correction Antenna pattern correction Geophysical parameters removed T A at surface each 1.44 sec –2B: T B at surface to SSS Roughness correction SST + model function (Klien-Swift) Avg to 5.76 sec Level 3: Time-space averaged SSS on standard earth-projection –3A: 7 day and monthly at 1 degree –3B: 7 day and monthly at 150 km L1 L2A L2B L3

Algorithm Modules: Level 2 –Input from L1B: Antenna temperature avg at 1.44 sec –Flags Flag Solar Flares Rain Flag Land Contamination, sea ice Excessive winds, foam Unusual Antenna Temperature –Antenna Pattern Correction Remove off-earth contribution (galactic, sun, limb) –Tearth = Tmeasured + Tspace Correct for Faraday rotation Compute effective Brightness at boresight –Tbv = A11 T1 + A12 T2 –Tbh = A21 T1 + A22 T2 – Remove Geophysical Contributions Atmospheric up/down welling and Attenuation Reflected galactic and sun Correct for land contamination (optional) –Convert Sea-Surface Brightness Temperature to Salinity Roughness correction SST Model function: SSS = F(SST, TB, θ): Klien & Swift; Wentz Average to d5.76 sec

Level 2A Radiometer Geolocated & Calibrated Sensor Units at Surface A. At 1.44 sec working average Flags: Solar Flares, Rain, Land, Sea Ice, Excessive Wind, Foam, Unsual TB Corrections Faraday Rotation Galactic Background Atmospheric Attenuation and Emission Sun and Moon Antenna Pattern Correction B. Output: Geolocated and Calibrated sensor units Th and Tv at the surface One value for each 1.44 sec

Level 2B Radiometer Geolocated SSS averaged to 5.76 sec A. TB at 1.44 sec Roughness Correction (for TB): Using Scat data (Algorithm provided by Scat) Alternative: Using local wind speed and/or sea state Average: One data point per 5.76 sec Located at center B.Convert to Salinity Klein & Swift model or latest version C.Output: Salinity at center of geolocated pixels One pixel per 5.76 sec. All Flags Quality flag (error estimate in salinity units)

Level 2 Scatterometer Roughness Correction at 5.76 sec A. Scatterometer Output NRCS (σ 0 ) colocated at 1.44 sec with radiometer data Roughness Correction (σ 0 to TB): Algorithm derived pre-launch Revised post-launch using scat data and surface truth Wind direction Assess importance and if necessary collect ancillary data B. Other Scatterometer Output NRCS at 5.76 sec with flags and quality index (Kpc) Other B.Archived Output: NRCS at 1.44 and 5.76 sec Flags and quality index Ancillary data (wind speed and surface roughness) Algorithm