Meta regression analysis framework: the effectiveness of correctional education in reducing recidivism Margaret Giles, PhD Paper presented to MAER-Net.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Australian Correctional Performance: Balancing Efficiency & Effectiveness James M. Byrne, Ph.D.
Advertisements

CRICOS Provider No 00025B uq.edu.au Signalling desistance? The role of prison-based vocational training programs Dr Robin Fitzgerald, UQ Dr Adrian Cherney,
The effectiveness of suspended sentences in reducing reoffending
Determinants of Recidivism in Rhode Island’s 2009 Prison Population Vlad Konopelko, Lucian Drobot, Alex Gemma, David Rodin, Bill Garneau.
Risk Assessment in the SVP Context Natalie Novick Brown, PhD, SOTP th St. NE, Suite 201 Seattle, Washington
1 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES - PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON JUSTICE AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS.
1 Risk Assessment in Corrections Larry Motiuk, PhD Director General, Offender Programs and Reintegration Canadian Criminal Justice Association Congress.
Peter Neyroud CBE QPM University of Cambridge
Economic and Social Cost of Crime
Re-Entry and Recidivism
Dr Wallace Brink Consultant in Forensic Psychiatry Devon Cluster Prisons.
BJS CORRECTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial
Community Corrections.  Community Corrections are the subfield of corrections in which offenders are supervised and provided services outside jail or.
Group Risk Assessment Model Monitoring trends in re-offending among convicted offenders in adult and children’s court Fourth National Justice Modelling.
Alternatives to Prison: Exploring non-custodial sentencing of domestic violence offenders in NSW’s lower courts Christine Bond & Samantha Jeffries School.
Older Offenders & Criminal Justice
Sentencing and Parole in Canada
Dr Peter Johnston  Director Research and Analysis  Department of Corrections.
Misspent Youth - Opportunities for Juvenile Justice Address by The Hon Wayne Martin Chief Justice of Western Australia JOHN CURTIN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC.
Re-validation of the Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instrument: Preliminary Findings.
Professor James Byrne Director, Global Centre for Evidence-based Corrections and Sentencing (GCECS) School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith.
Cost Program: Barbados Experience
 Parole officers interact with recently-released prisoners and their families in order to help them become productive members of society.  They develop.
Evaluation of the Connecticut Judicial Branch’s Three Court-Mandated Family Violence Programs: FVEP, EXPLORE, and EVOLVE Stephen M. Cox, Ph.D, Professor.
PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES OF SENTENCING. Goals of Sentencing  In Section 718 of the Criminal Code a statement is found that gives judges some direction.
Federal Vs Provincial What’s the difference? By Shane Scott.
Confidential Turning Point Leveraging Deterrence and Desistance to Reduce Reoffending A joint research endeavor Molly Slothower University of Maryland.
Program Evaluation: Guidelines for Effective Data Collection Sarah Schelle Mike Lloyd Indiana Department of Corrections Thomas L. Sexton, Ph. D., ABPP.
Chapter 8 Residential Intermediate Sanctions. Introduction Intermediate Sanctions are sentencing options between prison and probation that provide punishment.
1 THE MINISTRY OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL Office of the Correctional Investigator Royal Canadian Mounted Police Solicitor General Department National Parole.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.
An outcome evaluation of three restorative justice initiatives delivered by Thames Valley Probation Wager, N a, O’Keeffe, C b., Bates, A c. & Emerson,
Revisiting ‘A unique punishment’ Professor Jacqueline Tombs Glasgow Caledonian University.
The Effects of Time in Prison on Male Felons’ Employment and Earnings Haeil Jung University of Chicago 2007 Crime and Population Dynamics Summer Workshop.
November 5, 2014 New Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instruments – Status Update VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.
Gary Hill The Czech Institute of Criminology and Social Prevention Prague, Czech – September 2010 Use of Evidence Based Practices.
STICS: Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision (STICS) Applying the RNR Principles.
Corrections Victoria. RECEPTION RELEASE Prison-Based Case Management TAP Intensive Case Management Programs Permit Leave Program Corrections Victoria.
REALIGNMENT RESEARCH UPDATE January 24, Realignment Research Group Charter  Define a Data Governance Processes  Make recommendations for a county-wide.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Promoting Community Sentences Frances Done Chair, Youth Justice Board 6th July 2011.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Probation Statistics Part 1 Crime, Justice & Security Statistics Produced in Collaboration between.
By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:  LO1 Define community corrections and discuss its role in the criminal justice system  LO2 Describe.
(POST – TRIAL). The Act states that the sentencing judge is obliged to consider the following when sentencing:  Maximum penalty  Current sentencing.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
THE SCALE OF THE PROBLEM Quaker penal reform seminar 2013.
Faculty of Arts Hannah Graham Associate Lecturer in Criminology & Sociology, and current PhD candidate School of Sociology & Social Work, UTAS
A Natural Experiment on Residential Change and Recidivism: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina David S. Kirk Assistant Professor, University of Texas at Austin.
Viola Läänerand & Taavi Kruus
PRISON SYSTEM. Are responsible for:  Offenders with sentences of less than 2 years  Incarcerating all offenders  Processing parole applications  Supervising.
Using propensity score matching to understand what works in reducing re-offending GSS Methodology Symposium Sarah French & Aidan Mews, Ministry of Justice.
Are fines criminogenic? The impact of fines on re-offending in NSW local courts David Tait Justice Research Group University of Western Sydney With Alice.
Thinking for a Change Thinking for a Change is focused on developing social and cognitive skills of probationers in an attempt to lower recidivism rates.
The National Probation Service Who we are and what we do.
 Sentence - punishment imposed on a person convicted of committing a crime.  The goal or purpose of a sentence ◦ Protection of public ◦ Retribution.
SENTENCING Overview/Review The “PSI” and “Risk Assessment” Sentencing Disparity Sentencing Guidelines Who Dictates Time Served?
Criminal Justice Policy & Planning Division STATE OF CONNECTICUT OFFICE OF POLICY & MANAGEMENT (OPM) 1 ANNUAL REPORTS.
Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Intellectual disability, criminal offending and victimisation in Victoria Margaret Garnsey Clayton Campus 22 nd November.
Unit 8 Prof. Hulvat CJ240. Housekeeping…. We are winding down…. We are winding down…. Late work…. Late work…. Coming up in our final unit 9 Coming up.
Byrne Grant Reentry Enhancement Coordination Program State of Oregon Prison Reentry Multnomah County, Oregon.
Purpose of Youth Criminal Justice Act Purpose of Youth Criminal Justice Act Mechanics of the YCJA Mechanics of the YCJA Consequences under YCJA Consequences.
Crime and punishment Joan Garrod Hodder & Stoughton © 2017.
Types of Release Indeterminate Sentences Determinate Sentences
Presented by: Charlie Granville CEO, Capita Technologies Chris Baird
Invisible Female Offenders
California State Association of Counties
BJS CORRECTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
Dr Michelle Butler, Dominic Kelly, Dr Cate McNamee 31 August 2018
Presentation transcript:

Meta regression analysis framework: the effectiveness of correctional education in reducing recidivism Margaret Giles, PhD Paper presented to MAER-Net Colloquium, University of Athens, Greece, 12 September 2014

Take home message Question 1: What study characteristics are driving the difference between effect sizes in studies of the effectiveness of correctional education? Question 2: How is the effectiveness of correctional education measured? – Recidivism (Davis et al 2013) – Post release employment (Davis et al 2013) – Post release welfare dependence (Giles and Whale 2014)

Studies of effectiveness of correctional education on recidivism Many Most show positive effects or NPV > 0 Study in prison reduces the propensity to offend – Increases the opportunity cost of crime – Reduces impatience/time discount rates so more risk averse Irrespective of how recidivism is defined – Re-offending – More charges – More and/or longer consecutive custodial sentences – Sentences for more serious offences – Shorter time in the community between consecutive prison terms

Re-incarceration Time – Within one year – Within two years – Within the limit of the data – Within seven years – Within four years – Within n or N+ years Offence – Only counted if it is a new offence – Counted for new offence and/or breach of parole or other breaches in relation to previous offence (whatever reason)

Types of data Justice system data (total offending history) – Same name? – Are previous records good enough? Prison data Sample data Prison AND employment data (Nally et al. 2012) Matched data (UK Ministry of Justice 2010)

Data and methodology Davis et al 2013 systematic review of 50 studies of the effectiveness of correctional education Concluded that correctional education does reduce recidivism and is cost effective. Only US studies 1 January 1980 to 31 December 2011 Recidivism, employment and achievement test scores

Figure 1: Frequency distribution of studies by publication date (Davis et al. 2013)

Figure 2: Distribution of odds ratios for effect size estimates (Davis et al. 2013)

Where to from here? Co-researcher - Dr James Fogarty, The University of Western Australia (Stanley et al Guidelines for MRA) MRA on 50 studies MRA on 50+ studies – Outside the US (international) – After 31 December 2011 (more recent)